ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common compression neuropathy affecting the upper extremity. The aim of this study was to determine the preferred surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH). METHODS: We invited members of the ASSH research mailing list to complete our online survey. They were presented with 6 hypothetical cases and asked to choose their preferred treatment from the following options: open in situ decompression, endoscopic decompression, submuscular transposition, subcutaneous transposition, medial epicondylectomy, and conservative management. This was assessed independently and anonymously through an online survey (SurveyMonkey). RESULTS: 1069 responses were received. Seventy-three percent of the respondents preferred to continue conservative management when a patient presented with occasional paresthesias for greater than 6 months with a normal electromyogram (EMG) or nerve conduction velocity (NCV). Sixty-five percent picked open in situ decompression if paresthesias, weakness of intrinsics, and EMG/NCV reports of mild to moderate ulnar nerve entrapment was present. More than 50% of respondents picked open in situ decompression, as their preferred treatment when sensory loss of two-point discrimination of less than 5 or more than 10 was present in addition to the findings mentioned above. Seventy-nine percent of the respondents said their treatment algorithm would change if ulnar nerve subluxation was present. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey results indicate that open in situ decompression is the preferred operative procedure, if there is no ulnar nerve subluxation, among hand surgeons for cubital tunnel syndrome.
Subject(s)
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome/therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons , Conservative Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Cubital Tunnel Syndrome/diagnosis , Decompression, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Electromyography , Humans , Neural Conduction , Physical Examination , Societies, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
Volar locked plating has become a standard treatment for operative stabilization of distal radius fractures. It is assumed that volar plating portends a low risk of extensor tendon irritation and rupture, especially when compared with dorsal plating constructs; however, extensor tendon tenosynovitis and rupture is a well-described complication after volar plating of the distal radius. Dorsal cortical penetration of screws may go unnoticed with traditional intraoperative fluoroscopic techniques and may contribute to extensor tendon irritation. This article presents the authors' experience with an additional fluoroscopic dorsal tangential radiograph helping the surgeon ascertain dorsal screw prominence following volar plate fixation. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances.
