Guidelines for anaesthesiologist specialist training in pain medicine.

The Section and Board of Anaesthesiology of the European Union of Medical Specialists aims (EUMS/UEMS) at harmonization of training of anaesthesiologists and at improvement of patient care throughout Europe. Pain medicine is considered to be an area of expertise in anaesthesiology although exclusivity is not claimed. The Section and Board has approved both a core syllabus for pain medicine to be part of the specialist training in anaesthesiology and an additional qualification in pain medicine following the completion of a 5 yr basic specialty training in anaesthesiology. These proposals were prepared by the Working Party on Pain Medicine of the Section and Board. It considers a multidisciplinary approach to pain to contribute to quality in care and has taken the initiative to set up a Multidisciplinary Joint Committee on Pain Medicine within the EUMS/UEMS, for which these guidelines define the area of expertise of anaesthesiology.

The effects of lactated Ringer's solution infusion on cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the effects of an infusion of lactated Ringer's (LR) solution on changes in cardiac output (CO) after spinal anesthesia. Seventy-five patients scheduled for lower extremity surgery under spinal anesthesia were studied. We measured CO (impedance cardiography method) and blood pressure for 25 min before and 30 min after spinal anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups. In the No Infusion group, no LR solution was given during the period of measurements. The LR Before group received 12 mL/kg of LR solution within 20 min before spinal anesthesia. The LR After group received 12 mL/kg of LR solution within 20 min starting immediately after spinal anesthesia. After spinal anesthesia, CO decreased by 13.9% in the No Infusion group. In the LR Before group, CO increased after the infusion by 20% and returned to baseline value 30 min after spinal anesthesia. In the LR After group, CO increased after spinal anesthesia, and 30 min after spinal anesthesia, CO was 11.3% above baseline. We conclude that the decrease in CO after spinal anesthesia can be prevented by the infusion of an LR solution, with CO reaching the highest value while the infusion is running. IMPLICATIONS: We studied the effects of lactated Ringer's solution infusion on cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia. If the patients received no infusion, cardiac output decreased after spinal anesthesia. However, if the patients received lactated Ringer's solution infusion, cardiac output was maintained.

Haemodynamic effects of subarachnoid blockade: 20% lignocaine versus 0.5% plain bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Our study compared the haemodynamic changes after spinal anaesthesia with 2% lignocaine and 0.5% plain bupivacaine. METHODS: A controlled, randomized trial was performed on 30 patients scheduled for arthroscopic knee surgery. Two percent lignocaine and 0.5% plain bupicacaine was used for spinal anesthesia. We measured cardiac output, blood pressure and level of sensory blockade before and for 25 minutes after spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS: In patients developing sensory block below T6 there were no differences between the study drugs in heamodynamic measurements. In patients who developed a sensory block at or above T6 there was a greater drop in mean arterial pressure and cardiac output and a faster decrease in heart rate in patients receiving bupivacaine. CONCLUSION: In patients developing a sensory block at or above the T6 dermatome, the decrease in cardiac output and mean arterial pressure in the first 25 min. after spinal anaesthesia is smaller if 2% lignocaine rather than 0.5% bupivacaine is used for blockade.

[Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia with 2% lidocaine in comparison to 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine]. / Hämodynamische Effekte einer Spinalanästhesie mit 2% Lidocain im Vergleich zu 0,5% isobarem Bupivacain.

BACKGROUND: Our study compared the haemodynamic changes after spinal anesthesia with 2% lignocaine and 0.5% plain bupivacaine. METHODS: A controlled, randomized trial was performed on 30 patients scheduled for arthroscopic knee surgery. 2% lignocaine and 0.5% plain bupivacaine were used for spinal anaesthesia. We measured cardiac output (electrical bioimpedance cardiography), blood pressure and development of sensory blockade before and for 25 minutes after spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS: In patients developing a sensory block below T6 there were no differences between both anaesthetics in haemodynamic parameters. But in patients developing a sensory block at or above T6 there was a greater drop in mean arterial pressure and cardiac output and a faster decrease in heart rate for bupivacaine compared to patients receiving Lignocaine. CONCLUSION: In patients developing a sensory block at or above the T6 dermatome, the decrease in cardiac output and mean arterial pressure in the first 25 min after spinal anaesthesia is smaller when 2% lignocaine rather than 0.5% bupivacaine is used for blockade.

Estimation of arterial CO2 partial pressure by measurement of tracheal CO2 during high-frequency jet ventilation in patients with a laryngectomy.

Tracheal and arterial CO2 partial pressures were measured simultaneously in 27 laryngectomized patients both while they were awake and during high-frequency jet ventilation. Tracheal gas was sampled during brief interruptions of high-frequency jet ventilation. Agreement between tracheal and arterial CO2 partial pressures was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. The tracheal-arterial CO2 partial pressures gradient during spontaneous breathing was significantly lower (P < 0.0002) than during high-frequency jet ventilation. During spontaneous ventilation, the bias was -0.77 kPa (95% CI = -0.99 to -0.55 kPa), and the upper and lower limits of agreement were 0.29 kPa (95% CI = -0.11 to -0.7 kPa) and -1.83 kPa (95% CI = -2.24 to -1.43 kPa). During high-frequency jet ventilation, the bias was -1.61 kPa (95% CI = -1.76 to -1.46 kPa), and the limits of agreement were -0.48 kPa (95% CI = -0.75 to -0.21 kPa) and -2.74 kPa (95% CI = -3.01 to -2.47 kPa). Despite the poor agreement between tracheal CO2 partial pressure and arterial CO2 partial pressure, it is sufficient to allow for adjustment of ventilator settings during jet ventilation.

A comparison of intravenous and inhalational maintenance anaesthesia for endoscopic procedures in the aspirin intolerance syndrome.

Intravenous (n = 21) and inhalational maintenance anaesthesia (n = 21) were compared by random allocation in patients with the aspirin intolerance syndrome undergoing endoscopic nasal procedures. Premedication was with oral midazolam and intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate 10 mg kg-1. Anaesthesia was induced in both groups with etomidate and alfentanil and ventilation was controlled. Anaesthesia was maintained in the intravenous group by infusion of alfentanil 1-1.5 micrograms kg-1 min-1 and injections of midazolam 2.5-5 mg h-1, and in the inhalational group by isoflurane up to 2%. Moderate arterial hypotension (70 mmHg) was achieved with nitroglycerine 0.5-5 micrograms kg-1 min-1 in the intravenous group, and with isoflurane up to 2% in the inhalational group. Adrenaline 1: 200 000 with 2% lignocaine was injected into the operative field. One patient in the inhalational group developed a resistant tachyarrhythmia but there was no overall significant difference (P = 0.34) in the frequency of dysrhythmias precipitated by adrenaline and lignocaine between the two groups. In one patient of each group methylprednisolone precipitated bronchospasm. On later challenge testing, 125 mg of intravenous methylprednisolone significantly reduced the peak expiratory flow (P < 0.05) in one of these patients. The results suggest that intravenous and inhalational maintenance anaesthesia are equally suitable for patients with aspirin intolerance syndrome. Corticosteroids during surgery should be given by the same route used pre-operatively (spray, oral, or spray plus oral) because intravenous injection may have adverse effects.

NMR imaging in the earth's magnetic field.

The most important and very expensive part of a magnetic resonance imaging set-up is the magnet, which is capable of generating a constant and highly homogeneous magnetic field. Here a new MR imaging technique without the magnet is introduced. This technique uses the earth's magnetic field instead of a magnetic field created by a magnet. This new method has not yet reached the stage of medical application, but the first images obtained by MRIE (magnetic resonance imaging in the earth's field) show that the resolution is close to that expected based on sensitivity estimations.