The Mexican consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease of the colon. / Consenso mexicano sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la enfermedad diverticular del colon.

Since the publication of the 2008 guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease of the colon by the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología, significant advances have been made in the knowledge of that disease. A systematic review of articles published in the medical literature from January 2008 to July 2018 was carried out to revise and update the 2008 guidelines and provide new evidence-based recommendations. All high-quality articles in Spanish and English published within that time frame were included. The final versions of the 43 statements accepted in the three rounds of voting, utilizing the Delphi method, were written, and the quality of evidence and strength of the recommendations were established for each statement, utilizing the GRADE system. The present consensus contains new data on the definition, classification, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and risk factors of diverticular disease of the colon. Special emphasis is given to the usefulness of computed tomography and colonoscopy, as well as to the endoscopic methods for controlling bleeding. Outpatient treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis is discussed, as well as the role of rifaximin and mesalazine in the management of complicated acute diverticulitis. Both its minimally invasive alternatives and surgical options are described, stressing their indications, limitations, and contraindications. The new statements provide guidelines based on updated scientific evidence. Each statement is discussed, and its quality of evidence and the strength of the recommendation are presented.

Consenso mexicano sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la enfermedad diverticular del colon / The Mexican consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease of the colon

Desde la publicación en 2008 de las guías de diagnóstico y tratamiento de la enfermedad diverticular del colon de la Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología ha habido avances significativos en el conocimiento de esta enfermedad. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura en PubMed de enero de 2008 a julio de 2018 con el fin de revisar y actualizar las guías 2008 y proporcionar nuevas recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia. Se incluyeron todas las publicaciones en español e inglés, de alta calidad. Se redactaron los enunciados, que fueron votados utilizando el método Delphi. Se estableció la calidad de la evidencia y la fuerza de las recomendaciones según el sistema GRADE para cada enunciado. Cuarenta y tres enunciados fueron finalmente votados y calificados. Se informan nuevos datos sobre definición, clasificación, epidemiología, fisiopatología y factores de riesgo. Se revisó con especial énfasis la utilidad de la tomografía computarizada y de la colonoscopia, así como los métodos endoscópicos para el control de la hemorragia. Se discutió sobre el tratamiento ambulatorio de la diverticulitis no complicada, el papel de la rifaximina y la mesalazina, en el manejo de la diverticulitis aguda complicada tanto en sus alternativas mínimamente invasivas hasta las opciones quirúrgicas con énfasis en sus indicaciones, limitaciones y contraindicaciones. Los nuevos enunciados proporcionan directrices basadas en la evidencia actualizada. Se presentan la discusión, el grado y la fuerza de la recomendación de cada uno de ellos.

The fourth Mexican consensus on Helicobacter pylori. / IV consenso mexicano sobre Helicobacter pylori.

Important advances have been made since the last Mexican consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection was published in 2007. Therefore, the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología summoned 20 experts to produce "The Fourth Mexican Consensus on Helicobacter pylori". From February to June 2017, 4 working groups were organized, a literature review was performed, and 3 voting rounds were carried out, resulting in the formulation of 32 statements for discussion and consensus. From the ensuing recommendations, it was striking that Mexico is a country with an intermediate-to-low risk for gastric cancer, despite having a high prevalence of H. pylori infection. It was also corroborated that peptic ulcer disease, premalignant lesions, and histories of gastric cancer and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma should be considered clear indications for eradication. The relation of H. pylori to dyspeptic symptoms continues to be controversial. Eradication triple therapy with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and a proton pump inhibitor should no longer be considered first-line treatment, with the following 2 options proposed to take its place: quadruple therapy with bismuth (proton pump inhibitor, bismuth subcitrate, tetracycline, and metronidazole) and quadruple therapy without bismuth (proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole). The need for antimicrobial sensitivity testing when 2 eradication treatments have failed was also established. Finally, the promotion of educational campaigns on the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori for both primary care physicians and the general population were proposed.

The Mexican consensus on irritable bowel syndrome. / Consenso mexicano sobre el síndrome de intestino irritable.

BACKGROUND: Since the publication in 2009 of the Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome of the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología (2009 Guidelines), there have been significant advances in our knowledge of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease. AIMS: To present a consensus review of the most current knowledge of IBS, updating the 2009 Guidelines by incorporating new internationally published scientific evidence, with a special interest in Mexican studies. METHODS: The PubMed literature from January 2009 to March 2015 was reviewed and complemented through a manual search. Articles in English and Spanish were included and preference was given to consensuses, guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Statements referring to the different aspects of the disease were formulated and voted upon by 24 gastroenterologists employing the Delphi method. Once a consensus on each statement was reached, the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation were determined through the GRADE system. RESULTS: Forty-eight statements were formulated, updating the information on IBS and adding the complementary data that did not appear in the 2009 Guidelines regarding the importance of exercise and diet, diagnostic strategies, and current therapy alternatives that were analyzed with more stringent scientific vigor or that emerged within the last 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: We present herein a consensus review of the most relevant advances in the study of IBS, updating and complementing the 2009 Guidelines. Several studies conducted in Mexico were included.

[Atypical regenerative changes, dysplasia, and carcinoma in situ in chronic gastritis associated with Helicobacter pylori]. / Cambios regenerativos atípicos, displasia y carcinoma in situ en gastritis crónica asociada con Helicobacter pylori.

In the present work we study the association between chronic active gastritis (CAG), atypical regeneration and dysplasia and gastric Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. We study two groups of endoscopic biopsies. Regenerative changes and dysplasia were evaluated according to Gandur-Maymneh et al. classification which was simplified in typical and atypical regeneration, and mild and severe dysplasia. The group I included 94 patients with CAG, 9 with chronic non active gastritis (CNAG) and 2 with normal gastric mucosa. CAG was graded according to activity in; severe 28 patients; moderate 54 patients and; mild 12 patients. HP association in these cases was 100%, 77% and 25%. In cases of CNAG HP was present in 22%, there were not HP in normal gastric mucosa. There were atypical regeneration in 25% of moderate CAG and in 42% of severe CAG. Mild dysplasia was present in 7.5 and 25% in cases of moderate and severe CAG. Two biopsies showed severe dysplasia. In addition, intestinal metaplasia was found in 15% of CAG, the metaplasia was present in 25% of cases with CAG and atypical regeneration; in 54% of cases with mild dysplasia and; in 100% on cases with severe dysplasia. The group II included 9 cases of gastric cancer of intestinal type, 7 cases of diffuse type, and 4 cases of mixed type. In all these cases there was viewed CAG associated to HP infection in non-neoplastic mucosa. In 75% of cases there were showed atypical regeneration and 60% presented some type of dysplasia. There was transition between atypical regeneration and dysplasia in 6 cases of intestinal gastric cancer and in 3 cases of mixed type. We found relationship between the intensity of CAG and HP colonization, and the association with atypical regeneration and dysplasia.

[Effectiveness and safety of lansoprazole in the treatment of peptic ulcer]. / Efectividad y seguridad del lansoprazol en el tratamiento de la úlcera péptica.

BACKGROUND: Lansoprazole, a new proton pump inhibitor, is now available in Mexico. It has been tested elsewhere with excellent results. AIM: To study its safety and efficacy in Mexican patients. METHOD: 40 patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer larger than 0.5 cm, from 4 hospitals in central Mexico, were included. All were subjected to a complete medical history and upper GI endoscopy. symptoms (epigastric pain, heartburn, regurgitation, nausea, vomiting) were graded 1 to 4 according to severity. Lansoprazole (one 30 mg capsule/ day) was prescribed for 4 weeks in duodenal ulcer 8 weeks in gastric ulcer. Each patient was seen once a week at the office for compliance, symptom evaluation and side effects. A second endoscopy was performed at the end of the respective treatment period. Blood (CBC, chemistries) and urine tests were performed at the beginning and end of the study. RESULTS: 23 men and 17 women were included, Mean age: 53.8 yr. (19-95). 11 gastric ulcers and 29 duodenal ulcers. 27 measured 0.6-1.5 cm; 6 ulcers measured 1.6-2.5 cm; 6 ulcers were larger than 2.5 cm. 8 patients were bleeding at admission and 4 had multiple ulcers. 2 patients were lost to follow up. symptom grading: 18 patients had 10 points or less, 21 had more than 10 points, one bleeding patient was otherwise asymptomatic. After the first week of treatment, 42% were asymptomatic, after the 2nd. week, 75% were asymptomatic and 95% at the end of the study. The second endoscopy documented complete ulcer healing in 92% out of 37 remaining patients; further lansoprazole treatment healed 2 out of three unhealed ulcers. One patient underwent surgery for duodenal bulb stenosis. Side effects were reported by 2 patients. Treatment had to be discontinued in one patient because of headache. There was no effect of lansoprazole over the laboratory tests. CONCLUSIONS: Lansoprazole was effective for prompt symptom relief in most patients and was able to heal more than 90% of gastric and duodenal ulcers with minimal side effects.