Hypoglycaemic episodes in patients with type 2 diabetes--risk factors and associations with patient-reported outcomes: The PANORAMA Study.

AIM: To explore the frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes, their risk factors, and associations with patient-reported outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in the PANORAMA cross-sectional study. METHODS: Five thousand seven hundred and eighty-three patients aged ≥ 40 years with type 2 diabetes duration ≥ 1 year were recruited in nine European countries. Patients reported severe and non-severe hypoglycaemic episodes during the past year at a single study visit. Patient-reported outcomes were measured by the Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaires, Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey-II, and EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale. RESULTS: During the previous year, 4.4% of the patients experienced ≥ 1 severe hypoglycaemic episode; among those without severe hypoglycaemia, 15.7% experienced ≥ 1 non-severe episode. Patients experiencing any hypoglycaemic episode reported a greater negative impact of diabetes on quality of life, greater fear of hypoglycaemia, less treatment satisfaction and worse health status than those with no episodes. In multivariate analyses hypoglycaemia was significantly associated with longer diabetes duration; presence of microvascular and, to a lesser extent, macrovascular complications; treatment with insulin, glinides or sulfonylureas; and use of self-monitoring blood glucose. CONCLUSION: In patients with type 2 diabetes, severe hypoglycaemic episodes were not uncommon and one in five experienced some form of hypoglycaemia during the previous year. Hypoglycaemia was associated with more negative patient-reported outcomes. The risk of hypoglycaemia increased with diabetes duration, presence of diabetes-related complications, use of self-monitoring blood glucose, insulin secretagogues, and insulin treatment.

Impact of socio-economic position on health and quality of care in adults with Type 2 diabetes in France: the Entred 2007 study.

AIM: To describe the association between socio-economic position, health status and quality of diabetes care in people with Type 2 diabetes in France, where people may receive full healthcare coverage for chronic disease. METHODS: Data from a national cross-sectional survey performed in people pharmacologically treated for diabetes were used. They combined data from medical claims, hospital discharge, questionnaires for patients (n = 3894 with Type 2 diabetes) and their physicians (n = 2485). Socio-economic position was assessed using educational level (low, intermediate, high) and ability to make ends meet (financial difficulties vs. financially comfortable). RESULTS: People with diabetes reporting financial difficulties were more likely to be smokers (adjusted odds ratio 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.6) and obese (adjusted odds ratio 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.6) and to have poorer glycaemic control (HbA1c > 64 mmol/mol (8%); adjusted odds ratio 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8), than those who were financially comfortable. They were more likely to have their diabetes diagnosed because of complications (adjusted odds ratio 1.6; 95% CI 1.3-2.0). They were also more likely to have coronary and podiatric complications (adjusted odds ratios 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.6 and 1.7; 95% CI 1.4-2.2, respectively). They benefited more often from full coverage (adjusted odds ratio 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.6), visited general practitioners more often (ratio of estimated marginal means 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.2) but specialists less often (adjusted odds ratio 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.8 for a visit to private ophthalmologist). They also felt less well informed about their condition. CONCLUSIONS: Despite frequent access to full healthcare coverage, socio-economic position has an impact on the diagnosis of diabetes, health status and quality of diabetes care in France.

Frequency and predictors of confirmed hypoglycaemia in type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a real-life setting: results from the DIALOG study.

AIM: DIALOG assessed the prevalence and predictors of hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 (T1DM) or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a real-life setting. METHODS: In this observational study, insulin-treated patients (n=3048) completed prospective daily questionnaires reporting the frequency and consequences of severe/confirmed non-severe hypoglycaemia over 30 days. Patients (n=3743) also retrospectively reported severe hypoglycaemia over the preceding year. RESULTS: In this prospective survey, 85.3% and 43.6% of patients with T1DM and T2DM, respectively, reported experiencing at least one confirmed hypoglycaemic event over 30 days, while 13.4% and 6.4%, respectively, reported at least one severe event. Hypoglycaemia frequency increased with longer duration of diabetes and insulin therapy. Strongly predictive factors for hypoglycaemia were previous hypoglycaemia, >2 injections/day, BMI<30kg/m(2) and duration of insulin therapy>10 years. HbA1c level was not predictive of hypoglycaemia in either T1DM or T2DM. The confirmed hypoglycaemia rate was increased in the lowest compared with the highest tertile of HbA1c in T1DM, but not T2DM. At the time of enrolment, physicians reported severe hypoglycaemia in 23.6% and 11.9% of T1DM and T2DM patients, respectively, during the preceding year; the retrospective survey yielded frequencies of 31.5% and 21.7%, respectively. Also, severe hypoglycaemia led to medical complications in 10.7% and 7.8% of events in T1DM and T2DM patients, respectively, over 30 days. CONCLUSION: Using a unique combined prospective and retrospective approach, the DIALOG study found a relatively high frequency of hypoglycaemia among insulin-treated patients. These findings emphasize the importance of a patient-centred approach for managing diabetes in which hypoglycaemia risk evaluation is critical. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01628341.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus in France in 2012: results from the ObEpi survey.

AIM: This analysis estimates the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in French adults participating in the ObEpi (obesity epidemiology) 2012 survey and also proposes a description of that population, according to comorbidities, treatments and sociodemographic factors related to the disease. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was posted to 20,000 households from the Kantar Health panel. In total, 25,714 adults aged≥18 years and representative of the French population completed the survey between January and March 2012. RESULTS: The prevalence of T2DM was 5.5±0.3% (95% CI) in this representative sample of the adult French population. Average age of patients was 65.9 years; 55% were men. Mean body mass index was 29.9kg/m(2) (men: 29.4kg/m(2), women: 30.6 kg/m(2); P<0.01); the prevalence of obesity was 43.1% (men: 39.9%, women: 47.1%; P<0.01). Patient-reported treatments for comorbidities were frequent: high blood pressure, 59.1%; dyslipidaemia, 59.9%; myocardial infarction/angina pectoris, 9.7%; revascularization, 7.8%; heart failure, 7.4%; sleep apnoea, 8.3%; and osteoarthritis, 10.7%. With regards to known treatments, 81.4% of patients were taking oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), and 15.3% were using insulin therapy. Also, 18.8% of diabetic respondents reported financial hardship. CONCLUSION: T2DM remains a disease of major concern: compared with the non-diabetic population, all parameters surveyed showed unfavourable ratings, particularly for women.

The excess mortality related to cardiovascular diseases and cancer among adults pharmacologically treated for diabetes--the 2001-2006 ENTRED cohort.

AIMS: To compare the 5-year mortality (overall and cause-specific) of a cohort of adults pharmacologically treated for diabetes with that of the rest of the French adult population. METHODS: In 2001, 10 000 adults treated for diabetes were randomly selected from the major French National Health Insurance System database. Vital status and causes of death were successfully extracted from the national registry for 9101 persons. We computed standardized mortality ratios. RESULTS: Over 5 years, 1388 adults pharmacologically treated for diabetes died (15% of the cohort, 32.4/1000 person-years). An excess mortality, which decreased with age, was found for both genders [standardized mortality ratio 1.45 (1.37-1.52)]. Excess mortality was related to: hypertensive disease [2.90 (2.50-3.33)], ischaemic heart disease [2.19 (1.93-2.48)], cerebrovascular disease [1.76 (1.52-2.03)], renal failure [2.14 (1.77-2.56)], hepatic failure [2.17 (1.52-3.00)] in both genders and septicaemia among men [1.56 (1.15-2.09)]. An association was also found with cancer-related mortality: liver cancer in men [3.00 (2.10-4.15)]; pancreatic cancer in women [3.22 (1.94-5.03)]; colon/rectum cancer in both genders [1.66 (1.28-2.12)]. Excess mortality was not observed for breast, lung or stomach cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Adults pharmacologically treated for diabetes had a 45% increased risk of mortality at 5 years, mostly related to cardiovascular complications, emphasizing the need for further prevention. The increased risk of mortality from cancer raises questions about the relationship between cancer and diabetes and prompts the need for improved cancer screening in people with diabetes.

Correlates of health-related quality of life in French people with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: Diabetes is known to impair health-related quality of life (HrQol). Our aim was to analyse a comprehensive set of potential determinants of HrQol in a large sample of patients with diabetes. METHODS: This study is based on the ENTRED 2007 study, a representative sample of adults (18 years and older) with diabetes. Data were extracted from postal self-reported questionnaires (from patients and medical practitioners) and from reimbursements from the National health insurance data system. HrQol was assessed with the MOS SF-12 for mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) component summaries. Multivariate linear regression models were used to analyse the variables associated with HrQol. RESULTS: SF-12 MCS and PCS were available in 2832 patients with T2DM, with a mean age 64 years (1715 males, 56%). Lower income, severe hypoglycaemic episodes, hospitalisation ≥24 h, instrumental daily living (IADL) restriction, low satisfaction for social support and an HbA1c within the 8.1-10.0% range were associated with lower MCS rating, whereas an older age and male gender were associated with higher MCS. Older age, female sex, higher BMI, lower income, insulin treatment, macrovascular complications, severe hypoglycaemic episodes, hospitalisation ≥24 h, and IADL restriction were associated with lower PCS values whereas having no need for social support was associated with higher PCS values. DISCUSSION: HrQol associated factors are multiple but mainly linked with socio-demographic factors, diabetes complications and satisfaction for social support. A patient centred approach should be tested to prevent impairment of HrQol and thus to decrease the burden of diabetes. Assessment of social support should be included.

Prevalence of treatment for diabetes during 1997-2007, and trends in cardiovascular risk factors between 2001 and 2007 according to diabetic treatment, in the IPC (Investigations Préventives et Cliniques; Preventive and Clinical Investigations) cohort.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate changes in the prevalence of glucose-lowering agents in a large, unselected general French population from 1997 to 2007, with specific focus on changes in other cardiovascular risk factors in relation to diabetic status during 2001-2002 and 2006-2007. METHODS: The prevalence of treated diabetes was assessed in a large population who had a health check-up at the "Investigations Préventives et Cliniques" Center between 1997-2007. Baseline characteristics and risk profiles of individuals with and without treatment for diabetes were assessed and compared with data for 2001-2002 and 2006-2007. RESULTS: From 1997 to 2007, the prevalence of treatment for diabetes increased from 0.75% to 1.73% in men and from 0.7% to 2.28% in women. In 2006-2007 compared with 2001-2002, the odds ratios for receiving glucose-lowering agents, adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI) and educational level, were 1.54 (95% CI: 1.28-1.86) in men and 1.59 (95% CI: 1.26-2.03) in women. In those treated for diabetes compared with untreated subjects, greater decreases in blood pressure, cholesterol and glycaemia were found, stress and depression scores improved, and a greater increase in BMI was found. Smoking decreased in both treated and untreated individuals. Physical activity decreased in treated individuals, but remained unchanged in the general population. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of people treated with diabetes increased in the Paris area. Although most concomitant risk factors decreased more in treated individuals than in the general population, physical activity and BMI worsened, thus, emphasizing the need for improving patient education.

How patients' attitudes and opinions influence self-care behaviours in type 2 diabetes. Insights from the French DIABASIS Survey.

AIM: This study evaluated the profiles of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to identify sets of opinions and attitudes towards the disease that might influence self-care behaviours. METHODS: Altogether, 1,092 patients with T2DM, aged 45 or older from a large representative French cohort, completed a self-questionnaire exploring their knowledge and perceptions of diabetes, its impact on various aspects of daily life and self-management practices. Canonical and cluster analyses were used to identify sets of homogeneous 'profiles' of patients linking attitudes and opinions to specific disease-related behaviours (such as changes in lifestyle, drug compliance, treatment satisfaction, impact on everyday life and weight gain). RESULTS: Demographics of the T2DM study population were previously reported along with the main results (60% male; mean age: 66 years; mean age at diagnosis: 55 years; mean BMI: 29kg/m(2)). Five distinct patient types emerged from the typological approach: 'committed' (25%); 'carefree' (23%); 'bitter' (19%); 'disheartened' (19%); and 'overwhelmed' (15%). Each patient type defined a set of attitudes and beliefs towards T2DM that influenced disease-related behaviours, leading to different degrees of diabetes self-management. CONCLUSION: The DIABASIS survey provides important information for diabetes care by identifying distinct patients' profiles that express different degrees of difficulty in implementing self-management. For this reason, patients in each category require different kinds of customized support from their physician to induce behavioural changes that may be key in improving their metabolic control.

[Weight change, cardiometabolic risk and the impact of antidiabetic medications in type 2 diabetic patients]. / Variations pondérales, risque cardiométabolique et impact des médicaments antidiabétiques chez le diabétique de type 2.

In the first part of this review article, the prognostic impact of weight and weight changes in terms of clinical outcomes and metabolic control is reviewed, through the analysis of the results of several large cohorts and prospective studies of diabetic patients followed in "real world" settings. The second part of the review focuses on the impact of antidiabetic medications on weight, emphasising the importance of a comprehensive approach, taking into account weight, in the management of diabetic patients.

Effects of 1-year treatment with metformin on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in non-diabetic upper-body obese subjects with mild glucose anomalies: a post-hoc analysis of the BIGPRO1 trial.

AIM: Metformin has recently been considered as a possible pharmacological complement to lifestyle measures for preventing type 2 diabetes in high-risk subjects. However, little is known of its effects on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in non-diabetic subjects. METHODS: The BIGPRO1 trial was a 1-year multicentre, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial of metformin versus placebo, carried out in the early 1990s, in 457 upper-body obese non-diabetic subjects with no cardiovascular diseases or contraindications to metformin. We compared the changes (1-year minus baseline) in cardiometabolic risk factors between treatment groups in two subsets of trial subjects: those with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (n=101); and those who fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) (n=51). Comparisons were adjusted for age and gender. RESULTS: In the IFG/IGT subset, significant differences in 1-year changes were observed for systolic blood pressure, which decreased markedly more in the metformin group than in the placebo group (P<0.003), and for fasting plasma glucose, and total and LDL cholesterol, which decreased slightly in the metformin group, but increased in the placebo group (P<0.04). Similar results were observed in the subset with DPP criteria. Also, there were no significant differences in 1-year changes for weight, waist-to-hip ratio, 2-h post-load blood glucose, fasting and 2-h post-load insulin, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and fibrinolytic markers between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In subjects at high risk of developing diabetes, the use of metformin showed beneficial and no untoward effects on cardiometabolic risk factors.

How do patients with type 2 diabetes perceive their disease? Insights from the French DIABASIS survey.

AIM: The main purpose of this survey was to describe type 2 diabetes (T2DM) from the patient's standpoint in a representative French panel in 2008. METHODS: Fourteen thousand two hundred and one individuals from the general population aged 45 or older completed a self-questionnaire exploring knowledge about diabetes; 1092 replies were from patients with T2DM. RESULTS: The prevalence of T2DM in this population was 7.7%, with demographics as follows: 60% men; mean age: 66 years; mean age at diagnosis: 55 years; mean BMI: 29 kg/m(2). Eighty-five percent of T2DM patients reported that they wanted more information about at least one aspect of the disease at diagnosis; they reported feeling anxious (30%), frightened (13%), angry (4%) or that the disease was unfair (12%). Half of the patients had modified their dietary habits but 71% found it difficult to engage in regular physical activity. Most patients (90%) were treated with drugs: 81% with oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) (44% in monotherapy) while 19% received insulin (alone or in combination with OAD). Twenty-three percent complained of weight gain since start of current therapy (average gain of 7.3 kg). Insulin initiation represented a turning point for patients who became more aware of the disease severity, more willing to follow advice and to take greater control over their disease management. The mean time from diagnosis to insulin initiation was 13.8 years. Half of the patients perceived their disease as severe especially women, patients who initially reacted with anxiety, insulin-treated patients and those actively involved in their disease management. Some gender differences emerged: women took the disease more seriously, were more engaged in self-management, and reported a higher impact on daily life. CONCLUSIONS: DIABASIS provides important information for diabetes care by highlighting patients' views of the disease, such as distress at diagnosis, lack of adequate information to cope with this distress and the important supportive role played by the family. A deeper understanding of patients' perception of the disease would help optimize customized care.

Prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in the French general population: the INSTANT study.

AIMS: To estimate the prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in the French general population. Secondary objectives were to evaluate treatments and diabetic complications. METHODS: In this cross-sectional epidemiological survey, a representative sample of the French adult population was selected using a stratified quota method: 10,038 individuals were evaluated by a standardized face-to-face interview. The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes was determined on the basis of replies to six questions using a specific algorithm. Data were collected on risk factors, diabetes history, familial antecedents and diabetic complications. These patients also identified their treatments from an exhaustive list. RESULTS: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes was 5.08% in men and 4.11% in women, and rose progressively after the age of 50. Of these, 79 patients (13.4%) received no pharmacological treatment, 477 (80.9%) were taking an oral antidiabetic drug and 134 (22.7%) were taking insulin. Renal and ocular complications were reported by 6.8% and 21.0%, respectively, of the patients. Also, 10.4% had been hospitalized at some time of that year for a diabetes-related problem. The most frequently reported treatments were metformin and sulphonylureas, used by more than 50% of the patients. In addition, 380 patients (65.9%) claimed to be following a diet and 228 (39.2%) were consulting a dietitian. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of treated and untreated type 2 diabetes mellitus in France was 4.57%.

[One-year follow-up in real clinical practice conditions of type 2 diabetic patients treated with rosiglitazone: the Avantage study]. / Suivi sur un an dans les conditions de pratique courante d'une cohorte de patients diabétiques de type 2 traités par rosiglitazone: l'étude Avantage.

The Avandia, tolérance à grande échelle (Avantage) study was an observational study conducted in a large cohort of type 2 diabetic patients (T2D) followed for 12 months. Its aim was to assess in real clinical practice conditions, the tolerability of rosiglitazone, an oral antidiabetic agent of the new thiazolidinedione ("glitazone") class, available in France since May 2002. Study was carried out from December 2002 to January 2005. To be included, T2D seen during the inclusion period should start the rosiglitazone treatment (within eight days prior to 15 days after) in agreement with therapeutic indications and drug datasheet information in force at that time. Patient characteristics, clinical and biological data and adverse events (AE) during the 12-month follow-up were recorded. Among the 3845 T2D enrolled from January to November 2003, 3580 constituted the analyzed population (at least one documented rosiglitazone intake). At inclusion, mean age (+/-S.D.) was 62+/-11 years, 52% were male, mean BMI was 29.9+/-5.3kg/m2 and mean HbA1c was 8.5+/-1.4%. Ongoing antidiabetic treatments were mainly a monotherapy (46% of patients, metformin or a sulfonylurea) or a bitherapy (in 47%). Main reasons to prescribe rosiglitazone were insufficient control of diabetes (91% of patients), associated or not with a poor tolerance to the ongoing oral antidiabetic treatment at inclusion (in 29%) and/or with a contraindication to metformin (in 4%). Two thousand four hundred and twenty-four patients (71%) completed the 12-month follow-up. Along the study, 514 T2D (14%) experienced at least one AE, judged related to the treatment in the physician's opinion for 377 patients (11%). Two hundred and fifteen patients dropped out from the study due to AE. AE notified in more than 1% of patients were: weight gain (n=100 patients; 3% of the cohort), nausea (n=57; 2%), edema (n=55; 2%) and anemia (n=40; 1%). A seriousness criteria was reported for 105 patients (3% of the cohort), including 18 (<1%) heart failure. Mean HbA1c level decreased from 8.5+/-1.4% at inclusion to 7.8+/-1.6% at study end. Mean value of the main lipid parameters remained stable. Mean systolic blood pressure (BP) decreased from 137+/-13 to 135+/-12mmHg and diastolic BP from 79+/-8 to 78+/-8mmHg. Mean weight was 82+/-15kg at inclusion and 83+/-17kg at study end (NS), mean waist circumference was not significantly modified. In conclusion, the observational Avantage study, conducted in a large cohort of type 2 diabetic patients treated with rosiglitazone in clinical practice conditions and followed-up for 12 months, confirmed the results of controlled double blind clincal studies, with a clinical and biological tolerability in accordance with the known AE profile and a beneficial effect on metabolic control and arterial blood pressure.

Prevalence of macrovascular complications and cardiovascular risk factors in people treated for diabetes and living in France: the ENTRED study 2001.

AIM: The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of macrovascular complications and cardiovascular risk factors among people with diabetes living in France and to compare these prevalences with other national estimates. METHODS: We randomly sampled 10,000 people who received one or more reimbursements for insulin or oral hypoglycaemic treatment from the major national medical insurance system during the period October-December 2001; 3646 of the 10,000 people completed a questionnaire; for a subgroup of 1718 people, their care providers completed a medical questionnaire. RESULTS: The prevalence of diagnosed macrovascular complications was of 17% according to patients (angina or myocardial infarction, 15%; coronary revascularization, 9%) and of 20% overall, according to physicians (angina or myocardial infarction, 16%; coronary revascularization, 6%; stroke, 5%). Macrovascular complications were more frequent in people with type 2 than type 1 diabetes, reflecting an age effect. The prevalences of cardiovascular risk factors in type 1 and type 2 diabetes were: current smoking, 35 and 14%; overweight, 28 and 42%; obesity, 9 and 36%; blood pressure superior to 130/80 mmHg, 29 and 59%; LDL cholesterol superior or equal to 3.4 mmol/l, 18 and 26%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other European countries, elevated blood pressure is more frequent in people with diabetes living in France; compared with US estimates, the prevalence of macrovascular complications is lower, glucose control better and blood pressure control poorer in France. These data, observed in a country with widespread access to care and at low cost to the patient, nevertheless demonstrate an urgent need for improving the cardiovascular risk profile of people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, both with and without macrovascular complications.

French medical practice in type 2 diabetes: the need for better control of cardiovascular risk factors.

AIMS: In type 2 diabetes (T2D), to describe treatments to prevent cardiovascular disease, to compare current practice to French guidelines, and to identify factors associated with recommended treatments. METHODS: In the Echantillon National Témoin Représentatif des Personnes Diabétiques (ENTRED) study, 10,000 adults treated for diabetes (any type) were randomly selected from the French National Health Insurance System database. Deliveries during the last quarter of 2001 of treatments to prevent cardiovascular disease were extracted. Questionnaires were mailed to these people and their care providers. Final populations included 3324 people with T2D and their 1553 care providers. RESULTS: Overall, 18% reported coronary heart disease (CHD) and 44% others were classified as having a high cardiovascular risk; 68% received one or more antihypertensive treatment: ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), 44%; diuretic, 35%; calcium channel blocker, 25%; beta-blocker, 24%. Among those receiving antihypertensive treatment, 59% had blood pressure greater than 130/80mmHg. Overall, 42% received a hypolipidaemic treatment: statin, 25%; fibrate, 18%. About half the people with a high cardiovascular risk had LDL cholesterol greater than 1g/L, but only 32% were given a statin. Among people with an abnormal albumin/creatinine ratio (11%), 59% received an ACE inhibitor/ARB. Among those with CHD, 35% received the two treatments recommended in 1999 (beta-blockers and antiplatelet agents); in multivariate analyses, this two-treatment delivery was positively associated with male gender, self-reported hypertension and consulting a cardiologist. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular risk profiles reported by providers in T2D people are high. Despite recent progress, there is a need for major improvement in practices intended to prevent cardiovascular disease in these people, especially in those at greatest CHD risk.

A review of the metabolic syndrome.

While the concept of this syndrome has been described more than 60 years ago, and more formally almost 20 years ago, the controversy continues as to its utility, which of the various syndrome definitions should be used and their ability to predict diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease. The metabolic syndrome, of cardiovascular risk factors, provides an early warning of at risk subjects and emphasises the need to treat more aggressively (by at least lifestyle modification) patients with multiple abnormalities even though the abnormalities might be slight. Further, the syndrome can be easily used in clinical practice and when it is assessed against the background of the patient's age, sex and smoking habits, it provides an evaluation of potential cardiovascular risk. Prospective intervention studies are the only means of definitively accepting or refuting the usefulness of the syndrome. The metabolic syndrome is an entity which merits attention from both the medical profession and public health authorities.

Evidence for distinct effects of GH and IGF-I in the metabolic syndrome.

AIMS: The metabolic syndrome is a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors which include central obesity, dyslipidaemia, glucose intolerance and hypertension. These risk factors are common in patients with growth hormone (GH) deficiency, suggesting a role for the somatotropic axis in the development of metabolic syndrome. METHODS: We used factor analysis to investigate the relationships linking serum levels of GH and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) to metabolic syndrome variables (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting glucose, blood pressure and waist circumference). We studied 359 men and 388 women from the Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance syndrome (DESIR). Their age range was 30-64 years. RESULTS: Three independent latent factors explained 61% of the total variance in women and four factors explained 73% in men. In both men and women, IGF-I showed a strong positive correlation with the lipid factor and a negative correlation with the obesity/glucose factor. In women, GH showed a strong negative correlation with the obesity/glucose factor but not the lipid factor. In men, GH was unrelated to the lipid and obesity/glucose factors. The blood pressure factor was not related to GH or IGF-I. In contrast with IGF-I, GH was significantly lower in women with metabolic syndrome (1575 +/- 449 pg/ml) than in the other women (2121 +/- 520 pg/ml, P = 0.002). No significant difference was observed in men for GH or IGF-I. CONCLUSION: Our results support a link between the somatotropic axis and several features of the metabolic syndrome, and suggest distinct effects of GH and IGF-I on these parameters.

Low HDL-cholesterol is common in European Type 2 diabetic patients receiving treatment for dyslipidaemia: data from a pan-European survey.

AIMS: To measure the prevalence of low high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (men < 1.03 mmol/l; women < 1.29 mmol/l) in European Type 2 diabetic patients receiving treatment for dyslipidaemia. METHODS: The pan-European Survey of HDL-cholesterol measured lipids and other cardiovascular risk factors in 3866 patients with Type 2 diabetes and 4436 non-diabetic patients undergoing treatment for dyslipidaemia in 11 European countries. RESULTS: Diabetic patients were more likely to be obese or hypertensive than non-diabetic patients. Most patients received lifestyle interventions (87%) and/or a statin (89%); treatment patterns were similar between groups. Diabetic patients had [means (SD)] lower HDL-cholesterol [1.22 (0.37) vs. 1.35 mmol/l (0.44) vs. non-diabetic patients, P < 0.001] and higher triglycerides [2.32 (2.10) vs. 1.85 mmol/l (1.60), P < 0.001]. More diabetic vs. non-diabetic patients had low HDL-cholesterol (45% vs. 30%), high triglycerides (> or = 1.7 mmol/l; 57% vs. 42%) or both (32% vs. 19%). HDL-cholesterol < 0.9 mmol/l was observed in 18% of diabetic and 12% of non-diabetic subjects. Differences between diabetic and non-diabetic groups were slightly greater for women. LDL- and total cholesterol were lower in the diabetic group [3.02 (1.05) vs. 3.30 mmol/l (1.14) and 5.12 (1.32) vs. 5.38 mmol/l (1.34), respectively, P < 0.001 for each]. CONCLUSIONS: Low HDL-cholesterol is common in diabetes: one in two diabetic women has low HDL-cholesterol and one diabetic man in four has very low HDL-cholesterol. Management strategies should include correction of low HDL-cholesterol to optimize cardiovascular risk in diabetes.

Cardiovascular risk markers associated with the metabolic syndrome in a large French population: the "SYMFONIE" study.

OBJECTIVE: The SYMFONIE study was designed to analyze the clinical and biological characteristics, and the cardiovascular risk markers, in men and women with the metabolic syndrome compared to control subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study population included 101,697 men and women, 18 to 80 years of age, who had a health checkup at the Centre d'Investigations Preventives et Cliniques (Paris, France) between 1997 to 2002. The metabolic syndrome was defined according to the ATpiiI-NCEP 2001 criteria. RESULTS: Out of the 66,202 men (47.4+/-11.8 years) and 35,495 women (48.5+/-13.6 years) included in this population, 6761 men (10.2%) and 2155 women (6.1%) presented the metabolic syndrome. Among subjects < or =40 years of age, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was 5.0% in men and 2.2% in women, and rose to 14.1% and 12.0%, respectively, among men and women >70 years of age. After adjustment for age, patients with the metabolic syndrome presented higher pulse pressure (systolic minus diastolic blood pressure), higher heart rate, lower vital respiratory capacity, lower physical activity, an increase in inflammatory status assessed through leukocyte count and dental inflammation, hepatic abnormalities, and increased levels of stress and depression. CONCLUSION: In this large French population, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome is lower than in North American and northern European populations. Patients with the metabolic syndrome present several additional hemodynamic, inflammatory and psychological risk markers which could contribute to the poor cardiovascular prognosis of these subjects.

Three-year increase of gamma-glutamyltransferase level and development of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged men and women: the D.E.S.I.R. cohort.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Among hepatic markers, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) is the main predictor for development of type 2 diabetes, but there are no data to date on changes in GGT and type 2 diabetes incidence. METHODS: Data at baseline and at 3 years from the D.E.S.I.R. cohort were used, comprising 2,071 men and 2,130 women without baseline diabetes. RESULTS: Changes in GGT level were correlated with changes in markers of insulin resistance (fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance), as well as with the following elements of the metabolic syndrome: central obesity, and increased fasting glucose, triglycerides and blood pressure (systolic and diastolic). The 3-year increase in GGT was associated with incident type 2 diabetes in both sexes, after adjusting for age and baseline GGT. After further adjustment for baseline confounding factors, including alanine-aminotransferase, alcohol intake, obesity and fasting insulin, the odds ratios (95% CI) for an association between incident type 2 diabetes and unchanged or increased (as opposed to decreased) GGT levels were 2.54 (1.38-4.68) in men (p=0.003) and 2.78 (1.20-6.42) in women (p=0.02). These associations were slightly attenuated after adjusting for the 3-year change in BMI, alcohol consumption and fasting insulin, the odds ratios being 2.49 (1.28-4.86) in men and 2.53 (1.01-6.40) in women. This relationship was not dependent on intra-individual variability. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: An unchanged or increased GGT level over time, even when GGT is in the normal range, is correlated with increasing insulin resistance and is associated with a risk of incident type 2 diabetes in both sexes, independently of baseline GGT, which is itself a diabetes risk factor.