Laparoscopic and renal sparing approaches to tumours of the ureter and kidney.

Until recently, malignancies of the kidney and ureter were managed with open radical surgery. Over the last decade the urologic community has adopted the skill of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of these tumours. Parenchymal sparing procedures have become the standard of care in the treatment of selected patients with renal and ureteral tumours and many of these surgical procedures can be performed laparoscopically or ureteroscopically. Due partly to necessity and partly to the advancement of technology, renal and ureteral sparing procedures have become commonplace for definitive treatment and palliation of these tumours. The morbidity of such procedures is significantly less than for open surgery and the future of urologic minimally invasive surgery appears secure. This review article is aimed at updating the reader in the most recent advances in these techniques.

Mechanism of healing following the Snodgrass repair.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested that healing after tubularized incised plate urethroplasty occurs through re-epithelialization with normal tissue ingrowth or by secondary intent through scarring. We investigated healing in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hypospadias was created in 5 dogs by incising the ventral urethra, allowed to heal for 21 days and subsequently repaired. During hypospadias creation a tattoo was made longitudinally in the midline dorsal urethral plate. The tattoo was bisected during repair, thus creating 2 distinct lines marking the edges of the incision. A neourethra was tubularized and closed in 2 layers. At 21 days the phallus was harvested, inspected and embedded for histology. RESULTS: The dorsal urethral plate incision contained 2 distinct lines in all samples representing the area of separation between the native and ingrowing urethras. The distance between these lines was 0.9 +/- 0.1 mm. Proximal urethral lumen diameter (3. 3 +/- 0.1 mm.) was not significantly different from that of the neourethral lumen (3.1 +/- 0.1 mm.). Histologically all repairs had intact squamous epithelium. There was normal appearing subepithelial architecture with scant perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates between the tattoos. In contrast, the area around the sutures showed a desmoplastic (fibroblastic) reaction with an inflammatory, primarily neutrophilic response. CONCLUSIONS: Healing of the incision in the dorsal urethral plate during tubularized incised plate urethroplasty occurs by re-epithelialization with normal tissue ingrowth. In contrast, the sutured closure heals with a desmoplastic and inflammatory response.