Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Microb Cell ; 4(10): 331-341, 2017 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29082231

ABSTRACT

Post-translational modification by the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) is an important mechanism regulating protein function. Identification of SUMO conjugation sites on substrates is a challenging task. Here we employed a proteomic method to map SUMO acceptor lysines in budding yeast proteins. We report the identification of 257 lysine residues where SUMO is potentially attached. Amongst the hits, we identified already known SUMO substrates and sites, confirming the success of the approach. In addition, we tested several of the novel substrates using SUMO immunoprecipitation analysis and confirmed that the SUMO acceptor lysines identified in these proteins are indeed bona fide SUMOylation sites. We believe that the collection of SUMO sites presented here is an important resource for future functional studies of SUMOylation in yeast.

2.
Genes Dev ; 30(11): 1339-56, 2016 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27298337

ABSTRACT

The RecQ helicase Sgs1 plays critical roles during DNA repair by homologous recombination, from end resection to Holliday junction (HJ) dissolution. Sgs1 has both pro- and anti-recombinogenic roles, and therefore its activity must be tightly regulated. However, the controls involved in recruitment and activation of Sgs1 at damaged sites are unknown. Here we show a two-step role for Smc5/6 in recruiting and activating Sgs1 through SUMOylation. First, auto-SUMOylation of Smc5/6 subunits leads to recruitment of Sgs1 as part of the STR (Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1) complex, mediated by two SUMO-interacting motifs (SIMs) on Sgs1 that specifically recognize SUMOylated Smc5/6. Second, Smc5/6-dependent SUMOylation of Sgs1 and Top3 is required for the efficient function of STR. Sgs1 mutants impaired in recognition of SUMOylated Smc5/6 (sgs1-SIMΔ) or SUMO-dead alleles (sgs1-KR) exhibit unprocessed HJs at damaged replication forks, increased crossover frequencies during double-strand break repair, and severe impairment in DNA end resection. Smc5/6 is a key regulator of Sgs1's recombination functions.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , DNA, Cruciform/metabolism , RecQ Helicases/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Amino Acid Motifs , Crossing Over, Genetic , DNA Damage/genetics , DNA End-Joining Repair/genetics , Mutation , RecQ Helicases/genetics , Recombination, Genetic/genetics , SUMO-1 Protein/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Sumoylation
3.
Nature ; 493(7431): 250-4, 2013 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23178808

ABSTRACT

DNA double-strand break repair is critical for cell viability and involves highly coordinated pathways to restore DNA integrity at the lesion. An early event during homology-dependent repair is resection of the break to generate progressively longer 3' single-strand tails that are used to identify suitable templates for repair. Sister chromatids provide near-perfect sequence homology and are therefore the preferred templates during homologous recombination. To provide a bias for the use of sisters as donors, cohesin--the complex that tethers sister chromatids together--is recruited to the break to enforce physical proximity. Here we show that DNA breaks promote dissociation of cohesin loaded during the previous S phase in budding yeast, and that damage-induced dissociation of cohesin requires separase, the protease that dissolves cohesion in anaphase. Moreover, a separase-resistant allele of the gene coding for the α-kleisin subunit of cohesin, Mcd1 (also known as Scc1), reduces double-strand break resection and compromises the efficiency of repair even when loaded during DNA damage. We conclude that post-replicative DNA repair involves cohesin dissociation by separase to promote accessibility to repair factors during the coordinated cellular response to restore DNA integrity.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins/chemistry , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/chemistry , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , DNA Repair , DNA Replication , Endopeptidases/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/physiology , Alleles , Anaphase , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , G2 Phase , Metaphase , Protein Binding , Protein Stability , Protein Subunits/chemistry , Protein Subunits/metabolism , S Phase , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/cytology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/enzymology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/chemistry , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Separase , Cohesins
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...