[Planning and design of European prospective randomized trial on the value of drain in parotidectomy]. / Vorstellung einer europaweiten prospektiven Studie zur Wertigkeit einer Drainage bei Parotidektomie.

INTRODUCTION: There are no valid clinical studies on the value of wound drains in parotid surgery. The aim of the current trial is to analyze the influence of the closed wound drain (redon) on the incidence of postoperative complications such as bleeding, wound healing problems, infection, as well as salivary cyst and fistula after superficial or partial parotidectomy. METHODS: A European-wide multicenter prospective randomized study was planned. The study protocol was prepared by the leading study center (ENT University Hospital Cologne) in cooperation with the ENT University Hospitals Jena and Göttingen. The calculation of the number of cases was carried out with G*Power. The study includes test persons with an indication for parotidectomy for a benign tumor without known coagulation disorder or ongoing anticoagulation. Preoperative randomization and data management is software-supported (REDCap 9.1.24, Vanderbilt University). RESULTS: The study has been approved by the leading ethics committee in 10/2019 and is open since 04/2019. Currently, nine (9) ENT hospitals are participating in the study, 6 of them in Germany and 3 in Austria. Enrollment of patients is ongoing in 7 centers. With a calculated follow-up-to-treat population of 800 test persons, the planned duration of the study is 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: The Redon-study is the first prospective randomized study worldwide to investigate the effect of a drain in parotidectomy. In order to achieve the recruitment goal within the planned time frame, the participation of further specialized study centers is needed. We also encourage all ENT physicians to make their patients aware of the Redon study, inform them about the possibility of participating in the study and refer them to one of the participating centers.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Pathological Lymph Node Staging Data in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated at the General Hospital Vienna.

BACKGROUND: Results from publications evaluating discrepancies between clinical staging data in relation to pathological findings demonstrate that a significant number of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients are not correctly staged. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze potential discrepancies of radiological assessment versus pathological data of regional lymph node involvement and to compare the results with data published in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis we focused on patients with HNSCC routinely treated by surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy between 2002 and 2012. For inclusion, complete pre-operative clinical staging information with lymph node status and patho-histological information on involved lymph node regions as well as survival outcome data were mandatory. We included 87 patients (UICC stage III-IV 90.8%) for which the aforementioned data obtained by CT or MRI were available. Overall survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The Pearson correlation coefficient and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (non-linear relationship) was calculated. RESULTS: Discrepancies at the level of overall tumour stage assessment were noticed in 27.5% of all cases. Thereof, 5.7% were assigned to patho-histological up-staging or down-staging of the primary tumour. At the lymph node level, 11.5% of the patients were downstaged, and 10.3% were upstaged. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that in approximately one-fifth (21.8%) of the patients, lymph node assessment by CT or MRI differs from the pathologic staging, an outcome that corresponds well with those published by several other groups in this field.