Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol ; 42(5): 576-9, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26524801

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of recombinant follicular stimulating hormone (r-FSH) and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) on follicular microenvironment via assessment of follicular and serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Designed as a prospective cohort study. Twenty-five patients underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with r-FSH and 20 patients underwent with hMG. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding the women's mean age and body mass index (BMI). The amount of VEGF (pg/ml) in serum and follicular fluid in the group I and II were comparable (275 ± 135.3 vs 330.7 ± 190.0; p > 0.05 and 2,081.1 ± 1095.1 vs 1,971.1 ± 975.6; p > 0.05, respectively). The amount of IGF-1 (ng/ml) in serum and follicular fluid in the group I and II were also comparable (225.3 ± 69.3 vs 204.1 ± 56.3, p > 0.05 and 176.1 ± 67.2 vs 185.8 ± 48.7, p > 0.05, respectively). Pregnancy rates were also comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The hMG and r-FSH in COH produced comparable follicular microenvironment regarding follicular VEGF and IGF-l.


Subject(s)
Chorionic Gonadotropin/administration & dosage , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/administration & dosage , Follicular Fluid/metabolism , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/metabolism , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/metabolism , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Injections, Subcutaneous , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Prospective Studies , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/blood
2.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 35(3): 297-301, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25244592

ABSTRACT

A total of 413 consecutive infertile patients (572 cycles) with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 kg/m(2) were enrolled into the study. The luteal-long GnRH agonist group (Group I) constituted 211 patients (300 cycles) and the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist group (Group II) constituted 202 patients (272 cycles). The duration of stimulation (d) (10.1 ± 2.5 vs. 9.2 ± 2.0; p < 0.01); the total dose of gonadotrophin used (IU) (3,099.4 ± 2,885.0 vs. 2,684.0 ± 1,046.4; p < 0.05) and the E2 level on the day of hCG (pg/ml) (2,375.8 ± 1,554.6 vs. 1,905.6 ± 1,598.8; p < 0.01) were significantly lower in Group II when compared with Group I. However, the ongoing pregnancy per embryo transfer (37.0% vs. 25.7%; p < 0.05) and the implantation rate (25.7% vs. 15.6%; p < 0.01) were significantly lower in Group II when compared with Group I. In conclusion, we noted that the luteal-long GnRH agonist protocol produced higher implantation rates and higher clinical-ongoing pregnancy rates in overweight and obese patients when compared with the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol.


Subject(s)
Fertility Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/analogs & derivatives , Leuprolide/administration & dosage , Obesity/complications , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Adult , Clinical Protocols , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Female , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/administration & dosage , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/antagonists & inhibitors , Gonadotropins/administration & dosage , Humans , Infertility/therapy , Luteal Phase , Overweight/complications , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...