Defining fetal growth restriction: abdominal circumference as an alternative criterion.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine if using abdominal circumference percentile (AC) to define fetal growth restriction (FGR) improves ultrasound at ≥36 weeks as a screening test for small for gestational age (SGA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All non-anomalous singletons undergoing ultrasound at a single center at ≥36 weeks during 12/2008-5/2014 were included. FGR was defined as (estimated fetal weight) estimated fetal weight (EFW) and/or abdominal circumference (AC) < 10 for gestational age (GA). The primary outcome was SGA (birthweight ≤10th percentile for GA). Data were stratified by maternal race/ethnicity and BMI. Sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate (FPR), positive- and negative-predictive values (positive-predictive value (PPV), negative-predictive value (NPV)), and areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC were calculated. RESULTS: There were 1594 ultrasounds. Median (IQR) ultrasound GA was 37.3 (36.6-38.0), days to delivery 10.6 (5.0-18.4), and delivery GA 39.29 (38.6-39.9). EFW <10 had the following characteristics: sensitivity 50.6%, FPR 2.0%, PPV 83.8%, and AUC 0.743. Using AC <10, these were 64.0, 2.9, 81.3, and 0.806, respectively. Using AC or EFW <10, these were 67.5, 3.3, 80.3, and 0.821, respectively; this criterion has the largest AUC (p < .008). This finding persisted when stratified by maternal race/ethnicity and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: AC <10 is more sensitive and has a similar PPV compared with EFW <10 for SGA. Using AC <10 or EFW <10 has the best balance of sensitivity and specificity as a screening test and has a low FPR. AC may be a reasonable alternative criterion to EFW for FGR diagnosis.

Diagnosis and morbidity of placenta accreta.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the diagnostic precision of ultrasound examination for placenta accreta in women with placenta previa and to compare the morbidity associated with accreta to that of previa alone. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all women with previa with/without accreta examined at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) between 2002 and 2008. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of ultrasound examination for the diagnosis of accreta were calculated and compared with results from similar studies in the literature. Univariable analysis was used to compare clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The PPV of an ultrasound diagnosis of accreta was 68% and NPV was 98%. Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 89.5%. Compared with previa alone, accreta had an odds ratio (OR) of 89.6 (95% CI, 19.44-412.95) for estimated blood loss > 2 L, an OR of 29.6 (95% CI, 8.20-107.00) for transfusion and an OR of 8.52 (95% CI, 2.58-28.11) for length of hospital stay > 4 days. CONCLUSION: Placenta accreta is associated with greater morbidity than is placenta previa alone. Ultrasound examination is a good diagnostic test for accreta in women with placenta previa. This is consistent with most other studies in the literature.

Outcomes associated with cesarean section versus vaginal breech delivery at a university hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether vaginal breech delivery is associated with increased morbidity in term breech singletons using strict selection criteria. This study encompasses our previous studies (in 1987 and 1995) and extends our experience to 21 years. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from 1980 to 2001 including term, non-anomalous singleton breech deliveries selected by strict criteria. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for neonatal and maternal outcomes. RESULTS: Five hundred and eleven women underwent cesarean section and 214 a trial of labor. We found greater overall maternal morbidity in the cesarean section group (odds ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.34-2.65). In the vaginal delivery group, neonates were more likely to have had >1 day of mechanical ventilation (OR 10.0, 95% CI=1.56-63.9). No maternal deaths occurred and no neonatal deaths or seizures occurred. CONCLUSION: Given our findings, offering a trial of vaginal breech delivery to well-counseled strictly selected patients remains an appropriate option.