Estimating Time and Rhythm by Predicting External Stimuli.

In this chapter, we present recent findings from our group showing that elapsed time, interval timing, and rhythm maintenance might be achieved by the well-known ability of the brain to predict the future states of the world. The difference between predictions and actual sensory evidence is used to generate perceptual and behavioral adjustments that help subjects achieve desired behavioral goals. Concretely, we show that (1) accumulating prediction errors is a plausible strategy humans could use to determine whether a train of consecutive stimuli arrives at regular or irregular intervals. By analyzing the behavior of human and non-human primate subjects performing rhythm perception tasks, we demonstrate that (2) the ability to estimate elapsed time and internally maintain rhythms is shared across primates and humans. Neurophysiological recordings show that (3) the medial premotor cortex engages in rhythm entrainment and maintains oscillatory activity that reveals an internal metronome's spatial and temporal characteristics. Finally, we demonstrate that (4) the amplitude of gamma oscillations within this cortex increases proportionally to the total elapsed time. In conjunction with our most recent experiments, our results suggest that timing might be achieved by an internal simulation of the sensory stimuli and the motor commands that define the timing task that needs to be performed.

Discrimination of Regular and Irregular Rhythms Explained by a Time Difference Accumulation Model.

Perceiving the temporal regularity in a sequence of repetitive sensory events facilitates the preparation and execution of relevant behaviors with tight temporal constraints. How we estimate temporal regularity from repeating patterns of sensory stimuli is not completely understood. We developed a decision-making task in which participants had to decide whether a train of visual, auditory, or tactile pulses, had a regular or an irregular temporal pattern. We tested the hypothesis that subjects categorize stimuli as irregular by accumulating the time differences between the predicted and observed times of sensory pulses defining a temporal rhythm. Results suggest that instead of waiting for a single large temporal deviation, participants accumulate timing-error signals and judge a pattern as irregular when the amount of evidence reaches a decision threshold. Model fits of bounded integration showed that this accumulation occurs with negligible leak of evidence. Consistent with previous findings, we show that participants perform better when evaluating the regularity of auditory pulses, as compared with visual or tactile stimuli. Our results suggest that temporal regularity is estimated by comparing expected and measured pulse onset times, and that each prediction error is accumulated towards a threshold to generate a behavioral choice.