Complications in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty, is it a safe procedure?

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding various aspects of simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement (SBTKR). We found disparity in the postoperative outcomes and complications associated with the procedure in the literature linked with the topic. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the need for blood transfusion after surgery and complications associated with total knee replacement according to the type of procedure (SBTKR or unilateral). METHODS: Retrospective cohort analytical study. We included 251 patients with severe knee osteoarthritis that were divided into two groups. 124 (49%) who underwent SBTKR and 127 upon whom unilateral total knee replacement (UTKR) was performed. Demographic data, days of hospitalization, complications within the first 90 days after surgery (thromboembolic events, superficial and deep infection, stiffness, death); and percentages of patients transfused with blood products during hospitalization were evaluated. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in the analysis of postoperative complications in the first 90 days after surgery. In the SBTKR group, 8 patients (6.5%) presented some thromboembolic complication during the postoperative period, while this event was observed in only 2 patients (1.5%) from the other group. The analysis showed a statistically significant drop in postoperative hemoglobin, on average that of 0.8 â€‹g/dl, in the SBTKR patient group compared to the UTKR group (95% CI 0.44-1.13; p â€‹< â€‹0.001). A higher proportion of patients who required transfusion were observed in the SBTKR group (40%) (OR â€‹= â€‹7.12; 95% CI 3.3-16; p â€‹< â€‹0.001). We analyzed the cause of postoperative transfusion in the patients who required transfusion taking into account two parameters: hemoglobin less than 8 â€‹g/dl and the clinical needs of the patients (symptoms of hypotension, decay, difficulty to rehabilitate without pain, dyspnea). 59 patients received transfusion (50 in the SBTKR group and 9 in the other group). Of these, 19 patients (32.2%) did not meet any transfusion criteria. CONCLUSION: We consider SBTKR a safe procedure, which does not increase postoperative complications compared to UTKR. Although there is an increase in blood loss in SBTKR, it does not generate clinical symptoms of relevance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

El acortamiento del radio como factor limitante para la reducción cerrada en fracturas de antebrazo pediátrico / Radius shortening as a limiting factor for closed reduction in pediatric forearm fractures

IntroducciónLas fracturas diafisarias de antebrazo (FDA) en pacientes esqueléticamente inmaduros son lesiones comunes que representan el 30% de las fracturas de la extremidad superior en este grupo etario. Existen casos con lesiones inestables o reducciones inaceptables, en los cuales está indicada la resolución quirúrgica mediante la reducción y estabilización con clavos endomedulares elásticos (CEE) por vía percutánea. Una de las ventajas que ofrece este sistema es evitar un abordaje del foco de fractura, pudiendo realizar la reducción de forma cerrada en la gran mayoría de estas. Sin embargo, no siempre es posible lograr una aceptable reducción cerrada y entonces es necesaria la apertura del foco de fractura. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si existen factores preoperatorios para predecir la dificultad de efectuar una reducción cerrada en estos pacientes.MétodosSe realizó un estudio retrospectivo de pacientes esqueléticamente inmaduros con FDA agudas, tratados con CEE por el mismo cirujano pediátrico. La variable de resultado primaria se definió como la necesidad de llevar a cabo una reducción abierta; considerado como un abordaje quirúrgico directo en el sitio de fractura. Se analizaron las características demográficas de los pacientes incluidos y las radiográficas de la fractura.ResultadosEncontramos que la mediana del porcentaje del acortamiento del radio preoperatorio en los grupos de reducción cerrada y reducción abierta fue del 1 y 5%, respectivamente; resultando en una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p = 0,04).ConclusiónEl acortamiento del radio en las radiografías preoperatorias permite predecir un aumento del riesgo de requerir una reducción abierta de la fractura (39% de asociación); por lo cual, esta variable debe ser considerada por el traumatólogo general como un factor pronóstico para definir la derivación de estos pacientes.(AU)

IntroductionDiaphyseal forearm fractures in skeletally immature patients are common injuries that account for 30% of upper extremity fractures in this age group. There are cases with unstable injuries or unacceptable reductions, in which surgical resolution by reduction and stabilisation with percutaneous elastic endomedullary nailing is indicated. One of the advantages of this system is that it avoids an approach to the fracture site, allowing closed reduction in the vast majority of fractures. However, it is not always possible to achieve an acceptable closed reduction and opening of the fracture site is necessary. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are preoperative factors to predict the difficulty of performing closed reduction in these patients.MethodsA retrospective study of skeletally immature patients with acute diaphyseal forearm fractures treated with elastic endomedullary nailing by the same paediatric surgeon was performed. The primary outcome variable was defined as the need for open reduction; considered as a direct surgical approach to the fracture site. Demographic characteristics of the included patients and radiographic characteristics of the fracture were analysed.ResultsWe found that the median percentage of preoperative radial shortening in the closed reduction and open reduction groups was 1 and 5%, respectively; resulting in a statistically significant difference (p = 0.04).ConclusionRadial shortening on preoperative radiographs predicts an increased risk of requiring an open reduction of the fracture (39% association); thus we understand that this variable should be considered by the general traumatologist as a prognostic factor in defining the referral of these patients.(AU)

Radius shortening as a limiting factor for closed reduction in pediatric forearm fractures / El acortamiento del radio como factor limitante para la reducción cerrada en fracturas de antebrazo pediátrico

IntroductionDiaphyseal forearm fractures in skeletally immature patients are common injuries that account for 30% of upper extremity fractures in this age group. There are cases with unstable injuries or unacceptable reductions, in which surgical resolution by reduction and stabilisation with percutaneous elastic endomedullary nailing is indicated. One of the advantages of this system is that it avoids an approach to the fracture site, allowing closed reduction in the vast majority of fractures. However, it is not always possible to achieve an acceptable closed reduction and opening of the fracture site is necessary. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are preoperative factors to predict the difficulty of performing closed reduction in these patients.MethodsA retrospective study of skeletally immature patients with acute diaphyseal forearm fractures treated with elastic endomedullary nailing by the same paediatric surgeon was performed. The primary outcome variable was defined as the need for open reduction; considered as a direct surgical approach to the fracture site. Demographic characteristics of the included patients and radiographic characteristics of the fracture were analysed.ResultsWe found that the median percentage of preoperative radial shortening in the closed reduction and open reduction groups was 1 and 5%, respectively; resulting in a statistically significant difference (p = 0.04).ConclusionRadial shortening on preoperative radiographs predicts an increased risk of requiring an open reduction of the fracture (39% association); thus we understand that this variable should be considered by the general traumatologist as a prognostic factor in defining the referral of these patients.(AU)

IntroducciónLas fracturas diafisarias de antebrazo (FDA) en pacientes esqueléticamente inmaduros son lesiones comunes que representan el 30% de las fracturas de la extremidad superior en este grupo etario. Existen casos con lesiones inestables o reducciones inaceptables, en los cuales está indicada la resolución quirúrgica mediante la reducción y estabilización con clavos endomedulares elásticos (CEE) por vía percutánea. Una de las ventajas que ofrece este sistema es evitar un abordaje del foco de fractura, pudiendo realizar la reducción de forma cerrada en la gran mayoría de estas. Sin embargo, no siempre es posible lograr una aceptable reducción cerrada y entonces es necesaria la apertura del foco de fractura. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si existen factores preoperatorios para predecir la dificultad de efectuar una reducción cerrada en estos pacientes.MétodosSe realizó un estudio retrospectivo de pacientes esqueléticamente inmaduros con FDA agudas, tratados con CEE por el mismo cirujano pediátrico. La variable de resultado primaria se definió como la necesidad de llevar a cabo una reducción abierta; considerado como un abordaje quirúrgico directo en el sitio de fractura. Se analizaron las características demográficas de los pacientes incluidos y las radiográficas de la fractura.ResultadosEncontramos que la mediana del porcentaje del acortamiento del radio preoperatorio en los grupos de reducción cerrada y reducción abierta fue del 1 y 5%, respectivamente; resultando en una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p = 0,04).ConclusiónEl acortamiento del radio en las radiografías preoperatorias permite predecir un aumento del riesgo de requerir una reducción abierta de la fractura (39% de asociación); por lo cual, esta variable debe ser considerada por el traumatólogo general como un factor pronóstico para definir la derivación de estos pacientes.(AU)

Radius shortening as a limiting factor for closed reduction in pediatric forearm fractures. / El acortamiento del radio como factor limitante para la reducción cerrada en fracturas de antebrazo pediátrico.

INTRODUCTION: Diaphyseal forearm fractures in skeletally immature patients are common injuries that account for 30% of upper extremity fractures in this age group. There are cases with unstable injuries or unacceptable reductions, in which surgical resolution by reduction and stabilisation with percutaneous elastic endomedullary nailing is indicated. One of the advantages of this system is that it avoids an approach to the fracture site, allowing closed reduction in the vast majority of fractures. However, it is not always possible to achieve an acceptable closed reduction and opening of the fracture site is necessary. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are preoperative factors to predict the difficulty of performing closed reduction in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective study of skeletally immature patients with acute diaphyseal forearm fractures treated with elastic endomedullary nailing by the same paediatric surgeon was performed. The primary outcome variable was defined as the need for open reduction; considered as a direct surgical approach to the fracture site. Demographic characteristics of the included patients and radiographic characteristics of the fracture were analysed. RESULTS: We found that the median percentage of preoperative radial shortening in the closed reduction and open reduction groups was 1 and 5%, respectively; resulting in a statistically significant difference (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Radial shortening on preoperative radiographs predicts an increased risk of requiring an open reduction of the fracture (39% association); thus we understand that this variable should be considered by the general traumatologist as a prognostic factor in defining the referral of these patients.

¿Es seguro el ácido tranexámico en la cirugía de reemplazo total de rodilla de pacientes con enfermedad coronaria? / Is tranexamic acid safe in total knee replacement surgery in patients with coronary artery disease?

Introducción: El ácido tranexámico reduce la pérdida sanguínea y los requerimientos de transfusiones luego de un reemplazo total de rodilla. Una de sus contraindicaciones relativas son los antecedentes de colocación de prótesis intravasculares coronarias, por un supuesto aumento de eventos tromboembólicos. materiales y métodos:Análisis retrospectivo de pacientes sometidos a un reemplazo total de rodilla primario y de revisión que recibieron ácido tranexámico y tenían antecedente de colocación de prótesis intravascular coronaria. Se los comparó con un grupo sin estas prótesis. Se analizó la presencia de cualquier cambio clínico o electrocardiográfico de oclusión coronaria aguda, eventos tromboembólicos, el requerimiento de transfusión sanguínea y el nivel de hemoglobina pre y posoperatorio. Resultados: 57 pacientes (59 cirugías, 56 reemplazos primarios y 3 revisiones) con colocación de prótesis intravascular coronaria, al menos, un año antes de la artroplastia. Un paciente tuvo síntomas de síndrome coronario agudo y cambios en el electrocardiograma. No hubo diferencias en la cantidad de eventos tromboembólicos. Solo un paciente del grupo de control recibió una transfusión de glóbulos rojos. El sangrado relativo fue menor en el grupo coronario independientemente del uso crónico de aspirina y clopidogrel antes de la cirugía (2,09 vs. 3,06 grupo de control; p = 0,01). En pacientes del alto riesgo, el ácido tranexámico no se asoció con más eventos tromboembólicos. Conclusiones: El ácido tranexámico impresionó ser seguro y efectivo en nuestro grupo de pacientes con prótesis intravasculares coronarias; sin embargo, se necesita un estudio prospectivo con más casos para confirmar estos resultados. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

Introduction: Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss and need for a transfusion after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, patients with a history of coronary artery (CA) stent placement might be at increased risk for thromboembolic complications. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with a history of coronary stenting who had undergone primary and revision TKA and received preoperative TXA. A comparison was made with a group of patients without coronary stenting. The presence of any clinical or electrocardiographic changes of acute coronary occlusion, thromboembolic events (TEE), blood transfusion, and pre- and postoperative hemoglobin levels were analyzed. Results: 57 patients underwent 59 TKA surgeries (56 primary and 3 revisions) with a history of coronary stenting at least 1 year before arthroplasty. One patient presented symptoms of acute coronary syndrome and electrocardiogram (ECG) changes. There were no differences in the number of thromboembolic events. Only 1 patient received red blood cell transfusion in the control group. Relative bleeding was lower in the coronary group regardless of chronic use of aspirin and clopidogrel before surgery (2.09 vs 3.06 in the control group; p=0.01). In high-risk patients, TXA was not associated with higher TEEs. Conclusions: Although TXA seemed safe and effective in this database review of patients with previous placement of CAS; a larger prospective trial is warranted to confirm these results. Level of Evidence: IV