Polydioxanone Dome Technique for Guided Bone Regeneration: Surgical Technique and Results up to 72 Months of Follow-up.

This study aimed to describe the step-by-step procedure of the polydioxanone dome technique associated with guided bone regeneration (GBR) and to report the results up to 72 months after implant loading. Patients with maxillary horizontal bone defects (< 5 mm residual width, confirmed by CBCT scan) were treated with the proposed intervention. During the GBR procedure, four bone perforations were strategically prepared in a roughly square configuration. Segments of polydioxanone suture material were introduced in the perforations, forming a dome-shaped structure. Six months after bone augmentation, a new CBCT was performed. After implant restoration, periapical radiographs were taken, which were then repeated annually. The following outcomes were analyzed: implant survival, horizontal bone gain, marginal bone level, and complications. Twenty implants were placed in 11 patients with a survival rate of 100% in a mean follow-up of 38.18 ± 19.65 months after loading. Mean horizontal bone gain was 3.82 ± 1.67 mm and mean marginal bone level was -0.12 ± 1.17 mm. Only minor complications were observed. The present results suggest that the polydioxanone dome technique may represent a promising approach during horizontal GBR, alone or in combination with implant placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2023;43:223-230. doi: 10.11607/prd.6087.

Employment of U-Shape Technique at Reentry Surgery for Papillae Coronal Migration on the Rehabilitation of Anterior Single Implant: 3-Year Follow-Up Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: The rehabilitation of a maxillary single dental implant represents a great challenge at clinical practice. Harmony among the implant-supported crown and adjacent teeth is required in which concerns pink and white esthetics. The aim of the present case report is to depict a multidisciplinary treatment in which the U-shape flap technique for papillae preservation at second stage surgery was used. CASE PRESENTATION: One female patient presenting an un-rehabilitated dental implant at the left central incisor position sought treatment at the Centre of Education and Research on Dental Implants (CEPID). Alterations of color, shape, and position were observed on the anterior maxillary teeth. For proper treatment planning, radiograph, wax-up, and mock-up were performed. Second stage surgery was performed by the U-shape flap technique. A trunnion abutment was installed at the implant and a provisional subcontoured cemented crown was manufactured. Dental bleaching, feldspathic veneers, and a ceramic crown were performed. Oral hygiene instructions were recommended. Follow-up appointments were set at 1.5 and 3 years after restoration placement. After 3-year follow-up, soft tissue stability and health were preserved and papillae coronal migration around the single dental implant was observed. A complication-free treatment was reached, and patient demonstrated satisfaction towards esthetic and function. CONCLUSIONS: The use of U-shape technique at second stage surgery associated to adequate prosthetic contour improved soft tissue esthetic outcomes, while the multidisciplinary treatment planning provided adequate solutions, refining harmony between dental and implant-supported components.