ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Objective physical performance-based outcome measures (PerBOMs) are essential tools for the holistic management of people who have had an amputation due to vascular disease. These people are often non-ambulatory, however it is currently unclear which PerBOMs are high quality and appropriate for those who are either ambulatory or non-ambulatory. RESEARCH QUESTION: Which PerBOMs have appropriate clinimetric properties to be recommended for those who have had amputations due to vascular disease ('vascular amputee')? DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Scopus databases were searched for the terms: "physical performance" or "function", "clinimetric properties", "reliability", "validity", "amputee" and "peripheral vascular disease" or "diabetes". REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of PerBOMs for vascular amputees was performed following COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology and PRISMA guidelines. The quality of studies and individual PerBOMs was assessed using COSMIN risk of bias and good measurement properties. Overall PerBOM quality was evaluated with a modified GRADE rating. Key clinimetric properties evaluated were reliability, validity, predictive validity and responsiveness. RESULTS: A total of 15,259 records were screened. Forty-eight studies (2650 participants) were included: 7 exclusively included vascular amputees only, 35 investigated validity, 20 studied predictive validity, 23 investigated reliability or internal consistency and 7 assessed responsiveness. Meta-analysis was neither possible nor appropriate for this systematic review in accordance with COSMIN guidelines, due to heterogeneity of the data. Thirty-four different PerBOMs were identified of which only 4 are suitable for non-ambulatory vascular amputees. The Amputee Mobility Predictor no Prosthesis (AMPnoPro) and Transfemoral Fitting Predictor (TFP) predict prosthesis use only. PerBOMs available for assessing physical performance are the One-Leg Balance Test (OLBT) and Basic Amputee Mobility Score (BAMS). CONCLUSION: At present, few PerBOMs can be recommended for vascular amputees. Only 4 are available for non-ambulatory individuals: AMPnoPro, TFP, OLBT and BAMS.
ABSTRACT
Current surgeon established protocols encourage late weight bearing and prolonged immobilisation after ankle, hind- and mid-foot fusion surgery. There is no universal guidance regarding early mobilisation and rehabilitation after this type of surgery. There is a paucity of research in this area but early mobilisation may be beneficial in terms of improved clinical and patient reported outcome measures, whilst still offering good union and very few complications. Feasibility work prior to a full-scale trial is now needed to explore the efficacy of early functional mobilisation, prior to any adoption within clinical practice. A paradigm shift in the early post-operative management of this patient group has the potential to improve outcomes for patients and decrease the socioeconomic burden on the health service.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: There has recently been a paradigm shift in the management of Achilles tendon rupture and ankle fracture rehabilitation with emphasis on early mobilisation. There is, however, no consensus on post-operative rehabilitation for hind/mid-foot fusion and reconstructive surgery.The aim was to scope the post-operative rehabilitation practices of UK foot and ankle surgeons and allied health professionals (AHPs). METHODS: A 10 question online survey was sent to UK surgeons and AHPs via specialist interest groups in February 2019. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed. RESULTS: 117 surgeons and 55 AHPs responded. There was good agreement between survey responses in the 2 groups. Fifty percent reported that they followed a local post-operative rehabilitation protocol. More than half of respondents (57%) reported that not all patients were referred for post-operative rehabilitation. There was a wide variation in the time point at which patients were instructed to weight bear (2 weeks to >12-weeks). Non-union was a concern of early mobilisation as highlighted by 62% of respondents. Qualitative themes identified were: treatment tailored to individual patients, lack of knowledge about the patient journey, treatment tailored to surgeon preferences, lack of a pathway, variation in practice. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variation in the post-op rehabilitation of patients undergoing this surgery in the UK, with a lack of published research in this area. Early rehabilitation could improve patient outcomes, yet the risk of non-union is a major concern. Further research in the form of a multicentre trial is warranted to answer this research question.
