Health-related quality of life in GALAHAD: A multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study of niraparib for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and DNA-repair gene defects.

BACKGROUND: Niraparib is a highly selective poly (adenosine diphosphateribose) polymerase-1 and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase-2 inhibitor indicated for select patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. The phase 2 GALAHAD trial (NCT02854436) demonstrated that niraparib monotherapy is tolerable and efficacious in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations, particularly those with breast cancer gene (BRCA) alterations who had progressed on prior androgen signaling inhibitor therapy and taxane-based chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To report the prespecified patient-reported outcomes analysis from GALAHAD. METHODS: Eligible patients with alterations to BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA cohort) and with pathogenic alterations in other HRR genes (other HRR cohort) were enrolled and received niraparib 300 mg once daily. Patient-reported outcome instruments included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate and the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Changes from baseline were compared using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures. RESULTS: On average, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) improved in the BRCA cohort by cycle 3 (mean change = 6.03; 95% CI = 2.76-9.29) and was maintained above baseline until cycle 10 (mean change = 2.84; 95% CI = -1.95 to 7.63), whereas the other HRR cohort showed no early change in HRQoL from baseline (mean change = -0.07; 95% CI = -4.69 to 4.55) and declined by cycle 10 (mean change = -5.10; 95% CI = -15.3 to 5.06). Median time to deterioration in pain intensity and pain interference could not be estimated in either cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced mCRPC and BRCA alterations treated with niraparib experienced more meaningful improvement in overall HRQoL, pain intensity, and pain interference compared with those with other HRR alterations. In this population of castrate, heavily pretreated patients with mCRPC and HRR alterations, stabilization, and improvement in HRQoL may be relevant to consider when making treatment decisions. DISCLOSURES: This work was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC (no grant number). Dr Smith has received grants and personal fees from Bayer, Amgen, Janssen, and Lilly; and has received personal fees from Astellas Pharma, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr Sandhu has received grants from Amgen, Endocyte, and Genentech; has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Merck; and has received personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Serono. Dr George has received personal fees from the American Association for Cancer Research, Axess Oncology, Capio Biosciences, Constellation Pharma, EMD Serono, Flatiron, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Michael J. Hennessey Association, Millennium Medical Publishing, Modra Pharma, Myovant Sciences, Inc., NCI Genitourinary, Nektar Therapeutics, Physician Education Resource, Propella TX, RevHealth, LLC, and UroGPO; has received grants and personal fees from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer; has received personal fees and nonfinancial support from Bayer and UroToday; has received grants from Calithera and Novartis; and has received grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Exelixis, Inc., Sanofi, and Janssen Pharma. Dr Chi has received grants from Janssen during the conduct of the study; has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, POINT Biopharma, Roche, and Sanofi; and has received personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Saad has received grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Janssen during the conduct of the study; and has received grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Pfizer, Bayer, Myovant, Sanofi, and Novartis. Dr Thiery-Vuillemin has received grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Pfizer; has received personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Ipsen, Roche/Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Astellas Pharma; and has received personal fees from Sanofi, Novartis, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Olmos has received grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, and Pfizer; has received personal fees from Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; and has received nonfinancial support from Astellas Pharma, F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Genentech, and Ipsen. Dr Danila has received research support from the US Department of Defense, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, Stand Up to Cancer, Janssen Research & Development, Astellas Pharma, Medivation, Agensys, Genentech, and CreaTV. Dr Gafanov has received grants from Janssen during the conduct of the study. Dr Castro has received grants from Janssen during the conduct of the study; has received grants and personal fees from Janssen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer; and has received personal fees from Astellas Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, and Clovis. Dr Moon has received research funding from SeaGen, HuyaBio, Janssen, BMS, Aveo, Xencor, and has received personal fees from Axess Oncology, MJH, EMD Serono, and Pfizer. Dr Joshua has received nonfinancial support from Janssen; consulted or served in an advisory role for Neoleukin, Janssen Oncology, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Noxopharm, IQvia, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, and Eisai; and received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen Oncology, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mayne Pharma, Roche/Genentech, Bayer, MacroGenics, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Corvus Pharmaceuticals. Drs Mason, Liu, Bevans, Lopez-Gitlitz, and Francis and Mr Espina are employees of Janssen Research & Development. Dr Mason owns stocks with Janssen. Dr Fizazi has participated in advisory boards and talks for Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, MSD, Novartis/AAA, Pfizer, and Sanofi, with honoraria to his institution (Institut Gustave Roussy); has participated in advisory boards for, with personal honoraria from, Arvinas, CureVac, MacroGenics, and Orion. Study registration number: NCT02854436.

Niraparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and DNA repair gene defects (GALAHAD): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers are enriched for DNA repair gene defects (DRDs) that can be susceptible to synthetic lethality through inhibition of PARP proteins. We evaluated the anti-tumour activity and safety of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers and DRDs who progressed on previous treatment with an androgen signalling inhibitor and a taxane. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients aged at least 18 years with histologically confirmed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mixed histology accepted, with the exception of the small cell pure phenotype) and DRDs (assessed in blood, tumour tissue, or saliva), with progression on a previous next-generation androgen signalling inhibitor and a taxane per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 or Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, were eligible. Enrolled patients received niraparib 300 mg orally once daily until treatment discontinuation, death, or study termination. For the final study analysis, all patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis population; patients with germline pathogenic or somatic biallelic pathogenic alterations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA cohort) or biallelic alterations in other prespecified DRDs (non-BRCA cohort) were included in the efficacy analysis population. The primary endpoint was objective response rate in patients with BRCA alterations and measurable disease (measurable BRCA cohort). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02854436. FINDINGS: Between Sept 28, 2016, and June 26, 2020, 289 patients were enrolled, of whom 182 (63%) had received three or more systemic therapies for prostate cancer. 223 (77%) of 289 patients were included in the overall efficacy analysis population, which included BRCA (n=142) and non-BRCA (n=81) cohorts. At final analysis, with a median follow-up of 10·0 months (IQR 6·6-13·3), the objective response rate in the measurable BRCA cohort (n=76) was 34·2% (95% CI 23·7-46·0). In the safety analysis population, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were nausea (169 [58%] of 289), anaemia (156 [54%]), and vomiting (111 [38%]); the most common grade 3 or worse events were haematological (anaemia in 95 [33%] of 289; thrombocytopenia in 47 [16%]; and neutropenia in 28 [10%]). Of 134 (46%) of 289 patients with at least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event, the most common were also haematological (thrombocytopenia in 17 [6%] and anaemia in 13 [4%]). Two adverse events with fatal outcome (one patient with urosepsis in the BRCA cohort and one patient with sepsis in the non-BRCA cohort) were deemed possibly related to niraparib treatment. INTERPRETATION: Niraparib is tolerable and shows anti-tumour activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and DRDs, particularly in those with BRCA alterations. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development.

Niraparib with androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: safety and pharmacokinetic results from a phase 1b study (BEDIVERE).

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and pharmacokinetics and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of niraparib with apalutamide or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: BEDIVERE was a multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study of niraparib 200 or 300 mg/day with apalutamide 240 mg or AAP (abiraterone acetate 1000 mg; prednisone 10 mg). Patients with mCRPC were previously treated with ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy, including ≥ 1 androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy for prostate cancer. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled (niraparib-apalutamide, 6; niraparib-AAP, 27). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported when combinations included niraparib 200 mg; five patients receiving niraparib 300 mg experienced DLTs [niraparib-apalutamide, 2/3 patients (66.7%); niraparib-AAP, 3/8 patients (37.5%)]. Although data are limited, niraparib exposures were lower when given with apalutamide compared with historical niraparib monotherapy exposures in patients with solid tumors. Because of the higher incidence of DLTs, the niraparib-apalutamide combination and niraparib 300 mg combination with AAP were not further evaluated. Niraparib 200 mg was selected as the RP2D with AAP. Of 19 patients receiving niraparib 200 mg with AAP, 12 (63.2%) had grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, the most common being thrombocytopenia (26.3%) and hypertension (21.1%). Five patients (26.3%) had adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the choice of niraparib 200 mg as the RP2D with AAP. The niraparib-AAP combination was tolerable in patients with mCRPC, with no new safety signals. An ongoing phase 3 study is further assessing this combination in patients with mCRPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: NCT02924766 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Efficacy and safety of apalutamide in Japanese patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase-3 study.

BACKGROUND: In the global Phase-3 Selective Prostate Androgen Receptor Targeting with ARN-509 study, apalutamide plus ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly increased metastasis-free survival (MFS) and improved other clinical outcomes in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nm-CRPC) who were at high risk of developing metastases. In this subpopulation analysis of Selective Prostate Androgen Receptor Targeting with ARN-509 study, the efficacy and safety of apalutamide plus ADT were evaluated in Japanese patients with nm-CRPC. METHODS: The primary efficacy end point was MFS. Secondary efficacy end points were time to metastasis, progression-free survival, symptomatic progression, initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy, and overall survival. Safety and pharmacokinetic parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-five Japanese patients with ongoing ADT were randomized (apalutamide: n = 34, placebo: n = 21). Median treatment duration was 5.7 months in the apalutamide group and 11.0 months in the placebo group. Median MFS was not reached in the apalutamide group (95% confidence interval: 10.97, not estimable) and was 18.23 months (95% confidence interval: 11.04, 18.50) in the placebo group. Secondary end points were improved in the apalutamide group. The safety profile of apalutamide with ADT was comparable with the global population, and no new safety signals were identified in this Japanese subpopulation. Although, apalutamide exposure tended to be higher in the Japanese subpopulation compared with the non-Japanese population, this was likely to be explained by body weight and considered not clinically meaningful. CONCLUSION: In the Japanese subpopulation, treatment with apalutamide with ADT resulted in favorable efficacy outcomes with comparable benefit-risk profile to the global population with nm-CRPC who are at high-risk of developing metastases.

Understanding symptomatic experience, impact, and emotional response in recently diagnosed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: We sought to explore the symptomatic experience of men recently told their castration-resistant prostate cancer has metastasized (mCRPC); the impact and emotional response to this; the emotional burden of monitoring development to metastatic status; and the emotional impact on the primary support person (PSP). METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 25 men recently diagnosed with mCRPC from the United States (US), France, and Germany. We also interviewed 14 PSPs. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 72.2 years; mean time since metastasis 7.8 months. The most frequent symptoms were fatigue/tiredness, sexual dysfunction, and pain. Metastasis had a negative emotional impact on the patient and PSP. Some explicitly associated certain symptoms/impacts with metastasis, such as localized pain, diarrhea, blood in stool, and increased impact on activities of daily living. About 72% of patients highlighted the emotional impact of a metastatic diagnosis, reporting worry/anxiety/fear, low mood/depression, shock, increased burden on PSP, and strain on relationships. Monitoring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values was important; ten patients explicitly discussed feeling fear/worry when PSA was rising, and glad/happy/excited when PSA was falling. Most reported that, if a medication had been available to them to delay metastasis, they would have taken it, even if they were asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Interviews highlighted the substantial burden of mCRPC to both patient and PSP. Development of metastasis was associated with symptoms worsening rather than the development of new symptoms, with physical and emotional impacts. Most patients were willing to take a medication to delay metastasis.

Apalutamide Treatment and Metastasis-free Survival in Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Apalutamide, a competitive inhibitor of the androgen receptor, is under development for the treatment of prostate cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of apalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were at high risk for the development of metastasis. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial involving men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive apalutamide (240 mg per day) or placebo. All the patients continued to receive androgen-deprivation therapy. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival, which was defined as the time from randomization to the first detection of distant metastasis on imaging or death. RESULTS: A total of 1207 men underwent randomization (806 to the apalutamide group and 401 to the placebo group). In the planned primary analysis, which was performed after 378 events had occurred, median metastasis-free survival was 40.5 months in the apalutamide group as compared with 16.2 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.35; P<0.001). Time to symptomatic progression was significantly longer with apalutamide than with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.63; P<0.001). The rate of adverse events leading to discontinuation of the trial regimen was 10.6% in the apalutamide group and 7.0% in the placebo group. The following adverse events occurred at a higher rate with apalutamide than with placebo: rash (23.8% vs. 5.5%), hypothyroidism (8.1% vs. 2.0%), and fracture (11.7% vs. 6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Among men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastasis-free survival and time to symptomatic progression were significantly longer with apalutamide than with placebo. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; SPARTAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01946204 .).

Phase I/II trial of nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone in the treatment of newly diagnosed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The toxicity and efficacy of nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (TLC D-99) when substituted for conventional doxorubicin in the CHOP (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone) regimen were evaluated in the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Liposomal doxorubicin at doses of 40 mg/m2, 50 mg/m2, 60 mg/m2, and 80 mg/m2 was given with fixed doses of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone. Chemotherapy cycles were repeated every 21 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with a median age of 55 years (range, 25-83 years) were studied. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at any level. Reversible grade 3/4 neutropenia was the most common toxicity (95.8%). Most nonhematologic side effects were grade 1/2 in severity. Complete remissions were documented in 31 of 46 evaluable patients (67.4%) and partial remissions in 7 (15.2%), for an overall major response rate of 82.6%. The median duration of complete remission is > or = 27.7 months (range, 2.4 months to > or = 59.8 months). An exploratory objective was to correlate multidrug resistance-1 (MDR-1) expression with outcome. Immunohistochemistry for MDR-1-related p-glycoprotein was assessed in lymphoma tissues from 27 patients. Of the 27 lymphoma tissues studied, 8 (30%) were MDR-1 positive at diagnosis. The complete response rate was 63% in MDR-1-positive lymphomas and 74% in the MDR-1-negative cases (P = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone is an active regimen for patients with newly diagnosed, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The regimen is relatively well tolerated, with hematologic suppression as the major toxicity. Liposomal encapsulation might evade resistance caused by MDR-1 expression.

Phase I study of antisense oligonucleotide against vascular endothelial growth factor: decrease in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor with potential clinical efficacy.

PURPOSE: Vascular endothelial growth factor antisense (VEGF-AS) is an antisense oligonucleotide that targets VEGF, inhibiting angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation. This study established the safety, biologic effects, and pharmacokinetics of VEGF-AS in 51 patients with advanced malignancies. METHODS: VEGF-AS was administered as a 2-hour infusion daily for 5 consecutive days for only one cycle on the first four dose levels, and then administered daily for 5 days every other week for up to 4 months on subsequent levels. Pharmacokinetics, tumor response, and the effect on plasma VEGF levels were determined. RESULTS: The maximum-tolerated dose was 200 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 fever, and pulmonary embolism in one patient each at 250 mg/m2. Mild anemia, fever, fatigue, and gastrointestinal complaints were the most common adverse events. VEGF-AS t(1/2beta) (beta-phase terminal half-life of drug concentration) was 2.25 hours (range, 1.97 to 2.95 hours). Mean plasma VEGF-A (P = .002) and VEGF-C (P = .01) levels decreased 24 hours postinfusion, with a trend towards greater decreases at higher dose levels. At the maximum-tolerated dose, five of six patients demonstrated reductions in plasma VEGF. Clinical responses included complete remission in one patient with AIDS-Kaposi's sarcoma, a mixed but dramatic response in one patient with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and prolongation of progression-free survival compared with that obtained on the immediate prior regimen in six patients (12%) with renal cell, bronchoalveolar, small cell lung, thyroid, and ovarian carcinomas, and chondrosarcoma, respectively. CONCLUSION: VEGF-AS was well tolerated, with biologic effects and preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy.

Hepatitis C virus-related thrombocytopenia: clinical and laboratory characteristics compared with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura.

Thrombocytopenia can be a complication of hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. However, there is little published data regarding the clinical and laboratory manifestations of HCV-related thrombocytopenia (HCV-TP) compared with adult chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (CITP). We reviewed the medical records for all patients evaluated for chronic thrombocytopenia by the Haematology Service between January 1996 and June 2000. All patients were screened for HCV infection at the time of initial diagnosis. Of 250 patients who fulfilled American Society of Hematology criteria for CITP, 76 (30%) were HCV seropositive. HCV-TP patients were older [mean age (+/-SD) 54.9 +/- 8 years vs. 40.3 +/- 8 years, P

AIDS-related Burkitt's lymphoma versus diffuse large-cell lymphoma in the pre-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and HAART eras: significant differences in survival with standard chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of patients with HIV-Burkitt's lymphoma (HIV-BL) and HIV-diffuse large-cell lymphoma (HIV-DLCL) after treatment with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) or M-BACOD (methotrexate, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) in pre-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) versus HAART eras. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred sixty-three patients with AIDS-related lymphoma diagnosed from 1982 to 2003 were reviewed retrospectively, including 262 in the pre-HAART (HIV-BL, 117; HIV-DLCL, 145) and 101 in the HAART era (HIV-BL, 18; HIV-DLCL, 83). Pre-HAART included those who did not receive HAART, and HAART era included those diagnosed after January 1997 who received HAART. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, sex, history of injection drug use, prior AIDS, lactate dehydrogenase level, and disease stage at diagnosis. Compared with HIV-BL, HIV-DLCL was associated with significantly lower CD4 counts in the pre-HAART but not the HAART era. Although the overall median survival was similar for both groups in the pre-HAART era (HIV-BL, 6.4 months v HIV-DLCL, 8.3 months; P = .43), survival was significantly worse in patients with HIV-BL in the HAART era (HIV-BL, 5.7 months v HIV-DLCL, 43.2 months; P = .0003). Failure to attain complete remission and CD4 count less than 100 cells/mm(3) independently predicted for poor survival in the pre-HAART era. In comparison, histology of HIV-BL and no attainment of complete remission were independent poor prognostic factors in the HAART era. CONCLUSION: Survival of patients with HIV-DLCL has improved in the HAART era, along with CD4 count, whereas survival of similarly treated patients with HIV-BL remained poor. The current practice of using the same regimen for both groups of patients should be re-evaluated.

Weekly docetaxel is safe and effective in the treatment of advanced-stage acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related Kaposi sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous paclitaxel, 100 mg/m(2), given over 3 hours every 2 weeks is associated with a response rate of 59% in patients with recurrent or refractory acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related Kaposi sarcoma (KS). However, this regimen is associated with significant myelosuppression, and the inconvenience of a 3-hour infusion. Moreover, no effective therapies have been defined for use after treatment failure with this agent. A Phase II trial was conducted with weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced-stage KS to assess safety and antitumor activity. METHODS: Docetaxel was administered at a dose of 25 mg/m(2) intravenously over 15-30 minutes weekly for 8 weeks. Thereafter, if the patient experienced stable disease or better response, treatment doses were given every other week until complete disease remission, disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity occurred. RESULTS: Twelve patients were accrued-9 had > 25 mucocutaneous lesions, 1 had lymphedema, and 2 had visceral involvement. Ten patients (83%) had previous systemic chemotherapy, including 4 who received previous paclitaxel. Treatment was well tolerated, with no Grade 4 toxicity of any type. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 33% of patients but no patient had neutropenic fever. Five patients (42%) achieved a partial response, including 1 who had previously failed to respond to paclitaxel. The median time to disease progression was 26 months (range, 5-53 months). With a median follow-up period of 45 months, the median survival point had not been reached. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly docetaxel is safe, with reasonable antitumor activity in patients with advanced-stage, recurrent, or refractory AIDS-related KS.

Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin in combination with standard agents (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) in patients with newly diagnosed AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of therapy and correlates of response.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet; Medeus Pharma Ltd, Herts,UK) when substituted for doxorubicin in the CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) in patients with newly diagnosed AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (AIDS-NHL). Secondary objectives were to assess the impact of HIV viral control on response and survival, and to correlate MDR-1 expression with outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Liposomal doxorubicin at doses of 40, 50, 60, and 80 mg/m(2) was given with fixed doses of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone every 21 days. All patients received concurrent highly active antiretroviral therapy. NHL tissues were evaluated for multidrug resistance (MDR-1) expression. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were accrued. 67% had high or high-intermediate International Prognostic Index scores; the median CD4 lymphocyte count was 112/mm(3) (range, 19/mm(3) to 791/mm(3)). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at any level, with myelosuppression being the most frequent toxicity. Overall response rate was 88%, with 75% complete responses (CRs), and 13% partial responses. The median duration of CR was 15.6+ months (range, 1.7 to 43.5+ months). Effective HIV viral control during chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved survival (P =.027), but CRs were attained independent of HIV viral control. MDR-1 expression did not correlate with response, suggesting that the liposomal doxorubicin may evade this resistance mechanism. CONCLUSION: Liposomal doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone is active in AIDS-NHL, with complete remissions achieved in 75% independent of HIV viral control or tissue MDR-1 expression. HIV viral control is associated with a significant improvement in survival. Additional studies are warranted.

T-cell lymphoma in HIV-infected patients.

Linkage of AIDS and cancer registries has indicated an increase in T-cell lymphomas among individuals infected with the HIV. The characteristics of T-cell versus B-cell lymphoma in HIV-infected patients are not well described. Retrospectively, 11 cases of T-cell lymphoma were identified from the AIDS-Lymphoma Registry at the University of Southern California. These patients were compared with 418 consecutive HIV-seropositive patients with B-cell lymphoma diagnosed and treated within the same time period. T-cell lymphomas comprised 3% of all AIDS lymphomas. Pathologic types included peripheral T-cell lymphoma in 5; anaplastic large cell lymphoma in 3; and angioimmunoblastic, enteropathy type, and human T-cell lymphotropic virus-I-related adult T-cell lymphoma/leukemia in 1 case each. No differences in demographic characteristics, history of prior opportunistic infection, or immunologic characteristics were observed between T-cell and B-cell cases. Extranodal involvement of the skin (36% vs. 2%, P < 0.001) and bone marrow (45% vs. 15%, P = 0.019) was significantly more common in T-cell lymphomas. The median survival of patients with T-cell lymphomas was not significantly different from that of B-cell lymphoma patients (10.6 vs. 6.6 months, P = 0.13). T-cell lymphomas in HIV-infected patients represent a spectrum of pathologic types. T-cell lymphomas differ from B-cell cases in terms of a higher propensity for skin and bone marrow involvement. The median survival of patients with T-cell lymphoma is comparable to that of patients with B-cell AIDS-related lymphoma.

Treatment of AIDS related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with combination mitoguazone dihydrochloride and low dose CHOP chemotherapy: results of a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response and side effects of combination therapy with low dose CHOP chemotherapy and mitoguazone dihydrochloride in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS-NHL). METHODS: Eighteen patients newly diagnosed with intermediate or high-grade AIDS-NHL were treated with low dose CHOP as follows: day 1, cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m(2), intravenously (IV); doxorubicin 25mg/m(2) IV; vincristine 2mg IV; and prednisone 100mg given orally on days 1 through 5. In addition, mitoguazone dihydrochloride was given at a dose of 600 mg/m(2) IV on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle. RESULTS: Seventeen males and one female patient were accrued. Twelve patients had high-grade pathologies while the remainder had an intermediate grade pathology (diffuse large cell). The median CD4+ lymphocyte count was 98/dl (range 1-924). Three patients (17%) reported an AIDS-defining illness prior to lymphoma diagnosis. Of 14 evaluable patients, 6 (43%) achieved a complete remission and 5 (35%) a partial remission. The median failure free and overall survival times were 6.5 and 8.4 months, respectively. Major toxicity was hematologic with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 72%; two patients died of neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Mitoguazone in combination with low dose CHOP is a safe regimen, associated with a response rate of 79% (CR 43%, PR 36%, 95% CI=49-95%). These preliminary results suggest no major improvement in terms of response over use of CHOP without mitoguazone.

Potential role of platelet FcgammaRIIA in collagen-mediated platelet activation associated with atherothrombosis.

Collagen-mediated platelet activation contributes significantly to coronary and cerebrovascular thrombus formation associated with atherosclerotic plaque destabilization. Recent clinical and laboratory observations support a potential role for the platelet Fc receptor (FcgammaRIIA) in this process. The purpose of this study was to elucidate any association between platelet Fc receptor (FcR) expression levels and both atherosclerosis risk factors (ARFs) along with collagen-dependent platelet activation. Age and gender-independent variation has been described in the expression of this receptor that is stable over time. Platelet Fc surface expression was compared between patients experiencing an acute coronary or cerebrovascular event, healthy patients with two or more ARFs, and healthy patients with fewer than two ARFs. Platelet FcR expression was significantly and stably (6-52 weeks, mean 20 weeks) increased in 101 patients with acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or ischemic stroke syndrome (P<0.001) and 38 healthy patients with two or more ARFs (P=0.027) compared with 109 healthy patients with fewer than two ARFs. Patients with diabetes mellitus from all groups had significantly increased platelet FcR expression over those without diabetes (P<0.0001). Platelet aggregation studies suggested a correlation between number of ARFs per patient, platelet Fc expression levels, and relative sensitivity to collagen stimulation. Platelet FcR surface expression is increased in patients with an acute coronary or cerebrovascular event, non-acutely ill patients with two or more ARFs, and in patients with diabetes mellitus. Increased platelet FcR expression may therefore contribute towards risk for atherothrombotic events.

Detection of lupus anticoagulant identifies patients with autoimmune haemolytic anaemia at increased risk for venous thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-recognized complication of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA), and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this disorder. However, the incidence, pathogenesis and risk-factors for VTE in AIHA remain poorly defined. Lupus anticoagulants (LA) and anticardiolipin (ACA) antibodies are autoantibodies directed against epitopes on prothrombin or beta2 glycoprotein I (beta2-GPI). Both LA and ACA (together called antiphospholipid antibodies, APLA) are associated with VTE. We have prospectively studied the occurrence of VTE and APLA in 30 patients with AIHA. VTE was objectively documented in eight (27%) patients. APLA were detected in 19 (63%) patients with AIHA, of whom nine (30%) had a LA and 17 (57%) ACA. Seven patients had both LA and ACA. Among the eight patients with VTE, LA was detected in five (63%) and ACA in four (50%). There was a statistically significant association between presence of LA and occurrence of VTE (RR: 7.50, 95% CI: 1.25-45.2, P = 0.03). VTE is a frequent and life-threatening complication of AIHA. Detection of the lupus anticoagulant in patients with AIHA identifies individuals at significantly increased risk for VTE. Future studies should address the role of prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with AIHA.

Multicenter trial of low-dose paclitaxel in patients with advanced AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options are limited for patients with advanced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related Kaposi sarcoma (AIDS-KS) whose disease has progressed after receiving therapy with liposomal anthracyclines or combination chemotherapy with doxorubicin (Adriamycin), bleomycin, and vincristine (ABV). This study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of a novel dose and schedule of paclitaxel in patients with AIDS-KS who failed to respond to previous systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter Phase II study. Eligible patients had advanced AIDS-KS consisting of at least 25 mucocutaneous lesions, visceral disease, or lymphedema, and had failed to respond to at least one previous systemic chemotherapy regimen. Patients were treated with paclitaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) given intravenously over 3 hours, every 2 weeks. Primary efficacy end points were tumor response, time to progression, time to treatment failure, and survival. Quality of life and adverse events were evaluated using the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS) and the World Health Organization Toxicity Criteria, respectively. RESULTS: One hundred and seven male patients with advanced AIDS-KS were enrolled from nine participating sites. The median entry CD4+ lymphocyte count was 41/mm(3) (range 0-1139). Previous treatment regimens included ABV in 52, liposomal daunorubicin in 49, and liposomal doxorubicin in 40 patients. Forty-one patients (38%) received two or more previous chemotherapy regimens. Protease inhibitor use during the study was reported by 82 (77%) patients overall; 47 patients (44%) were receiving a protease inhibitor before study entry. Complete or partial response was documented in 60 patients (56%). The median duration of response was 8.9 months. Major response rate was similar when comparing patients not on a protease inhibitor at the time of response (59%) with patients on a protease inhibitor at time of response (54%). However, protease inhibitor use had a significant impact on survival (P = 0.04). Grade 4 neutropenia was reported in 35% of patients; other life-threatening side effects were uncommon. Significant improvements were seen in the total quality of life scores measured by the SDS, including significant improvement in KS-related symptoms such as facial disease, tumor-associated edema, and pulmonary involvement. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel given every 2 weeks induces major tumor regression in the majority of patients with advanced KS who failed to respond to previous systemic chemotherapy. Paclitaxel is associated with significant improvement in quality of life with acceptable toxicity and should be considered as an effective treatment option for patients with advanced KS.

Characteristics of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients with type 1 human immunodeficiency virus infection.

BACKGROUND: There is recent evidence that the incidence of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) appears to be increased in persons with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The current study was conducted to describe the clinical, immunologic, and pathologic characteristics of indolent B-cell lymphoma in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: The current report was a retrospective study of 10 cases of indolent NHL identified from the AIDS-Lymphoma Registry at the University of Southern California School of Medicine. These patients were compared with 336 consecutive patients with systemic intermediate/high-grade AIDS-related NHL who were diagnosed and treated at a single institution. RESULTS: The pathology of the indolent cases included follicular lymphoma (five patients), small lymphocytic lymphoma (two patients), and one case each of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), monocytoid B-cell, and marginal zone lymphoma. When comparing the indolent lymphomas with the intermediate/high-grade AIDS-NHL cases, no differences were observed with regard to demographic characteristics or history of prior opportunistic infection. HIV patients with indolent lymphomas were found to have a significantly higher median CD4+ lymphocyte count compared with patients with intermediate/high-grade NHL (531 /mm3 vs. 90 /mm3) (P < 0.0001). Bone marrow involvement was significantly more common in indolent NHL cases (50%) versus intermediate/high-grade NHL cases (17%) (P = 0.02). The median survival for patients with indolent NHL was significantly longer compared with patients with intermediate/high-grade NHL (66.8 months vs. 7.1 months) (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Indolent lymphomas occurring in patients infected with HIV appear to differ from intermediate/high-grade lymphomas with regard to immune status and propensity for bone marrow involvement and prolonged survival. The median survival in the group of HIV-seropositive patients with indolent NHL examined in the current study was found to be comparable to that reported in HIV-negative individuals.

Multidrug resistance (MDR-1) expression in AIDS-related lymphomas.

P-glycoprotein is a product of the multidrug resistance (MDR-1) gene. In non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, less than 20% of untreated de novo lymphomas express MDR-1 compared with approximately 50% after failure of chemotherapy. We wished to study the expression of MDR-1 in AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (AIDS-NHL). Tissue biopsies from 50 patients with newly diagnosed AIDS-NHL were studied by immunohistochemical analysis using C494, a monoclonal antibody specific for the MDR-1 isoform of P-gp. MDR-1 expression was correlated with patient demographics, lymphoma characteristics, response to chemotherapy, and survival. Forty-six males and four females with a median age of 38 years (range 26-63) were studied. A prior AIDS-defining opportunistic infection was reported in 35 patients (70%). The median CD4+ lymphocyte count was 69/mm(3) (range 0-920). Thirty-two patients (63%) had received prior anti-HIV therapy, including a protease inhibitor in five (10%). Pathologic types consisted of diffuse large cell in 13 (26%), immunoblastic in 13 (26%), small non-cleaved in 22 (44%), and high grade not otherwise specified in two (4%). The majority of patients (76%) had stage III/IV disease. Pre-treatment lymphoma tissues from 33 patients (66%) stained positively for MDR-1. MDR-1 positive patients had a significantly lower complete remission rate compared to MDR-1 negative patients (33 versus 65%, P=0.042). Duration of complete response was significantly longer in MDR-1 negative patients compared with MDR-1 positive patients (not reached versus 9.9 months, P=0.003). Strategies to overcome MDR-1 expression may be important for initial treatment in patients with AIDS-NHL.