Validation of cell-based fluorescence assays: practice guidelines from the ICSH and ICCS - part II - preanalytical issues.

Flow cytometry and other technologies of cell-based fluorescence assays are as a matter of good laboratory practice required to validate all assays, which when in clinical practice may pass through regulatory review processes using criteria often defined with a soluble analyte in plasma or serum samples in mind. Recently the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has entered into a public dialogue in the U.S. regarding their regulatory interest in laboratory developed tests (LDTs) or so-called "home brew" assays performed in clinical laboratories. The absence of well-defined guidelines for validation of cell-based assays using fluorescence detection has thus become a subject of concern for the International Council for Standardization of Haematology (ICSH) and International Clinical Cytometry Society (ICCS). Accordingly, a group of over 40 international experts in the areas of test development, test validation, and clinical practice of a variety of assay types using flow cytometry and/or morphologic image analysis were invited to develop a set of practical guidelines useful to in vitro diagnostic (IVD) innovators, clinical laboratories, regulatory scientists, and laboratory inspectors. The focus of the group was restricted to fluorescence reporter reagents, although some common principles are shared by immunohistochemistry or immunocytochemistry techniques and noted where appropriate. The work product of this two year effort is the content of this special issue of this journal, which is published as 5 separate articles, this being Validation of Cell-based Fluorescence Assays: Practice Guidelines from the ICSH and ICCS - Part II - Preanalytical issues. © 2013 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

An investigation into the potential use of serum Hsp70 as a novel tumour biomarker for Hsp90 inhibitors.

Hsp90 inhibitors are under investigation in multiple human clinical trials for the treatment of cancers, including myeloma, breast cancer, prostate, lung, melanoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumour and acute myeloid leukaemia. The pharmacodynamic activity of Hsp90 inhibitors in the clinic is currently assessed by Hsp70 induction in peripheral blood mononuclear cells using Western blot analysis, a method that is laborious, semiquantitative and difficult to implement in the clinic. Since Hsp70 was reported to be secreted by tumour cells and elevated in sera of cancer patients, serum Hsp70 has been evaluated as a potentially more robust, easily and reproducibly measured biomarker of Hsp90 inhibition as an alternative to cytosolic Hsp70. A highly sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescent ELISA was developed to measure serum Hsp70 and employed to evaluate Hsp70 levels in both ex vivo and xenograft samples. In ex vivo studies, maximal secretion of Hsp70 by tumour cells was observed between 48 and 72 h after exposure to Hsp90 inhibitors. In in vivo studies a 3-4-fold increase in serum Hsp70 was observed following treatment with BIIB021 in tumour-bearing mice. Strikingly, secreted Hsp70 was detectable in mice transplanted with human tumours but not in naive mice indicating a direct origination from the transplanted tumours. Analysis of clinical samples revealed low baseline levels (2 - 15 ng ml(-1)) of Hsp70 in the serum of cancer patients and normal donors. Together these findings in laboratory studies and archived cancer patient sera suggest that serum Hsp70 could be a novel biomarker to assess reliably the pharmacological effects of Hsp90 inhibitors in clinical trials, especially under conditions where collection of tumour biopsies is not feasible.