Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hum Lact ; 31(4): 631-40, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26266946

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Massachusetts Department of Public Health's (MDPH) Mass in Motion Program (MiM) facilitates the adoption of community-level strategies that promote healthy weight in 52 municipalities. MiM provided the platform for enhancing postdischarge continuity of care for breastfeeding. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to improve the continuity of breastfeeding care and support for mothers by enhancing postdischarge care infrastructure and supportive contacts for women and families. METHODS: The MDPH awarded catalyst grants to community-based organizations (CBOs) that facilitated the formation of teams for improving breastfeeding support. The effort focused on populations that often experience disparities in breastfeeding outcomes such as minority women and women receiving Medicaid. The Added Value Model of Community Coalitions was used to qualitatively assess effect across multiple levels of the socioecological model of influence. RESULTS: Six communities were awarded grants to enhance or convene Breastfeeding Continuity-of-Care Teams consisting of at least 3 CBOs, including 1 maternity hospital, the local Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, and the local MiM representative. Teams implemented customized plans with performance indicators to create and strengthen infrastructure for supportive contacts with breastfeeding mothers. The project included Baby Café pilots in 3 additional MiM communities. Across all grantee communities, there was an average total increase of 491 contacts with mothers per month, an improvement of 8.5% over baseline. The project created 153 added value outcomes of community collaboration at 5 levels in the socioecological framework. CONCLUSION: The project demonstrated how cross-sector, coordinated efforts focused on vulnerable populations can leverage local strengths to establish/enhance breastfeeding support services customized to local needs.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Postnatal Care/organization & administration , Female , Financing, Organized , Health Promotion/methods , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Massachusetts , Postnatal Care/methods , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Qualitative Research , Social Support
2.
J Hum Lact ; 31(4): 641-50, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26266947

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies have analyzed patient education materials provided at discharge. To the best of our knowledge, there are no comprehensive studies analyzing and reporting the content of breastfeeding discharge packets within the United States. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the extent to which patient education materials provided at discharge from maternity facilities in Massachusetts cover topics that support successful breastfeeding. METHODS: We collected discharge packets from all 48 maternity hospitals/birth centers. Topics for analysis were based on recommendations associated with the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative and content identified for discharge packets generally. Materials were reviewed independently and scored according to 39 criteria that we assembled from various sources for optimal breastfeeding information at discharge. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore if any hospital characteristics predicted presence of breastfeeding education topics in written information provided at discharge. RESULTS: An average of 25.4 of 39 criteria (65.2%, ranging from 30.7%-97.4%) were included in packets submitted by all 48 facilities. Exploratory multivariate analyses did not show relationships of hospital characteristics to contents of packets. Each facility received a 2-page report noting strengths, suggestions for improvement, and individual scores on all 39 criteria. CONCLUSION: Discharge packet contents varied widely; whereas some institutions' information met and/or exceeded recommended content, others were limited and/or missing information. These analyses provide a thorough review of discharge packet content for all facilities in Massachusetts; however, further study is needed to identify the implications of such variation for breastfeeding outcomes.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Health Promotion/methods , Hospitals, Maternity , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Postnatal Care/methods , Female , Health Promotion/standards , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Maternity/standards , Hospitals, Maternity/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Massachusetts , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Discharge , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Patient Education as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Postnatal Care/standards , Postnatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Quality Assurance, Health Care
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...