Epidural administration of ropivacaine and midazolam is superior to intra-articular administration as postoperative analgesia after isolated arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings autograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Reconstructive surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is quite common, previous studies have documented that adequate pain control in the early phases of the postoperative period translates into early mobility and a rapid start of rehabilitation. Therefore, the search for new strategies for postoperative pain control is justified. The aim of this study was to compare intra-articular to the epidural administration of ropivacaine and midazolam as postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft (HA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Double-blinded, prospective randomized clinical trial included 108 consecutive patients aged from 18 to 50 years that had undergone arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with HA. The patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The first group received intraarticular ropivacaine and midazolam. The second group received epidural ropivacaine and midazolam. The need for rescue analgesia, the postoperative pain experienced, side effects and complications of the analgesic drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: The intra-articular group received statistically significantly higher mean doses of rescue analgesia on the first two days (2.8 â€‹± â€‹1.0 vs. 1.3 â€‹± â€‹0.6 in the epidural group; p â€‹= â€‹0.001). Visual Analogue Scale scores at flexion were statistically significantly higher in the intra-articular group over the entire study period. The intra-articular group also reported a statistically significantly lower range-of-motion 87 â€‹± â€‹15 vs. 102 â€‹± â€‹11 in the epidural group (p â€‹= â€‹0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural administration of ropivacaine combined with midazolam in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with HA was clinically and significantly better relative to rescue analgesia and the intensity of pain in the first 48 postoperative hours when compared to intraarticular administration. There was no difference in terms of adverse effects and complications.

Modification of the technique for subclavian-vein catheterization.

INTRODUCTION: In invasive monitoring, subclavian-vein puncture is a routine procedure indicated for central vein cathe-terization. It is indicated in patients according to hospital stay, including the administration of drugs and the treatment of chronic and cardiac disease. The techniques described to date include infraclavicular percutaneous puncture; others place catheters using angiographic methods, and the use of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound has also been reported. Studies have been done in cadavers to get a better understanding of the procedure since the relationship between vascular elements and surrounding tissues are obtained. The usual technique is with the patient in Trendelenburg position, with the arm in adduction, the placement of an interscapular roll, and the head turned away from the puncture site. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate less frequent technical failures and complications using a modification of the usual technique. We propose catheterization of the right subclavian vein with the patient in decubitus, without an interescapular roll, with the arm in abduction and using the distal third of the clavicle and the suprasternal notch as anatomical references. RESULTS: Two technical puncture failures and three complications occurred in a total of 42 patients with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0410) in frequency (11.9%) from that reported with the traditional technique (21.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Greater efficacy with the technique modified by the authors was confirmed. Anatomical cadaver dissections showed a greater space between the right subclavian vein and the clavicle.