An Actual Use Study of Tamsulosin in Men with Bothersome Urinary Symptoms in a Simulated Over-the-Counter Setting.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the ability of men with bothersome urinary symptoms to use an over-the-counter tamsulosin (0.4 mg) product concordant with the information in the proposed drug facts label in a simulated over-the-counter setting. METHODS: Eligibility for this 24-week study was determined by a phone interview. Men who reported not using (nonprescription users) or using (prescription users) a prescription medicine for benign prostatic hyperplasia at screening/baseline reviewed the proposed over-the-counter tamsulosin product. They could then choose to purchase this product and enter the actual use phase. The primary objective was to assess the proportion of nonprescription users compliant with "stop use" directions (performance threshold upper bound of 95% CI 10% or less). Secondary objectives included assessing the proportion of nonRx users compliant with other prespecified instructions on the proposed drug facts label and evaluating adverse events. Analyses were based on outcomes mitigated by a panel of urologists. RESULTS: Of the 4,508 men screened 3,929 were eligible for product review and 1,117 entered the home use phase. Overall 1,074 men (nonprescription users 924, prescription users 150) purchased and used tamsulosin. Mean±SD age was 62.6±10.7 and 66.5±8.8 years, respectively. The primary end point was met, as only 2 of 924 nonprescription users (0.2%, 95% CI 0.0-0.8) reported a "stop use" condition within the first 12 weeks and did not appropriately stop use or initiate contact with a doctor. No unexpected safety concerns were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that self-directed use by men interested in using an over-the-counter tamsulosin product was in line with the drug facts label instructions implemented in this study and no unexpected safety concerns were identified.

A phase 1b study of afatinib in combination with standard-dose cetuximab in patients with advanced solid tumours.

This phase 1b, open-label trial assessed the combination of afatinib, an ErbB family blocker, with cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, in heavily pretreated patients with unselected/EGFR wild-type, advanced solid tumours. In Part A, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of afatinib + cetuximab was evaluated using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design; the starting dose was afatinib 30 mg/day plus cetuximab 250 mg/m2/week (after cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose), escalating to afatinib 40 mg/day. Part B further evaluated safety and tolerability at the MTD and preliminary anti-tumour activity in three patient cohorts with squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and other solid tumours. Nine patients were treated in Part A; the MTD and recommended dose was determined as afatinib 40 mg/day plus cetuximab 250 mg/m2/week. In Part B, 49 patients were treated at the recommended dose (12 with squamous NSCLC, 15 with HNSCC and 22 with other tumours). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) across all 58 patients were diarrhoea (63.8%) and acneiform dermatitis (43.1%). Overall, the best confirmed response was stable disease (SD; 53.4%); mean duration of disease control was 4.5 months; median progression-free survival was 2.6 months. In Part B, 55.1% of patients had SD (squamous NSCLC, 75.0%; HNSCC, 66.7%; other tumours; 36.4%). In conclusion, the recommended phase 2 dose was determined as afatinib 40 mg/day plus cetuximab 250 mg/m2/week. AEs were predictable and manageable, and anti-tumour activity was observed in some patients, particularly in those with squamous NSCLC and HNSCC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02020577.

Tadalafil in idiopathic or heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) compared to PAH associated with connective tissue disease.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate clinical outcomes of tadalafil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) associated with connective tissue disease (CTD-PAH) compared with patients with idiopathic/heritable PAH (I/H-PAH) for primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints, and safety. This analysis included adult patients with CTD-PAH or I/H-PAH who participated in the PHIRST and PHIRST-2 studies. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to tadalafil (2.5, 10, 20, or 40mg) or placebo in the PHIRST study and the majority of these patients were subsequently assigned 40mg in PHIRST-2. Patients taking 20mg in PHIRST without demonstrating clinical worsening continued on 20mg in PHIRST-2. Outcomes analyzed included 6MWD, WHO-FC, and incidence and time to first occurrence of clinical worsening. Safety was assessed through evaluation of adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory data, electrocardiograms, and physical examinations. RESULTS: Increased 6MWD in PHIRST was maintained in both CTD-PAH and I/H-PAH subgroups for 52weeks. Patients with CTD-PAH tended to be older, were more likely female, had lower exercise capacity, were more likely to have clinical worsening, and experienced AEs more frequently than patients with I/H-PAH. CONCLUSION: The effect of tadalafil treatment in patients enrolled in both PHIRST studies was detectable for both I/H-PAH and CTD-PAH subgroups. In general, subgroup differences were modest. Patients with CTD-PAH may perform less well than patients with I/H-PAH in safety and efficacy measures in all treatment groups, which is similar to other studies demonstrating a worse prognosis for patients with CTD-PAH.

Effect of tadalafil once daily on prostate blood flow and perfusion in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of tadalafil vs placebo on prostatic blood flow measured by transrectal ultrasonography in men aged ≥45 years with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia-lower urinary tract symptoms. METHODS: After screening and washout, patients were randomized to placebo (n = 50) or tadalafil 5 mg (n = 47) once daily for 8 weeks. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed at baseline, 4, and 8 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the prostate transition zone (TZ) resistive index (RI). Secondary efficacy measures were RI in the peripheral zone and bladder neck, color pixel intensity (CPI), and color pixel density (CPD) in all 3 regions. Outcomes were assessed using mixed-model repeated-measures analyses. RESULTS: The overall treatment effect (tadalafil vs placebo) for the change from baseline through week 8 in prostate TZ RI was not statistically significant (least squares mean change: placebo, -0.01; tadalafil, 0.00; P = .118), nor was the change from baseline in prostate TZ CPI (P = .564) or CPD (P = .592). Results were similar for all flow measures in prostate peripheral zone and bladder neck. The adverse event profile was consistent with previous studies with no new safety findings. CONCLUSION: Tadalafil for 8 weeks in men with BPH-LUTS did not result in detectable decreases in arterial RI or increases in CPI or CPD in the prostate or bladder neck. Detection of changes may not be possible because of already low baseline RI, insufficient sensitivity of techniques used, or may have been confounded by methodologic variability across sites. Alternatively, other possible mechanisms not assessed in this study may be more prominently involved.

Effects of tadalafil once daily on maximum urinary flow rate in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: Tadalafil significantly improves lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. We post hoc characterized changes in the maximum urinary flow rate using integrated data from 4 international, placebo controlled studies of tadalafil once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a 4-week placebo lead-in period 1,500 men were randomized to tadalafil 5 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. Data were analyzed using ANCOVA. Maximum urinary flow rate values were rank transformed for analysis. RESULTS: Baseline maximum urinary flow rate data were available on 1,371 men with a mean age of 63.1 years and end point data were available on 1,197. Tadalafil 5 mg significantly increased maximum urinary flow vs placebo (median 1.1 vs 0.4 ml per second, p = 0.003). At a baseline voided volume of 125 to less than 250 ml the median change in the maximum urinary flow rate was 0.9 and 1.2 ml per second (p = 0.142) in 731 patients, at a baseline of 250 to 450 ml the change was -0.3 and 0.7 ml per second (p = 0.011) in 428, and at a baseline of greater than 450 ml the change was -0.2 and 2.0 ml per second (p = 0.186) in 38 for placebo and tadalafil, respectively. The difference was 0.3, 1.0 and 2.2 ml per second, respectively. At a baseline maximum urinary flow rate of greater than 15 ml per second in 128 patients the median flow rate change was -2.1 and -0.8 ml per second (p = 0.246), at a maximum of 10 to 15 ml per second in 522 the change was 0.2 and 0.8 ml per second (p = 0.044), and at a maximum of less than 10 ml per second in 547 the change was 1.2 and 1.8 ml per second (p = 0.189) for placebo and tadalafil, respectively. Tadalafil improved I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) voiding subscores significantly vs placebo across all baseline maximum urinary flow subgroups (each p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This integrated analysis revealed a small but statistically significant median maximum urinary flow rate improvement for tadalafil vs placebo. The numerical difference in the maximum urinary flow change from baseline between tadalafil and placebo increased with increased voided volume.

Effects of tadalafil on lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and on erectile dysfunction in sexually active men with both conditions: analyses of pooled data from four randomized, placebo-controlled tadalafil clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) are common in aging males and frequently occur together. Tadalafil has demonstrated efficacy in treating both conditions. AIM: The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg once daily vs. placebo over 12 weeks in treating both LUTS/BPH and ED in sexually active men. We also assessed relationships of baseline disease severity and prostate specific antigen (PSA) to outcomes. METHODS: Data were pooled from four multinational, randomized studies of men ≥45 years with LUTS/BPH, with analyses restricted to sexually active men with ED. Randomization (baseline) followed a 4-week placebo run-in; changes from baseline were assessed vs. placebo using analysis of covariance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS subscores, Quality-of-Life Index (IPSS-QoL), BPH Impact Index (BII), and International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain score were used in this study. RESULTS: Tadalafil (N = 505) significantly improved total IPSS vs. placebo (N = 521); mean changes from baseline were -6.0 and -3.6, respectively (P < 0.001). Improvements in IIEF-EF Domain score (tadalafil, 6.4; placebo, 1.4) were also significant vs. placebo, as were the IPSS storage and voiding subscores, IPSS-QoL, and BII (all P < 0.001). No significant impact of baseline ED severity or PSA category on IPSS response was observed (interaction P values, 0.463 and 0.149, respectively). Similarly, improvement in IIEF-EF Domain score was not significantly impacted by baseline LUTS/BPH severity or PSA category (interaction P values, 0.926 and 0.230, respectively). Improvements in IPSS and IIEF-EF Domain score during treatment were weakly correlated (r = -0.229). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil was efficacious and well tolerated in treating ED and LUTS/BPH in sexually active men with both conditions. Improvements in both conditions were significant regardless of baseline severity. Improvements in the total IPSS and the IIEF-EF Domain score were weakly correlated.

Tadalafil 2.5 or 5 mg administered once daily for 12 weeks in men with both erectile dysfunction and signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-LUTS) commonly coexist in aging men. Tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor approved for treating ED, is currently being evaluated for treating BPH-LUTS. AIMS: This multinational Phase 3 study assessed effects of tadalafil 2.5 or 5 mg once daily on ED and BPH-LUTS in men with both conditions during 12 weeks of double-blinded therapy. METHODS: Men were ≥ 45 years old, sexually active, and experiencing ED for ≥ 3 months and BPH-LUTS for >6 months. Randomization (baseline) followed a 4-week placebo lead-in; changes from baseline were assessed via analysis of covariance and compared to placebo. A gatekeeping procedure controlled for multiple comparisons of co-primary and key secondary measures at end point (last post-baseline observation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The co-primary measures were the International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function (IIEF-EF) domain and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score; key secondary measures were the Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3 (SEP Q3) and BPH Impact Index (BII). Treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, orthostatic vital signs, clinical laboratory and uroflowmetry parameters, and postvoid residual volume were assessed. RESULTS: Tadalafil 2.5 mg (N = 198) and 5 mg (N = 208) significantly improved IIEF-EF domain scores (both P < 0.001) vs. placebo (N = 200) at end point. For IPSS, improvements were significant with tadalafil 5 mg (P < 0.001), but not 2.5 mg, for observations from 2 weeks through end point (least-squares mean ± standard error change from baseline at end point, placebo -3.8 ± 0.5, tadalafil 2.5 mg -4.6 ± 0.4, and 5 mg -6.1 ± 0.4). Tadalafil 5 mg significantly improved SEP Q3 and BII (P < 0.001). Overall, tadalafil was well tolerated with no clinically adverse changes in orthostatic vital signs or uroflowmetry parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil 5 mg significantly improved both ED and BPH-related outcomes through 12 weeks and was well tolerated.

Long-term safety and efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg dosed once daily in men with erectile dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: With once-daily administration of tadalafil, dosing and sexual activity would no longer need to be temporally linked for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM: To evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg dosed once daily for the treatment of ED. METHODS: Patients > or = 18 years of age with ED of any functional severity or etiology received tadalafil 5 mg once daily for 1 (N = 234) or 2 (N = 238) years during the open-label extensions of two previously reported studies. Patients who completed the 1-year open-label extension concluded with a 4-week ED treatment-free period. Baseline was defined as prior to receiving any study drug. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety measures included adverse events, electrocardiograms, and clinical laboratory measures. Efficacy measures included the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-Erectile Function (-EF), -Intercourse Satisfaction (-IS), and -Overall Satisfaction (-OS) domain scores, and the Global Assessment Questions (GAQ1: improved erections; GAQ2: improved ability to engage in sexual activity). RESULTS: Overall, 208/234 (88.9%) and 139/238 (58.4%) patients completed the 1- and 2-year open-label extensions, respectively. No study drug-related serious adverse events were observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events observed in > or = 5% of the patients during the first year of either open-label extension were dyspepsia, headache, back pain, and influenza. No clinically meaningful abnormalities associated with tadalafil were observed for electrocardiograms or clinical laboratory measures. Mean IIEF domain scores improved from baseline to the conclusions of the 1- and 2-year open-label extensions, respectively: -EF, +10.4 and +10.8; -IS, +4.0 and +3.7; and -OS, +3.0 and +3.2. At the conclusion of the 2-year open-label extension, 95.7% and 92.1% of the patients reported positive responses to GAQ1 and GAQ2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In these long-term, open-label, once-daily dosing studies, tadalafil 5 mg was well tolerated and effective, making it a viable alternative to the current on-demand dosing of tadalafil for men with ED.

Tadalafil relieves lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of tadalafil dosed once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following a 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in 281 men were randomly assigned (1:1) to 5 mg tadalafil for 6 weeks, followed by dose escalation to 20 mg for 6 weeks or 12 weeks of placebo. RESULTS: Tadalafil significantly improved the mean change from baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score at 6 weeks (5 mg tadalafil -2.8 vs placebo -1.2) and at 12 weeks (5/20 mg tadalafil -3.8 vs placebo -1.7). Larger changes were observed with inclusion of the placebo run-in at 12 weeks (5/20 mg tadalafil -7.1 vs placebo -4.5). Significant improvements were also seen in the International Prostate Symptom Score irritative and obstructive domains, the International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life index, a question about urinary symptom improvement and the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (significant at 12 weeks) vs placebo. International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain scores significantly improved in the 56% of men with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia who were sexually active and had erectile dysfunction. Changes in uroflowmetry parameters were similar in the placebo and tadalafil groups. Commonly reported (2% or greater) treatment emergent adverse events were "erection increased," dyspepsia, back pain, headache, nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection (each 5.1% or less). No change in post-void residual volume was seen with tadalafil treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil once daily was well tolerated and demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant symptomatic improvement for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia. Tadalafil also improved erectile function in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction.

Diabetic autonomic neuropathy is associated with an increased incidence of strokes.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain risk factors associated with the occurrence of strokes in type 2 diabetes over a 5-year follow-up period. BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease when compared to non-diabetic patients. Strokes are a significant source of morbidity and mortality. DESIGN/METHODS: We evaluated the relationship between a number cardiovascular risk factors in 950 normotensive and hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients enrolled in the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) trial on the incidence of stroke. We analyzed data from this longitudinal study to evaluate the relationships between various baseline risk factors and the occurrence of strokes. RESULTS: A number of baseline risk factors were associated with the occurrence of strokes including history of a stroke (p=0.02) and heart failure (p=0.004) at baseline, age (p=0.004), longer duration of diabetes (p=0.03), higher systolic blood pressure (p=0.005), an abnormal ankle/brachial index (p=0.05), decreased duration on the exercise treadmill test at baseline (p=0.009), the presence of retinopathy (p=0.02), overt albuminuria (p=0.03) and the presence of diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) as defined as a borderline or abnormal E/I ratio (p=0.016). Other variables that were tested but were not significantly associated included gender, duration of hypertension, diastolic blood pressure and smoking. When applying a multiple logistic regression model, DAN (OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.10-4.44), along with a history of heart failure (OR=7.4, 95% CI=2.12-26.15) and strokes (OR=3.4, 95% CI=1.02-11.00) at baseline were each associated with the occurrence of strokes. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study of type 2 diabetic patients, DAN is a significant independent risk factor for the occurrence of stroke. This may occur due to accelerated cerebral vascular damage and alterations in the regulation of cerebral blood flow in diabetic patients with DAN.

Differential effects of antihypertensive agents on electrocardiographic voltage: results from the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) trial.

BACKGROUND: Serial decline in electrocardiographic voltage in patients with increased left ventricular mass has been associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events. METHODS: We studied 468 patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension in the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) trial. Patients were randomized in a stratified design to receive initial treatment with either enalapril or nisoldipine and to either intensive or moderate treatment goals. We measured an electrocardiographic index for increased left ventricular mass, the adjusted Cornell voltage, serially by treatment group. The association between changes in electrocardiographic voltage and cardiovascular events was defined with Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: In 5 years of follow-up, the decline in adjusted Cornell voltage was significantly greater for patients treated with enalapril than for patients treated with nisoldipine (repeated measures analysis of variance P =.002). In the Cox proportional hazards model, treatment assignment (enalapril vs nisoldipine) was the strongest predictor of cardiovascular events, but the presence of coronary disease at baseline, the duration of diabetes mellitus, and change in voltage were also independent predictors of cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: In the ABCD study, enalapril treatment was associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction. The reduction in left ventricular mass as reflected by diminished electrocardiographic voltage may explain some, but not all, of the effect of enalapril in this study.

Lack of improvement in the treatment of hyperlipidemia among patients with type 2 diabetes.

PURPOSE: We investigated the adequacy of treatment of hyperlipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes, and assessed the temporal trends in adherence to published guidelines. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of 501 patients enrolled in the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes trial. All patients had fasting lipid profiles at baseline and during the 5 years (1993 to 1998) of the trial. Achieving the National Cholesterol Education Panel's goals for hyperlipidemia management was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level less than 130 mg/dL was 53% (n = 266) at baseline and 54% (n = 270) at the end of 5 years (P = 0.75). Almost 14% (n = 69) of these patients continued to have an LDL cholesterol level greater than 160 mg/dL at the completion of the study. Only 19% (n = 25) of the 133 patients with known coronary artery disease had an LDL cholesterol level less than 100 mg/dL at baseline, and only 16% (n = 21) achieved this level at the completion of the study (P = 0.37). CONCLUSION: Although prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes is a public health priority, our results suggest that hyperlipidemia is being treated suboptimally.

Intensive blood pressure control reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral arterial disease and type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and diabetes are both associated with a high risk of ischemic events, but the role of intensive blood pressure control in PAD has not been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes study followed 950 subjects with type 2 diabetes for 5 years; 480 of the subjects were normotensive (baseline diastolic blood pressure of 80 to 89 mm Hg). Patients randomized to placebo (moderate blood pressure control) had a mean blood pressure of 137+/-0.7/81+/-0.3 mm Hg over the last 4 years of treatment. In contrast, patients randomized to intensive treatment with enalapril or nisoldipine had a mean 4-year blood pressure of 128+/-0.8/75+/-0.3 mm Hg (P<0.0001 compared with moderate control). PAD, which is defined as an ankle-brachial index <0.90 at the baseline visit, was diagnosed in 53 patients. In patients with PAD, there were 3 cardiovascular events (13.6%) on intensive treatment compared with 12 events (38.7%) on moderate treatment (P=0.046). After adjustment for multiple cardiovascular risk factors, an inverse relationship between ankle-brachial index and cardiovascular events was observed with moderate treatment (P=0.009), but not with intensive treatment (P=0.91). Thus, with intensive blood pressure control, the risk of an event was not increased, even at the lowest ankle-brachial index values, and was the same as in a patient without PAD. CONCLUSIONS: In PAD patients with diabetes, intensive blood pressure lowering to a mean of 128/75 mm Hg resulted in a marked reduction in cardiovascular events.

Outcome of catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity arterial bypass occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical outcome of patients undergoing catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for lower extremity arterial bypass (LEAB) occlusion. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of two university-based practices from 1988 to 2001. All patients with LEAB occlusion (<14 days by history) undergoing CDT as initial treatment were included. Technical success, complications, secondary patency, and limb salvage were examined. Additional analysis examined secondary procedures performed for residual lesions or failed CDT and the number of LEABs that were replaced or that became infected. RESULTS: One hundred four patients (77% male; mean age, 65 years) had 109 LEAB occlusions. CDT restored patency in 77%. Of the 25 LEABs that failed initial CDT, 15 underwent surgical thrombectomy/revision, four were replaced, and six underwent no further interventions. Of the 84 LEABs successfully lysed, 51 had residual lesions that underwent revision with interventional (n = 30) or surgical (n = 15) techniques or both (n = 6). Median hospital stay was 8 days with three periprocedural deaths. One quarter of CDT procedures had bleeding or thrombotic complications or both. The mean follow-up period was 45 months. Secondary patency rates on an intention-to-treat basis (attempted thrombolysis) were 32% and 19% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. After successful CDT, the 1-year secondary patency rate was comparable in LEABs with or without residual lesions (42% versus 45%). Overall, the limb salvage rates were 73% and 55% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. The survival rate was 56% at 5 years. Ten of the 54 LEABs (19%) that eventually failed after successful CDT had three or more reocclusive episodes. Seven LEABs (8.3%) salvaged with CDT eventually became infected from recurrent interventions; six of these necessitated major amputation. Twenty LEABs initially salvaged with CDT were replaced (four immediately and 16 after episodes of recurrent ischemia). Two patients died during hospitalization for treatment of recurrent ischemia. CONCLUSION: Despite relatively high initial technical success for LEAB thrombolysis, eventual failure is the rule rather than the exception. Recurrent LEAB occlusions lead to significant morbidity, including recurrent interventions, eventual graft infection/replacement, and limb loss. However, LEAB replacement has substantial problems associated with limited conduit, reoperative anatomy, and subsequent wound complications. We therefore advocate an initial attempt at CDT with liberal use of graft replacement for early and late failures or as an initial strategy in those with favorable remaining conduit.

Peripheral arterial disease is not associated with an increased prevalence of intradialytic cramps in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been suggested as a contributing factor to the development of intradialytic muscle cramps in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, 122 patients from two dialysis centers were studied. The presence of PAD was determined by measurement of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) in the lower extremities of patients pre- and postdialysis. The experience of intradialytic cramps was assessed using patient history and review of medical records. RESULTS: PAD defined as a predialysis ABI < or =0.90 had an overall prevalence of 16.4% among patients studied. The prevalence of PAD was age-dependent, reaching 37.5% in patients 80-89 years old. Intradialytic muscle cramps were common, with 52.1% of patients reporting cramps within the previous two months, but there was no relationship between cramps during dialysis and PAD (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PAD was common in hemodialysis patients, but there was no association between the presence of PAD and the prevalence of intradialytic muscle cramps.

Effects of aggressive blood pressure control in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients on albuminuria, retinopathy and strokes.

BACKGROUND: Although several important studies have been performed in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients, it is not known whether lowering blood pressure in normotensive (BP <140/90 mm Hg) patients offers any beneficial results on vascular complications. The current study evaluated the effect of intensive versus moderate diastolic blood pressure (DBP) control on diabetic vascular complications in 480 normotensive type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: The current study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial in normotensive type 2 diabetic subjects. The subjects were randomized to intensive (10 mm Hg below the baseline DBP) versus moderate (80 to 89 mm Hg) DBP control. Patients in the moderate therapy group were given placebo, while the patients randomized to intensive therapy received either nisoldipine or enalapril in a blinded manner as the initial antihypertensive medication. The primary end point evaluated was the change in creatinine clearance with the secondary endpoints consisting of change in urinary albumin excretion, progression of retinopathy and neuropathy and the incidence of cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 5.3 years. Mean BP in the intensive group was 128 +/- 0.8/75 +/- 0.3 mm Hg versus 137 +/- 0.7/81 +/- 0.3 mm Hg in the moderate group, P < 0.0001. Although no difference was demonstrated in creatinine clearance (P = 0.43), a lower percentage of patients in the intensive group progressed from normoalbuminuria to microalbuminuria (P = 0.012) and microalbuminuria to overt albuminuria (P = 0.028). The intensive BP control group also demonstrated less progression of diabetic retinopathy (P = 0.019) and a lower incidence of strokes (P = 0.03). The results were the same whether enalapril or nisoldipine was used as the initial antihypertensive agent. CONCLUSION: Over a five-year follow-up period, intensive (approximately 128/75 mm Hg) BP control in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients: (1) slowed the progression to incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy; (2) decreased the progression of diabetic retinopathy; and (3) diminished the incidence of stroke.

Clinical and demographic predictors of exercise capacity in end-stage renal disease.

Patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease have reduced exercise tolerance. Multiple processes related to uremia and hemodialysis have been implicated in the pathophysiology of this impairment. However, limited data are available to identify the separate and combined effects of clinical factors on the degree of impairment for individuals within this population. For this purpose, data from 193 patients who had undergone exercise testing for two clinical trials were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify demographic and clinical correlates of peak exercise oxygen uptake (VO2). Peak VO2 averaged 18.5 +/- 6.4 mL/min/kg. On univariate analysis, peak VO2 correlated positively with male sex and hemoglobin, serum albumin, and serum creatinine concentrations and correlated negatively with dialytic age and diagnosis of diabetes or chronic heart failure. In a multiple linear regression model, sex, hemoglobin concentration, age, and diagnosis of diabetes each remained statistically significant. Together, factors included in the model accounted for 41% of the variability in peak VO2 (P = 0.0001). Among factors not correlating significantly with peak VO2 were resting blood pressure, serum carnitine level, and urea clearance assessed by Kt/V. Findings show the range of exercise impairment among clinically stable ambulatory hemodialysis patients, which may be sufficient to interfere with normal daily activities for many of these patients. Although this impairment may be broadly attributable to physiological consequences of uremia, the degree of impairment for individual patients is predicted by demographic factors, coexistent disease, and factors potentially modified by medical therapeutics.