Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JMIR Perioper Med ; 7: e52125, 2024 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573737

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pip is a novel digital health platform (DHP) that combines human health coaches (HCs) and technology with patient-facing content. This combination has not been studied in perioperative surgical optimization. OBJECTIVE: This study's aim was to test the feasibility of the Pip platform for deploying perioperative, digital, patient-facing optimization guidelines to elective surgical patients, assisted by an HC, at predefined intervals in the perioperative journey. METHODS: We conducted an institutional review board-approved, descriptive, prospective feasibility study of patients scheduled for elective surgery and invited to enroll in Pip from 2.5 to 4 weeks preoperatively through 4 weeks postoperatively at an academic medical center between November 22, 2022, and March 27, 2023. Descriptive primary end points were patient-reported outcomes, including patient satisfaction and engagement, and Pip HC evaluations. Secondary end points included mean or median length of stay (LOS), readmission at 7 and 30 days, and emergency department use within 30 days. Secondary end points were compared between patients who received Pip versus patients who did not receive Pip using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients were invited, of whom 172 (60.8%) enrolled in Pip. Of these, 80.2% (138/172) patients had ≥1 HC session and proceeded to surgery, and 70.3% (97/138) of the enrolled patients engaged with Pip postoperatively. The mean engagement began 27 days before surgery. Pip demonstrated an 82% weekly engagement rate with HCs. Patients attended an average of 6.7 HC sessions. Of those patients that completed surveys (95/138, 68.8%), high satisfaction scores were recorded (mean 4.8/5; n=95). Patients strongly agreed that HCs helped them throughout the perioperative process (mean 4.97/5; n=33). The average net promoter score was 9.7 out of 10. A total of 268 patients in the non-Pip group and 128 patients in the Pip group had appropriate overlapping distributions of stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting for the analytic sample. The Pip cohort was associated with LOS reduction when compared to the non-Pip cohort (mean 2.4 vs 3.1 days; median 1.9, IQR 1.0-3.1 vs median 3.0, IQR 1.1-3.9 days; mean ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.62-0.93; P=.009). The Pip cohort experienced a 49% lower risk of 7-day readmission (relative risk [RR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.11-2.31; P=.38) and a 17% lower risk of 30-day readmission (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.30-2.31; P=.73), though these did not reach statistical significance. Both cohorts had similar 30-day emergency department returns (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.56-2.01, P=.85). CONCLUSIONS: Pip is a novel mobile DHP combining human HCs and perioperative optimization content that is feasible to engage patients in their perioperative journey and is associated with reduced hospital LOS. Further studies assessing the impact on clinical and patient-reported outcomes from the use of Pip or similar DHPs HC combinations during the perioperative journey are required.

2.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol ; 26(2): 91-104, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22910083

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is defined as one of the following: hypertension, congestive heart failure (HF), stroke, coronary heart disease and congenital heart defects. CVD is the main cause of the disease burden (illness and death) in Europe (23% of all the disease burdens) and the second main cause of the disease burden in those European Union (EU) countries with very low child and adult mortality (17%).(1) Heart disease is a common health problem worldwide. According to the most recent Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2011 update,(2) greater than 82 000 000 adults living in the United States of America (USA) have one or more types of CVD. Many resources have been invested in attempting to understand and curtail the progression of congestive HF. This article attempts to address the growing concern over HF by looking at the epidemiology, pathophysiology and available therapies as anaesthesiologists encounter these patients more often nowadays in the operating room and intensive care units. Mechanical circulatory assistance and heart transplantation are two established treatment methods for end-stage HF. In this review, we also address the indications and contraindications for mechanical circulatory assistance, types and spectrum of available ventricular assist devices, efficacy, safety and cost analysis of circulatory support therapy.


Subject(s)
Assisted Circulation/methods , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart-Assist Devices , Adult , Anesthesia/methods , Anesthesiology/methods , Assisted Circulation/economics , Assisted Circulation/instrumentation , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/physiopathology , Cardiovascular Diseases/surgery , Child , Contraindications , Disease Progression , Equipment Design , Europe/epidemiology , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Heart-Assist Devices/economics , Humans , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...