Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 53
Filter
1.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1338859, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38873256

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a national lockdown and the interruption of all cancer preventive services, including cervical cancer screening. We aimed to assess the COVID-19 pandemic impact on opportunistic screening participation, abnormal cytology (ASCUS+) prevalence and screening interval in 2020 and 2021 within the Public Health System of Catalonia, Spain. Methods: Individual data on cytology and HPV testing of women aged 25-65 from 2014 to 2021 were retrieved from the Information System for Primary Care Services (SISAP). Time-series regression models were used to estimate expected screening participation and abnormal cytology prevalence in 2020 and 2021. The impact was determined by comparing observed and expected values (ratios). Additionally, changes in screening interval trends between 2014 and 2021 were assessed by fitting a Piecewise linear regression model. Results: Cervical cancer screening participation decreased by 38.8% and 2.2% in 2020 and 2021, respectively, with the most significant impact on participation (-96.1%) occurring in April 2020. Among older women, participation was lower, and it took longer to recover. Abnormal cytology prevalence was 1.4 times higher than expected in 2020 and 2021, with variations by age (range=1.1-1.5). From June 2020 onwards, the screening interval trend significantly changed from an increase of 0.59 to 3.57 months per year, resulting in a median time of 48 months by December 2021. Conclusions: During the pandemic, fewer women have participated in cervical cancer screening, abnormal cytology prevalence has increased, and the screening interval is more prolonged than before. The potential cervical cancer lifetime risk implications highlight the need for organized HPV-based screening.

2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(2)2024 Jan 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38275867

ABSTRACT

Purpose. To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adherence to oral endocrine therapy in patients diagnosed with breast cancer in the public healthcare system in Catalonia (Spain). Methods. Retrospective cohort study in patients starting endocrine therapy from 2017 to 2021. Adherence was measured during the first year of treatment, and the impact of the pandemic was calculated according to the calendar year and whether the first year of treatment included the peak period of the pandemic in our setting (March-September 2020). Analyses were performed using a chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression, with results stratified by year, age group, and drug type. Results. Mean overall adherence during the first year of treatment was 89.6% from 2017 to 2021. In contrast, the patients who started treatment in 2019 and 2020 and whose treatment included the peak pandemic period presented an adherence of 87.0% and 86.5%, respectively. Young age and tamoxifen or combination therapy were predictors of low adherence. An increase in neoadjuvant therapy was also observed in 2020. Conclusions. The COVID-19 pandemic had only a modest impact on adherence to endocrine therapy (≈3%), despite the enormous disruptions for patients, the healthcare system in general, and cancer care in particular that were occurring in that period.

3.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 8097, 2022 05 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35577853

ABSTRACT

We show how the use and interpretation of population-based cancer survival indicators can help oncologists talk with breast cancer (BC) patients about the relationship between their prognosis and their adherence to endocrine therapy (ET). The study population comprised a population-based cohort of estrogen receptor positive BC patients (N = 1268) diagnosed in Girona and Tarragona (Northeastern Spain) and classified according to HER2 status (+ / -), stage at diagnosis (I/II/III) and five-year cumulative adherence rate (adherent > 80%; non-adherent ≤ 80%). Cox regression analysis was performed to identify significant prognostic factors for overall survival, whereas relative survival (RS) was used to estimate the crude probability of death due to BC (PBC). Stage and adherence to ET were the significant factors for predicting all-cause mortality. Compared to stage I, risk of death increased in stage II (hazard ratio [HR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51-3.30) and stage III (HR 5.11, 95% CI 3.46-7.51), and it decreased with adherence to ET (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.59). PBC differences were higher in non-adherent patients compared to adherent ones and increased across stages: stage I: 6.61% (95% CI 0.05-13.20); stage II: 9.77% (95% CI 0.59-19.01), and stage III: 22.31% (95% CI 6.34-38.45). The age-adjusted survival curves derived from this modeling were implemented in the web application BreCanSurvPred ( https://pdocomputation.snpstats.net/BreCanSurvPred ). Web applications like BreCanSurvPred can help oncologists discuss the consequences of non-adherence to prescribed ET with patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Patient Compliance , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Software , Spain/epidemiology
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35329292

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer (BC) is globally the most frequent cancer in women. Adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone-receptor-positive BC patients is active and voluntary for the first five years after diagnosis. This study examines the impact of adherence to ET on 10-year excess mortality (EM) in patients diagnosed with Stages I to III BC (N = 2297). Since sample size is an issue for estimating age- and stage-specific survival indicators, we developed a method, ComSynSurData, for generating a large synthetic dataset (SynD) through probabilistic graphical modeling of the original cohort. We derived population-based survival indicators using a Bayesian relative survival model fitted to the SynD. Our modeling showed that hormone-receptor-positive BC patients diagnosed beyond 49 years of age at Stage I or beyond 59 years at Stage II do not have 10-year EM if they follow the prescribed ET regimen. This result calls for developing interventions to promote adherence to ET in patients with hormone receptor-positive BC and in turn improving cancer survival. The presented methodology here demonstrates the potential use of probabilistic graphical modeling for generating reliable synthetic datasets for validating population-based survival indicators when sample size is an issue.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Bayes Theorem , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Models, Statistical
5.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 48(5): 967-977, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34479744

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Complex surgery and radiotherapy are the central pillars of loco-regional oncology treatment. This paper describes the reimbursement schemes used in radiation and complex surgical oncology, reports on literature and policy reviews. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature of the reimbursement models has been carried out separately for radiotherapy and complex cancer surgery based on PRISMA guidelines. Using searches of PubMed and grey literature, we identified articles from scientific journals and reports published since 2000 on provider payment or reimbursement systems currently used in radiation oncology and complex cancer surgery, also including policy models. RESULTS: Most European health systems reimburse radiotherapy using a budget-based, fee-for-service or fraction-based system; while few reimburse services according to an episode-based model. Also, the reimbursement models for cancer surgery are mostly restricted to differences embedded in the DRG system and adjustments applied to the fees, based on the complexity of each surgical procedure. There is an enormous variability in reimbursement across countries, resulting in different incentives and different amounts paid for the same therapeutic strategy. CONCLUSION: A reimbursement policy, based on the episode of care as the basic payment unit, is advocated for. Innovation should be tackled in a two-tier approach: one defining the common criteria for reimbursement of proven evidence-based interventions; another for financing emerging innovation with uncertain definitive value. Relevant clinical and economic data, also collected real-life, should support reimbursement systems that mirror the actual cost of evidence-based practice.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Radiation Oncology , Surgical Oncology , Fee-for-Service Plans , Humans , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoplasms/surgery , Reimbursement Mechanisms
6.
Radiother Oncol ; 169: 114-123, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34461186

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Complex surgery and radiotherapy are the central pillars of loco-regional oncology treatment. This paper describes the reimbursement schemes used in radiation and complex surgical oncology, reports on literature and policy reviews. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature of the reimbursement models has been carried out separately for radiotherapy and complex cancer surgery based on PRISMA guidelines. Using searches of PubMed and grey literature, we identified articles from scientific journals and reports published since 2000 on provider payment or reimbursement systems currently used in radiation oncology and complex cancer surgery, also including policy models. RESULTS: Most European health systems reimburse radiotherapy using a budget-based, fee-for-service or fraction-based system; while few reimburse services according to an episode-based model. Also, the reimbursement models for cancer surgery are mostly restricted to differences embedded in the DRG system and adjustments applied to the fees, based on the complexity of each surgical procedure. There is an enormous variability in reimbursement across countries, resulting in different incentives and different amounts paid for the same therapeutic strategy. CONCLUSION: A reimbursement policy, based on the episode of care as the basic payment unit, is advocated for. Innovation should be tackled in a two-tier approach: one defining the common criteria for reimbursement of proven evidence-based interventions; another for financing emerging innovation with uncertain definitive value. Relevant clinical and economic data, also collected real-life, should support reimbursement systems that mirror the actual cost of evidence-based practice.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Radiation Oncology , Surgical Oncology , Fee-for-Service Plans , Humans , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoplasms/surgery
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36612726

ABSTRACT

Mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD), second tumours, and other causes is of clinical interest in the long-term follow-up of breast cancer (BC) patients. Using a cohort of BC patients (N = 6758) from the cancer registries of Girona and Tarragona (north-eastern Spain), we studied the 10-year probabilities of death due to BC, other cancers, and CVD according to stage at diagnosis and hormone receptor (HR) status. Among the non-BC causes of death (N = 720), CVD (N = 218) surpassed other cancers (N = 196). The BC cohort presented a significantly higher risk of death due to endometrial and ovarian cancers than the general population. In Stage I, HR- patients showed a 1.72-fold higher probability of all-cause death and a 6.11-fold higher probability of breast cancer death than HR+ patients. In Stages II-III, the probability of CVD death (range 3.11% to 3.86%) surpassed that of other cancers (range 0.54% to 3.11%). In Stage IV patients, the probability of death from any cancer drove the mortality risk. Promoting screening and preventive measures in BC patients are warranted, since long-term control should encompass early detection of second neoplasms, ruling out the possibility of late recurrence. In patients diagnosed in Stages II-III at an older age, surveillance for preventing late cardiotoxicity is crucial.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Cardiovascular Diseases , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer , Probability
8.
PLoS One ; 16(1): e0245806, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33481914

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Short message service (SMS) based interventions are widely used in healthcare and have shown promising results to improve cancer screening programs. However, more research is still needed to implement SMS in the screening process. We present a study protocol to assess the impact on health and economics of three targeted SMS-based interventions in population-based cancer screening programs. METHODS/DESIGN: The M-TICs study is a randomized controlled trial with a formal process evaluation. Participants aged 50-69 years identified as eligible from the colorectal cancer (CRC) and breast cancer (BC) screening program of the Catalan Institute of Oncology (Catalonia, Spain) will be randomly assigned to receive standard invitation procedure (control group) or SMS-based intervention to promote participation. Two interventions will be conducted in the CRC screening program: 1) Screening invitation reminder: Those who do not participate in the CRC screening within 6 weeks of invite will receive a reminder (SMS or letter); 2) Reminder to complete and return fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit: SMS reminder versus no intervention to individuals who have picked up a FIT kit at the pharmacy and they have not returned it after 14 days. The third intervention will be performed in the BC screening program. Women who had been screened previously will receive an SMS invitation or a letter invitation to participate in the screening. As a primary objective we will assess the impact on participation for each intervention. The secondary objectives will be to analyze the cost-effectiveness of the interventions and to assess participants' perceptions. EXPECTED RESULTS: The results from this randomized controlled trial will provide important empirical evidence for the use of mobile phone technology as a tool for improving population-based cancer screening programs. These results may influence the cancer screening invitation procedure in future routine practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: NCT04343950 (04/09/2020); clinicaltrials.gov.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Text Messaging , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
9.
Maturitas ; 144: 53-59, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358209

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore whether the type of mammographic feature prompting a false-positive recall (FPR) during mammography screening influences the risk and timing of breast cancer diagnosis, particularly if assessed with invasive procedures. STUDY DESIGN: We included information on women screened and recalled for further assessment in Spain between 1994 and 2015, with follow-up until 2017, categorizing FPRs by the assessment (noninvasive or invasive) and mammographic feature prompting the recall. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Breast cancer rates in the first two years after FPR (first period) and after two years (second period). RESULTS: The study included 99,825 women with FPRs. In both periods, the breast cancer rate was higher in the invasive assessment group than in the noninvasive group (first period 12 ‰ vs 1.9 ‰, p < 0.001; second period 4.4‰ vs 3.1‰, p < 0.001). During the first period, the invasive assessment group showed diverse breast cancer rates for each type of mammographic feature, with a higher rate for asymmetric density (31.9‰). When the second period was compared with the first, the breast cancer rate decreased in the invasive assessment group (from 12‰ to 4.4‰, p < 0.001) and increased in the noninvasive assessment group (from 1.9‰ to 3.1‰, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the context of mammography screening, the risk of breast cancer diagnosis during the first two years after FPR was particularly high for women undergoing invasive assessment; importantly, the risk was modified by type of mammographic feature prompting the recall. This information could help to individualize follow-up after exclusion of malignancy.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Early Detection of Cancer , Mammography , Mass Screening/methods , Biopsy , Breast/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Risk , Spain/epidemiology
10.
Artif Intell Med ; 107: 101875, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828436

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two common issues may arise in certain population-based breast cancer (BC) survival studies: I) missing values in a survivals' predictive variable, such as "Stage" at diagnosis, and II) small sample size due to "imbalance class problem" in certain subsets of patients, demanding data modeling/simulation methods. METHODS: We present a procedure, ModGraProDep, based on graphical modeling (GM) of a dataset to overcome these two issues. The performance of the models derived from ModGraProDep is compared with a set of frequently used classification and machine learning algorithms (Missing Data Problem) and with oversampling algorithms (Synthetic Data Simulation). For the Missing Data Problem we assessed two scenarios: missing completely at random (MCAR) and missing not at random (MNAR). Two validated BC datasets provided by the cancer registries of Girona and Tarragona (northeastern Spain) were used. RESULTS: In both MCAR and MNAR scenarios all models showed poorer prediction performance compared to three GM models: the saturated one (GM.SAT) and two with penalty factors on the partial likelihood (GM.K1 and GM.TEST). However, GM.SAT predictions could lead to non-reliable conclusions in BC survival analysis. Simulation of a "synthetic" dataset derived from GM.SAT could be the worst strategy, but the use of the remaining GMs models could be better than oversampling. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest the use of the GM-procedure presented for one-variable imputation/prediction of missing data and for simulating "synthetic" BC survival datasets. The "synthetic" datasets derived from GMs could be also used in clinical applications of cancer survival data such as predictive risk analysis.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Algorithms , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Registries , Survival Analysis
11.
Radiother Oncol ; 151: 200-205, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32771615

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the effects of non-adherence to external beam radiation therapy in cancer patients receiving treatment with a curative. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study collected health records data for all cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy with curative intent in 2016 in Catalonia, Spain. Adherence was defined as having received at least 90% of the total dose prescribed. A logistic regression model was used to assess factors related to non-adherence, and its association with one-year survival was evaluated using Cox regression. RESULTS: The final sample included 8721 patients (mean age 63.6 years): breast cancer was the most common tumour site (38.1%), followed by prostate and colon/rectum. Treatment interruptions prolonged the total duration of therapy in 70.7% of the patients, and 1.0% were non-adherent. Non-adherence was associated with advanced age, female gender, and some localization of primary tumour (head and neck, urinary bladder, and haematological cancers). The risk of death in non-adherent patients was higher than in adherent patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval 0.97-2.74), after adjusting for the potential confounding effect of age, gender, tumour site and comorbidity. CONCLUSION: Non-adherence to radiotherapy, as measured by the received dose, is very low in our setting, and it may have an impact on one-year survival.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Prostate , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Spain
12.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 34(4): 356-362, jul.-ago. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-198706

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Analizar la supervivencia poblacional del cáncer de mama (CM) en estadios precoces, estimando la tendencia temporal del exceso de mortalidad (EM) a largo plazo en periodos anuales y quinquenales, y determinando, si es posible, una proporción de pacientes que puedan considerarse curadas. MÉTODO: Se incluyó la cohorte de pacientes diagnosticadas de CM en estadios I y II antes de los 60 años de edad en Gerona y Tarragona (N = 2453). Se calcularon la supervivencia observada (SO) y la supervivencia relativa (SR) al CM hasta los 20 años de seguimiento. Para valorar el EM se estimó la SR a intervalos anuales (SRI) y quinquenales (SR5). Los resultados se presentan por grupos de edad (≤49 y 50-59), estadio (I/II) y periodo de diagnóstico (1985-1994 y 1995-2004). RESULTADOS: En el estadio I, la SO y la SR fueron mayores en 1995-2004 que en 1985-1994: 3,5% a los 15 años de seguimiento y 4,5% a los 20 años. La SO superó el 80% en el estadio I y se mantuvo inferior al 70% en el estadio II. Sin embargo, el EM a largo plazo no desapareció (SRI <1) independientemente del grupo de edad, el estadio y el periodo de diagnóstico. A los 15 años de seguimiento, el EM a 5 años osciló entre el 1-5% en el estadio I (SR5 ≥0,95) y el 5-10% en el estadio II. CONCLUSIONES: En nuestra cohorte, a los 15 años de seguimiento se detectó que el EM anual no desapareció y el quinquenal fue del 1-10%. Por ello, no se pudo determinar una proporción de curación del CM durante el periodo de estudio


OBJECTIVE: To analyze the population-based survival of breast cancer (CM) diagnosed in early stages estimating the time trends of excess mortality (EM) in the long term in annual and five-year time intervals, and to determine, if possible, a proportion of patients who can be considered cured. METHOD: We included women diagnosed with BC under the age of 60 years in stages I and II in Girona and Tarragona (N = 2453). The observed (OS) and relative survival (RS) were calculated up to 20 years of follow-up. RS was also estimated at annual (RSI) and in five-year intervals (RS5) to graphically assess the EM. The results are presented by age groups (≤49 and 50-59), stage (I/II) and diagnostic period (1985-1994 and 1995-2004). RESULTS: In stage I, OS and RS were higher during 1995-2004 compared to 1985-1994: 3.5% at 15 years of follow-up and 4.5% at 20-years of follow-up. In 1995-2004, the OS surpassed 80% in stage I patients whereas in stage II it remained below 70%. During 1995-2004, the long-term EM did not level off towards 0 (RSI <1) independently of age group, stage and period of diagnosis. After 15 years of follow-up, the 5-year EM oscillated between 1 and 5% in stage I (RS5 ≥0.95) and between 5 and 10% in stage II. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, after 15 years of follow-up, it was detected that the annual EM did not disappear and the five-year EM remained between 1 and 10%. Therefore, it was not possible to determine a cure rate of BC during the study period


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Disease-Free Survival , Neoplasm Staging/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Mortality/trends , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Follow-Up Studies , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data
13.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 29(6): 486-492, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32039928

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer screening programs with computed tomography of the chest reduce mortality by more than 20%. Yet, they have not been implemented widely because of logistic and cost implications. Here, we sought to: (1) use real-life data to compare the outcomes and cost of lung cancer patients with treated medically or surgically in our region and (2) from this data, estimate the cost-benefit ratio of a lung cancer screening program (CRIBAR) soon to be deployed in our region (Catalunya, Spain). We accessed the Catalan Health Surveillance System (CHSS) and analysed data of all patients with a first diagnosis of lung cancer between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016. Analysis was carried forward until 30 months (t = 30) after lung cancer diagnosis. Main results showed that: (1) surgically treated lung cancer patients have better survival and return earlier to regular home activities, use less healthcare related resources and cost less tax-payer money and (2) depending on incidence of lung cancer identified and treated in the program (1-2%), the return on investment for CRIBAR is expected to break even at 3-6 years, respectively, after its launch. Surgical treatment of lung cancer is cheaper and offers better outcomes. CRIBAR is estimated to be cost-effective soon after launch.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Lung Neoplasms/economics , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Pneumonectomy/economics , Pneumonectomy/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Combined Modality Therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Young Adult
14.
Gac Sanit ; 34(4): 356-362, 2020.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30573319

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the population-based survival of breast cancer (CM) diagnosed in early stages estimating the time trends of excess mortality (EM) in the long term in annual and five-year time intervals, and to determine, if possible, a proportion of patients who can be considered cured. METHOD: We included women diagnosed with BC under the age of 60 years in stages I and II in Girona and Tarragona (N = 2453). The observed (OS) and relative survival (RS) were calculated up to 20 years of follow-up. RS was also estimated at annual (RSI) and in five-year intervals (RS5) to graphically assess the EM. The results are presented by age groups (≤49 and 50-59), stage (I/II) and diagnostic period (1985-1994 and 1995-2004). RESULTS: In stage I, OS and RS were higher during 1995-2004 compared to 1985-1994: 3.5% at 15 years of follow-up and 4.5% at 20-years of follow-up. In 1995-2004, the OS surpassed 80% in stage I patients whereas in stage II it remained below 70%. During 1995-2004, the long-term EM did not level off towards 0 (RSI <1) independently of age group, stage and period of diagnosis. After 15 years of follow-up, the 5-year EM oscillated between 1 and 5% in stage I (RS5 ≥0.95) and between 5 and 10% in stage II. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, after 15 years of follow-up, it was detected that the annual EM did not disappear and the five-year EM remained between 1 and 10%. Therefore, it was not possible to determine a cure rate of BC during the study period.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Registries , Spain/epidemiology
15.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 33(5): 468-471, sept.-oct. 2019. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-189022

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Evaluar las diferencias de participación en un programa de cribado de cáncer de mama entre mujeres autóctonas y alóctonas. Método: Estudio retrospectivo basado en el programa de cribado de cáncer de mama de la provincia de Tarragona (2008-2015). La muestra es la población diana del programa con país de origen conocido. Resultados: Cohorte de 40.824 mujeres. Las mujeres alóctonas participan menos que las autóctonas (41,8% vs. 72,3%), aunque muestran una tasa de detección de cáncer similar a estas, pero con diferencias según el índice de desarrollo humano de su país de origen. Los dos grupos presentan similares estadios tumorales en el momento del diagnóstico (p=0,59). Conclusiones: Sería necesario desarrollar estrategias específicamente dirigidas a la población inmigrante para mejorar su participación en el cribado del cáncer de mama


Objective: To evaluate the differences between autochthonous and allochthonous women's participation in a breast cancer screening programme. Method: Retrospective study based on data from the Breast Cancer Screening Programme of the province of Tarragona (2008-2015). The sample is the target population of the programme with known country of origin. Results: Cohort of 40,824 women. Allochthonous women participate less than autochthonous women (41.8% vs. 72.3%) although they have a similar global detection rate to the latter but with differences according to the human development index of their country of origin. Both groups present similar tumour stages on detection (p=.59). Conclusions: Strategies specifically aimed at the immigrant population are required to improve their participation in breast cancer screening


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Spain/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data
16.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 175(3): 733-740, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30887164

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess adherence to endocrine therapy and its relation to recurrence and mortality in women with early breast cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in population-based cancer registries in two Catalonian provinces of Spain. We included all cases of invasive stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed from 2007 to 2011 and with follow-up to 2017. Adherence to endocrine therapy was measured by means of prescription refills. Patients were considered non-adherent if they filled less than 80% of their prescriptions. After collecting data from patients' medical records, we analysed clinical variables and their relation with adherence by means of logistic and Cox regression models. RESULTS: The study included 2413 women. Five-year adherence was 84.5%; the greatest risk for non-adherence was in women under 50 years of age, diagnosed with stage III cancer, treated with neoadjuvant therapy, or receiving tamoxifen or sequential treatment. Adverse effects were associated with greater adherence. Non-adherence was significantly and independently associated with recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-2.51) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.62-2.74), after adjusting for age and tumour stage. CONCLUSIONS: Although non-adherence was relatively infrequent in this population-based study, its impact on the risk of recurrence and mortality was considerable. Clinicians should make efforts to ensure therapeutic adherence during clinical follow-up of women with breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
17.
Gac Sanit ; 33(5): 468-471, 2019.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30205914

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences between autochthonous and allochthonous women's participation in a breast cancer screening programme. METHOD: Retrospective study based on data from the Breast Cancer Screening Programme of the province of Tarragona (2008-2015). The sample is the target population of the programme with known country of origin. RESULTS: Cohort of 40,824 women. Allochthonous women participate less than autochthonous women (41.8% vs. 72.3%) although they have a similar global detection rate to the latter but with differences according to the human development index of their country of origin. Both groups present similar tumour stages on detection (p=.59). CONCLUSIONS: Strategies specifically aimed at the immigrant population are required to improve their participation in breast cancer screening.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Africa/ethnology , Aged , Americas/ethnology , Asia/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Europe/ethnology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Oceania/ethnology , Procedures and Techniques Utilization , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology
18.
Prev Med ; 118: 304-308, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30414944

ABSTRACT

Severe complications (SC) in colonoscopy represent the most important adverse effect of colorectal cancer screening programs (CRCSP). The objective is to evaluate the risk factors for SC in colonoscopy indicated after a positive fecal occult blood test in population-based CRCSP. The SC (n = 161) identified from 48,730 diagnostic colonoscopies performed in a cohort of all the women and men invited from 2000 to 2012 in 6 CRCSP in Spain. A total of 318 controls were selected, matched for age, sex and period when the colonoscopy was performed. Conditional logistic regression models were estimated. The analysis was performed separately in groups: immediate-SC (same day of the colonoscopy); late-SC (between 1 and 30 days after); perforation; and bleeding events. SC occurred in 3.30‰ of colonoscopies. Prior colon disease showed a higher risk of SC (OR = 4.87). Regular antiplatelet treatment conferred a higher risk of overall SC (OR = 2.80) and late-SC (OR = 9.26), as did regular anticoagulant therapy (OR = 3.47, OR = 7.36). A history of pelvic-surgery or abdominal-radiotherapy was a risk factor for overall SC (OR = 5.03), immediate-SC (OR = 8.49), late-SC (OR = 4.65) and perforation (OR = 21.59). A finding of adenoma or cancer also showed a higher risk of overall SC (OR = 8.71), immediate-SC (OR = 12.67), late-SC (OR = 4.08), perforation (OR = 4.69) and bleeding (OR = 17.02). The risk of SC doesn't vary depending on the type of preparation or type of anesthesia. Knowing the clinical history of patients such as regular previous medication and history of surgery or radiotherapy, as well as the severity of the findings during the colonoscopy process could help to focus prevention measures in order to minimize SC in CRCSP.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Hemorrhage , Adult , Aged , Female , Hemorrhage/complications , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain
19.
Eur J Public Health ; 28(6): 1132-1138, 2018 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29684144

ABSTRACT

Background: HPV screening has been shown to be more cost-effective than cytology screening under most scenarios. Furthermore, it should be offered only in organized programmes with good quality assurance mechanisms. This study analyses the comparative cost of the current policy of opportunistic cytology screening vs. a hypothetical organized programme based on primary HPV screening. Methods: Total cervical cancer expenditure was defined as the sum of three cost elements: (i) direct (medical and non-medical) costs, obtained from a calibrated Markov model of the natural history of HPV and cervical cancer; (ii) programmatic costs, estimated based on other organized screening programmes; and (iii) indirect costs, extrapolated from previously published data. Results: Organized HPV screening at 5-year intervals costs consistently less across all coverage levels than opportunistic cytology screening at 3-year intervals. The current annual direct medical cost to the public health system of the opportunistic cytology at 40% coverage is estimated at €33.2 per woman screened aged 25-64. Under an organized programme of primary HPV screening at 70% coverage, the cost is estimated to be €18.4 per woman screened aged 25-64. Conclusion: Our study concludes that the economic resources currently devoted to providing opportunistic cytology screening to 40% of the target population at 3-year intervals could be more effectively used to screen 70% of the target population at 5-year intervals by switching to an organized programme based on primary HPV screening. This finding is of relevance to other European countries or regions with similar screening policies and health infrastructures.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Mass Screening/economics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Primary Health Care , Spain
20.
Breast J ; 24(4): 509-518, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29517151

ABSTRACT

Women with a benign breast disease (BBD) have an increased risk of subsequent breast carcinoma. Information is scarce regarding the characteristics of breast carcinomas diagnosed after a BBD. Our aim was to point out the differences in clinical and histologic characteristics of breast carcinomas diagnosed in women with and without a previous pathologic diagnosis of BBD in the context of population-based mammography screening. Retrospective cohort study of all women aged 50-69 years who were screened at least once in a population-based screening program in Spain, between 1994 and 2011 and followed up until December 2012. The mean follow-up was 6.1 years. We analyzed 6645 breast carcinomas, of whom 238 had a previous pathologic diagnosis of BBD. Information on clinical and histologic characteristics was collected from pathology reports. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of occurrence of selected histologic characteristics of breast carcinomas in women with and without a previous BBD. Women with a previous BBD had a higher proportion of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) compared with women without a BBD (22.1% and 13.6%, respectively). Among those diagnosed with an invasive breast carcinoma, women with previous BBD were more likely to be diagnosed with carcinomas sized >2 cm (OR = 1.46; 95%CI = 1.03-2.08), metastatic positive (OR = 2.66; 95%CI = 1.21-5.86), and with a high Ki-67 proliferation rate (OR = 1.93; 95%CI = 1.24-2.99). No differences were found across histologic subtypes of BBD. Screening participants with a previous pathologic diagnosis of BBD had a higher proportion of DCIS. However, invasive carcinomas detected in women with a BBD were associated with clinical and histologic characteristics conferring a worst prognosis.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Aged , Breast Diseases/epidemiology , Breast Diseases/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Lymphatic Metastasis , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...