ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To study the early and late results of mitral valve replacement (MVR) by Starr-Edwards caged-ball and bileaflet mechanical prosthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 236 MVR performed in 236 patients: 127 by Starr-Edwards prosthesis (group 1) and 109 by bileaflet prosthesis (group 2). RESULTS: During the early period (30 days), the mortality rate was higher in group 1 (6.3% vs 1.8%; p=0.0001), while hemorrhagic, thromboembolic and infectious complications were comparable in the two groups. In the late period (>30 days) and with an average follow-up of 11.5+/-5.7 years, mortality was higher in group 1 (9.4% vs 4.6%; p<0.0001). The same was true for thromboembolic complications (20.8% vs 6.4%; p<0.0001), hemorrhagic complications (13.4% vs 7.3%; p=0.02), infectious complications (3.1% vs 0.9%; p=0.02) and cardiac complications that were not due to the prosthesis (32.3% vs 14.7 %; p=0.02). The hemodynamic profile of the bileaflet prostheses was better than that of the Starr-Edwards prostheses (average functional prosthetic surface area was 2.37+/-0.44 cm(2) and average pressure gradient was 5.6+/-1.1 mmHg vs 2.04+/-0.52 cm(2) and 7.6+/-4.9 mmHg). CONCLUSION: Our work confirms the superiority of bileaflet mechanical prostheses, with rates of early and late mortality, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications lower than those of the Starr-Edwards prostheses in more than 11 years of follow-up. However, one should not forget that the prevention of infective endocarditis, good observance of oral anticoagulant treatment and early surgery before left ventricular dysfunction occurs remain the best guarantee a good result of the MVR.
Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis , Mitral Valve/surgery , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The definitive endocardial stimulation is easy to install, allows a stable position of the leads, and a satisfactory stimulation thresholds for a long period. The epicardial approach is reserved for some rare indications including infectious contexts. The endocardial approach has been considered for a 67 years man with a complete AV block and an atrial fibrillation. This patient had undergone a right pneumonectomy 15 years before. A VVIR pacemaker has been implanted successfully by an internal jugular vein approach, and connected to a passively fixed unipolar lead. Because of the right ventricle deformation which made it unrecognizable, even by angiography means, we had to face major difficulties to position the lead. The epicardial approach should be considered even if a direct unique lung controlateral approach is easier than homolateral, because it allows us a quick ventricular access under the view control.
Subject(s)
Pacemaker, Artificial , Pneumonectomy , Aged , Humans , Male , Pneumonectomy/methodsABSTRACT
Definitive cardiac stimulation ralatually used for brady cardia are going to be in the third millennium the specific therapy of arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy. In the last 10 years, may progress occur in the use of cardiac stimulation as hemodynamic therapy of obstructions hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies resistant to conventional medical treatment. Moreover auricular stimulation present antiarrhythmic effects in some atrial arrhythmias as auricular fibrillations auricular diseases and atypical flutters. It confirmed by prospective multicentric randomized trials cardiac stimulation may represent in the future a good physiopathologic and efficient treatment free from the side effects of drugs that remain partially active. These perspectives needs to be modulated by the known and acceptable risks of a definitive cardiac stimulation.
