Desensitization in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation With Low ABO Iso-Agglutinin Titers.

BACKGROUND: In ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation (KT) with low iso-agglutinin (IG) titers (IGT), standard pre-conditioning treatment might be excessive. To try to answer this question, we evaluated the pre-conditioning requirements of a group of ABOi KT with low ABO IGT in our center. Our main objective was to assess desensitization requirements for ABOi KT with low IGT (<16) at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from 2006 to 2014. METHODS: A retrospective study of desensitization (rituximab and plasma exchange [PE]) requirements for ABOi KT with IGT <16 was conducted. RESULTS: One and 5 years after KT, patient survival was 100%. Renal graft survival was 90% at 1 and 5 years after KT. Mean PE performed before KT was 1.7 (standard deviation [SD], 1.703); 50% of the patients did not receive PE after transplantation, 30% received 2 sessions of PE, and 20% received only 1. The average is 0.8 (SD, 0.91).Follow-up IG determinations remained with low titers (≤8/8). No rebounds of titers were observed during the first 4 to 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients with IGT ≤8 required none or only 1 PE session to reach acceptable titers (titers ≤4) to perform ABOi KT safely. This information is useful to assess the possibility of a minimized desensitization protocol in ABOi KT donors with low titers of IG to reduce adverse effects, reduce cost, and simplify pre-transplant logistics.

Pre-Emptive Retransplantation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Graft Failure.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the group of patients receiving a new kidney transplant before starting dialysis again (pre-reTR) with a group of patients receiving a new kidney transplant after restarting dialysis (reTR). METHODS: This retrospective cohort included all the kidney retransplantations (second transplantations) between 2000 and 2012 performed at our center and their follow-up until July 2014. We analysed graft and patient survival, rejection rates, and immunologic parameters of these patients. RESULTS: We studied 18 patients who had pre-reTR and 83 who had reTR. In the pre-reTR group no patient had panel-reactive assay (PRA) >10% at any time. In the reTR group 26.5% had PRA >10% at the time of transplantation (P = .014) and 54.2% had a historical highest PRA >10% (P < .001). The rejection rate was 11.1% in the pre-reTR group and 27.7% in the reTR group during the first year post-retransplantation (P = .227). Patient survival rate was 100% in the pre-reTR group at 5 years of follow-up, whereas in the reTR group at 1 year it was 95.2% and 85.9% at 5 years after retransplantation. Allograft survival at 1 and 5 years was 88% and 89%, respectively, in the pre-reTR group. On the other hand, in the reTR group it was 89% after the first year and 65% at 5 years post-retransplantation. CONCLUSION: Pre-emptive renal retransplantation is a feasible option that should be assessed in patients with kidney graft failure and may help to minimize the morbidity associated with dialysis reinitiation.

Impact of urinary tract infections on short-term kidney graft outcome.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are frequent after renal transplantation, but their impact on short-term graft outcome is not well established. All kidney transplants performed between July 2003 and December 2010 were investigated to evaluate the impact of UTI on graft function at 1 year after transplantation. Of 867 patients who received a kidney transplant, 184 (21%) developed at least one episode of UTI, at a median of 18 days after transplantation. The prevalence of acute graft pyelonephritis (AGP) was 15%. The most frequent pathogens identified were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 37% of which were considered to be multidrug-resistant strains. Thirty-eight patients (4%) lost their grafts, 225 patients (26%) had graft function impairment and the 1-year mortality rate was 3%; however, no patient died as a consequence of a UTI. Surgical re-intervention and the development of at least one episode of AGP were independently associated with 1-year graft function impairment. Moreover, the development of at least one episode of AGP was associated with graft loss at 1 year. Patients with AGP caused by a resistant strain had graft function impairment more frequently, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (53% vs. 36%, p 0.07). Neither asymptomatic bacteriuria nor acute uncomplicated UTI were associated with graft function impairment in multivariate analysis. To conclude, UTIs are frequent in kidney transplant recipients, especially in the early post-transplantation period. Although AGP was significantly associated with kidney graft function impairment and 1-year post-transplantation graft loss, lower UTIs did not affect graft function.

Economic analysis of the treatment of end-stage renal disease treatment: living-donor kidney transplantation versus hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a major public health problem in the Spanish health system. Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice, offering better survival and cost-effectiveness than other alternatives. This study aimed to compare the cost of living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) during the first year after transplantation with that of hemodialysis (HD). METHOD: A prospective, descriptive study of cost and efficacy was performed in the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona from January to December 2011. We included 106 patients (57 undergoing HD and 49 receiving a LDKT). The costs of LDKT (donor and recipient) and HD were calculated based on our economic database program. RESULTS: The mean age of recipients and donors was 46 ± 15 and 52 ± 10 years, respectively, and 67% of the recipients were men. In HD patients, the mean age was 67 ± 11 years and 62% were men. The total cost of LDKT was €29,897.91 (€8,128.44 for donors and €21,769.47 for recipients). The total cost of HD was €43,000.88 (€37,917 for HD and related procedures plus €5,082 for transport). LDKT represented a savings of €13,102.97 per patient/year and the payback period was less than 1 year. Quality-adjusted life years were higher in LDKT than in HD patients. CONCLUSION: LDKT is cost effective during the first year after transplantation and is associated with enhanced quality of life. From both the medical and economic points of view, pre-emptive LDKD should be encouraged in Spain to reduce the health budget for ESRD.

Polyclonal versus monoclonal induction therapy in a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation: a comparison of efficacy and costs.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy in renal transplantation reduces the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in expanded criteria donation (ECD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD). We compared the efficacy of Thymoglobulin (Sanofi-Aventis, Spain), ATG Fresenius (ATG-Fresenius, Spain), and Simulect (Novartis Farm, Spain) in a calcineurin-free protocol in ECD and DCD renal transplantation by evaluating patient survival, graft survival, and AR at 1 year and overall costs. METHODS: An observational retrospective study was performed using our database of 289 consecutive cadaveric ECD renal transplant recipients (n = 178) and DCD recipients (n = 111) from April 1999 to December 2011. Induction therapy consisted of Simulect, Thymoglobulin, and ATG Fresenius. Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free maintenance therapy consisted of mycophenolate mofetil or sodium and steroids. RESULTS: There were no differences in the patients' demographic characteristics or patient and graft survival. One-year AR rates were equivalent (ECD: 10%, 19.1%, 17.7% versus DCD: 14.3%, 7.1%, 16.7%). Leukopenia and thrombopenia were significantly more frequent in the ECD group treated with polyclonal induction. The average total cost of transplantation was higher in the ECD group but there were no significant differences in the average total cost between ECD and DCD: 39,970.31 ± 7,732€ versus 35,058.34 ± 6,801€ (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Our study shows the same efficacy with polyclonal and monoclonal antibody induction and a CNI-free treatment regimen in ECD and DCD renal transplantation with no differences in overall costs at 1 year after transplantation.

Impact of antibiotic resistance on the development of recurrent and relapsing symptomatic urinary tract infection in kidney recipients.

We sought to determine the frequency, risk factors, and clinical impact of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) in kidney transplant recipients. Of 867 patients who received a kidney transplant between 2003 and 2010, 174 (20%) presented at least one episode of UTI. Fifty-five patients presented a recurrent UTI (32%) and 78% of them could be also considered relapsing episodes. Recurrent UTI was caused by extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (31%), followed by non-ESBL producing Escherichia coli (15%), multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14%), and ESBL-producing E. coli (13%). The variables associated with a higher risk of recurrent UTI were a first or second episode of infection by MDR bacteria (OR 12; 95%CI 528), age >60 years (OR 2.2; 95%CI 1.15.1), and reoperation (OR 3; 95%CI 1.37.1). In addition, more relapses were recorded in patients with UTI caused by MDR organisms than in those with susceptible microorganisms. There were no differences in acute rejection, graft function, graft loss or 1 year mortality between groups. In conclusion, recurrent UTI is frequent among kidney recipients and associated with MDR organism. Classic risk factors for UTI (female gender and diabetes) are absent in kidney recipients, thus highlighting the relevance of uropathogens in this population.

Long-term experience with kidney transplantation from hepatitis C-positive donors into hepatitis C-positive recipients.

Kidney transplantation from hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positive donors (HCVD+) into HCV antibody positive recipients (HCVR+) is controversial. We implemented this policy in our units in 1990. Herein, we report the long-term safety of this strategy. From March 1990 to March 2007, 162 HCVR+ received a kidney from HCVD+ (group 1) and 306 from HCVD- (group 2) in our units. Mean follow-up was 74.5 months. Five-and 10-year patient survival was 84.8% and 72.7% in group 1 vs. 86.6% and 76.5% in group 2 (p = 0.250). Three deaths in group 1 and two in group 2 were liver-disease related. Five- and 10-year graft survival was 58.9% and 34.4% versus 65.5% and 47.6% respectively (p = 0.006) while death-censored graft survival was 69% and 47% versus 72.7% and 58.5% (p = 0.055). Decompensated chronic liver disease was similar: 10.3% versus 6.2%. Cox-regression analysis could not identify the donor's HCV serology as a significant risk factor for death, graft failure and severe liver disease in HCVR+. In conclusion, long-term outcome of HCVR+ transplanted with kidneys from HCVD+ seems good in terms of patient survival, graft survival and liver disease. HCVD+ was not a significant risk factor for mortality, graft failure and liver disease among HCVR+. These data strongly suggest that the use of kidneys from HCVD+ in HCVR+ is a safe long-term strategy that helps to prevent kidney loss.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation in patients with cirrhosis and chronic kidney disease.

The outcome of patients with cirrhosis and chronic kidney disease treated with combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) is not well known because most series of patients treated with CLKT include not only patients with cirrhosis but also patients with inherited diseases without cirrhosis. To evaluate to what extent the combined kidney transplantation impairs posttransplantation outcome compared to liver transplantation (LT) alone, the outcome of patients with cirrhosis and chronic kidney disease treated with CLKT (n = 20) was compared to that of a group of patients with cirrhosis without chronic kidney disease treated with LT alone matched by age, sex, year of transplantation and severity of cirrhosis (n = 60). The primary end point of the study was survival, and secondary end points were outcome of renal function and complications within 6 months of transplantation. Patients with CLKT had a higher incidence of bacterial infections and transfusion requirements compared to LT patients. The incidence of acute renal failure during the first 6 months was similar, yet the severity of renal failure was greater in patients with CLKT. Hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays were longer in the CLKT group. One- and three-year survival probabilities in patients treated with CLKT were 80 and 75% compared to 97 and 88%, respectively, in patients treated with LT. In conclusion, CLKT for patients with cirrhosis and chronic kidney disease is associated with a relatively high frequency of postoperative complications that moderately impairs short-term survival. However, 3-year survival of patients with cirrhosis treated with CLKT is excellent.

Trasplante renal ABO incompatible: de un sueño a una realidad. Experiencia del Hospital Clínic de Barcelona / ABO incompatible living donor kidney transplantation: a dream come true. Experience of Hospital Clínic of Barcelona

Introducción: En los últimos años se ha mantenido estable el número de pacientes en lista de espera para un trasplante renal. El trasplante renal de donante vivo representa actualmente una vía para aumentar el pool de donantes, pero hay un grupo de pacientes que presentan incompatibilidad de grupo sanguíneo ABO, lo que contraindicaba hasta ahora que pudiera llevarse a cabo el trasplante. Nuestro objetivo consiste en describir nuestra experiencia con el programa de trasplante renal de donante vivo con incompatibilidad de grupo ABO. Material y métodos: Se trata de un estudio de retrospectivo-descriptivo de los primeros 11 pacientes sometidos a trasplante renal de donante vivo ABO incompatible en el Hospital Clínic de Barcelona desde octubre de 2006 a enero de 2009. Se utilizó un protocolo de acondicionamiento basado en inmunoadsorción específica (con número sesiones necesarias hasta conseguir títulos de isoaglutininas aceptables pretrasplante), inmunoglobulina policlonal inespecífica y anticuerpo monoclonal anti-CD20, seguido del tratamiento inmunosupresor adaptado a cada receptor. Se determinaron títulos de isoaglutininas antes del tratamiento de acondicionamiento, pretrasplante y postrasplante durante las primeras 2 semanas. La valoración inmunológica, médica y quirúrgica fue la habitual en el programa de trasplante renal de donante vivo. Resultados: La edad media de los donantes y receptores fue de 47,8 ± 12,4 y 44,4 ± 14,1 años, respectivamente. Un 90,1% de los donantes fue mujer y un 72,7% de los receptores, hombres. El tiempo de seguimiento medio fue de 10,2 ± 10,2 meses. Hermanos y esposos fueron las relaciones más frecuentes (n = 4, 36,4%, respectivamente), al igual que la causa de nefropatía fueron la glomerulopatía, poliquistosis y el síndrome de Alport (n = 2, 18,2% para cada enfermedad renal primaria). Todos los pacientes adquirieron un título de isoaglutininas correctos pretrasplante (<8) y requirieron 5,54 ± 2,6 sesiones de inmunoadsorción pretrasplante y 2,82 sesiones postrasplante. Un paciente no requirió ninguna sesión de inmunoadsorción (única con incompatibilidad anti-B) y otro requirió recambios plasmáticos, en vez de inmunoadsorciones, por tratarse de un potencial receptor hipersensibilizado con crossmatch por citometría de flujo positivo. Los títulos de isoaglutininas postrasplante se mantuvieron a títulos bajos. Dos pacientes presentaron un episodio de rechazo agudo celular (Banff IA e IB), con buena respuesta al tratamiento. La supervivencia de paciente y del injerto fue de un 90,9% en el primer año y se mantuvo estable a lo largo del seguimiento. Únicamente se registró una pérdida del injerto por fallecimiento en relación con una complicación hemorrágica en las primeras 72 horas sin relación con la incompatibilidad de grupo ABO. La función de injerto renal al año es excelente, con valores de creatinina sérica de 1,3 ± 0,8 mg/dl, con aclaramiento de creatinina ajustado a superficie corporal 62,6 ml/min/1,73 m2 y proteinuria de 244,9 mg/orina de 24 horas. Conclusiones: El trasplante renal de donante vivo con incompatibilidad de grupo sanguíneo representa una alternativa eficaz y segura en determinados pacientes en lista de espera de trasplante renal, obteniendo resultados excelentes de supervivencia de paciente e injerto y con una buena función de injerto renal (AU)

Introduction: During the last years the number of patients on waiting list for kidney transplantation has been stable. Living donor kidney transplantation is nowadays a chance to increase the pool of donors. However, there are a group of patients with ABO incompatibility, making impossible the transplant until now. The aim of the present study is to describe the experience of Hospital Clinic Barcelona on ABO incompatible living transplantation. Material and methods: A retrospective-descriptive study was made based on 11 living donor kidney recipients with ABO incompatibility in Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from October’06 to January’09. Selective blood group, antibody removal with specific immunoadsortion, immunoglobulin and anti-CD20 antibody were made until the immunoglobulin (IgG) and isoaglutinine (IgM) antibody titters were 1/8 or lower. Immunosuppressive protocol was adjusted to particular recipient characteristics. Isoaglutinine titters were set before, during and post desensitization treatment and two weeks after transplant. Immunological, medical and surgical evaluation was the standard in living donor kidney transplant program. Results: Medium age of donors and recipients were 47.8 ±12.4 and 44.4 ± 14.1 years, respectively. 90% of donors were females and 73% of recipients males. Follow-up time was 10.2 ±10.2 months. Siblings and spouses were the most frequent relation (n = 4, 36.4%, respectively). Chronic glomerulonephritis, adult polycystic kidney disease and Alport syndrome, the most frequent cause of end-stage renal disease. All the patients acquire appropriate isoaglutinine titters pre transplant (<1/8), requiring 5.54 ± 2.6 immunoadsorption sessions pretransplant and 2.82 postransplant. One patient didn´t need any immunoadsorption session (incompatibility blood group B) and another patient plasma exchange instead of immunoadsorption for being hipersensitized with positive flow cytometry crossmath. Postransplant isoaglutinine titters remained low. Two patients had cellular acute rejection episode (type IA and IB of Banff classification) with good response to corticosteroid treatment. Patient and graft survival were 91% at first year and remain stable during the follow-up. A graft lost by death of patient in relation to haemorrhagic shock developed within the first 72 hours after transplantation. Renal graft function at first year was excellent with serum creatinina of 1.3 ± 0.8 mg/dl, creatinine clearance of 62.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 and proteinuria of 244.9 mg/U 24 h. Conclusion: ABO incompatible living donor kidney transplantation represent an effective and safe alternative in certain patients on waiting list for renal transplant, obtaining excellent results in patient and graft survival, with good renal graft function (AU)

[ABO incompatible living donor kidney transplantation: a dream come true. Experience of Hospital Clínic of Barcelona]. / Trasplante renal ABO incompatible: de un sueño a una realidad. Experiencia del Hospital Clínic de Barcelona.

INTRODUCTION: During the last years the number of patients on waiting list for kidney transplantation has been stable. Living donor kidney transplantation is nowadays a chance to increase the pool of donors. However, there are a group of patients with ABO incompatibility, making impossible the transplant until now. The aim of the present study is to describe the experience of Hospital Clinic Barcelona on ABO incompatible living transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective- descriptive study was made based on 11 living donor kidney recipients with ABO incompatibility in Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from October'06 to January'09. Selective blood group, antibody removal with specific immunoadsortion, immunoglobulin and anti- CD 20 antibody were made until the immunoglobulin (IgG) and isoaglutinine (IgM) antibody titters were 1/8 or lower. Immunosuppressive protocol was adjusted to particular recipient characteristics. Isoaglutinine titters were set before, during and post desensitization treatment and two weeks after transplant. Immunological, medical and surgical evaluation was the standard in living donor kidney transplant program. RESULTS: Medium age of donors and recipients were 47.8 +/- 12.4 and 44.4 +/- 14.1 years, respectively. 90% of donors were females and 73% of recipients males. Follow-up time was 10.2 +/- 10.2 months. Siblings and spouses were the most frequent relation (n=4, 36.4%, respectively). Chronic glomerulonephritis, adult polycystic kidney disease and Alport syndrome, the most frequent cause of end-stage renal disease. All the patients acquire appropriate isoaglutinine titters pre transplant (< 1/8), requiring 5.54 +/- 2.6 immunoadsorption sessions pretransplant and 2.82 posttransplant. One patient didn t need any immunoadsorption session (incompatibility blood group B) and another patient plasma exchange instead of immunoadsorption for being hypersensitized with positive flow cytometry crossmatch. Posttransplant isoaglutinine titters remained low. Two patients had cellular acute rejection episode (type IA and IB of Banff classification) with good response to corticosteroid treatment. Patient and graft survival were 91% at first year and remain stable during the follow-up. A graft lost by death of patient in relation to haemorrhagic shock developed within the first 72 hours after transplantation. Renal graft function at first year was excellent with serum creatinine of 1.3 +/- 0.8 mg/dl, creatinine clearance of 62.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 and proteinuria of 244.9 mg/U-24h. CONCLUSION: ABO incompatible living donor kidney transplantation represent an effective and safe alternative in certain patients on waiting list for renal transplant, obtaining excellent results in patient and graft survival, with good renal graft function.

Risk factors for infection with extended-spectrum and AmpC beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative rods in renal transplantation.

Increasing prevalence of infections caused by multiresistant gram-negative enteric bacilli due to synthesis of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) or to desrepressed chromosomic AmpC beta-lactamase (AmpC) is a major concern in the hospitalized patient population. Renal transplant recipients are especially susceptible to these infections. A cohort observational study in a 3-year period was performed. ESBL-production was determined by phenotypic analysis based on the CLSI recommendations. A multi-variate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent variables associated with multi-resistant gram-negative bacilli infection. The study included 417 patients (61 double kidney-pancreas recipients). The incidence of ESBL-producing and desrepressed chromosomic AmpC beta-lactamase resistance was 11.8% (49 patients). The most frequent bacteria isolated was E. coli (35/60 isolations), followed by Klebsiella spp(12/60 isolations). Double kidney-pancreas transplantation(OR 3.5, CI95% 1.6-7.8), previous use of antibiotics(OR 2.1,CI95% 1.1-4.1), posttransplant dialysis requirement (OR 3.1, CI95% 1.5-6.4) and posttransplant urinary obstruction (OR 5.8, CI95% 2.2-14.9) were independent variables associated with these multiresistant gram-negative enteric bacilli infections. The incidence of ESBL-producing and desrepressed AmpC beta-lactamase gram-negative enteric bacilli infection in our population was high. These infections are associated with significant morbidity after renal transplantation.

Calcineurin inhibitor reduction based on maintenance immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant patients: POP study.

Since calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been introduced, they have become the cornerstone of immunosuppression for renal transplant patients, but their cardiovascular and neurological toxicities, and primarily their renal toxicity, have brought about an increased effort to find combinations of immunosuppressants that are either CNI-free or that use minimum doses of these drugs. The weight of immunosuppression therefore lies with drugs that have a better toxicity profile. The POP observational transverse study including 213 renal transplant patients was designed to study CNI minimization strategies. The mean time of transplant evolution to the time of reduction was 9.9 +/- 11.8 months. The acute rejection rate to the start of reduction was 9.4%. Almost all the patients were undergoing treatment with CNI + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + steroids in the immediate posttransplantation period. When reduction was chosen, all patients were undergoing treatment with MMF (mean dose at the start of reduction = 1490.7 +/- 478.0 mg/d). Among the cohort, 66.7% of patients were being treated with tacrolimus (mean C0 levels 13.3 +/- 6.6 ng/mL) and 33.3% with cyclosporine (mean C0 levels 192.2 +/- 94.0 ng/mL; mean C2 levels 1097.5 +/- 457.6). The main reasons for withdrawal were nephrotoxicity (55.9% of the cases), as well as prevention of adverse effects (21.6%). The mean target CNI dose reduction was 41.4% +/- 21.45% in the tacrolimus group and 28.6 +/- 10.0% in the cyclosporine group. In conclusion, CNI toxicity, primarily renal toxicity, makes reduction of these drugs based on the use of full MMF doses an alternative to manage renal transplant patients.

Gastrointestinal complications in renal transplant recipients: MITOS study.

INTRODUCTION AND METHODS: An epidemiologic multicenter study was performed to evaluate the prevalence and management of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in solid organ transplant patients. A total of 1788 recipients were included, 1132 of which corresponded to renal transplanted patients. RESULTS: The mean age for the renal transplanted patients was 52 +/- 13.2 years. The mean time from the transplantation was 5.4 +/- 5.4 years. 17.7% showed some pretransplant GI disease, while 53% presented this type of complication in the posttransplant period. Diarrhea was the most prevalent GI complication (51.5%) and digestive perforation was the GI disorder that affected the patients daily living the most. From the patients with GI complications, 71% received pharmacological treatment, using gastric protectors in 91.3% of the cases. Regarding immunosuppressive drugs, in 30.9% of the cases the dose of the drug was reduced, in 9.3% discontinued temporarily and in 7.5% discontinued permanently. These changes mainly affected the MMF (89%, 83% and 74% for dose change, temporary and permanent discontinuation, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of GI complications in renal transplant exceeded 50%, and affected patients' daily living. The management of these complications was based on treatment with gastric protectors, dose reduction and/or partial or definitive MMF discontinuation.

Epidemiology and outcomes of multiple antibiotic-resistant bacterial infection in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Mutiresistant bacterial infections are an emerging problem in the nosocomial setting. Our objectives were to describe the incidence, outcome, and risk factors for acquisition of multiresistant bacteria among renal transplant recipients. METHODS: We prospectively followed patients undergoing kidney transplantation over a 3-year period. We collected demographic features, underlying chronic diseases, and main transplant characteristics and complications. Multiple antibiotic resistance was defined for the most important bacteria: Enteric gram-negative bacilli resistant to betalactamics, cephalosporins, and quinolones; Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin, cotrimoxazole, and clindamcin; Enterococcus spp resistant to ampicillin and quinolones; nonfermentator bacilli resistant to all antibiotics except aminoglycosides and collistin. RESULTS: Overall, 416 patients included 65 double transplants (62 kidney-pancreas and three kidney-liver) of mean age 48.5 years, and 57% men. Infection with multiresistant bacteria was observed in 58 patients (14%). Most frequent multiresistant bacteria were: Escherichia coli (n = 33), Klebsiella spp (n = 15), Citrobacter spp (n = 8), Enterobacter spp (n = 5), Morganella morganii (n = 2), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 16), Acinetobacter baumanii (n = 2), Enterococcus spp (n = 9) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, n = 2). Age greater than 50 years, hepatitis C virus infection, double kidney-pancreas transplantation, requirement for posttransplant hemodialysis, surgical reoperation, and requirement for nephrostomy were independent variables associated with multiresistant bacterial infection. Most used antibiotics for treatment were: carbapenems (65%), amikacin (12%), linezolid, piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin, collistin, and fosfomycin. Infection with multiresistant bacteria was associated with a worse prognosis (graft loss or death, 19% vs 8%, P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of infection with multiresistant bacteria in our renal transplant cohort was high, being most frequently cephalosporin-resistant enteric gram-negative bacilli and multiresistant P aeruginosa. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus incidence was low. Infection with multiresistant bacteria conferred a worse prognosis.

Lessons from cyclosporine monotherapy in renal transplantation: the impact of acute rejection on long-term allograft outcome.

UNLABELLED: The introduction of cyclosporine in kidney transplantation rapidly improved short and medium term graft and patient survival rates. Initially many trials used cyclosporine monotherapy to avoid steroid toxicity, but high acute rejection rates lead to a change in the immunosuppressant scheme. The use of prophylactic steroids significantly decreased acute rejection rates, but the long-term benefit of such a reduction has not been assessed. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the impact of early acute rejection on long-term outcome (10 years) in 264 consecutive renal transplants performed in a single institution between 1986 and 1993 using cyclosporine monotherapy (CM) (n=139) versus cyclosporine and prednisone (CS) (n=125). Different protocols were used for elderly or immunological high-risk patients and for transplants with delayed graft function and therefore these patients are not included. The incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes and long-term patient and graft survivals were analyzed. RESULTS: At 1 year, acute rejection episodes showed significantly higher frequency in the CM group than in the CS group (72.66% vs 46.40%). Nevertheless, graft and patient survival rates were similar at 1, 5, and 10 years (Graft: 96.38%, 78.77%, and 59.84% vs 92.59%, 75.62%, and 53.44%; PATIENT: 99.27%, 95.06%, and 84.76% and 95.9%, 93.09%, and 88.28%). CONCLUSION: The addition of prophylactic steroids decreases the incidence of acute rejection but does not improve the long-term graft survival. These findings suggest that in an era of new immunosuppressants, fewer acute rejection episodes will be evident requiring more effort to detect and treat subclinical rejections.

Diagnosis and treatment of acute humoral rejection after kidney transplantation: preliminary experience.

BACKGROUND: Acute humoral rejection, or rejection associated with de novo production of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after kidney transplantation (KTx), is a clinicopathologic entity that is not completely understood. Recent studies have proposed criteria for its diagnosis, including: (1) steroid-resistant acute dysfunction; (2) positive post-Tx donor-specific crossmatch (XM); and (3) widespread C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC) upon renal biopsy. METHODS: During 2002, prospective screening for AHR was established at our unit, seeking DSA post-KTx in selected cases of steroid-resistant acute rejection or acute dysfunction in high-risk sensitized or re-Tx patients. Frozen donor lymphocytes were used for post-Tx flow cytometry (FC) XM and high-definition flow PRA for patients with no frozen donor cells. We treated patients diagnosed with DSA using plasma exchange and polyclonal immunoglobulin. RESULTS: Post-Tx DSA studies were performed in 9 of 94 patients transplanted during 2002. We detected DSA post-Tx in 3 of 9 recipients: 2 by FCXM and 1 using high-definition flow PRA. Two were highly sensitized pre-Tx, but the third patient was a 70-year-old woman receiving a first Tx (PRA=0%). All 3 recipients presented with severe steroid-resistant acute renal dysfunction during the first 2 weeks post-Tx. Biopsies showed some features of AHR (neutrophils in PTC); 1 case showed no signs of concomitant cellular rejection. All rejection episodes were treated successfully (XM became negative and renal function recovered) by combining plasma exchange and polyclonal immunoglobulin. CONCLUSIONS: The use of specific tools, like the crossmatch, in cases of acute, steroid-resistant renal graft dysfunction is important to identify and treat otherwise undetected humoral mechanisms of rejection.

[Pure red blood cell aplasia associated with neutralizing antibodies against erythropoietin induced by epoetin alfa:a new form of acquired erythroblastopenia in auremic patients]. / Aplasia pura de la serie roja asociada a anticuerpos neutralizantes frente a eritropoyetina inducida por epoetina alfa: una nueva forma de eritroblastopenia adquirida en pacientes urémicos.

We report the case of a woman with end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis and treated with recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) administered subcutaneously, who developed a pure red cell aplasia secondary to the development of neutralizing antibodies anti-erythropoietin after 8 months of treatment. Despite epoetin withdrawal and immunosuppressive treatment with corticosteroids and gammaglobulins the patient still has high red blood cell transfusion requirements and undetectable plasma erythropoietin levels. Pure red cell aplasia secondary to the development of neutralizing antibodies anti-erythropoietin is a rare but severe complication associated with the use of recombinant human erythropoietin in uremic patients. In recent years, the incidence of this complication has sharply increased, specially associated with the use of epoetin alfa administered subcutaneously. For this reason, the Spanish Drug Agency has recently contraindicated treating uremic patients with epoetin alfa administered subcutaneously.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlations of cyclosporine therapy in stable renal transplant patients: evaluation of long-term target C(2).

We investigated the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cyclosporine in 15 stable renal transplant patients in order to define an effective and safe therapeutic range. The area under the curve of the first 4 h (AUC(0-4)), trough (C(0)) and 2 h (C(2)) levels showed median values of 1655 ng x h/ml, 114 ng/ml and 384 ng/ml, respectively. C(2) showed a strong correlation with AUC(0-4) (r=0.942, p=0.0005). C(0) correlated poorly with C(2) and AUC(0-4) (r=0.596, p=0.019 and r=0.538, p=0.031, respectively). Calcineurine activity (CNa) was 6.74% at 0 h and 3.90% at 2 h, representing significant reductions (82% and 89.6%, respectively; p<0.0005) compared with normal healthy controls (median basal value 37.4%). IL-2 production was 349 pg/ml at 0 h and 276.35 pg/ml at 2 h; both results were significantly lower (reductions of 44.5% and 56.1%, respectively; p=0.04 and 0.005) than the controls of 629.1 pg/ml. IFN-gamma at 2 h post-dose (8.16 UI/ml) was significantly lower (72.1% reduction, p=0.005) than in controls (29.2 UI/ml). There was a good correlation between CNa and IFN-gamma production, particularly at 2 h post-dose (r=0.537, p=0.007), and a fair correlation between CNa and IL-2 concentration (p=0.030, r=0.426). C(2) showed an inverse significant correlation with CNa (Spearman's p=0.000, r=-0.753), IL-2 (p=0.000, r=-0.725) and IFN-gamma (p=0.000, r=-0.701) production. In treated patients, the Emax inhibitory sigmoidal model showed that a C(2) of 279 ng/ml was needed to achieve a 50% inhibition (EC50) of IL-2 and INF-gamma production. The results demonstrated a significant inhibition of calcineurin activity and IL-2 and IFN-gamma production in patients receiving cyclosporine monotherapy compared to healthy controls. A median C(2) value of 384 ng/ml was associated with a good degree of inhibition of CNa and IL-2 and IFN-gamma synthesis, and the lack of rejection episodes and relevant toxicity.

Aplasia pura de la serie roja asociada a anticuerpos neutralizantes frente a eritropoyetina inducida por epoetina alfa: una nueva forma de eritroblastopenia adquirida en pacientes urémicos / Pure red blood cell aplasia associated with neutralizing antibodies against erythropoietin induced by epoetin alfa: a new form of acquired erythroblastopenia in uremic patients

Se describe el caso de una paciente con insuficiencia renal crónica terminal en programa de hemodiálisis y en tratamiento con eritropoyetina recombinante humana (epoetina alfa) por vía subcutánea, que a los 8 meses de tratamiento presentó una aplasia pura de la serie roja secundaria al desarrollo de anticuerpos neutralizantes anti-eritropoyetina. A pesar de la retirada del tratamiento y de haberse ensayado tratamiento inmunosupresor con corticoides y gammaglobulinas la paciente sigue presentando unos requerimientos transfusionales muy elevados y niveles circulantes de eritropoyetina indetectables. La eritroblastopenia secundaria al tratamiento con eritropoyetina recombinante humana es una complicación rara pero grave en pacientes urémicos. En los últimos años se ha descrito un aumento de su incidencia, especialmente en pacientes tratados con epoetina alfa por vía subcutánea. Por ello, recientemente la Agencia Española del Medicamento ha contraindicado administrar epoetina alfa por vía subcutánea en pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica

We report the case of a woman with end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis and treated with recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) administered subcutaneously, who developed a pure red cell aplasia secondary to the development of neutralizing antibodies anti-erythropoietin after 8 months of treatment. Despite epoetin withdrawal and immunosuppressive treatment with corticosteroids and gammaglobulins the patient still has high red blood cell transfusion requirements and undetectable plasma erythropoietin levels. Pure red cell aplasia secondary to the development of neutralizing antibodies anti-erythropoietin is a rare but severe complication associated with the use of recombinant human erythropoietin in uremic patients. In recent years, the incidence of this complication has sharply increased, specially associated with the use of epoetin alfa administered subcutaneously. For this reason, the Spanish Drug Agency has recently contraindicated treating uremic patients with epoetin alfa administered subcutaneously

[Atypical cytomegalovirus in renal transplantation: a new form of presentation]. / Citomegalovirus atípico en el trasplante renal: una nueva forma de presentación.

Infection due to cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most frequent opportunistic infection following renal transplantation (RT). It is usually asymptomatic. Cytomegalovirus disease causes fever leucopenia, thrombocytopenia and slightly elevated transaminases. The development of severe invasive forms is uncommon nowadays with post-transplantation monitoring, prophylactic regimens in high-risk patients and early treatment with ganciclovir. We report two renal transplant recipients who presented with severe gastrointestinal bleeding as the first manifestation of CMV disease at 9 and 14 weeks after transplantation. In both patients repeated post-transplantation pp65 antigenemia monitoring was negative. One patient developed hypovolemic shock due to severe rectal bleeding; an atypical bleeding ulcer was detected in the ileocecal valve. The other patient presented with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from a bleeding duodenal ulcer. Histological and immunohistochemical study confirmed the diagnosis. Both patients were elderly and on triple therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate and prednisone. We discuss the role of mycophenolate and the new immunosuppressant agents as factors favoring a state of enhanced immunosuppression, which may facilitate the onset of severe atypical forms of CMV disease.