Neurocritical care and neuromonitoring considerations in acute pediatric spinal cord injury.

Management of pediatric spinal cord injury (SCI) is an essential skill for all pediatric neurocritical care physicians. In this review, we focus on the evaluation and management of pediatric SCI, highlight a novel framework for the monitoring of such patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), and introduce advancements in critical care techniques in monitoring and management. The initial evaluation and characterization of SCI is crucial for improving outcomes as well as prognostication. While physical examination and imaging are the main stays of the work-up, we propose the use of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for challenging clinical scenarios. SSEPs allow for functional evaluation of the dorsal columns consisting of tracts associated with hand function, ambulation, and bladder function. Meanwhile, TMS has the potential for informing prognostication as well as response to rehabilitation. Spine stabilization, and in some cases surgical decompression, along with respiratory and hemodynamic management are essential. Emerging research suggests that targeted spinal cerebral perfusion pressure may provide potential benefits. This review aims to increase the pediatric neurocritical care physician's comfort with SCI while providing a novel algorithm for monitoring spinal cord function in the ICU.

The State of the Field of Pediatric Multimodality Neuromonitoring.

BACKGROUND: The use of multimodal neuromonitoring in pediatrics is in its infancy relative to adult neurocritical care. Multimodal neuromonitoring encompasses the amalgamation of information from multiple individual neuromonitoring devices to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the condition of the brain. It allows for adaptation to the changing state of the brain throughout various stages of injury with potential to individualize and optimize therapies. METHODS: Here we provide an overview of multimodal neuromonitoring in pediatric neurocritical care and its potential application in the future. RESULTS: Multimodal neuromonitoring devices are key to the process of multimodal neuromonitoring, allowing for visualization of data trends over time and ideally improving the ability of clinicians to identify patterns and find meaning in the immense volume of data now encountered in the care of critically ill patients at the bedside. Clinical use in pediatrics requires more study to determine best practices and impact on patient outcomes. Potential uses include guidance for targets of physiological parameters in the setting of acute brain injury, neuroprotection for patients at high risk for brain injury, and neuroprognostication. Implementing multimodal neuromonitoring in pediatric patients involves interprofessional collaboration with the development of a simultaneous comprehensive program to support the use of multimodal neuromonitoring while maintaining the fundamental principles of the delivery of neurocritical care at the bedside. CONCLUSIONS: The possible benefits of multimodal neuromonitoring are immense and have great potential to advance the field of pediatric neurocritical care and the health of critically ill children.

A Survey of Pediatric Neurocritical Care Fellowship Training in North America.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) has emerged as a field to care for children at the intersection of critical illness and neurological dysfunction. PNCC fellowship programs evolved over the past decade to train physicians to fill this clinical need. We aimed to characterize PNCC fellowship training infrastructure and curriculum in the United States and Canada. METHODS: Web-based survey of PNCC fellowship program leaders during November 2019 to January 2020. RESULTS: There were 14 self-identified PNCC fellowship programs. The programs were supported by Child Neurology and/or Pediatric Critical Care Medicine divisions at tertiary/quaternary care institutions. Most programs accepted trainees who were board-eligible or board-certified in child neurology or pediatric critical care medicine. Clinical training consisted mostly of rotations providing PNCC consultation (n = 13) or as a provider on the pediatric intensive care unit-based neurointensive care team (n = 2). PNCC-specific didactics were delivered at most institutions (n = 13). All institutions provided training in electroencephalography use in the intensive care unit and declaration of death by neurological criteria (n = 14). Scholarly activity was supported by most programs, including protected time for research (n = 10). CONCLUSIONS: We characterized PNCC fellowship training in the United States and Canada, which in this continuously evolving field, lays the foundation for exploring standardization of training going forward.

Creating a Robust Community of Practice as a Foundation for the Successful Development of a Pediatric Neurocritical Care Program.

BACKGROUND: There has been a growing impetus for developing pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) programs to improve care delivery for children with critical neurological conditions. We sought to develop a unique PNCC program using the concept of Community of Practice (CoP). METHODS: This is a process improvement project in an academic Children's Hospital. Using CoP framework (domain, community, practice), we created a domain of PNCC with a stated vision and formal organizational structure, a core community of intensivists and neurologists interested in PNCC, and a standardized practice approach by establishing core competencies for PNCC and implementing practice guidelines. RESULTS: We evaluated the program through the Four-Frame Model of Organizational Theory and Behavior (structural, human resource, political, symbolic) and by the Neurocritical Care Society's (NCS's) standards for a Level I Neurocritical Care Unit (Neuro-ICU). Structural frame included opening a pediatric Neuro-ICU, identifying PNCC leaders across specialties, and developing a multidisciplinary care delivery model. Human resource frame included forming physician and nurse groups with a primary role in PNCC and ongoing education through workshops, lecture series, and certification. Politically, program implementation was tailored to each department gaining institution-wide support for program initiatives. Symbolically, the PNCC program highlighted the vision to advance knowledge and best practices. Our program met 232 of 252 (92%) proposed NCS standards. CONCLUSIONS: The CoP as the foundation for program development has enabled us to achieve the majority of standards proposed by NCS for a Level I Neuro-ICU. The generalizability of these frameworks may facilitate the development of a PNCC program for other institutions.

A Virtual Community of Practice: An International Educational Series in Pediatric Neurocritical Care.

Pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) is a rapidly growing field. Challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic on trainee exposure to educational opportunities involving direct patient care led to the creative solutions for virtual education supported by guiding organizations such as the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group (PNCRG). Our objective is to describe the creation of an international, peer-reviewed, online PNCC educational series targeting medical trainees and faculty. More than 1600 members of departments such as pediatrics, pediatric critical care, and child neurology hailing from 75 countries across six continents have participated in this series over a 10-month period. We created an online educational channel in PNCC with over 2500 views to date and over 130 followers. This framework could serve as a roadmap for other institutions and specialties seeking to address the ongoing problems of textbook obsolescence relating to the rapid acceleration in knowledge acquisition, as well as those seeking to create new educational content that offers opportunities for an interactive, global audience. Through the creation of a virtual community of practice, we have created an international forum for pediatric healthcare providers to share and learn specialized expertise and best practices to advance global pediatric health.

Pharmacologic and Acute Management of Spinal Cord Injury in Adults and Children.

Purpose of Review: This review provides guidance for acute spinal cord injury (SCI) management through an analytical assessment of the most recent evidence on therapies available for treating SCI, including newer therapies under investigation. We present an approach to the SCI patient starting at presentation to acute rehabilitation and prognostication, with additional emphasis on the pediatric population when evidence is available. Recent Findings: Further studies since the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS) demonstrated a potential functional outcome benefit with ultra-early surgical intervention ≤ 8 h post-SCI. Subsequent analysis of the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) II and NASCIS III trials have demonstrated potentially serious complications from intravenous methylprednisolone with limited benefit. Newer therapies actively being studied have demonstrated limited or no benefit in preclinical and clinical trials with insufficient evidence to support use in acute SCI treatment. Summary: Care for SCI patients requires a multi-disciplinary team. Immediate evaluation and management are focused on preventing additional injury and restoring perfusion to the affected cord. Rapid assessment and intervention involve focused neurological examination, targeted imaging, and surgical intervention when indicated. There are currently no evidence-based recommendations for pathomechanistically targeted therapies.

Practice Recommendations for Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography in Critically Ill Children in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus Statement.

Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) is being used in many pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) to aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of children with known or suspected pathophysiological changes to cerebral hemodynamics. Standardized approaches to scanning protocols, interpretation, and documentation of TCD examinations in this setting are lacking. A panel of multidisciplinary clinicians with expertise in the use of TCD in the PICU undertook a three-round modified Delphi process to reach unanimous agreement on 34 statements and then create practice recommendations for TCD use in the PICU. Use of these recommendations will help to ensure that high quality TCD images are captured, interpreted, and reported using standard nomenclature. Furthermore, use will aid in ensuring reproducible and meaningful study results between TCD practitioners and across PICUs.

Evaluation of the Effects of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on Antiepileptic Drug Serum Concentrations in Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Patients supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) have an increased incidence of seizures. Phenobarbital (PB) and fosphenytoin (fos-PHT) are common antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used to manage seizures in the pediatric population; however, it is unknown what effect ECMO has on the serum concentrations of AEDs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of ECMO on AED serum concentrations. METHODS: A retrospective, matched-cohort study was performed in patients younger than 18 years who received ECMO and were treated with intravenous (IV) PB or fos-PHT at Texas Children's Hospital between 2004 and 2014. Patients receiving IV AED therapy and ECMO were matched, based on age, sex, and weight, with patients receiving IV AED therapy without ECMO. The 24-hour cumulative AED dose, serum concentrations, number of doses per serum concentration drawn ratio, volume of distribution, therapeutic serum concentrations, and time to therapeutic serum concentration were compared between both groups. The fos-PHT and PB groups were analyzed in all patients and in neonates only. RESULTS: Fourteen patients met inclusion criteria. The fos-PHT neonatal (20.1 vs 11.3 mg/kg/day, p = 0.044), PB composite (33.9 vs 21.6 mg/kg/day, p = 0.012), and PB neonatal (40.3 vs 20 mg/kg/day, p = 0.04) had larger 24-hour cumulative doses compared with non-ECMO patients. Lower serum concentrations were observed in the PB composite ECMO group (19.1 vs 35.4 mg/L, p < 0.001) and the PB neonatal ECMO group (20.5 vs 27.8 mg/L, p = 0.01) compared with non-ECMO patients. CONCLUSION: Pediatric patients receiving PB on ECMO and neonatal patients receiving fos-PHT on ECMO required larger doses, and in pediatric patients achieved lower serum concentrations, suggesting the necessity for alternative dosing strategies in these populations.