Esophageal stenting for benign and malignant disease: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline

This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), endorsed by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), the European Society of Digestive Endoscopy (ESDO), and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. Main recommendations for malignant disease 1 ESGE recommends placement of partially or fully covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) for palliative treatment of malignant dysphagia over laser therapy, photodynamic therapy, and esophageal bypass (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). 2 For patients with longer life expectancy, ESGE recommends brachytherapy as a valid alternative or in addition to stenting in esophageal cancer patients with malignant dysphagia. Brachytherapy may provide a survival advantage and possibly a better quality of life compared to SEMS placement alone. (Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.) 3 ESGE recommends esophageal SEMS placement as the preferred treatment for sealing malignant tracheoesophageal or bronchoesophageal fistula (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). 4 ESGE does not recommend the use of concurrent external radiotherapy and esophageal stent treatment. SEMS placement is also not recommended as a bridge to surgery or prior to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. It is associated with a high incidence of adverse events and alternative satisfactory options such as placement of a feeding tube are available. (Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.) Main recommendations for benign disease 1 ESGE recommends against the use of self-expandable stents (SEMSs) as first-line therapy for the management of benign esophageal strictures because of the potential for adverse events, the availability of alternative therapies, and costs (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). 2 ESGE suggests consideration of temporary placement of SEMSs as therapy for refractory benign esophageal strictures (weak recommendation, moderate evidence). Stents should usually be removed at a maximum of 3 months (strong recommendation, weak quality evidence). 3 ESGE suggests that fully covered SEMSs be preferred over partially covered SEMSs for the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures, because of their lack of embedment and ease of removability (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). 4 For the removal of partially covered esophageal SEMSs that are embedded, ESGE recommends the stent-in-stent technique (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). 5 ESGE recommends that temporary stent placement can be considered for treating esophageal leaks, fistulas, and perforations. The optimal stenting duration remains unclear and should be individualized. (Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.) 6 ESGE recommends placement of a SEMS for the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding refractory to medical, endoscopic, and/or radiological therapy, or as initial therapy for patients with massive esophageal variceal bleeding (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence).

Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcome of invasive aspergillosis in renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) has been considered an infrequent complication after renal transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the differences in clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of IA between renal and other types of transplantation. METHODS: We reviewed all cases of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients from Hospital Clinic at Barcelona, who had proven and probable IA, according to the EORTC/MSG criteria, between June 2003 and December 2010. RESULTS: A total of 1762 transplants were performed. From this cohort, 27 cases of IA were diagnosed (1.5%): in 56% (15/27) liver, 33% (9/27) kidney, and 11% (3/27) combined transplant. The median onset time from renal and non-renal transplants to IA was 217 and 10 days, respectively (P < 0.001). There were 6 cases (22%) of late IA (>6 months), all in kidney recipients (P < 0.001). Renal transplant patients with IA more frequently had chronic lung disease (44% vs. 6%) and chronic heart failure (33% vs. 6%); they also had none of the classical risk factors for IA defined for liver transplantation (0% vs. 33%, P = 0.001), and therefore they did not receive antifungal prophylaxis (0% vs. 72%, P = 0.001). In 14/24 patients, serum galactomannan antigen was positive, and this related to higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: While classical risk factors described for IA in liver recipients are still valid, IA appears later in renal patients and is commonly associated with co-morbid conditions.

Limitations of use of the noninvasive clearance of indocyanine green as a prognostic indicator of graft function in liver transplantation.

AIM: To assess the prognostic value of noninvasive indocyanine green (ICG) clearance (ICG-pulse-densitometric method [PDR]) for the outcome of liver grafts after transplantation. METHODS: ICG-PDR, hepatic artery resistance index, cardiac output, transaminases, prothrombin time, bilirubin, albumin, hematocrit at 48 to 72 hours after transplantation were analyzed with reference to outcome among 59 liver graft recipients. RESULTS: Two grafts were lost at 10 and 88 days during the initial hospitalization. These two patients only differed from the other recipients in the need for packing (1/2 versus 3/57) and degree of hypoproteinemia (46 ± 0 versus 51 ± 7.8 g/L), whereas they had similar ICG-PDR values (16.7%/min and 21.8%/min versus 17.3%/min ± 7.2%/min). Seven patients showed an ICG-PDR ≤ 8.8%/min, a previously identified cutoff for early postoperative complications. These patients versus the other 52 significantly differed in prothrombin index (47.9% ± 15.9% versus 64.3% ± 11.7%, P = .001) and bilirubin (8.3 ± 3.2 versus 3.3 ± 2.9 mg/dL, P = .0001). Early postoperative complications--primary graft nonfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, or septic shock--responsible for an ICG-PDR ≤ 8.8%/min were observed in 2/7 patients. Interestingly, six cases developed an early (range: 3-15 days) rejection episode. In all the cases rejection suspected by analytical abnormalities was confirmed by liver biopsy. Among the overall series of patients, ICG-PDR significantly correlated with serum albumin (r = 0.345; P = .007), bilirubin (r = -0.514; P = .0001), and hematocrit (r = 0.462; P = .0001) but not with transaminases, prothrombin index, cardiac output, or hepatic artery resistance index. Actuarial 72-month probability of graft survival was 75%. Overall, 14 grafts were lost over a median follow-up of 78 months (range 1-99 m). There were no significant differences among early ICG-PDR values among grafts lost vs retained upon follow-up. CONCLUSION: ICG-PDR measured once early after liver transplantation did not offer relevant information to predict individual patient outcomes in the immediate postoperative phase. This lack of prognostic value may have been due to the multiple confounding factors involved in ICG metabolism after liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation for acute liver failure: a Spanish perspective.

The Spanish characteristics of organ donation (high accessibility to a transplant) and the different proportion in the etiologies of acute liver failure (ALF), namely, the very low incidence of paracetamol overdose causing this syndrome in contrast with other Western countries, are the causes of some specific features of emergency liver transplantation for ALF. The most relevant are the short time between the need for a graft and effective urgent liver transplant, and the high proportion of patients who undergo this therapy. This paper analyzes these characteristics and provides information about the use of biological and nonbiological extracorporeal liver support devices in acute liver failure, suggesting that these systems should be tested in countries with a long waiting times for urgent liver transplantation, or in patients with ALF and contraindications for transplantation.

Nuevas estrategias terapéuticas en el fallo hepático agudo / No disponible

No disponible

Assessment of portal hypertension in humans.

Patients suspected of having portal hypertension (either by clinical history, physical examination, or previous diagnosis) should undergo ultrasonography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Ultrasonography, preferably using the duplex technique, can disclose the patency of the portal venous system, the presence of signs of portal hypertension (splenomegaly, portocollateral vessels, repermeabilization of the umbilical vein, and so forth) and provide additional information about liver, biliary, or pancreatic diseases that may be the cause of portal hypertension. Endoscopy can assess the presence and size of gastroesophageal varices, the appearance of the variceal wall, and the presence and severity of portal hypertensive gastropathy. Patients showing a patent portal vein should have hepatic vein catheterization to evaluate the presence of presinusoidal, sinusoidal, or postsinusoidal portal hypertension. Patients in whom presinusoidal portal hypertension is suspected (those having esophageal varices with an HVPG below 10 mm Hg) should have liver biopsy and percutaneous transhepatic measurement of portal pressure. In sinusoidal portal hypertension, the results of endoscopy and HVPG measurement are decisive for the therapeutic management of the patients. The authors' results indicate that, before starting prophylactic therapy with beta-blockers, all patients should undergo at least an hepatic vein catheterization to assess HVPG; it would be preferable to have a variceal pressure measurement also. These measurements must be repeated 3 to 4 weeks after the final dose of therapy has been reached to assess the risk of variceal bleeding or rebleeding.

Randomized comparison of long-term losartan versus propranolol in lowering portal pressure in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It has been suggested that losartan, an angiotensin II (A-II) type 1 receptor blocker, may have a pronounced portal pressure reducing effect, far greater than that of propranolol. This randomized controlled trial compared the hemodynamic and renal effects of continued 6-week administration of losartan (n = 25) vs. propranolol (n = 15) in portal hypertensive patients with cirrhosis treated endoscopically after a variceal bleeding episode. METHODS: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), systemic hemodynamics, renal function, and vasoactive factors were measured before and at 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Losartan did not reduce HVPG (-2% +/- 12%, NS) but significantly decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP, -8% +/- 10%, P = 0.001). On the contrary, propranolol significantly reduced HVPG (-10% +/- 11%, P = 0.003) and cardiac output (-16% +/- 12%, P = 0.001) but did not modify MAP (2.5% +/- 10%, NS). Losartan increased A-II levels, reduced aldosterone, and decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Child B patients. Propranolol did not modify renal function. Adverse events related to therapy were mild and similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike propranolol, long-term losartan administration does not significantly reduce HVPG in patients with cirrhosis treated after a variceal bleeding episode, and it caused hypotension and reduced GFR in patients with moderate liver failure. Therefore, losartan is not an alternative to propranolol in preventing variceal rebleeding.

Stenosis of the suprahepatic inferior vena cava as a complication of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in Budd-Chiari patients.

We report 2 patients with Budd-Chiari (BC) syndrome secondary to thrombogenic conditions who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement because of refractory ascites and impending liver failure. After TIPS placement, there was marked symptomatic relief and improvement in liver function, but the courses of both patients were complicated by the development of an inferior vena cava (IVC) syndrome caused by segmental stenosis of the suprahepatic IVC just at the outflow jet of the TIPS at 11 and 9 months later. One patient underwent liver transplantation, and the other patient, caval angioplasty and stenting. Stenosis of the IVC represents an unrecognized complication of TIPS in patients with BC syndrome.

Multicenter randomized controlled trial of terlipressin versus sclerotherapy in the treatment of acute variceal bleeding: the TEST study.

Failure to control bleeding and early rebleeding account for the high mortality associated with variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. We compared endoscopic sclerotherapy to terlipressin, a drug that effectively controls acute bleeding while reducing in-hospital mortality. This multicenter randomized controlled trial included 219 cirrhotic patients admitted for endoscopy-proven acute variceal bleeding and randomized to receive repeated injections of terlipressin during 6 days (n = 105) or emergency sclerotherapy (n = 114). Success was defined as obtaining control of bleeding (24-hour bleeding-free period during the first 48 hours) and lack of early rebleeding (any further bleeding from initial control to 5 days later) and survival during the study. Both groups were similar at inclusion. Failure rate for terlipressin was 33% and 32% for sclerotherapy (not significant [NS]). Early rebleeding was responsible for 43% and 44% of failures, respectively. This high efficacy was observed in both Child-Pugh class A + B and Child-Pugh class C patients. Both treatments were similar regarding transfusion requirements, in-hospital stay, and 6-week mortality (26 vs. 19 patients). Side effects appeared in 20% of patients receiving terlipressin and in 30% of those on sclerotherapy (P =.06); being serious in 4% and 7%, respectively (NS). In conclusion, terlipressin and sclerotherapy are equally highly effective therapies achieving the initial control of variceal bleeding and preventing early rebleeding. Both treatments are safe, but terlipressin is better tolerated. Therefore, terlipressin may represent a first-line treatment in acute variceal bleeding until the administration of elective therapy, especially in hospitals where a skilled endoscopist is not available 24 hours a day.

Predictive value of the variceal pressure response to continued pharmacological therapy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Noninvasive measurements of variceal pressure adequately reflect the hemodynamic effects of propranolol on portal hypertension. However, the prognostic value of variceal pressure responses during continued propranolol therapy has not been evaluated, and it is unclear whether this may substitute invasive measurements of portal pressure response. Fifty-five portal hypertensive patients with cirrhosis were studied before and at 4 months of continued propranolol therapy. Variceal pressure was measured using an endoscopic pressure gauge. Portal pressure was evaluated as the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Over a 28 +/- 11 month follow-up, 16 patients experienced variceal bleeding. Baseline characteristics were similar in bleeders and nonbleeders. At 4 months, reduction in variceal pressure was less marked in bleeders than in nonbleeders (5% +/- 20% vs. -15% +/- 24%; P =.03). A fall in variceal pressure 20% or greater of baseline was an independent predictor of absence of variceal bleeding; which occurred in 5% of patients with a 20% or greater fall in variceal pressure versus 42% of patients with less than a 20% reduction (P =.004). The HVPG response had similar independent prognostic value (decrease > or =20%: 6% bleeding; decrease <20%: 45% bleeding; P =.004) but identified different patients. Achieving a 20% decrease in either variceal pressure or HVPG was highly sensitive (85%) and specific (93%) identifying patients not bleeding on follow-up. Endoscopic measurements of variceal pressure response to continued pharmacotherapy provide useful prognostic information on the risk of variceal bleeding. As with HVPG response, a fall in variceal pressure of 20% or greater is associated with a very low risk of variceal bleeding. The combination of both parameters allows almost optimal prognostication.

CO(2) wedged hepatic venography in the evaluation of portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND/AIMS/METHODS: During hepatic vein catheterisation, in addition to measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), iodine wedged retrograde portography can be easily obtained. However, it rarely allows correct visualisation of the portal vein. Recently, CO(2) has been suggested to allow better angiographic demonstration of the portal vein than iodine. In this study we investigated the efficacy of CO(2) compared with iodinated contrast medium for portal vein imaging and its role in the evaluation of portal hypertension in a series of 100 patients undergoing hepatic vein catheterisation, 71 of whom had liver cirrhosis. RESULTS: In the overall series, CO(2) venography was markedly superior to iodine, allowing correct visualisation of the different segments of the portal venous system. In addition, CO(2), but not iodine, visualised portal-systemic collaterals in 34 patients. In cirrhosis, non-visualisation of the portal vein on CO(2) venography occurred in 11 cases; four had portal vein thrombosis and five had communications between different hepatic veins. Among non-cirrhotics, lack of portal vein visualisation had a 90% sensitivity, 88% specificity, 94% negative predictive value, and 83% positive predictive value in the diagnosis of pre-sinusoidal portal hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Visualisation of the venous portal system by CO(2) venography is markedly superior to iodine. The use of CO(2) wedged portography is a useful and safe complementary procedure during hepatic vein catheterisation which may help to detect portal thrombosis. Also, lack of demonstration of the portal vein in non-cirrhotic patients strongly suggests the presence of pre-sinusoidal portal hypertension.

Effects of end-to-side portacaval shunt and distal splenorenal shunt on systemic and pulmonary haemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis exhibit splanchnic, peripheral and pulmonary vasodilation, which are thought to play a role in increasing portal pressure, promoting sodium retention and determining arterial hypoxaemia. The present study investigated whether these abnormalities are influenced by portal hypertension or by portal systemic shunting. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with cirrhosis who had haemodynamic measurements before and after end-to-side portacaval shunt (n = 30) or distal splenorenal shunt (n = 31) were evaluated. RESULTS: End-to-side portacaval shunts were more effective than distal splenorenal shunts in decompressing the portal system (portocaval pressure gradient 3.2 +/- 2.5 vs splenocaval gradient 6.5 +/- 3.2 mmHg, P < 0.0001), because of a greater shunt blood flow (33 +/- 12 vs 21 +/- 12 mL/min per kg, P < 0.005). Azygos blood flow and hepatic blood flow decreased significantly after both surgical shunts. However, end-to-side portacaval shunts caused a greater decrease in peripheral resistance than distal splenorenal shunts (-23 +/- 18 vs -11+/- 27%, P < 0.05). Mean arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were significantly reduced after an end-to-side portacaval shunt (-7 +/- 10%, P < 0.001 and -14 +/- 33%, P < 0.004, respectively), but not after splenorenal shunt. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that end-to-side portacaval shunts, despite normalizing portal pressure, worsen the peripheral and pulmonary vasodilatation. The splenorenal shunt that maintained a higher portal pressure, caused less peripheral vasodilatation and did not enhance pulmonary vasodilatation. These findings suggest that portal systemic shunting is more important than increased portal pressure in determining peripheral vasodilatation in cirrhosis.

Wedged hepatic venous pressure adequately reflects portal pressure in hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis.

Wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) is equivalent to portal venous pressure in patients with alcoholic liver diseases. However, it may underestimate portal pressure in nonalcoholics, which is important because hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a frequent cause of chronic liver disease. We investigated the agreement between directly measured portal pressure and WHVP in alcoholic and HCV-related liver diseases. Seventy-one patients with liver disease resulting from HCV infection (n = 32), alcohol (n = 25), or both (n = 14) underwent simultaneous measurements of WHVP (by hepatic vein catheterization) and portal pressure (by direct puncture). In 9 patients, measurements were repeated 20 minutes after acute iv propranolol administration. WHVP showed an excellent agreement with portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis resulting from either HCV, alcohol or both (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.94, 0.93, and 0.97, respectively; P <.001). A discrepancy of >/=5 mm Hg was observed in 7 cases. WHVP underestimated portal pressure in only 1 case and exceeded portal pressure by >/=5 mm Hg in 6 patients. The WHVP response to propranolol closely and significantly correlated with changes in portal pressure (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.87; P <.004). The simple and safe measurement of WHVP accurately reflects portal pressure in alcoholic and HCV-related liver disease. This technique also allows us to accurately assess the portal pressure response to propranolol in both alcoholic and HCV-related cirrhosis.

Prognostic value of early measurements of portal pressure in acute variceal bleeding.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Variceal bleeding is the most important complication of portal hypertension. However, the relationship between the increase in portal pressure and the outcome of variceal bleeding has not been well defined. METHODS: We measured the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of 65 cirrhotic patients with acute variceal hemorrhage, early after admission (20.6 +/- 15.6 hours). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients had a poor evolution (failure to control bleeding or early variceal rebleeding), and 42 had an uneventful evolution. The only variable associated with outcome was the HVPG, which was higher in patients with a poor evolution (23.7 +/- 6.1 vs. 19.2 +/- 3.3 mm Hg; P < 0.0004). This was confirmed by multivariate analysis. HVPG was >/=20 mm Hg in 19 of 23 patients with poor evolution vs. 12 of 42 patients with uneventful evolution (P < 0.0001). An initial HVPG of >/=20 mm Hg was associated with a significantly longer intensive care unit stay (7 +/- 5 vs. 4 +/- 2 days; P < 0.02), longer hospital stay (19 +/- 10 vs. 14 +/- 6 days; P < 0.02), greater transfusion requirements (9.0 +/- 7.7 vs. 4.7 +/- 3.2 UU; P < 0.007), and a worse actuarial probability of survival (1-year mortality, 64% vs. 20%; P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Early measurement of HVPG in cirrhotic patients during acute variceal bleeding provides useful prognostic information on the evolution of the bleeding episode and long-term survival.

Persistent hypertransaminasemia as the presenting feature of celiac disease.

Asymptomatic persistent hypertransaminasemia unrelated to hepatitis viral infection is a common cause of referral to the hepatologist. Less frequent liver diseases should then be considered, as well as extrahepatic-origin hypertransaminasemia. Celiac disease, although it has repeatedly been reported as a cause of persistent hypertransaminasemia, is often not included in its differential diagnosis in the absence of the classic malabsorption syndrome. We present the cases of four patients sent to a liver unit for evaluation of persistent hypertransaminasemia in whom celiac disease was finally discovered. Our report highlights the importance of including celiac disease in list of conditions potentially responsible for chronic hypertransaminasemia of unknown cause.

Influence of pharmacological agents on portal hemodynamics: basis for its use in the treatment of portal hypertension.

Progress in the knowledge of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension has opened the door to pharmacological treatments, resulting in a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to portal hypertension. This review summarizes pharmacological agents that have been shown to effectively decrease portal pressure, paying special attention to its mechanisms of action. In addition, the way to monitor response and clinical efficacy of pharmacological agents is reviewed.

Randomized controlled trial of sclerotherapy versus somatostatin infusion in the prevention of early rebleeding following acute variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis. Variceal Bleeding Study Group.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Early rebleeding is a very frequent complication of variceal hemorrhage. Sclerotherapy effectively controls variceal hemorrhage and prevents early rebleeding. Somatostatin infusion is as effective as sclerotherapy in controlling variceal hemorrhage, but no study has evaluated the efficacy of 5-day somatostatin infusion in preventing early rebleeding after the initial control of bleeding. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of somatostatin and sclerotherapy in the prevention of early variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: The study included 169 patients with acute variceal hemorrhage who were randomized within 24 h of controlling the acute bleeding to receive either sclerotherapy (n=79) or continuous somatostatin infusion for 5 days (250 microg/h after a 250-microg bolus, repeated every 24 h, n=90). Success of therapy was defined by absence of rebleeding during the 5 days following randomization. RESULTS: Early (5 days) rebleeding occurred in 12/79 patients treated with sclerotherapy vs 14/90 of those receiving somatostatin (NS). The treatment was equally effective in Child's C patients (sclerotherapy: 18/20; somatostatin: 17/20; NS) and Child's A+B patients (sclerotherapy: 49/59; somatostatin: 59/70; NS). Complications occurred in 19/79 patients receiving sclerotherapy vs 4/90 in the somatostatin group (p= 0.00019), being severe in 6 vs 0 patients (p=0.0094). There were no differences between the two groups in the incidence of 6-week rebleeding (14% vs 15%, NS) and mortality (9% vs 9%). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous somatostatin infusion is as effective as sclerotherapy in preventing early variceal rebleeding and maintaining low mortality following acute variceal hemorrhage. Somatostatin is associated with a lower rate of complications than sclerotherapy.

Effects of increasing blood hemoglobin levels on systemic hemodynamics of acutely anemic cirrhotic patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In experimental portal hypertension, blood hemoglobin levels have been shown to influence the hyperdynamic circulatory state. The aim of this study was to assess the hemodynamic effects of increasing hemoglobin concentration in human portal hypertension. METHODS: Sixteen cirrhotic patients recovering from a variceal bleeding episode were randomly assigned to receive two units of packed red cells or 500 ml of a protein solution. Systemic and portal hemodynamics, and rheological and hormonal parameters were measured at baseline and after expansion. RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to the degree of liver failure, severity of the bleeding episode, activation of the endogenous vasopressor systems, and hemodynamic parameters. The administration of either erythrocytes or a protein solution prompted a similar increase in total blood volume and suppression of vasopressor systems. Both groups of patients experienced similar increases in wedged hepatic venous pressure. Hepatic venous pressure gradient was not significantly modified but tended to increase in erythrocyte-transfused patients. Cardiopulmonary pressures increased, but this increment was significant in the non-blood-transfused patients only. Cardiac output decreased in erythrocyte-transfused patients, while it increased in the group receiving a protein solution. Red blood cell transfusion resulted in an increase in systemic vascular hindrance (resistance/blood viscosity), whereas the administration of a protein solution prompted a decrease in this parameter, thus reflecting true vasoconstriction and vasodilation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in blood hemoglobin in acutely anemic cirrhotic patients attenuates their hyperdynamic circulation beyond viscosity-dependent changes, an effect which might be counteracted by the effects on portal venous pressure gradient.

Effects of propranolol on the hepatic hemodynamic response to physical exercise in patients with cirrhosis.

Physical exercise increases portal pressure (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG]) in patients with cirrhosis. It is unknown if this deleterious effect is associated with changes in gastroesophageal collateral blood flow and if these can be prevented by propranolol administration. The aim of this study was to characterize the effects of propranolol on the splanchnic hemodynamic response to exercise in patients with cirrhosis. Twenty-three patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension had hemodynamic measurements in baseline conditions, and during moderate cycling exercise (40 W) under double-blind propranolol or placebo administration. In patients receiving placebo, HVPG significantly increased during exercise (from 16.7 +/- 0.9 to 19.0 +/- 1.0 mm Hg; P < .01), hepatic blood flow (HBF) decreased (-18% +/- 4%; P < .01), while azygos blood flow (AzBF) was unchanged (4% +/- 12%; ns). In patients receiving propranolol, portal pressure did not increase during exercise, but decreased from 16.3 +/- 1.0 to 12.9 +/- 1.1 mm Hg (P < .01). The lack of increase in HVPG in response to exercise in patients receiving propranolol may be related to a more pronounced decrease in HBF, as compared with patients receiving placebo, and to a blunted increase in cardiac output (CO). Moderate physical exercise adversely influences the hepatic hemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis, causing a significant increase in portal pressure. This is effectively prevented by propranolol pretreatment.