Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Radiol Med ; 124(8): 783-793, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30972532

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to properly define the information regarding patient exposure to Ionizing Radiations in the radiological report, according to the European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM (EU 2013/59 art.58(b)). For this purpose, we evaluated the results from other Member States EU 2013/59 transpositions and from Guidelines recommendation published by International Organizations involved in diagnostic radiology. A practical way for implementing art.58 is also traced. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dosimetric quantities, such as exposure, absorbed dose and effective dose which may be included in radiological report, were first analyzed; then, in order to define international state of art of Member States EU 2013/59 transposition, a Web research using French, English, Spanish and German key words was performed. RESULTS: EU 2013/59 transposition for 5 Member States was reported. Especially regarding art.58, a European project reports that few European countries (11 of 28) have identified the dose metrics to be used in radiological report. Scientific organizations supporting clinical radiologists and medical physicists have published Guidelines reporting parameters useful to quantify the radiation output and to assess patient dose. CONCLUSIONS: Our research revealed that there is not a shared interpretation of patient exposure information to be included in radiological report. Nevertheless, according to scientific community, authors believe that the exposure is the most appropriate information that could be included in radiological report. Alternatively, but with more expensiveness, a risk index based on effective dose could be used. Moreover, the systematic exposure information recorded could be useful for dose estimates of population from medical exposure.


Subject(s)
Medical Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Education as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiology/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Age Factors , Child , European Union , Humans , Radiation, Ionizing , Radiometry , Reference Values , Relative Biological Effectiveness
2.
Radiol Med ; 124(8): 728-735, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30919221

ABSTRACT

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article was to explore the implications of the new Euratom dose limit for occupational radiation protection in the context of medical occupational radiation exposures. The European Directive 2013/59/Euratom takes into account the new recommendations on reduction in the dose limit for the lens of the eye for planned occupational exposures released in 2012 by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP 118). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Different dose-monitoring procedures and devices were considered. Occupational eye lens doses reported by previous studies were analyzed, mainly considering workers involved in interventional procedures with X-rays. The current status of eye lens radiation protection and the main methods for dose reduction were investigated. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the workers, potentially exceeding the new limit, are clinical staff performing interventional procedures with a relatively high X-ray dose. Regarding radiological protection issues, the considered literature reports that the proper use of personal protective equipment may reduce the eye lens absorbed dose. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of the occupational eye lens dose is essential to establish which method of personal dose monitoring should be preferred. Furthermore, education and training about the right use of personal protective equipment are important for medical staff working with ionizing radiation.


Subject(s)
Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , European Union , Humans , Maximum Allowable Concentration , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/standards , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Exposure/standards , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiation, Ionizing
3.
Alzheimers Dement ; 12(6): 645-53, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27079753

ABSTRACT

Identifying accurate biomarkers of cognitive decline is essential for advancing early diagnosis and prevention therapies in Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's disease DREAM Challenge was designed as a computational crowdsourced project to benchmark the current state-of-the-art in predicting cognitive outcomes in Alzheimer's disease based on high dimensional, publicly available genetic and structural imaging data. This meta-analysis failed to identify a meaningful predictor developed from either data modality, suggesting that alternate approaches should be considered for prediction of cognitive performance.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/complications , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Apolipoproteins E/genetics , Biomarkers , Cognition Disorders/genetics , Computational Biology , Databases, Bibliographic/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests
4.
Comput Math Methods Med ; 2015: 814104, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26089977

ABSTRACT

Neurodegenerative diseases are frequently associated with structural changes in the brain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can show these variations and therefore can be used as a supportive feature for a number of neurodegenerative diseases. The hippocampus has been known to be a biomarker for Alzheimer disease and other neurological and psychiatric diseases. However, it requires accurate, robust, and reproducible delineation of hippocampal structures. Fully automatic methods are usually the voxel based approach; for each voxel a number of local features were calculated. In this paper, we compared four different techniques for feature selection from a set of 315 features extracted for each voxel: (i) filter method based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; two wrapper methods, respectively, (ii) sequential forward selection and (iii) sequential backward elimination; and (iv) embedded method based on the Random Forest Classifier on a set of 10 T1-weighted brain MRIs and tested on an independent set of 25 subjects. The resulting segmentations were compared with manual reference labelling. By using only 23 feature for each voxel (sequential backward elimination) we obtained comparable state-of-the-art performances with respect to the standard tool FreeSurfer.


Subject(s)
Hippocampus/pathology , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Computational Biology , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Machine Learning , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...