Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ; 39(4): e20230303, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749004

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the most common causes of recurrent angina after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and our treatment approaches applied in these patients. METHODS: We included all patients who underwent CABG, with or without percutaneous coronary intervention after CABG, at our hospital from September 2013 to December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to the time of onset of anginal pain after CABG. Forty-five patients (58.16 ± 8.78 years) had recurrent angina in the first postoperative year after CABG and were specified as group I (early recurrence). Group II (late recurrence) comprised 82 patients (58.05 ± 8.95 years) with angina after the first year of CABG. RESULTS: The mean preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was 53.22 ± 8.87% in group I, and 54.7 ± 8.58% in group II (P=0.38). No significant difference was registered between groups I and II regarding preoperative angiographic findings (P>0.05). Failed grafts were found in 27.7% (n=28/101) of the grafts in group I as compared to 26.8% (n=51/190) in group II (P>0.05). Twenty-four (53.3%) patients were treated medically in group I, compared with 54 (65.8%) patients in group II (P=0.098). There was a need for intervention in 46.6% (n=21) of group I patients, and in 34.1% (n=28) of group II patients. CONCLUSION: Recurrent angina is a complaint that should not be neglected because most of the patients with recurrent angina are diagnosed with either native coronary or graft pathology in coronary angiography performed.


Subject(s)
Angina Pectoris , Coronary Artery Bypass , Recurrence , Humans , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Angina Pectoris/etiology , Angina Pectoris/surgery , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Coronary Angiography , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Stroke Volume/physiology
2.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ; 38(1): 132-138, 2023 02 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35675492

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) remains a surgical challenge and is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CABG in patients with LVD. METHODS: This retrospective study included a total of 160 consecutive patients (133 males, 27 females, mean age 62.1±10.12 years [range 37 to 86 years]) who had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45% determined by echocardiography and underwent elective isolated CABG between September 2013 and December 2018. Preoperative echocardiographic data, such as ejection fraction, left ventricular (LV) end-systolic diameter, and LV end-diastolic diameter, were collected and evaluated. Preoperatively, 85 (53.13%) patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV and the mean LVEF was 38.65±5.72% (range 20 to 45). RESULTS: The overall hospital mortality was 5% (eight patients). Late follow-up was obtained in 152 (90%) cases (median follow-up time was 56,5 [3-87] months postoperatively). During follow-up, mortality developed in 11.3% (16 patients). Mean LVEF increased significantly from 38.78±5.59% before surgery to 43.29±8.46% after surgery (P<0.01). Mean late survival, freedom from coronary reintervention, and congestive heart failure rates were 86.3±3.3%, 88.7±3.9%, and 89.4±3.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with LVD, CABG can be performed with low postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with LVD could benefit from coronary bypass surgery regarding postoperative LV systolic function and higher quality of life.


Subject(s)
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Ventricular Function, Left , Male , Female , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Stroke Volume , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Coronary Artery Bypass , Follow-Up Studies
3.
Vascular ; 31(1): 182-188, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34866519

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to systemic coagulation activation and thrombotic complications including venous thromboembolism. This study compares the development of pulmonary embolism, post-thrombotic syndrome, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: One hundred and eight patients diagnosed with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) between June 2020 and February 2021 in our institution were included in this retrospective study. Thirty-nine patients had been previously diagnosed with COVID-19 and specified as the COVID-19 group. Sixty-nine patients did not have COVID-19 and specified as the non-COVID-19 group. Mean ages of both groups were 64.3 ± 15.8 and 60.1 ± 19.7 years, respectively (p = .37). RESULTS: The median duration from the onset of the COVID-19 to diagnosis of DVT was 22 (2-120) days in the COVID-19 group. The patients of two groups were mostly treated outpatient at rates of 94.9% vs 94.2%, respectively (p = .88). Pulmonary embolism was seen in six patients (15.4%) in the COVID-19 group and in three patients (4.3%) in the non-COVID-19 group (p = .04). Kaplan-Meir curves showed that patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher pulmonary embolism than those without COVID-19 (p = .015). The recurrence rate of DVT was 2.6% in the COVID-19 group (n = 1), and 4.3% in the non-COVID-19 group (n = 3), indicating no statistically significant difference (p = .63). Mortality was seen in six patients (15.4%) in the COVID-19 group, and in seven patients (10.1%) in the non-COVID-19 group. According to the Kaplan-Meir method, 10 months survival rates were 73.9 ± 10% in the COVID-19 group, and 66.3 ± 12.8% in the non-COVID-19 group with no statistical significance (p = .218). CONCLUSIONS: Our data draw attention to the fact that deep vein thrombosis should not be considered a safe and self-limited condition. Efficient preventive measures such as mobilization and prophylactic drug use should be considered to prevent DVT during the management of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Venous Thrombosis , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
4.
Ann Saudi Med ; 41(6): 392-395, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34873931

ABSTRACT

A high rate of thrombotic complications have been observed in patients infected with COVID-19. These complications are related to increased blood hypercoagulabity, which can cause both venous and arterial thrombosis. We report a case of a 60-year-old man with COVID-19 pneumonia and thrombotic occlusion of the infrarenal abdominal aorta at the time of admission to the hospital. A CT scan showed a crazy-paving pattern in the lungs, consistent with COVID-19. A clinical suspicion of aortic thrombosis was confirmed by CT angiography. Embolectomy was undertaken a few hours later. At the end of the procedure, the patient was taken to the intensive care unit while intubated. The patient then worsened, developing severe renal failure, and died on day 1 after admission to the hospital. A CT scan, which is necessary for diagnosis of COVID-19, and a CT angiography, can be used to diagnose thrombotic events. It should be kept in mind that arterial thrombosis can be present not only in hospitalized COVID-19 patients but also at the time of admission. SIMILAR CASES PUBLSHED: 1.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thrombosis , Aorta, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Thrombosis/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
J Tehran Heart Cent ; 10(3): 117-21, 2015 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26697083

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of a ruptured abdominal aorta aneurysm (RAAA) continues to present a significant challenge to surgeons. There are some patient factors such as age and gender that cannot be changed, and comorbid conditions can be optimized but not eliminated. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors affecting high mortality after the surgical repair of an RAAA. METHODS: Data on 121 patients who underwent surgical repair for RAAAs between January 1997 and June 2011 in our institution were collected retrospectively. All the patients had been diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) scans, and intraoperative extra-luminal blood was visualized intraoperatively. Variables studied comprised demographic data; preoperative, operative, and postoperative data; and the causes of mortality. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of mortality. RESULTS: One hundred eight (89.2%) patients were male and 13 (10.7%) were female at an average age of 68.9 ± 10.5 years. Totally, 121 patients underwent surgery for RAAAs. Fifty-four patients had aortic tube grafts, 32 aortobiiliac grafts, 20 aortobifemoral grafts, 1 aortoiliac graft, and 1 aortofemoral graft for the replacement of the RAAAs. Seven patients had only surgical exploration. Operative mortality was 41.3% (50 patients). The factors associated with mortality were preoperative shock, free blood, positive inotropic agent, hematocrit value, and need for blood and plasma. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative shock and positive inotropic agents were found to be significant as the predictors of death (OR: 19.8, 95%CI: 3.2-122.8 and OR: 8.6, 95% CI: 2.9-26.3, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the preoperative clinical findings affected the mortality associated with RAAAs.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...