Surgical management of secondary acquired cholesteatoma depends on its characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: Cholesteatoma secondary to tympanic perforation, known as "secondary acquired cholesteatoma" may progress slower than a retraction pocket cholesteatoma, with less bone destruction and fewer intracranial complications. However, complete surgical removal remains difficult because the pathological epithelium on the marginal side of the extension is not covered by the subepithelial layer of the cholesteatoma matrix, making the boundary with the middle ear mucosa difficult to identify. Therefore, considering the pathophysiology of secondary acquired cholesteatoma, suitable preoperative evaluation and surgical techniques are required. In this study, we aimed to evaluate (i) the extension of secondary acquired cholesteatoma according to the size and location of tympanic membrane perforation; and (ii) the microscopic surgical outcomes, including the rate of residual cholesteatoma, requirement for specialized surgical management, and changes in hearing. METHODS: This retrospective study included data of cases with secondary acquired cholesteatoma (n = 66; 66 ears of 64 patients, 2 patients had bilateral ear involvement), including those who underwent a staged operation (n = 25). RESULTS: The perforation level of the tympanic membrane was associated with the cholesteatoma extension. When the cholesteatoma extended around the stapes, staged operation was chosen. Six cases of spontaneous resolution of stapes lesions at the time of staged surgery were observed. A significant postoperative improvement in hearing was observed; however, five cases experienced sensorineural hearing loss. CONCLUSION: Surgery, including staged surgery of the stapes lesions, along with careful observation of the perforation, is required in secondary acquired cholesteatoma. For lesions that are visible yet challenging to remove, it is imperative to exercise prudent judgment, taking into account the possibility of spontaneous resolution.

Risk factors for bacterial infection to cause sensorineural hearing loss in eosinophilic otitis media.

OBJECTIVE: Eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) is an intractable type of otitis media in which sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) progresses over time. Clinically, bacterial infection complicates the course of EOM, making it challenging to control otorrhea/middle ear effusion (MEE) from infected ears, and accelerates the progression of SNHL. In this study, we focused on infection, one of the risk factors for SNHL in EOM, and analyzed factors associated with it. METHODS: In this cohort study, we evaluated 144 ears of 72 patients diagnosed with bilateral EOM. Patients visited our hospital once every 1-3 months and received intratympanic or systematic administration of steroids when otorrhea/MEE was observed. Several investigations, including blood tests, otorrhea/MEE cytology, bacterial culture tests, and respiratory function tests, were performed. In the otorrhea/MEE cytology, the leukocyte fraction was measured. RESULTS: Two risk factors for SNHL in EOM were middle ear mucosal thickening (p <0.01) and infection (p <0.05). Compared to the group with <40% neutrophils in otorrhea/MEE samples, groups with 40-70% and ≥70% neutrophils had a significantly higher bone conduction hearing level (p <0.01, p <0.05, respectively). Two risk factors associated with the occurrence of infection in EOM were tympanic membrane (TM) perforation (p <0.01) and the coincidence of otorrhea/MEE and rhinorrhea in bacterial culture test results (p <0.001). A positive correlation was observed between TM perforation and infection (p <0.001). Our analysis of the relationship between the frequency of intratympanic corticosteroids administration and the time-period until the occurrence of TM perforation showed that >4 intratympanic administrations/year significantly increased the risk of perforation (p<0.001). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from otorrhea/MEE samples, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fungi, detected in cultures of rhinorrhea samples, were significantly related to the deterioration of bone conduction hearing levels. CONCLUSION: The risk factors associated with the occurrence of infection in patients with EOM were TM perforation and the coincidence of otorrhea/MEE and rhinorrhea in bacterial culture test results. Since TM perforation is likely to occur even due to intratympanic corticosteroids administration, it is necessary to confirm whether the frequency of treatment is appropriate and try a less invasive technique of administration. Furthermore, Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection poses a high risk for the development of SNHL, and clinicians should be alert to this possibility, even if the bacteria were identified only in cultures of rhinorrhea samples.

Effectiveness of myringoplasty in patients with eosinophilic otitis media.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether myringoplasty can be an effective tool to control eosinophilic otitis media and improve hearing. METHODS: Severity scores for patients with eosinophilic otitis media with or without myringoplasty were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical outcomes were assessed and compared to those of patients with control: chronic otitis media with tympanic membrane perforation. RESULTS: The average eosinophilic otitis media severity score for the patients with myringoplasty was significantly lower after than before surgery (P = 0.004), although the score for the group without myringoplasty remained stable during the study period. The success rate for graft uptake was 87.5%, and a statistically significant improvement was observed in the postoperative air conduction hearing level within the speech range (mean ± standard deviation; 41.5 ± 12.3 to 34.6 ± 9.22 dB; P = 0.0026) for patients with eosinophilic otitis media. CONCLUSION: Myringoplasty contributed to decreased postoperative eosinophilic otitis media severity scores and should be considered to protect the patients from recurrent bacterial infections and pathogenic antigen parasitism in the middle ear.

Periostin in middle ear mucosa according to eosinophilic otitis media severity: Middle ear pathology-based treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) is an intractable disorder associated with bronchial asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Periostin is an extracellular matrix protein secreted by fibroblasts in response to interleukin (IL)-4 and/or IL-13 and is a known marker for eosinophilic disorders. We assessed serum periostin levels and expression of periostin in the middle ear mucosa according to three grade of EOM severity (grade1 to 3). METHODS: 68 patients of blood and serum samples were corrected by whom diagnose bilateral EOM in Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center from January 2015 to June 2017.Immunohistochemical evaluation was performed to 18 EOM middle ears mucosa samples, which cauterized in tree groups and compared to that of chronic otitis media (COM). RESULTS: Serum periostin levels was significantly higher in EOM patients than in COM patients (EOM, 125.0 ± 45.5 ng/mL; COM, 79.4 ± 38.3 ng/mL; P<0.0001). The expression of periostin immunopositivity in the EOM middle ear mucosa was significantly greater in severe cases (grade3 samples) than others (grade1 and grade2 samples) (P <0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively). Periostin was expressed at the lamina propria especially in severe EOM cases and the cases had little response to glucocorticoids treatment. CONCLUSION: This study showed that periostin in the middle ear mucosa was correlated with EOM severity, and EOM with highly expressed periostin had difficulty in glucocorticoids treatment.

Proposal of a Treatment Strategy for Eosinophilic Otitis Media Based on Middle Ear Condition.

OBJECTIVE: We classified eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) into three grades (G1-G3) based on the middle ear mucosal thickness and aimed to establish a treatment strategy for EOM based on these pathological categories. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: We evaluated 136 ears of 68 patients (38 women, 30 men; average age, 56.1 yr; range, 32-80 yr) with bilateral EOM, including 14 surgically treated ears. INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostics and treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment responses to intratympanic instillation of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) and surgery. RESULTS: G1 (mild) cases of EOM responded well to intratympanic TA. G2 (moderate) cases required both TA and systemic glucocorticoids. G3 (severe) cases with granulation were unresponsive to but tolerated the treatment. In 14 ears, granulation tissue was surgically removed and the area was covered with a gelatin sponge containing TA. After the surgery, the severity level of EOM decreased from G3 to G2 in 12 ears, and hearing improved in 4 ears. Three ears showed normalization of the tympanic membrane, and seven ears had less otorrhea. Risk factors for granulation (G3) were the presence of bacterial infection (p = 0.017) and diabetes mellitus (HbA1c of ≥6.5%) (P = 0.039) (odds ratios of 4.55 and 3.95, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that G3 EOM was unresponsive to conservative glucocorticoid treatment and required granulation tissue removal. Classification based on the middle ear pathology is useful for determining the most appropriate and successful treatment for EOM.

Predicting postoperative fever and bacterial colonization on packing material following endoscopic endonasal surgery.

Postoperative fever following endoscopic endonasal surgery is a rare occurrence of concern to surgeons. To elucidate preoperative and operative predictors of postoperative fever, we analyzed the characteristics of patients and their perioperative background in association with postoperative fever. A retrospective review of 371 patients who had undergone endoscopic endonasal surgery was conducted. Predictors, including intake of antibiotics, steroids, history of asthma, preoperative nasal bacterial culture, duration of operation, duration of packing and intraoperative intravenous antibiotics on the occurrence of postoperative fever, and bacterial colonization on the packing material, were analyzed retrospectively. Fever (≥38 °C) occurred in 63 (17 %) patients. Most incidences of fever occurred on postoperative day one. In majority of these cases, the fever subsided after removal of the packing material without further antibiotic administration. However, one patient who experienced persistent fever after the removal of packing material developed meningitis. History of asthma, prolonged operation time (≥108 min), and intravenous cefazolin administration instead of cefmetazole were associated with postoperative fever. Odds ratios (ORs) for each were 2.3, 4.6, and 2.0, respectively. Positive preoperative bacterial colonization was associated with postoperative bacterial colonization on the packing material (OR 2.3). Postoperative fever subsided in most patients after removal of the packing material. When this postoperative fever persists, its underlying cause should be examined.

[A clinical study of auditory ossicular malformations in 44 ears].

Generally reporting, among the various forms of conductive hearing loss, auditory ossicular malformation clinically treated by surgery had good hearing improvement. We conducted a retrospective review of 40 patients (44 ears) with auditory ossicular malformations who were treated in our hospitals between April 2004 and March 2011. We analyzed the following preoperative features, surgical methods, and results of surgery. An otomicroscopic examination, auditory ossicules reflection, tympanometory, and temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography were undertaken in all patients. We also investigated whether these preoperative examinations would enable surgeons to make a preoperative diagnosis. There were 13 males (14 ears) and 27 females (30 ears), with an average age of 19.0 years. Classification of the pathologic condition based on surgical findings showed separation of the incus-stapes joint in 24 ears, fixation of the malleus or incus in 6 ears, fixation of the stapes footplate in 7 ears, and multifocal ossicular malformations in 7 ears. Ossicular reconstruction was performed by the modified type III method in 27 ears (including IIIc in 21 ears, IIIi-M in 1 ears, IIIi-I in 5 ears) and by the modified type IV method in 7 ears (including IVc in 5 ears, and IVi-I in 2 ears), stapes surgery in 11 ears (include total stapedectomy in 9 ears and partial stapedectomy in 2 ears) and exploratory tympanotomy in 1 ear. Postoperative hearing evaluations based on the criteria classified by the Japan Otology Society in 2010 were obtained for all cases. The procedure was deemed successful when the postoperative hearing level met at least one of these three bench marks; (1) Air-bone gap less than 15dB, (2) Recovered hearing more than 15dB, and (3) Improved or preserved hearing less than 30dB. Hearing was evaluated at 1 year after surgery. The success rates of hearing improvement was 92.3%. The success rates of postoperative hearing improvement were satisfactory. Surgeons should treat auditory ossicular malformations actively.