ABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Los tumores ováricos son raros en la infancia y representan entre el 1 y el 5% de todos los tumores sólidos. Nuestro objetivo es conocer las características epidemiológicas, los subtipos histológicos y el manejo terapéutico de los tumores sólidos ováricos de la población pediátrica de la provincia de Córdoba. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, observacional, en el que se han revisado las historias clínicas de pacientes ≤ 14 años diagnosticadas de tumores sólidos ováricos en un hospital de tercer nivel entre los años 1994 y 2017, excluyéndose los tumores secundarios. Se revisó la edad, la presentación clínica, la lateralidad, la metodología diagnóstica, el tratamiento, la anatomía patológica y la evolución. RESULTADOS: Se revisaron 37 tumores ováricos en 31 pacientes, siendo 6 bilaterales. La edad media fue de 10,3 años (0-14). El 58% debutaron como masa palpable. No existe predominio de lateralidad. Los marcadores tumorales fueron negativos. Se practicó cirugía conservadora en el 29,7% y anexectomía en el 70,3%. Solo un teratoma inmaduro estadio I con gliomatosis peritoneal precisó tratamiento quimioterápico adyuvante postoperatorio. El estudio histológico demuestra un predominio de tumores de células germinales (65%) frente a los de estirpe epitelial (22%). Destacan 3 tumores estromales que corresponden a fibromas (síndrome de Gorlin) y un gonadoblastoma bilateral asociado a síndrome de Frasier. El tipo de tumor más frecuente fue el teratoma quístico maduro (35,1%). Evolución favorable en todos los casos. CONCLUSIONES: Dada la alta tasa de benignidad de los tumores ováricos en la infancia, la cirugía conservadora debe ser de primera elección, sobre todo en los bilaterales. Si existen antecedentes hereditarios, es imprescindible realizar estudios genéticos moleculares para descartar síndromes asociados
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Ovarian tumours are rare in childhood, and account for 1-5% of all tumours. The aim of this study is to determine the epidemiological features, histological subtypes, and therapeutic management of ovarian solid ovarian tumours of the paediatric population of the province of Cordoba, in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive, observational and institutional study was conducted in which a review was made of the clinical histories of patients younger than 14years-old diagnosed with ovarian tumours, excluding secondary tumours in a University Hospital between 1994 and 2017. A review was carried out on the age, clinical presentation, laterality, diagnostic methodology, treatment, histopathology, and evolution of these tumours. RESULTS: A total of 37 ovarian tumours were reviewed in 31 patients, 6 of them being bilateral. The mean age was 10.3 (0-14) years, with 58% presenting as a palpable mass. There was no predominance of laterality. The tumour markers were negative. Conservative surgery was performed in 29.7% and adnexectomy in 70.3%. Only one case required post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (stage I immature teratoma with peritoneal gliomatosis). The histological study shows a predominance of germ cell tumours (65%) against those of epithelial lineage (22%). There were 3 stromal tumours that corresponded to fibroma (Gorlin syndrome), and bilateral gonadoblastoma associated with Frasier syndrome. The most frequent type of tumour was mature cystic teratoma (35.1%). There were no complications in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Given that most childhood ovarian tumours are benign, conservative surgery is considered as the first choice, being even more important in bilateral tumours. If there is a family history, it is essential to carry out molecular genetic studies, to rule out associated syndromes
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Fibroma/pathology , Gonadoblastoma/pathology , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Teratoma/pathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Ovarian tumours are rare in childhood, and account for 1-5% of all tumours. The aim of this study is to determine the epidemiological features, histological subtypes, and therapeutic management of ovarian solid ovarian tumours of the paediatric population of the province of Cordoba, in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive, observational and institutional study was conducted in which a review was made of the clinical histories of patients younger than 14years-old diagnosed with ovarian tumours, excluding secondary tumours in a University Hospital between 1994 and 2017. A review was carried out on the age, clinical presentation, laterality, diagnostic methodology, treatment, histopathology, and evolution of these tumours. RESULTS: A total of 37 ovarian tumours were reviewed in 31 patients, 6 of them being bilateral. The mean age was 10.3 (0-14) years, with 58% presenting as a palpable mass. There was no predominance of laterality. The tumour markers were negative. Conservative surgery was performed in 29.7% and adnexectomy in 70.3%. Only one case required post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (stageI immature teratoma with peritoneal gliomatosis). The histological study shows a predominance of germ cell tumours (65%) against those of epithelial lineage (22%). There were 3 stromal tumours that corresponded to fibroma (Gorlin syndrome), and bilateral gonadoblastoma associated with Frasier syndrome. The most frequent type of tumour was mature cystic teratoma (35.1%). There were no complications in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Given that most childhood ovarian tumours are benign, conservative surgery is considered as the first choice, being even more important in bilateral tumours. If there is a family history, it is essential to carry out molecular genetic studies, to rule out associated syndromes.
Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Fibroma/pathology , Gonadoblastoma/pathology , Humans , Infant , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Teratoma/pathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: La funduplicatura de Nissen (FN) es la técnica más utilizada y con mejores resultados para tratar el reflujo gastroesofágico en niños. El abordaje laparoscópico (FNL) es seguro, con baja morbilidad y alta tasa de éxito, aunque algunos casos precisan abordaje convencional (FNC) o abierto. Nuestro objetivo es comparar los resultados entre la FNC y la FNL en nuestro centro. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de los pacientes < 14 años sometidos a FN entre 2000 y 2015. Comparamos ambos abordajes: complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria y seguimiento. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 75 FN; 49 (65,3%) FNL, 23 (30,7%) FNC y 3 (4,0%) reconversiones. Se asoció gastrostomía por laparoscopia en el 10,7% y abierta en el 5,3%. El 10,7% portaban gastrostomía previamente a la FN. La edad media fue de 4 anos, y el 68,7% fueron varones. El 36% presentaron algún grado de encefalopatía, el 14,7% hernia hiatal, el 5,4% antecedente de atresia esofágica intervenida y el 5,4% al menos un episodio aparentemente letal. No encontramos diferencias significativas en la duración de la intervención entre ambos abordajes. El 36% presentaron complicaciones, más frecuente en la FNC: OR = 3,30 (IC 95%: 1,1-9,6). La estancia disminuyó en 9 días en la FNL (IC 95%: 5,5-13,5). El seguimiento medio fue de 26 meses (IC 95%: 20,9-31,6), con 10,7% fallecimientos (5 insuficiencias respiratorias, una muerte súbita y 2 por su encefalopatía); el 4,2% precisaron nueva funduplicatura, el 15,8% mostraron mejoría sintomática y el 64,0%, ausencia de síntomas. CONCLUSIONES: La FNL es una técnica adecuada para el tratamiento del reflujo gastroesofágico, con menor morbilidad y menor estancia que la FNC, por lo que se recomienda como primera opción terapéutica
INTRODUCTION: Nissen fundoplication (NF) is the most used and effective technique for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in children. The laparoscopic approach (LNF) is safe, with low morbidity and high success rate, although some cases require a conventional approach (CNF). The aim of the study is to compare the results between LNF and CNF in our centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients < 14 years after NF between 2000 and 2015. A comparison was made of the complications, hospital stay, and followup for both approaches. RESULTS: Of the total 75 NF performed, 49 (65.3%) were LNF, 23 (30.7%) CNF, and 3 (4.0%) reconversions. Concomitant laparoscopic gastrostomy was performed in 10.7%, and open gastrostomy in 5.3% of cases. Prior to NF, 10.7% had a gastrostomy. The mean age was 4 years and 68.7% were male. Of the diagnoses, 36% had encephalopathy, 14.7% hiatal hernia, 5.4% oesophageal atresia, and 5.4% an acute life-threatening event. No differences were found in operation time. More than two-thirds (36%) had complications, which were more frequent in the CNF (OR = 3.30, 95% CI: 1.1-9.6). The hospital-stay decreased by 9 days in the LNF (95% CI: 5.5-13.5). Mean follow-up was 26 months (95% CI: 20.9-31.6). Mortality during follow-up was of 5.3% (5 respiratory failure, 1 sudden cardiac death, and 2 due to complications of the encephalopathy), 4.2% required re-fundoplication, 15.8% had symptomatic improvement, and 64.0% had absence of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The LNF is an effective technique for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux, with lower morbidity and shorter hospital stay than CNF. It is recommended as the first surgical option
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Fundoplication/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Hernia, Hiatal/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Deglutition Disorders/complicationsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Nissen fundoplication (NF) is the most used and effective technique for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in children. The laparoscopic approach (LNF) is safe, with low morbidity and high success rate, although some cases require a conventional approach (CNF). The aim of the study is to compare the results between LNF and CNF in our centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients <14years after NF between 2000 and 2015. A comparison was made of the complications, hospital stay, and follow-up for both approaches. RESULTS: Of the total 75 NF performed, 49 (65.3%) were LNF, 23 (30.7%) CNF, and 3 (4.0%) reconversions. Concomitant laparoscopic gastrostomy was performed in 10.7%, and open gastrostomy in 5.3% of cases. Prior to NF, 10.7% had a gastrostomy. The mean age was 4 years and 68.7% were male. Of the diagnoses, 36% had encephalopathy, 14.7% hiatal hernia, 5.4% oesophageal atresia, and 5.4% an acute life-threatening event. No differences were found in operation time. More than two-thirds (36%) had complications, which were more frequent in the CNF (OR=3.30, 95%CI: 1.1-9.6). The hospital-stay decreased by 9 days in the LNF (95%CI: 5.5-13.5). Mean follow-up was 26 months (95%CI: 20.9-31.6). Mortality during follow-up was of 5.3% (5 respiratory failure, 1 sudden cardiac death, and 2 due to complications of the encephalopathy), 4.2% required re-fundoplication, 15.8% had symptomatic improvement, and 64.0% had absence of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The LNF is an effective technique for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux, with lower morbidity and shorter hospital stay than CNF. It is recommended as the first surgical option.
Subject(s)
Fundoplication/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Laparoscopy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
No disponible
