Methotrexate in inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter retrospective study focused on long-term efficacy and safety. The Madrid experience.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is useful in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but its role is secondary because of its limited experience and a supposedly unfavorable safety profile. AIM: To describe the efficacy and safety of methotrexate in a long-term real clinical practice. METHODS: Retrospectively reviewed records of IBD patients treated with methotrexate in eight hospitals of Madrid (Spain). RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were included (80% Crohn's disease); 94% received methotrexate because of steroid dependency. Overall, 82% of the patients initially responded (28% remission). Eighty-eight percent of the patients followed maintenance treatment for a mean of 17 (range: 1-108) months. Forty percent of the patients lost response at a mean of 57 weeks after starting methotrexate. No statistically significant differences were found in the response rates in terms of the disease type, route of administration, or the Montreal Classification category. The mean methotrexate cumulative dose was 1108 mg (range: 25-6480). The main adverse events included 10 cases of gastrointestinal symptoms, four of myelotoxicity, and 10 of abnormal liver function tests, and led to methotrexate withdrawal in four (5%) patients. Transient elastography, performed in 46 patients, detected six additional cases with significant fibrosis and normal liver function tests. CONCLUSION: Methotrexate is useful in inducing a response in IBD, although its efficacy decreases frequently through the follow-up. Although methotrexate seems safe in the long term, in addition to biochemical controls, a more accurate method to detect liver damage should be considered.

Outcomes of pregnancies fathered by inflammatory bowel disease patients exposed to thiopurines.

OBJECTIVES: Immunomodulators are used as maintenance treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data regarding their possible effects in the course of pregnancy when the father is exposed at the time of conception are limited. METHODS: To evaluate the outcomes of pregnancies of which the fathers were exposed to thiopurines at the time of conception. A series of male patients followed in seven IBD clinics in Madrid, Spain, was studied. Any exposure to thiopurines during the 3 months preceding conception was considered significant. Controls were pregnancies fathered by patients who either had never been treated with thiopurines or had interrupted them >3 months before conception. Statistical comparisons and multivariate analysis were carried out with the generalized estimating equations model. RESULTS: There were 46 conceptions in the exposed group (mercaptopurine 9, azathioprine 37) and 84 in the control group. In the exposed group, there were more Crohn's patients (82.6% vs. 53.6%), the duration of the disease was longer (median: 8 vs. 5 years), fathers were slightly older (mean: 34.2 vs. 32.7 years), and there were fewer patients on mesalamine (15.2% vs. 47.6%). Otherwise, baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences regarding unsuccessful pregnancies-namely, spontaneous abortions, ectopic pregnancies, anembryonic pregnancies, or fetal deaths (10.9% exposed group vs. 13.1% control group; odds ratio (OR): 0.79, confidence interval (CI): 0.22-2.85), preterm births (4.3% vs. 2.4%; OR: 1.3, CI: 0.22-7.61), low birth weight (6.5% vs. 6%; OR: 1.06, CI: 0.25-4.54), or congenital malformations (2.2% vs. 2.4%; OR: 0.82, CI: 0.08-9). No infant neoplasms were detected. The proportion of conceptions that needed >1 year to be achieved was higher in the exposed group, but this was not statistically significant (15.2% vs. 8.3%; OR: 1.92, CI: 0.54-6.88). Multivariate analysis was carried out for unsuccessful pregnancies and fertility impairment, and it showed that, although mesalamine exposure confounded the effect of the exposure to thiopurines on these outcomes, this effect was still nonsignificant (respectively, OR: 0.49, CI: 0.17-1.44; OR: 2.82, CI: 0.7-11.38). CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the practice of routinely recommending to male patients that they interrupt thiopurines when wanting to conceive.