The effect of renal localization on the fate of clinically insignificant residual fragments after retrograde intrarenal surgery: A prospective 1-year follow-up study. / El efecto de la localización renal en el destino de los fragmentos residuales clínicamente insignificantes después de la cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada: Un estudio prospectivo de seguimiento de 1 año.

OBJECTIVES: Even after a successful retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) could not pass from the kidney. We aimed to find out the differences on the fate of CIRF according to being in the lower pole or other renal localizations. METHODS: 81 patients whose stones were fragmented completely by RIRS were subdivided into two groups as group 1 (lower pole with 41 patients) and group 2 (upper pole, midpole, and renal pelvis with 40 patients). Basal characteristics, urine culture, and renal stone screening were evaluated before and 1-year later from the surgery. RESULTS: While the number of stone-free patients was less and patients with CIRF ≤4 mm was higher in the lower pole stone group 1-year later from the surgery, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (p=0.158, p=0.136). The number of patients whose CIRFs regrew was 46.3% in group 1 and, 52.5% in group 2. A positive correlation was detected between preoperative stone size and first-year maximal residual fragment size in group 1. Linear regression analysis suggested that preoperative stone size is a predictor of the postoperative first-year residual fragment size in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that almost the half of the CIRFs in all renal localizations regrew and became symptomatic. There is an effect of the stone size on the residual fragment size while performing RIRS for particularly the lower pole renal stones. Patients with CIRF are needed to be followed-up more closely regardless of the renal localization in order to assess the requirement of retreatment.

OBJETIVOS: Incluso después de una cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada exitosa (CRIR), fragmentos residuales clínicamente insignificantes (FRCI) no pudieron pasar del riñón. Nuestro objetivo fue conocer las diferencias en el destino del FRCI según esten en el polo inferior u otras localizaciones renales.MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: 81 pacientes cuyos cálculos se fragmentaron completamente por CRIR se subdividieron en dos grupos: grupo 1 (polo inferior con 41 pacientes) y grupo 2 (polo superior, polo medio y pelvis renal con 40 pacientes). Las características basales, urocultivo y cribado de cálculos renales se evaluaron antes y un año después de la cirugía. RESULTADOS: Mientras que el número de pacientes sin cálculos fue menor y los pacientes con FRCI ≤4 mm fue mayor en el grupo de cálculos del polo inferior 1 año después de la cirugía, no hubo diferencia estadística entre los dos grupos (p=0,158, p=0,136). El número de pacientes cuyo FRCI volvió a crecer fue del 46,3% en el grupo 1 y del 52,5% en el grupo 2. Se detectó una correlación positiva entre el tamaño del cálculo preoperatorio y el tamaño máximo del fragmento residual del primer año en el grupo 1. El análisis de regresión lineal sugirió que el tamaño del cálculo preoperatorio es un predictor del tamaño del fragmento residual del primer año posoperatorio en el grupo 1. CONCLUSIÓNES: Observamos que casi la mitad de los FRCI en todas las localizaciones renales volvieron a aparecer y se volvieron sintomáticos. Hay un efecto del tamaño del cálculo sobre el tamaño del fragmento residual mientras se realiza la CRIR, en particular, para los cálculos renales del polo inferior. Es necesario realizar un seguimiento más detenido de los pacientes con FRCI independientemente de la localización renal para evaluar la necesidad de retratamiento.

Efficacy of various laser devices on lithotripsy in retrograde intrarenal surgery used to treat 1-2 cm kidney stones: A prospective randomized study.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy of different laser devices and power ranges on lithotripsy in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for 1-2 cm kidney stones. METHODS: A total of 223 participants undergoing RIRS for 1-2 cm kidney stones at our clinic between January 2015 and January 2017 were recruited for this prospective study (NCT02451319). Two hundred and four participants included in our study were randomly allocated into either ≤20 W with 20 W laser device (group 1) or ≤20 W with 30 W laser device (group 2) or >20 W with 30 W laser device (group 3). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic and stone characteristics. Operation and fluoroscopy times were significantly longer (P = .003 and P < .001, respectively) and stone-free rate (SFR) was significantly lower in group 1 (P = .002). Complications were similar in all three groups (P = .512). However, post-operative pain scores were significantly higher in group 1 (P < .001). The multivariate analysis revealed that stone size (95% CI: 0.654-0.878, OR = 0.758, P < .001), ureteral access sheath use (95% CI: 1.003-20.725, OR = 4.560, P = .049), and lithotripsy with 30 W laser device (95% CI: 1.304-11.632, OR = 3.895, P = .015; 95% CI: 1.738-17.281, OR = 5.480, P = .004, groups 2 and 3, respectively) were independent factors predicting SFR for RIRS used in 1-2 cm kidney stones. CONCLUSION: The 30 W laser device used in RIRS for 1-2 cm kidney stones had shorter operation times, higher SFRs, and lower post-operative pain scores compared with the 20 W device. The 30 W laser device is safe and more efficient in RIRS for treatment of 1-2 cm kidney stones.

Comparison of the efficiency, safety and pain scores of holmium laser devices working with 20 watt and 30 watt using in retrograde intrarenal surgery: One center prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser lithotripsy is used in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Fragmentation is made with a certain value of pulse energy (Joule) and frequency (Hertz) in Holmium laser lithotripsy and the multiplication of these values gives us total power (Watt). Devices with maximum power of 20 Watt and 30 Watt are used in clinical practice. We want to compare the efficiency, safety and pain scores of the lithotripsy made below 20 Watt and over 30 Watt with 30 Watt laser device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 60 patients who had 2-3 cm sized kidney stones and operation planned were prospectively divided into three groups. Groups were random identified. In the first group, fragmentation was performed below 20 Watt power with 20 Watt laser device. In the second group, fragmentation was performed below 20 Watt power with 30 Watt laser device. In the third group, fragmentation was performed over 20 Watt power with 30 Watt laser device. Demographic, stone, intraoperative and postoperative data were recorded. We compared these groups regarding efficiency, safety and pain score. RESULTS: For demographic and stone data, there was a statistically significant difference only for stone number. For intraoperative and postoperative data, there was a statistically significant difference only for ureteral access sheath usage between the groups. Success was lower than the other groups in Group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Success was higher in groups using 30 Watt laser device. There was not statistically significantly difference between complications and pain. 30 Watt laser device is safe and efficient in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.

Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the oncological and functional results of open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) at the T1b clinical stage, which constitutes 25% of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) at diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The characteristics of 63 patients with stage T1b solitary tumor who underwent OPN (41) or LPN (22) were compared. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the factors affecting disease-free survival. Potential predictive factors, which might affect the postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), were evaluated using multivariate linear regression analysis. Results: No differences were observed between OPN and LPN groups regarding patient and tumor characteristics. Although the warm ischemia time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, and operation duration were higher in the LPN group, no differences were noted between the two techniques regarding complication rates (p<0.001, p=0.023, p≤0.001, and p=0.190, respectively). The median hospitalization time was shorter in the LPN group than that in the OPN group (4 and 5 days, respectively), with less severe complications. No intergroup differences were observed regarding cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). The evaluation of the factors affecting DFS showed that age was an effective parameter (RR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.010-8.254), but the surgical technique was not. Conclusion: No differences were observed between OPN and LPN techniques between oncological and functional outcomes in patients with clinical stage T1b RCC.

Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Used in the Treatment of 2-4 cm Kidney Stones in Terms of Pain and Need for Additional Analgesics: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Purpose: To compare the effects of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) on postoperative pain and their differences in terms of the postoperative need for analgesics in the treatment of 2-4 cm kidney stones. Methods: A total of 132 patients who suffered from renal stones 2-4 cm in size and had surgery at our urology clinic between April 2015 and April 2017 were enrolled in this prospective study (NCT02430168). Patients were randomized into either the RIRS group (Group 1) or PNL group (Group 2) in a ratio of 1:1. Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) values at 8 and 24 hours postoperatively and analgesic treatments of patients were recorded. Results: Patients from both groups had similar demographic characteristics. Stone-free states were achieved in 37 (74%) patients in the RIRS group and 45 (90%) patients in the PNL group. Postoperative complication rates were similar in two groups. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the postoperative need for analgesics (P = .309). However, the PNL group had higher VAS values (P < .001). Conclusion: Although the early postoperative pain scales were high in the PNL group, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the standard analgesic treatments for achieving patient's comfort. PNL, which has similar complications, but with higher success rates, compared with RIRS, did not require additional analgesic treatment during postoperative pain management. Thus, in our opinion, PNL should still remain as a first choice in treatment of 2-4 cm renal stones.

Transcatheter embolization in pediatric blunt renal trauma: Case report and review of the literature.

This study aims to evaluate the clinical use and outcomes of transcatheter embolization in the setting of pediatric blunt renal trauma cases using an index case and review of the literature. Although the treatment method selection depends on the grade of the trauma and the hemodynamic status of the patient, conservative methods are considered initially in the setting of pediatric blunt renal trauma. Transcatheter embolization, which is a relatively conservative treatment option, is commonly utilized in adult blunt renal trauma patient population; however, experience in the pediatric population is scarce. A seven-year-old male patient was admitted due to grade IV renal injury secondary to blunt abdominal trauma. He was conservatively followed until -on the post-trauma day 15- he developed gross hematuria and an unstable hemodynamic status. A renal angiogram was performed, which revealed right-sided renal inferior segmental artery pseudoaneurysm and arterio-venous fistula. Subsequently, a transcatheter embolization was performed. There were no complications and no permanent renal injury. Review of the literature revealed that the success rate of transcatheter embolization is 89.47% in the setting of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma-related renal injury regardless of the renal trauma grade. Four patients underwent nephrectomy due to a failed transcatheter embolization procedure. There are not any patients who suffered from embolization-related complications. These results suggest that transcatheter embolization can be safely performed in children with renal injuries due to blunt abdominal trauma with high success and low complication rates and preservation of renal function.

Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the oncological and functional results of open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) at the T1b clinical stage, which constitutes 25% of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) at diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The characteristics of 63 patients with stage T1b solitary tumor who underwent OPN (41) or LPN (22) were compared. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the factors affecting disease-free survival. Potential predictive factors, which might affect the postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), were evaluated using multivariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS: No differences were observed between OPN and LPN groups regarding patient and tumor characteristics. Although the warm ischemia time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, and operation duration were higher in the LPN group, no differences were noted between the two techniques regarding complication rates (p<0.001, p=0.023, p≤0.001, and p=0.190, respectively). The median hospitalization time was shorter in the LPN group than that in the OPN group (4 and 5 days, respectively), with less severe complications. No intergroup differences were observed regarding cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). The evaluation of the factors affecting DFS showed that age was an effective parameter (RR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.010-8.254), but the surgical technique was not. CONCLUSION: No differences were observed between OPN and LPN techniques between oncological and functional outcomes in patients with clinical stage T1b RCC.

Is RIRS Safe and Efficient In Patients With Kidney Stones Who Had Previous Open, Endoscopic, or Percutaneous Kidney Stone Surgery? One Center Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: In our study, we assessed the efficiency and reliability of retrograde intrarenal surgery secondary to open surgery for kidney stone treatment. Moreover, we compared the efficiency and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery for the patients with previous history of open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, secondary retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and primary RIRS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had kidney anomalies, who had been stented due to ureteral stricture in the operation and who were < 18 years old, were excluded. There were 30 patients who underwent RIRS secondary to open surgery. The demographic and stone characteristic as well as intraoperative and postoperative data of the patients were recorded. 30 patients with similar demographic and stone characteristics to those patients were selected by match pairing method from patients who had previous PNL, RIRS history and had undergone primary RIRS. A total of 120 patients, in total 4 groups, were included in the study. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference was detected among the groups with regards to shock wave lithotripsy history and preoperative JJ stent rate. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of stone characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative data. CONCLUSION: RIRS is an efficient and safe method for kidney stone treatment of the patients with previous history of open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery. It has a similar efficiency and safety for the patients who have undergone retrograde intrarenal surgery. This is the first study that compares the patients especially  with different previous surgery methods.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of stones in horseshoe kidney; what are the advantages and disadvantages compared to each other?

INTRODUCTION: Kidney stones occur more frequently in patients with a horseshoe kidney (HSK) anomaly. Abnormal anatomy may make the stone removal procedures more difficult. Therefore we aimed to evaluate and compare retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of renal stones in the HSK anomaly. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this descriptive study, patients with HSK anomaly who underwent RIRS and PCNL procedures were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic and renal stone characteristics, success and complications associated with the surgical methods were compared across patients. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were evaluated, 28 underwent RIRS and 21 underwent PCNL. No differences were determined between the groups concerning the demographics of patients and stone characteristics. A single session and final stone-free rate was 71.4% and 85.7% in RIRS, 81% and 90.5% in PCNL (both p ≥0.05). However, RIRS had more re-treatment rate, while its mean length of hospital stay was shorter than PCNL (p = 0.035, p = 0.001). While no differences were detected between the associated complication rates, more of the complications encountered in the PCNL group were of a serious nature. CONCLUSIONS: In the HSK anomaly, renal stones can be treated with RIRS and PCNL procedures with high success. With its minimal morbidity, low complication rates and the minor character of the associated complications, the RIRS procedure can sometimes be preferred to avoid complications related to PCNL in HSK anomaly with big sized kidney stones.

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Following Laser Endopyelotomy; Sequential Procedures for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction and Nephrolithiasis.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)following retrograde laser endopyelotomy (rLEP) in concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) andstone disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with concomitant UPJO and renal stone disease who were first treated in ourclinic by rLEP for obstruction and then RIRS for stone disease were enrolled. Study period went from 2012 to2017. RIRS following rLEP was performed earliest at the sixth week. Patients who underwent rLEP were matchedwith those with normal anatomy at a 1:1 ratio based on the propensity scores. Additionally, clinical results werecompared in order to evaluate the effects of rLEP surgery on RIRS. Subsequently, patients who underwent RIRSfollowing rLEP were independently evaluated and factors affecting the success of sequential procedures wereinvestigated. RESULTS: The sole difference between those that underwent RIRS following rLEP (n=27) and controls with normalanatomy that underwent RIRS was in operative times (p = .011). Evaluation of potential success factors inthe sequential rLEP-RIRS group revealed that primary etiology, obstruction length less than 1cm, smaller stonesize and presence of single stone showed significant effects (p = .047, p = .030, p = .040, p ? .001, respectively).RIRS following rLEP generated an 81.5% stone-free and, after a median follow-up time of 32 months, a 74.1%obstruction-free rate. CONCLUSION: RIRS following rLEP in patients with UPJO and renal stones is an effective treatment method. It canbe used safely in patients with single stones < 2cm, short obstruction lengths, and presence of primary etiology.

Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods For Management of Big- Sized Kidney Stones(? 4 cm): Single Center Retrospective Study.

Purpose: Management of ? 4 cm sized kidney stone is a rarely seen problem in urology. Few studies are present about this issue. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PNL), Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery(RIRS) and open surgery are the methods used in stone management. In our study we aimed to compare RIRS and PNL in the management of ? 4 cm sized kidney stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among patients who had undergone RIRS and PNL in D?skap? Y?ld?r?m Beyaz?t Train-ing and Research Hospital, 94 patients who had ? 4 cm sized kidney stones were included our study. The demo-graphic, intraoperative and postoperative data of these patients and complications were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: 94 patients (67 PNL, 27 RIRS) were in the study. Stone laterality, urinary anomaly and gender were sim-ilar in two groups.(Group PNL(P) and Group RIRS(R)) Stone number were 2.55 ± 1.44 and 2.78 ± 1.42 in Group P and R, respectively. Stone size were 47.06 ± 7.02 and 46.41 ± 6.00 mm. in Group P and R, respectively. The differences between two groups were not statistically significant.(P > .05) In Group P scopy time, hospital stay and stone free rate were higher and operation time was lower than Group R. And the difference was statistically significant(P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: As a result, PNL is an effective method and operation time is lower than RIRS. Also a second oper-ation for JJ stent taking is lower in PNL . RIRS is a safe method. RIRS has less complications and hospitalization time. They are feasible in treatment of ? 4 cm sized kidney stones.

Primary Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Rare Case Report.

Primary prostatic signet ring cell carcinoma is a rare form of cancer with a poor prognosis, which is generally treated with a traditional prostate adenocarcinoma therapy. This case report presents a 70-year-old diagnosed with primary prostatic signet ring cell carcinoma, treated with a combination of radiotherapy and hormone therapy and a 16 month survival without an evidence of the disease at follow up.

Does Tadalafil Increase The Uptake of Finasteride into Prostate Tissue? A Biochemical and Histological Evaluation in Rats.

PURPOSE: To histopathologically and biochemically evaluate the hypothesis that tadalafil increases the uptake of a second medication into the prostate tissue by increasing the blood supply in the prostate. METHODS: Forty 12-week-old Sprague Dawley male rats were equally divided into 5 groups and were administered drugs orally as follows: Group 1 - no drugs, Group 2 - 10 days of finasteride, Group 3 - 10 days of finasteride + tadalafil, Group 4 - 30 days of finasteride, and Group 5 - 30 days of finasteride + tadalafil. At the end of 10 days of drug administration in Group1, 2, and 3, and at the end of 30 days of drug administration in Group 4 and 5,blood samples were collected from rats and analyzed for serum androgen levels. In addition, prostate tissues were removed for histological examination. RESULTS: The mean DHT level as well as the minimum and maximum epithelial thicknesses in Group 3 were lower than those in Group 2. However, there was no statistical significant difference (P = 0.989, P = 0.176, and P = 0.070, respectively). The mean DHT level as well as the minimum and maximum epithelial thicknesses in Group 5 were lower than those in Group 4. However, there was no statistical significant difference (P = 0.984, P = 0.147, and P= 0.478, respectively). The mean minimum and maximum epithelial thicknesses in Group 3 and Group 4 were not statistically different (P = 0.488 and P = 0.996, respectively). CONCLUSION: The similarity of the mean minimum and maximum epithelial thickness in Group 3 and Group 4 may be indicate that the combination therapy provides an early histological effect. However, the fact that there was no statistical significant difference between Group 2 and Group 3, and between Group 4 and Group 5, in terms of the mean DHT level and minimum-maximum epithelial thicknesses suggests that longer term studies with more rats are necessary to test the validity of our hypothesis.

The Association of Encrustation and Ureteral Stent Indwelling Time in Urolithiasis and KUB Grading System.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the management of prolonged indwelling ureteral stents and the newly developed KUB (kidney, ureter, and bladder) grading system for the classification of encrusted stents in urolithiasis. METHOD: This study involved 69 patients that had indwelling and forgotten ureteral stents for more than 6 months after urolithiasis treatment. They were categorized into 4 groups based on indwelling time and were reviewed retrospectively. Patients whose ureteral stent could not be removed with simple cystoscopy were graded according to stone surface area and the KUB system. RESULTS: The mean stent indwelling time was 23.1 months. Stone burden in KUB and, in proportion to that, total KUB (T) score showed increased association that was directly proportional to indwelling time (p < 0.001, p = 0.008). Surgical intervention was required in 73.9% of patients. Among patients requiring surgery, 78.4% were treated in a single session and multi-modal interventions were performed in 70.5%. K score ? 3 was found to be associated with multiple surgery requirements (odds ratio [OR];11.25, %95 confidence interval [CI]:2.132-59.375),multi-modal procedure requirements (OR;16.50, %95 CI:3.434-79.826 ), and lower stone-free rates (p = 0.04). Bscore ? 3 was associated with multi-modal procedure requirements (OR;8.90, %95 CI:1.052-75.462). U score ? 3and T score ? 9 were associated with an operating time >180 minutes (p < 0.001, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Prolonged indwelling time of the ureteral stent in urolithiasis is associated with increased encrustation and stone burden. Since the KUB system specifies stone burden and its particular localization, it can be used as a simple, convenient method for the planning treatment of encrusted ureteral stents.

Cystic nephroma: A case report in adult patients.

Cystic nephroma is an unusual, cystic neoplasm of the kidney and is usually benign. There are two peaks in the incidence of the tumor, with a bimodal distribution presenting in children younger than two years old and in adults. These benign lesions are usually seen in childhood, whose clinical presentation is nonspecific with symptoms such as flank pain, hematuria and urinary tract infection. We aim to report treatment, and follow-up of a 48-year-old female patient with cystic nephroma for whom we performed open partial nephrectomy. As a surgical treatment radical or partial nephrectomy is applied according to the size and position of the masses. Long-term follow-up is recommended to rule out local recurrence or metastasis.

The Association of a Number of Anatomical Factors with the Success of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Lower Calyceal Stones.

PURPOSE: To determine anatomical factors affecting Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) success in the treatment of renal lower calyx stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of patients were evaluated retrospectively. The patients who have preoperative intravenous urography (IVU) and computed tomography (CT) were divided into two groups as successful (S)(N=103) and unsuccessful(U) (N=29). The anatomic characteristics such as infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), infundibular length (IL), infundibular width (IW) and pelvicaliceal height (PCH) values were compared among two groups. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 47±13.6 years in group S and 49.5 ±11.9 years in group U. The mean stone size was 10mm (6-54mm) in group S and 19mm (8-45mm) in group U (P < .001) Mean IPA was 85.8 ±16.9 degree in group S versus 54.7 ± 11.5 degree in group U. The mean PCH was 1.9cm (0.5-4cm) in group S versus 2.3cm (0.7-3.9cm) in group U. The mean IL were 2.7 ± 0.8 cm and 3.2±0.7cm in group S and group U, respectively. The mean IWs were 0.7 cm (0.2-2.3cm) and 0.7cm (0.3-2) in group S and group U, respectively. The differences were statistically significant for IPA, PCH, IL (P < .05) while was not statistically significant for IW (P > .05). After multivariate analyses, PCH, IPA and stone size were statistically significant factors. CONCLUSION: In our study we found that IPA, PCH and stone size were significant anatomical factors affecting RIRS success in the treatment of renal lower calyx stones. The patients whose IPA, PCH and stone size valuables are unsuitable, may need multiple RIRS sessions or additionaltreatment modalities.

A Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Management of Renal Stones ?2 CM.

PURPOSE: In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the outcomes in patients who have been treated withpercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) on renal stones ≥ 2 cm size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent PNL or RIRS for renal stones ≥ 2 cm size betweenNovember 2011 and November 2014. Stone size, operation, fluoroscopy and hospitalization time, success rates,stone-free rates and complication rates were compared in both groups. Patients were followed for three months. RESULTS: 254 patients were in the PNL Group. 185 patients were in the RIRS Group. The mean age was 46.88 and48.04 years in PNL and RIRS groups, respectively.The patient and stone characteristics (age, gender, Body Mass Index, kidney anomaly, SWL history and stoneradioopacity) were similar between two groups.The mean stone size preoperatively was significantly larger in patients who were treated with PNL (26.33mm.vs24.04mm.; P = .006). In the RIRS group, the mean stone number was significantly higher than PNL group (P <.001).The mean operative, fluoroscopy and hospitalization time were significantly higher in PNL group (P < .001). Thestone-free rate was 93.3% for the PNL group and 73.5% for the RIRS group after first procedure (P < .001). Nomajor complication (Clavien III-V) occurred in the RIRS group. CONCLUSION: Although the primary treatment method for renal stones ≥ 2cm size is PNL, serious complicationscan be seen. Therefore, RIRS can be an alternative treatment option in the management of renal stones ≥2 cm size.

Malfunctioned and Fractured Penile Prosthesis Caused by Cross Placement: Case Report.

Penile prosthesis is a functional option for patients who have erectile dysfunction after failed medical and intracavernosal treatments. Malleable penile prosthesis is a good alternative. Penile prosthesis implantation is a surgical process. Seldomly complications occur. In this study we presented a 61 y old man who has malfunctioned and broken penile prosthesis due to cross implantation.

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Performed on the Kidney Stone in a Patient With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Case Study.

A 68-year-old man with serious cervical kyphosis and dorsolumbar scoliosis due to ankylosing spondylitis was admitted with a stone 17 mm in size in left kidney lower calyx. A percutaneous nephrolithotomy operation was decided considering the size and location of stone and the anatomical deformities of patient. The kidney was accessed through monoplaner triangulation method by giving a special position of the patient's spinal deformity and stone was successfully removed. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a feasible method in ankylosing spondylitis patients in case that the right position is achieved. Each patient should be assessed individually deciding on treatment methods.