Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Surg ; 238: 115837, 2024 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39067082

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis are often discharged from the Emergency Department (ED) and asked to follow-up for elective cholecystectomy. We aimed to identify the social determinants of health (SDOH) that serve as barriers to elective cholecystectomy and to assess the associated impact on patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study of patients discharged from the ED with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Univariable logistic regression was used to assess for variables associated with re-presenting to the ED rather than for elective cholecystectomy. P values â€‹< â€‹0.05 identified significance. RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified lack of a primary care physician, Black race, self-pay, language other than English as the primary language, and unemployed status to be independently associated with re-presentation to the ED for biliary disease. CONCLUSIONS: Socially disadvantaged populations would benefit from surgery at the time of presentation to the ED versus being sent home for elective follow-up.

2.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 25(1): 13-19, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36480136

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to analyze the evidence regarding the appropriateness of PEG placement in the following clinical situations: short bowel syndrome, head and neck cancer, dementia and palliative use in malignant bowel obstruction. RECENT FINDINGS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are placed for a variety of clinical indications by numerous different specialties. First described in 1980, PEG tubes are now the dominant method of enteral access. Typically, PEG tubes are technically feasible procedures that can come with significant risk for both minor and major complications. Therefore, it is important to perform an in-depth, patient specific risk-benefit analysis when considering insertion. By analyzing the current evidence regarding benefits in these situations, superimposed by the lens of biomedical ethics, we make recommendations that are accessible to any provider who may be a consultant or proceduralist, helping to provide informed care that is in the patient's best interest.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Obstruction , Short Bowel Syndrome , Humans , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , Gastrostomy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL