Bone mineral density and bone markers in patients with a recent low-energy fracture: effect of 1 y of treatment with calcium and vitamin D.

BACKGROUND: Low-energy fractures of the hip, forearm, shoulder, and spine are known consequences of osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of 1 y of treatment with calcium and vitamin D on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone markers in patients with a recent low-energy fracture. DESIGN: In a double-blinded design, patients with fracture of the hip (lower-extremity fracture, or LEF) or upper extremity (UEF) were randomly assigned to receive 3000 mg calcium carbonate + 1400 IU cholecalciferol or placebo (200 IU cholecalciferol). BMD of the hip (HBMD) and lumbar spine (LBMD) were evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and physical performance was assessed by the timed Up & Go test. Serum concentrations of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol, parathyroid hormone (PTH), telepeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), osteocalcin, and N-terminal propeptide of collagen type I were measured. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included (84% women; x +/- SD age: 70 +/- 11 y); 68% completed the study. In an intention-to-treat analysis, LBMD increased in the intervention group and decreased in the placebo group, and the difference between the groups was significant after 12 mo: 0.931 +/- 0.211 compared with 0.848 +/- 0.194 (P<0.05). No significant change was shown for HBMD. The effect of treatment was more pronounced in patients aged <70 y. The intervention decreased bone turnover. PTH was significantly lower in the intervention group (P<0.01) for the LEF patients. ICTP and change in LBMD were significantly related to physical performance. CONCLUSIONS: A 1-y intervention with calcium and vitamin D reduced bone turnover, significantly increased BMD in patients younger than 70 y, and decreased bone loss in older patients. The effect of treatment was related to physical performance.

Bone mineral density in patients with growth hormone deficiency: does a gender difference exist?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to clarify whether a gender difference exists with respect to bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). DESIGN: A case-control design. METHODS: Blood sampling for measurements of calcium, phosphate, creatinine, PTH, vitamin D, IGF-1, markers of bone formation and bone resorption, and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), to determine BMD and BMC of the lumbar spine, hip, distal arm and total body, were performed in 34 patients with GHD (19 females) and 34 sex-, age- and weight-matched healthy control subjects. The patients were well substituted on all pituitary axes, apart from GH. RESULTS: GH-deficient males had significantly lower BMD in the lumbar spine (P = 0.02), hip (P = 0.01) and total body (P = 0.003) than healthy males while GH-deficient females compared to healthy females had identical BMD values at all regions. This gender difference was even more obvious when BMD values were expressed as Z-scores or as three-dimensional BMD of the total body. The bone formation and bone resorption markers, as well as calcium and vitamin D, were all at the same levels in GH-deficient and healthy males, indicating identical bone turnover. The GH-deficient females, however, had significantly lower levels of bone markers compared to healthy females, indicating a reduced bone turnover. Oestrogen substitution of the GH-deficient females could explain this difference. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to healthy control subjects GH-deficient males had, in contrast to GH-deficient females, significantly reduced BMD and BMC. This obvious gender difference seems to be caused by the oestrogen substitution given to the females, compensating for the lack of GH, an effect testosterone does not seem to possess.

Characteristics of the Danish families with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is caused by autosomal dominantly inherited mutations in the MEN1 gene. Here, we report 25 MEN1 mutations - of which 12 are novel - found in 36 Danish families with MEN1 or variant MEN1 disease. Furthermore, one FIHP family was found to have an earlier reported mutation. The mutations were predominantly found in exons 9 and 10 encoding the C-terminal part of menin. Seven of the mutations were missense mutations, changing conserved residues. Furthermore screening of 93 out of 153 consecutive patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) identified five mutation carriers. Two of these belonged to known MEN1 families, whereas the only MEN1-related disease in the other three was pHPT. Screening of 96 consecutive patients with fore-/midgut endocrine tumours revealed five mutation carries out of 28 patients with sporadic gastrinomas, whereas no mutations were found in 68 patients with other fore-/midgut endocrine tumours. Moreover, screening of 60 consecutive patients with primary prolactinoma did not identify any mutation carriers. Our data indicate that MEN1 mutation screening is efficient in patients with familial MEN1. Screening should also be offered to patients with pHPT or gastrinomas after thorough investigation into the family history. In contrast, sporadic carcinoid tumours or primary prolactinomas are rarely associated with germ-line MEN1 mutations.