Adaptation of a chemosensitivity assay to accurately assess pemetrexed in ex vivo cultures of lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Pemetrexed is the only FDA approved treatment for mesothelioma and is a second line agent for treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Pemetrexed is inhibited by folate and its analogs, which are components of many culture media, making it challenging to study pemetrexed in vitro. In order to accurately evaluate pemetrexed's effects in vitro, the protocol for a standard chemosensitivity assay, the ChemoFx drug response marker, had to be modified. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Novel rinse and media change steps were assessed and then added to the assay protocol in order to observe pemetrexed activity. The intraday and interday stability of pemetrexed were also established under the adapted protocol. Then, the modified protocol was used to examine pemetrexed in 65 ex vivo lung cancer specimens. RESULTS: Substituting 5% RPMI + EGF for BEGM allowed pemetrexed to exert its anticancer activity in the ChemoFx DRM. ChemoFx classified 6.2% of the lung specimens as responsive, 9.2% as intermediate responsive and 84.6% as non-responsive to pemetrexed. CONCLUSIONS: Adapting the ChemoFx protocol allowed for the accurate evaluation of pemetrexed anticancer activity in ex vivo lung specimens. ChemoFx evaluation may provide an indication of a patient's clinical response to the drug prior to pemetrexed treatment. Having this information when treatment options are being considered could avoid wasted time, unnecessary costs and needless side effects that are the result of an inappropriate chemotherapy regimen.

Distinct genes related to drug response identified in ER positive and ER negative breast cancer cell lines.

Breast cancer patients have different responses to chemotherapeutic treatments. Genes associated with drug response can provide insight to understand the mechanisms of drug resistance, identify promising therapeutic opportunities, and facilitate personalized treatment. Estrogen receptor (ER) positive and ER negative breast cancer have distinct clinical behavior and molecular properties. However, to date, few studies have rigorously assessed drug response genes in them. In this study, our goal was to systematically identify genes associated with multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative breast cancer cell lines. We tested 27 human breast cell lines for response to seven chemotherapeutic agents (cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel). We integrated publicly available gene expression profiles of these cell lines with their in vitro drug response patterns, then applied meta-analysis to identify genes related to multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative cells separately. One hundred eighty-eight genes were identified as related to multidrug response in ER positive and 32 genes in ER negative breast cell lines. Of these, only three genes (DBI, TOP2A, and PMVK) were common to both cell types. TOP2A was positively associated with drug response, and DBI was negatively associated with drug response. Interestingly, PMVK was positively associated with drug response in ER positive cells and negatively in ER negative cells. Functional analysis showed that while cell cycle affects drug response in both ER positive and negative cells, most biological processes that are involved in drug response are distinct. A number of signaling pathways that are uniquely enriched in ER positive cells have complex cross talk with ER signaling, while in ER negative cells, enriched pathways are related to metabolic functions. Taken together, our analysis indicates that distinct mechanisms are involved in multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative breast cells.

Chemoresponse assay for evaluating response to sunitinib in primary cultures of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Not all patient tumors respond equally to the same type of therapy. An in vitro chemoresponse assay that can suggest individualized tumor response to therapies, in this case sunitinib, can be a valuable guide for clinical decision-making. RESULTS: The assay was shown to be sensitive and reproducible while differentiating renal cell lines based on sunitinib sensitivity and evaluating vendors' supply of the compound. Of the cultured breast cancer tumor specimens treated with sunitinib, ChemoFx classified 7.6% as responsive (R), 20.5% of specimens as intermediate responsive (IR), and 71.7% as non-responsive (NR). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The ChemoFx(®) drug response marker (DRM) (Precision Therapeutics, Inc.) was carried out on SK-OV-3 cells treated with sunitinib to establish appropriate dose ranges and assay thresholds, and to evaluate vendor supplies of sunitinib. Once reference values were determined, the assay was applied to eight different renal cell lines treated with sunitinib, each of which was subsequently classified into responsive, intermediate responsive, and non-responsive groups. Next, ex vivo tumor samples from 39 clinically diagnosed breast cancer patients were grown in culture and assayed for their response to sunitinib using ChemoFx. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoresponse assay assessment is an effective tool for evaluating sunitinib sensitivity in cultured cell lines as well as ex vivo breast cancer samples. An in vitro assay that may indicate an individual patient's clinical response to a chemotherapeutic agent can be beneficial in time, cost, and clinical outcome when therapeutic options are considered.

Analysis of chemotherapeutic response heterogeneity and drug clustering based on mechanism of action using an in vitro assay.

BACKGROUND: Cancer chemotherapeutic treatment is a complex scientific task. The ChemoFx Drug Response Marker (DRM) assists physicians in identifying treatment protocols likely to be effective for specific patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ChemoFx DRM was used to study drug response in vitro. Established human cancer cell lines and primary cultures of patient tumor specimens were challenged with chemotherapeutic agents to observe response of multiple tumor samples and determine whether drugs with similar mechanisms of action elicit similar response. RESULTS: These studies demonstrated heterogeneous response among patient tumor samples and clustering of drug response with similar mechanisms of action. Also highlighted was the reproducibility of ChemoFx DRM and its utility in characterizing tumor response to chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneous drug responses observed in vitro were similar to those observed clinically. Response characteristics were similar for drugs with similar mechanisms of action, suggesting response heterogeneity is determined at a cellular and molecular level.