Acute Suppurative Thyroiditis in Children: Clinical Decision-Making.

Acute suppurative thyroiditis are infrequent infections, although their early and proper management are needed to reduce complications and recurrences. We review the clinical presentation, etiology, clinical outcome and management of 9 cases of thyroid infections diagnosed in children, and analyze the existence of predisposing factors for these infections.

Fatal Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Case Report and Literature Review.

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a chronic childhood inflammatory disease. SJIA accounts for approximately 5-15 per cent of all cases of JIA and has a high morbidity and mortality rate. In this disease, pulmonary complications (PC) other than pleuritis are much less frequent and not easily recognised by clinicians. Pulmonary hypertension, the most severe PC, is associated with uncontrolled disease and use of biologic therapies. We present a case of a school-age female with sJIA who died of acute cardiopulmonary instability secondary to pulmonary venous-occlusive disease demonstrated by necropsy. We describe her clinical evolution. We also undertook a narrative review of the literature about PC in sJIA to discuss the current state of the art regarding this complication. High disease activity and the use of multiple therapies include disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs should be a red flag for clinicians when discounting PC and pulmonary hypertension. The combination of chest X-ray, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram appear to be the best tests to achieve an early diagnosis.

Fatal Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Case Report and Literature Review / Enfermedad venooclusiva fatal y artritis idiopática juvenil sistémica: caso clínico y revisión de la literatura

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a chronic childhood inflammatory disease. SJIA accounts for approximately 5–15 per cent of all cases of JIA and has a high morbidity and mortality rate. In this disease, pulmonary complications (PC) other than pleuritis are much less frequent and not easily recognised by clinicians. Pulmonary hypertension, the most severe PC, is associated with uncontrolled disease and use of biologic therapies. We present a case of a school-age female with sJIA who died of acute cardiopulmonary instability secondary to pulmonary venous-occlusive disease demonstrated by necropsy. We describe her clinical evolution. We also undertook a narrative review of the literature about PC in sJIA to discuss the current state of the art regarding this complication. High disease activity and the use of multiple therapies include disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs should be a red flag for clinicians when discounting PC and pulmonary hypertension. The combination of chest X-ray, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram appear to be the best tests to achieve an early diagnosis.(AU)

La artritis idiopática juvenil sistémica (AIJs) es una enfermedad juvenil crónica que representa aproximadamente del 5 al 15% de todos los casos de AIJ y tiene una elevada tasa de morbimortalidad. En esta enfermedad, las complicaciones pulmonares (CP) distintas a pleuritis son mucho menos frecuentes, y no fácilmente reconocibles por los clínicos. La hipertensión pulmonar, la CP más grave, está asociada a la enfermedad incontrolada y el uso de terapias biológicas. Presentamos el caso de una mujer en edad escolar con AIJs que falleció debido a inestabilidad cardiopulmonar aguda secundaria a enfermedad venosooclusiva confirmada en la necropsia. Describimos su evolución clínica, y también realizamos una revisión narrativa de la literatura relativa a CP en AIJs, para debatir los avances más recientes sobre esta complicación. La elevada actividad de la enfermedad y el uso de terapias múltiples que incluyen fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad deberían servir de signo de alarma a los clínicos para descartar CP e hipertensión pulmonar. La combinación de placas de tórax, electrocardiograma y ecocardiograma parece ser el mejor conjunto de pruebas para lograr un diagnóstico precoz.(AU)

Decrease in the use of bronchodilators in the management of bronchiolitis after applying improvement initiatives.

INTRODUCTION: In the treatment of patients with acute bronchiolitis there is great variability in clinical practice. Treatments whose efficacy has not been demonstrated are frequently used despite the recommendations contained in the Clinical Practice Guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A quality improvement strategy is implemented in the care of patients with acute bronchiolitis in the Emergency Department, which is maintained for five years and is periodically updated to be increasingly restrictive regarding the use of bronchodilators. To evaluate the impact of the intervention, a retrospective study of the rates of prescription of bronchodilators in children diagnosed with acute bronchiolitis in the month of December of four epidemic periods (2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018) was carried out. RESULTS: 1767 children are included. There were no differences regarding age, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation or the estimated severity in each of the study seasons. The use of salbutamol in the Emergency Department decreased from 51.2% (95% CI: 46.6-55.8%) in 2012 to 7.8% (95% CI: 5.7%-10.5%) in 2018 (P < .001) and epinephrine prescription rates fell from 12.9% (95% CI: 10.1%-16.3%) to 0.2% (95% CI: 0-1.1%) (P < .001). At the same time, there was a decrease in the median time of attendance in the Emergency Department and in the admission rate without changing the readmission rate in 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic and continuous deployment over time of actions aimed at reducing the use of salbutamol and epinephrine in the treatment of bronchiolitis, prior to the epidemic period, seems an effective strategy to reduce the use of bronchodilators in the Emergency Department.

Descenso del uso de broncodilatadores en el manejo de la bronquiolitis tras aplicar iniciativas de mejora / Decrease in the use of bronchodilators in the management of bronchiolitis after applying improvement initiatives

Introducción: En el tratamiento de los pacientes con bronquiolitis aguda existe una gran variabilidad de la práctica clínica y con frecuencia se utilizan de forma indiscriminada tratamientos cuya eficacia no está demostrada a pesar de las recomendaciones recogidas en las guías de práctica clínica. Material y métodos: Se implementó una estrategia de mejora de la calidad en la atención a los pacientes con bronquiolitis aguda en el Servicio de Urgencias que se mantuvo durante 5 años y se actualizó periódicamente para ser cada vez más restrictiva respecto al uso de tratamientos broncodilatadores. Para evaluar el impacto de la intervención se realizó un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de las tasas de prescripción de broncodilatadores en los niños diagnosticados de bronquiolitis aguda en el mes de diciembre de 4 periodos epidémicos (2012, 2014, 2016 y 2018). Resultados: Se incluyó a 1.767 niños. No existieron diferencias respecto a edad, frecuencia respiratoria, saturación de oxígeno ni gravedad en cada una de las temporadas a estudio. El empleo de salbutamol en Urgencias descendió del 51,2% (IC del 95%: 46,6-55,8%) en 2012 al 7,8% (IC del 95%: 5,7-10,5%) en 2018 (p <0,001) y el de adrenalina del 12,9% (IC del 95%: 10,1-16,3%) al 0,2% (IC del 95%: 0-1,1%) (p <0,001). Se produjo a su vez un descenso en la mediana de tiempo de asistencia en Urgencias y en la tasa de ingreso sin que se modificase la tasa de readmisión en 72 h. Conclusiones: El despliegue sistemático y continuado en el tiempo de acciones dirigidas a la reducción del uso de fármacos en el tratamiento de la bronquiolitis, previo al periodo epidémico, parece una estrategia eficaz para reducir el uso de broncodilatadores en urgencias. (AU)

Introduction: In the treatment of patients with acute bronchiolitis there is great variability in clinical practice. Treatments whose efficacy has not been demonstrated are frequently used despite the recommendations contained in the Clinical Practice Guidelines. Material and methods: A quality improvement strategy is implemented in the care of patients with acute bronchiolitis in the Emergency Department, which is maintained for five years and is periodically updated to be increasingly restrictive regarding the use of bronchodilators. To evaluate the impact of the intervention, a retrospective study of the rates of prescription of bronchodilators in children diagnosed with acute bronchiolitis in the month of December of four epidemic periods (2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018) was carried out. Results: 1767 children are included. There were no differences regarding age, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation or the estimated severity in each of the study seasons. The use of salbutamol in the Emergency Department decreased from 51.2% (95% CI: 46.6%–55.8%) in 2012 to 7.8% (95% CI: 5.7%–10.5%) in 2018 (P<.001) and epinephrine prescription rates fell from 12.9% (95% CI: 10.1%–16.3%) to 0.2% (95% CI: 0–1.1%) (P<.001). At the same time, there was a decrease in the median time of attendance in the Emergency Department and in the admission rate without changing the readmission rate in 72h. Conclusions: The systematic and continuous deployment over time of actions aimed at reducing the use of salbutamol and epinephrine in the treatment of bronchiolitis, prior to the epidemic period, seems an effective strategy to reduce the use of bronchodilators in the Emergency Department. (AU)

[Decrease in the use of bronchodilators in the management of bronchiolitis after applying improvement initiatives]. / Descenso del uso de broncodilatadores en el manejo de la bronquiolitis tras aplicar iniciativas de mejora.

INTRODUCTION: In the treatment of patients with acute bronchiolitis there is great variability in clinical practice. Treatments whose efficacy has not been demonstrated are frequently used despite the recommendations contained in the Clinical Practice Guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A quality improvement strategy is implemented in the care of patients with acute bronchiolitis in the Emergency Department, which is maintained for five years and is periodically updated to be increasingly restrictive regarding the use of bronchodilators. To evaluate the impact of the intervention, a retrospective study of the rates of prescription of bronchodilators in children diagnosed with acute bronchiolitis in the month of December of four epidemic periods (2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018) was carried out. RESULTS: 1767 children are included. There were no differences regarding age, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation or the estimated severity in each of the study seasons. The use of salbutamol in the Emergency Department decreased from 51.2% (95% CI: 46.6%-55.8%) in 2012 to 7.8% (95% CI: 5.7%-10.5%) in 2018 (P<.001) and epinephrine prescription rates fell from 12.9% (95% CI: 10.1%-16.3%) to 0.2% (95% CI: 0-1.1%) (P<.001). At the same time, there was a decrease in the median time of attendance in the Emergency Department and in the admission rate without changing the readmission rate in 72h. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic and continuous deployment over time of actions aimed at reducing the use of salbutamol and epinephrine in the treatment of bronchiolitis, prior to the epidemic period, seems an effective strategy to reduce the use of bronchodilators in the Emergency Department.

Acute Appendicitis in Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Neither Delayed Diagnosis Nor Worse Outcomes.

AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of complicated appendicitis during the SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic lockdown. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of pediatric patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis in a single pediatric institution that assumed care responsibility for most of the pediatric emergencies during the lockdown period in Madrid (Spain). A control group was made up of the same number of patients diagnosed the previous year. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis were included (77 during self-quarantine and 74 during the previous year). The incidence of complicated appendicitis was 38.9% versus 28.3%, showing no significant differences. The 2 groups were homogeneous, with no differences in time elapsed between symptom onset and first emergency department visit, laboratory test results, median length of stay, intensive care admissions, or patients correctly diagnosed on their first visit. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) self-quarantine has not increased the incidence of complicated appendicitis, and children who developed complicated appendicitis did not have worse clinical outcomes. Parents did not delay presenting for medical attention, and emergency department pediatricians did not fail to diagnose this condition. Reorganization of hospital resources, fast-track treatment protocols for noncomplicated appendicitis, and extended use of home-stay hospitalization for complicated appendicitis could have contributed to these favorable outcomes.

Espectro clínico y factores de riesgo de enfermedad complicada en niños ingresados con infección por SARS-CoV-2 / Clinical spectrum and risk factors for complicated disease course in children admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection

INTRODUCCIÓN: En este momento existen todavía grandes interrogantes acerca de las características de enfermedad causada por el nuevo coronavirus (COVID-19) en los niños, así como acerca de los factores asociados al desarrollo de formas graves de la enfermedad. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo que incluye pacientes menores de 18 años ingresados debido a infección por SARS-CoV-2. La infección fue confirmada por la reacción en cadena de la transcriptasa inversa-polimerasa (RT-PCR) en tiempo real o por serología. Describimos los datos epidemiológicos y clínicos, los hallazgos de laboratorio y de imágenes, así como el tratamiento y la evolución de estos pacientes. Los pacientes se clasificaron en dos grupos de gravedad y luego se compararon. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 39 niños, con una mediana de edad de nueve años (rango 12 días-16 años); 23 eran varones. Los casos con evolución no complicada (24) se presentaron en su mayoría con fiebre y/o síntomas respiratorios sin alteraciones significativas en los hallazgos de laboratorio. De los 15 niños con enfermedad complicada, 12 desarrollaron shock. Además de la fiebre, frecuentemente presentaban alteraciones de la apariencia, taquicardia extrema, dolor abdominal, vómitos, diarrea, erupción cutánea y/o hiperemia conjuntival. También mostraron mayor linfopenia (p = 0,001), elevación de la proporción neutrófilos/linfocitos (p = 0,001), proteína C reactiva (p < 0,001), procalcitonina (p = 0,001), dímero D (p < 0,001) y ferritina (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: La infección por SARS-CoV-2 en niños ingresados se presenta con una gran variabilidad clínica. Cuando se les proporciona tratamiento de soporte, los pacientes con síntomas respiratorios que no tienen alteración de las pruebas de laboratorio, generalmente tienen una enfermedad no complicada. Los pacientes con enfermedad complicada se presentan principalmente con fiebre y síntomas abdominales y/o mucocutáneos, la mayoría desarrollan un shock. La elevación de los marcadores inflamatorios puede permitir una detección temprana y el pronóstico final es bueno

INTRODUCTION: At this time there are still major questions about the characteristics of disease caused by the new coronavirus (COVID-19) in children as well as factors associated with the development of severe forms of the disease. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study including patients under 18 years of age admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 1 to April 30, 2020. Infection was confirmed by realtime reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or antibody testing. We describe the epidemiological and clinical data, laboratory and imaging findings, as well as treatment and outcome in these patients. In light of these findings, patients were classified into two severity groups and then compared. RESULTS: Thirty-nine children were included, with a median age of 9 years (range 12 days-16 years); 23 were boys. Cases with uncomplicated disease course (24) mostly presented to the emergency department (ED) with fever and/or respiratory symptoms without significant alterations in laboratory findings. Of the 15 children with a complicated course, 12 developed shock. In addition to fever, they frequently presented altered appearance, extreme tachycardia, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, rash, and/or conjunctival hyperemia. They also showed greater lymphopenia (p = 0.001), elevated neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.001), C-reactive protein (p < 0.001), procalcitonin (p = 0.001), D-dimer (p < 0.001), and ferritin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection in admitted children presents with great clinical variability. When provided supportive care, patients with predominant respiratory symptoms without altered laboratory-test results generally have an uncomplicated course. Patients with complicated disease present mainly with fever and abdominal and/or mucocutaneous symptoms. Most develop shock. Elevation of inflammatory markers may allow for early detection and the final outcome is good

Clinical spectrum and risk factors for complicated disease course in children admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

INTRODUCTION: At this time there are still major questions about the characteristics of disease caused by the new coronavirus (COVID-19) in children as well as factors associated with the development of severe forms of the disease. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study including patients under 18 years of age admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 1 to April 30, 2020. Infection was confirmed by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or antibody testing. We describe the epidemiological and clinical data, laboratory and imaging findings, as well as treatment and outcome in these patients. In light of these findings, patients were classified into two severity groups and then compared. RESULTS: Thirty-nine children were included, with a median age of 9 years (range 12 days-16 years); 23 were boys. Cases with uncomplicated disease course (24) mostly presented to the emergency department (ED) with fever and/or respiratory symptoms without significant alterations in laboratory findings. Of the 15 children with a complicated course, 12 developed shock. In addition to fever, they frequently presented altered appearance, extreme tachycardia, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, rash, and/or conjunctival hyperemia. They also showed greater lymphopenia (p = 0.001), elevated neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.001), C-reactive protein (p < 0.001), procalcitonin (p = 0.001), D-dimer (p < 0.001), and ferritin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection in admitted children presents with great clinical variability. When provided supportive care, patients with predominant respiratory symptoms without altered laboratory-test results generally have an uncomplicated course. Patients with complicated disease present mainly with fever and abdominal and/or mucocutaneous symptoms. Most develop shock. Elevation of inflammatory markers may allow for early detection and the final outcome is good.

INTRODUCCIÓN: En este momento existen todavía grandes interrogantes acerca de las características de enfermedad causada por el nuevo coronavirus (COVID-19) en los niños, así como acerca de los factores asociados al desarrollo de formas graves de la enfermedad. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo que incluye pacientes menores de 18 años ingresados debido a infección por SARS-CoV-2. La infección fue confirmada por la reacción en cadena de la transcriptasa inversa-polimerasa (RT-PCR) en tiempo real o por serología. Describimos los datos epidemiológicos y clínicos, los hallazgos de laboratorio y de imágenes, así como el tratamiento y la evolución de estos pacientes. Los pacientes se clasificaron en dos grupos de gravedad y luego se compararon. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 39 niños, con una mediana de edad de nueve años (rango 12 días-16 años); 23 eran varones. Los casos con evolución no complicada (24) se presentaron en su mayoría con fiebre y/o síntomas respiratorios sin alteraciones significativas en los hallazgos de laboratorio. De los 15 niños con enfermedad complicada, 12 desarrollaron shock. Además de la fiebre, frecuentemente presentaban alteraciones de la apariencia, taquicardia extrema, dolor abdominal, vómitos, diarrea, erupción cutánea y/o hiperemia conjuntival. También mostraron mayor linfopenia (p = 0,001), elevación de la proporción neutrófilos/linfocitos (p = 0,001), proteína C reactiva (p < 0,001), procalcitonina (p = 0,001), dímero D (p < 0,001) y ferritina (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: La infección por SARS-CoV-2 en niños ingresados se presenta con una gran variabilidad clínica. Cuando se les proporciona tratamiento de soporte, los pacientes con síntomas respiratorios que no tienen alteración de las pruebas de laboratorio, generalmente tienen una enfermedad no complicada. Los pacientes con enfermedad complicada se presentan principalmente con fiebre y síntomas abdominales y/o mucocutáneos, la mayoría desarrollan un shock. La elevación de los marcadores inflamatorios puede permitir una detección temprana y el pronóstico final es bueno.

En respuesta al artículo «Uso de sueros hipotónicos en la prescripción de la fluidoterapia intravenosa de mantenimiento» / In response to the article «Use of hypotonic fluids in the prescription of maintenance intravenous fluid therapy»

No disponible

[Clinical spectrum and risk factors for complicated disease course in children admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection]. / Espectro clínico y factores de riesgo de enfermedad complicada en niños ingresados con infección por SARS-CoV-2.

INTRODUCTION: At this time there are still major questions about the characteristics of disease caused by the new coronavirus (COVID-19) in children as well as factors associated with the development of severe forms of the disease. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study including patients under 18 years of age admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 1 to April 30, 2020. Infection was confirmed by realtime reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or antibody testing. We describe the epidemiological and clinical data, laboratory and imaging findings, as well as treatment and outcome in these patients. In light of these findings, patients were classified into two severity groups and then compared. RESULTS: Thirty-nine children were included, with a median age of 9 years (range 12 days-16 years); 23 were boys. Cases with uncomplicated disease course (24) mostly presented to the emergency department (ED) with fever and/or respiratory symptoms without significant alterations in laboratory findings. Of the 15 children with a complicated course, 12 developed shock. In addition to fever, they frequently presented altered appearance, extreme tachycardia, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, rash, and/or conjunctival hyperemia. They also showed greater lymphopenia (p = 0.001), elevated neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.001), C-reactive protein (p < 0.001), procalcitonin (p = 0.001), D-dimer (p < 0.001), and ferritin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection in admitted children presents with great clinical variability. When provided supportive care, patients with predominant respiratory symptoms without altered laboratory-test results generally have an uncomplicated course. Patients with complicated disease present mainly with fever and abdominal and/or mucocutaneous symptoms. Most develop shock. Elevation of inflammatory markers may allow for early detection and the final outcome is good.

Hematuria asintomática como manifestación del tumor de Wilms botrioide / Asymptomatic haematuria as a sign of a botyroid Wilms tumour

No disponible

Erythema multiforme-like lesions in children and COVID-19.

During examination of cases of chilblains in children and adolescents, we identified four patients who also showed skin lesions similar to erythema multiforme (EM). They had no other known triggers for EM. One of them had a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2, while the other three were negative. Skin biopsies from two patients showed features not typical of EM, such as deep perivascular and perieccrine infiltrate and absence of necrosis of keratinocytes. Immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 spike protein showed granular positivity in endothelial cells and epithelial cells of eccrine glands in both biopsies. All patients had an excellent outcome, and had minimal or no systemic symptoms. The coincidence of EM, a condition commonly related to viruses, and chilblains in the setting of COVID-19, and the positivity for SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 spike protein by immunohistochemistry strongly suggest a link between EM-like lesions and SARS-CoV-2.

Chilblains in children in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Different skin manifestations of COVID-19 are being reported. Acral lesions on the hands and feet, closely resembling chilblains, have been recognized during the peak incidence of the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 22 children and adolescents with chilblain-like lesions seen over a short period of time in the Emergency Department of a children's hospital during the peak incidence of COVID-19 in Madrid, Spain. RESULTS: All patients had lesions clinically consistent with chilblains of the toes or feet, with three also having lesions of the fingers. Pruritus and mild pain were the only skin symptoms elicited, and only 10 had mild respiratory and/or GI symptoms. None had fever. Coagulation tests, hemogram, serum chemistry, and lupus anticoagulant were normal in all patients tested. One out of 16 tested cases had elevated D-dimer results, but without systemic symptoms or other laboratory anomalies. SARS-CoV-2 PCR tested in 19 cases was positive in just one case. Skin biopsies obtained in six patients were consistent with chilblains. On follow-up, all cases showed spontaneous marked improvement or complete healing. CONCLUSION: Acute chilblains were observed during COVID-19 pandemic in children and teenagers. It is a mildly symptomatic condition with an excellent prognosis, usually requiring no therapy. Etiopathogenesis remains unknown.

Paciente con clínica neurológica como única manifestación de infección por SARS-CoV-2 / Report of a patient with neurological symptoms as the sole manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection

No disponible

Impacto en la práctica clínica de un nuevo protocolo de bronquiolitis aguda / Impact of a new acute bronchiolitis protocol on clinical practice

Introducción: La prevalencia y la variabilidad de la práctica clínica en la bronquiolitis aguda la convierten en una candidata perfecta para evaluar la adecuación en el uso de recursos asistenciales. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar la utilización de recursos no recomendados para la atención de pacientes con bronquiolitis en el Servicio de Urgencias, antes y después de la instauración de un nuevo protocolo basado en las recomendaciones actuales. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de una muestra de pacientes diagnosticados de bronquiolitis aguda en el Servicio de Urgencias de un hospital terciario y seleccionados mediante aleatorización simple antes (diciembre de 2014) y después (diciembre de 2016) de la instauración de un nuevo protocolo. Se comparó el uso de pruebas diagnósticas y el tratamiento en ambos grupos. Resultados: Se han comparado 113 pacientes con bronquiolitis aguda atendidos en diciembre de 2014 y 128 en diciembre de 2016. Las características clínicas en ambos grupos eran similares. En el período posprotocolo se observó una disminución significativa en la utilización de salbutamol, tanto en el servicio de urgencias (33,6% vs 19,5%, p < 0,01) como al alta (46,7% vs 15,2%, p < 0,001); de adrenalina (12,4% vs 2,4%, p = 0,002) y de suero salino hipertónico nebulizado (5,3% vs 0,8%, p = 0,04). También disminuyó la solicitud de la prueba de detección rápida de VRS (40,7% vs 26,6%, p = 0,01). No se produjo un aumento en el número de ingresos o readmisiones en urgencias en las siguientes 72 horas. Conclusiones: la instauración de un nuevo protocolo de bronquiolitis aguda disminuyó la utilización de recursos no recomendados, principalmente el uso de broncodilatadores y de la prueba de detección rápida del VRS

Introduction: The prevalence and the variability of clinical practice in acute bronchiolitis make it a perfect candidate to monitor the proper use of resources. The aim of this study is to analyse the differences in the use of non-recommended resources in the management of bronchiolitis in the Emergency Department, before and after the establishment of a new protocol. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on a sample of patients diagnosed with acute bronchiolitis in the Emergency Department of a tertiary hospital, before (December 2014) and after (December 2016) the implementation of a new protocol. A comparison was made on the use of diagnostic tests and treatments in both groups. Results: The analysis included a total of 113 patients with acute bronchiolitis examined in December 2014, and 128 patients in December 2016. The clinical characteristics in both groups were similar. In the post-protocol period, there was a significant decrease in the use of salbutamol, both in the Emergency Department (33.6% vs 19.5%, P < .01) and at discharge (46.7% vs 15.2%, P < .001); adrenaline (12.4% vs 2.4%, P = .002), and nebulised hypertonic saline solution (5.3% vs 0.8%, P = .04). Rapid respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) testing was also decreased (40.7% vs 26.6%, P = .01). This decrease was not associated with an increase in the number of admissions or re-assessments in the Emergency Department. Conclusions: The establishment of a new protocol for acute bronchiolitis decreased the use of non-recommended resources, mainly the use of bronchodilators and rapid RSV testing

[Impact of a new acute bronchiolitis protocol on clinical practice]. / Impacto en la práctica clínica de un nuevo protocolo de bronquiolitis aguda.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence and the variability of clinical practice in acute bronchiolitis make it a perfect candidate to monitor the proper use of resources. The aim of this study is to analyse the differences in the use of non-recommended resources in the management of bronchiolitis in the Emergency Department, before and after the establishment of a new protocol. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on a sample of patients diagnosed with acute bronchiolitis in the Emergency Department of a tertiary hospital, before (December 2014) and after (December 2016) the implementation of a new protocol. A comparison was made on the use of diagnostic tests and treatments in both groups. RESULTS: The analysis included a total of 113 patients with acute bronchiolitis examined in December 2014, and 128 patients in December 2016. The clinical characteristics in both groups were similar. In the post-protocol period, there was a significant decrease in the use of salbutamol, both in the Emergency Department (33.6% vs 19.5%, P<.01) and at discharge (46.7% vs 15.2%, P<.001); adrenaline (12.4% vs 2.4%, P=.002), and nebulised hypertonic saline solution (5.3% vs 0.8%, P=.04). Rapid respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) testing was also decreased (40.7% vs 26.6%, P=.01). This decrease was not associated with an increase in the number of admissions or re-assessments in the Emergency Department. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a new protocol for acute bronchiolitis decreased the use of non-recommended resources, mainly the use of bronchodilators and rapid RSV testing.