Parent SMART (Substance Misuse in Adolescents in Residential Treatment): Pilot randomized trial of a technology-assisted parenting intervention.

Adolescents in residential level of care for substance-related problems have high risk of relapse following discharge. Parent engagement lowers relapse risk, but there are myriad barriers to engaging parents in residential treatment and continuing care. Parent SMART (Substance Misuse in Adolescents in Residential Treatment) is a technology-assisted parenting intervention that was designed to circumvent barriers associated with traditional, office-based continuing care interventions to better engage parents. This pilot randomized trial assessed the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness of Parent SMART as an adjunctive intervention to adolescent residential treatment-as-usual (TAU). Sixty-one parent-adolescent dyads were randomized to Parent SMART+TAU or TAU-only. Thirty-seven dyads were recruited from a short-term facility and 24 dyads were recruited from a long-term facility. Those randomized to Parent SMART received a multi-component technology-assisted intervention combining an off-the-shelf online parenting program, coaching sessions, and a parent networking forum. Parent and adolescent assessments were conducted at baseline, 6, 12, and 24-weeks post-discharge. Feasibility (e.g., parental effectiveness) and acceptability (e.g., parental satisfaction, willingness to recommend the intervention) benchmarks were specified a priori as the primary hypotheses. Secondary effectiveness indicators were the proportion of days adolescent used alcohol, cannabis, and any substance. All acceptability and feasibility benchmarks were met or exceeded among dyads in both short- and long-term residential. Generalized linear mixed models showed no significant effects pooled across sites. Analyses by facility revealed two significant time by condition interactions. Adolescents in short-term residential whose parents received Parent SMART showed fewer drinking days and fewer school problems over time, relative to adolescents whose parents received TAU. Results indicate that Parent SMART was both acceptable and feasible, with preliminary indication of effectiveness among those in short-term residential. A fully-powered trial is warranted to reliably test the effectiveness of Parent SMART and understand possible mechanisms of improvement.

What parents of adolescents in residential substance use treatment want from continuing care: A content analysis of online forum posts.

Background: Parents of adolescents in residential substance use (SU) treatment face a myriad of barriers to continuing care services. Growing research suggests that mobile health (mHealth) technologies can overcome common barriers to continuing care services, yet no work has addressed parents' needs. To gain insight into parents' continuing care needs, we analyzed online forum posts made by parents who received a novel mHealth intervention. Methods: Thirty parents received access to an online networking forum where they could connect with our adolescent SU expert or the community of parents also navigating their adolescent's post-discharge transition. In real-time, participants could ask questions and share information, experiences, and emotional support. Results: Twenty-one parents (70%) posted at least once; 12 parents made 15 posts to our expert, while 18 parents made 50 posts to the parent community. Thematic analysis uncovered five major themes: parenting skills; parent support; managing the post-discharge transition; adolescent SU; and family functioning. Conclusions: Parents discussed a range of topics directly and indirectly related to their adolescent's treatment. Incorporating networking forums into mHealth continuing care interventions offers parents a secure space to ask questions, share concerns, and gather information needed to support their adolescent's transition home.

Marketing therapy to parents concerned about adolescent substance use: Association of adolescent problems and parent preferences for direct-to-consumer marketing.

Parent-directed marketing strategies have great potential to promote the utilization of therapy by adolescents with or at risk of substance-related problems. The extent to which marketing strategies should be tailored to parents of adolescents with various presenting problems - such as substance use, mental health, and legal involvement - is unknown. The current study represents a secondary analysis of a direct-to-consumer (DTC) marketing survey, which used a well-established framework called the Marketing Mix to solicit parent preferences about marketing across three dimensions: Promotion (i.e., how parents prefer to receive information); Place (i.e., where parents prefer to receive therapy); and Price (i.e., how much parents are willing to pay and how far parents are willing to travel). Four-hundred eleven parents of 12- to 19-year-old adolescents (51% girls, 82% Non-Hispanic White) completed the survey and answered five questions spanning Promotion, Price, and Place dimensions of the Marketing Mix. A subsample of 158 parents also reported on their actual therapy-seeking behavior, allowing us to report on both parents' ideal and actual experiences. We explored the extent to which parent preferences varied as a function of adolescent substance use, externalizing, internalizing, and legal problems. Bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regressions were used to examine which of these variables were associated with parents' responses to specific survey items. Analyses confirmed that both parent preferences and parents' actual therapy-seeking behavior varied as a function of adolescent problems. Recommendations are offered for professional psychologists to use DTC marketing strategies to connect with adolescents in need of services.

Factors associated with contingency management adoption among opioid treatment providers receiving a comprehensive implementation strategy.

Background: Contingency management (CM) is an evidence-based behavioral intervention for opioid use disorders (OUDs); however, CM adoption in OUD treatment centers remains low due to barriers at patient, provider, and organizational levels. In a recent trial, OUD treatment providers who received the Science to Service Laboratory (SSL), a multilevel implementation strategy developed by a federally funded addiction training center, had significantly greater odds of CM adoption than providers who received training as usual. This study examined whether CM adoption frequency varied as a function of provider sociodemographic characteristics (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, licensure) and perceived barriers to adoption (i.e., patient-, provider-, organization-level) among providers receiving the SSL in an opioid treatment program. Methods: Thirty-nine providers (67% female, 77% non-Hispanic white, 72% with specialty licensure, Mage = 42 [SD = 11.46]) received the SSL, which consisted of didactic training, performance feedback, specialized training of internal change champions, and external coaching. Providers completed a comprehensive baseline assessment and reported on their adoption of CM biweekly for 52 weeks. Results: Providers reported using CM an average of nine 2-week intervals (SD = 6.35). Hierarchical multiple regression found that providers identifying as younger, non-Hispanic white, and without addiction-related licensure all had higher levels of CM adoption frequency. Higher perceived patient-level barriers predicted lower levels of CM adoption frequency, whereas provider- and organization-level barriers were not significant predictors. Conclusions: The significant effect of age on CM adoption frequency was consistent with prior research on predictors of evidence-based practice adoption, whereas the effect of licensure was counter to prior research. The finding that CM adoption frequency was lower among racially/ethnically diverse providers was not expected and suggests that the SSL may require adaptation to meet the needs of diverse opioid treatment providers. Entities using the SSL may also wish to incorporate a more explicit focus on patient-level barriers.

Impressions of "Evidence-Based Practice": A Direct-to-Consumer Survey of Caregivers Concerned about Adolescent Substance Use.

National behavioral health organizations have recently started using direct-to-consumer (DTC) marketing strategies as a means of promoting increased utilization of evidence-based practice (EBP). Such strategies often encourage patients and caregivers to proactively seek out EBP, based on the assumptions that patients and caregivers understand the concept and view it favorably. We conducted a DTC marketing survey of caregivers concerned about their adolescents' substance use in order to explore how these caregivers define, value, and prefer to describe the EBP concept. We also examined whether caregiver perceptions of EBP vary by socio-demographic (race/ethnicity, income per capital, education level) and clinical (adolescent's history of therapy) characteristics. A total of 411 caregivers (86% women, 88% Non-Hispanic White) of adolescents age 12 to 19 (M age = 16.1, SD = 1.8, 82% Non-Hispanic White) completed an online survey. Caregivers answered a series of questions evaluating assumed definitions of EBP, underlying EBP principles, the appeal of EBP, and alternate terms to describe EBP. Chi-square analyses and multivariate logistic regressions were used to examine which variables were associated with the greatest likelihood of response selection. Results indicated that most parents defined EBP correctly, valued EBP principles, and found EBP appealing. However, caregivers from racial/ethnic minority groups, with lower income per capita, and lower education were more likely to define EBP incorrectly and have negative impressions of the concept. Education level was the strongest and most consistent predictor of caregiver perceptions. Clinical implications for the development of targeted, accessible marketing messages are discussed.