A Systematic Review of the State of Neurosurgical Disparities Research: Past, Present, and Future.

BACKGROUND: The social determinants of health, which influence healthcare access, patient outcomes, and population-level burden of disease, contribute to health disparities experienced by marginalized patient populations. In the present study, we sought to evaluate the landscape of health disparities research within neurosurgery. METHODS: Embase, Ovid-MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest Dissertations databases were queried for original research on health disparities regarding access to, outcomes of, and/or postoperative management after neurosurgical procedures in the United States. RESULTS: Of 883 studies screened, 196 were included, of which 144 had a neurosurgery-affiliated author. We found a significant increase in the number of neurosurgical disparities reports beginning in 2010, with only 10 studies reported before 2010. Of the included studies, 3.1% used prospective methods and 63.8% used data from national registries. The disparities analyzed were racial/ethnic (79.6%), economic/socioeconomic (53.6%), gender (18.9%), and disabled populations (0.5%), with 40.1% analyzing multiple or intersecting disparities. Of the included reports, 96.9% were in phase 1 (detecting phase of disparities research), with a few studies in phase 2 (understanding phase), and none in phase 3 (reducing phase). The spine was the most prevalent subspecialty evaluated (34.2%), followed by neuro-oncology (19.9%), cerebrovascular (16.3%), pediatrics (10.7%), functional (9.2%), general neurosurgery (5.1%), and trauma (4.1%). Senior authors with a neurosurgical affiliation accounted for 79.2% of the reports, 93% of whom were academically affiliated. CONCLUSIONS: Although a recent increase has occurred in neurosurgical disparities research within the past decade, most studies were limited to the detection of disparities without understanding or evaluating any interventions for a reduction in disparities. Future research in neurosurgical disparities should incorporate the latter 2 factors to reduce disparities and improve outcomes for all patients.

Baseline frailty status, not advanced patient age, predicts epilepsy surgery outcomes: An analysis of 696 patients from the NSQIP database.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery remains challenging. Recently, the efforts to look beyond age alone as an outcomes predictor has resulted in the development of measures of physiological reserve, or 'frailty indices.' The most frequently cited index in neurosurgery is the 11-item or 5-item modified frailty index (mFI11 or mFI-5). The present study aimed to use a large national registry to evaluate the effect of frailty (as measured by mFI-5 versus age on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, overseen by the American College of Surgeons (ACS), was used to extract data for patients undergoing epilepsy surgery from 2015 to 2019. Univariate and multivariate analyses for age and mFI-5 were performed for the following 30-day outcomes of extended length of hospital stay (eLOS) and non-home discharge (NHD). The effect sizes were summarized by odds ratio and associated 95 % confidence intervals. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including area under the curve (AUC), was used to quantify the discrimination. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that frailty statuses from mFI-5, not age, were significantly predictive of eLOS and NHD. On ROC curve analysis, mFI-5 was a stronger predictor of eLOS (C = 0.59, 95 % CI 0.54-0.64, p < 0.001) and NHD (C = 0.69, 95 % CI 0.64-0.76, p < 0.001) than age (C = 0.53, 95 % CI 0.48-0.58, p = 0.21 and C = 0.53, 95 % CI 0.46-0.59, p = 0.44, respectively). CONCLUSION: Frailty, not age, is an independent risk factor for poor postoperative outcomes, particularly eLOS and NHD, in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. Usage of mFI-5 for preoperative risk stratification of epilepsy surgery patients can help in prognostication.

Thirty-day outcomes for suboccipital decompression in adults with Chiari malformation type I: a frailty-driven perspective from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

OBJECTIVE: When indicated, patients with symptomatic Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) may benefit from suboccipital decompression (SOD). Although SOD is considered a lower-risk neurosurgical procedure, preoperative risk assessment and careful surgical patient selection remain critical. The objectives of the present study were twofold: 1) describe 30-day SOD outcomes for CM patients with attention to the impact of preoperative frailty and 2) design a predictive model for the primary endpoint of nonhome discharge (NHD). METHODS: There were 1015 CM-I patients who underwent SOD in the 2011-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database, as specified by diagnostic and procedural codes (Current Procedural Terminology code 61343). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze total cohort baseline demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes within 30 days of surgery. Univariate cross-tabulation was used to compare baseline demographics and preoperative characteristics across the NHD and home discharge (HD) cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the discriminative ability of the revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev) on NHD. RESULTS: The study cohort had a median age of 36 years, and 80.6% of patients were female. Race distribution was categorized as White (69.9%), Black (16.6%), and other groups (13.6%). The most common preoperative comorbidities were active smoking (24.4%), hypertension (19.2%), and diabetes mellitus (4.7%). The primary outcome of NHD occurred in 4.6% of patients (n = 47). Increasing frailty (measured by the RAI-rev) was associated with a stepwise increase in the rate of NHD: 2.3% for RAI-rev scores 0-10, 5.8% for RAI-rev scores 11-15, 7.6% for RAI-rev scores 16-20, 18.2% for RAI-rev scores 21-25, and 77.8% for RAI-rev scores ≥ 26 (p < 0.001). Other preoperative factors associated with NHD included older age, nonelective surgery, diabetes, hypertension, and elevated creatinine (all p < 0.01). The other most common 30-day complications included unplanned readmission (9.3%), unplanned reoperation (5.3%), return to the operating room (5.8%), Clavien-Dindo grade IV (life-threatening) (1.5%), organ space surgical site infection (SSI) (1.5%), superficial SSI (1.4%), and reoperation for a CSF leak (1.1%). Surgical mortality (within 30 days) was extremely rare (1/1015, 0.1%). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that RAI-rev predicted NHD with significant discriminatory accuracy among CM-I patients who received SOD treatment (C-statistic 0.731, 95% CI 0.648-0.814). CONCLUSIONS: This decade-long analysis of a multicenter surgical registry provides internationally representative, modern rates of 30-day outcomes after suboccipital decompression (with or without duraplasty) for adult CM-I patients. Preoperative frailty assessment with the RAI-rev may help identify higher-risk surgical candidates.

Frailty Measured by the Risk Analysis Index Predicts Nonhome Discharge and Mortality After Resection in Refractory Epilepsy: Analysis of 1236 Patients From a Prospective Surgical Registry, 2012 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of epilepsy surgery patients remains difficult. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a frailty measurement that augments preoperative risk stratification. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate RAI's discriminative threshold for nonhome discharge disposition (NHD) and mortality (or discharge to hospice within 30 days of operation) in epilepsy surgery patients. METHODS: Patients were queried from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2012-2020) using diagnosis/procedure codes. Linear-by-linear trend tests assessed RAI's relationship with NHD and mortality. Discriminatory accuracy was assessed by C-statistics (95% CI) in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Epilepsy resections (N = 1236) were grouped into temporal lobe (60.4%, N = 747) and nontemporal lobe (39.6%, N = 489) procedures. Patients were stratified by RAI tier: 76.5% robust (RAI 0-20), 16.2% normal (RAI 21-30), 6.6% frail (RAI 31-40), and 0.8% severely frail (RAI 41 and above). The NHD rate was 18.0% (N = 222) and positively associated with increasing RAI tier: 12.5% robust, 34.0% normal, 38.3% frail, and 50.0% severely frail ( P < .001). RAI had robust predictive discrimination for NHD in overall cohort (C-statistic 0.71), temporal lobe (C-statistic 0.70), and nontemporal lobe (C-statistic 0.71) cohorts. The mortality rate was 2.7% (N = 33) and significantly associated with RAI frailty: 1.1% robust, 8.0% normal, 6.2% frail, and 20.0% severely frail ( P < .001). RAI had excellent predictive discrimination for mortality in overall cohort (C-statistic 0.78), temporal lobe (C-statistic 0.80), and nontemporal lobe (C-statistic 0.74) cohorts. CONCLUSION: The RAI frailty score predicts mortality and NHD after epilepsy surgery. This is accomplished with a user-friendly calculator: https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/epilepsy/ .