Importance of dynamics in the finite element prediction of plastic damage of polyethylene acetabular liners under edge loading conditions.

After hip replacement, in cases where there is instability at the joint, contact between the femoral head and the acetabular liner can move from the bearing surface to the liner rim, generating edge loading conditions. This has been linked to polyethylene liner fracture and led to the development of a regulatory testing standard (ISO 14242:4) to replicate these conditions. Performing computational modelling alongside simulator testing can provide insight into the complex damage mechanisms present in hard-on-soft bearings under edge loading. The aim of this work was to evaluate the need for inertia and elastoplastic material properties to predict kinematics (likelihood of edge loading) and plastic strain accumulation (as a damage indicator). While a static, rigid model was sufficient to predict kinematics for experimental test planning, the inclusion of inertia, alongside elastoplastic material, was required for prediction of plastic strain behaviour. The delay in device realignment during heel strike, caused by inertia, substantially increased the force experienced during rim loading (e.g. 600 N static rigid, ∼1800 N dynamic elastoplastic, in one case). The accumulation of plastic strain is influenced by factors including cup orientation, swing phase force balance, the moving mass, and the design of the device itself. Evaluation of future liner designs could employ dynamic elastoplastic models to investigate the effect of design feature changes on bearing resilience under edge loading.

Periprosthetic femoral fracture--a biomechanical comparison between Vancouver type B1 and B2 fixation methods.

Current clinical data suggest a higher failure rate for internal fixation in Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) fixations compared to long stem revision in B2 fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of several fixations in the aforementioned fractures. Finite element models of B1 and B2 fixations, previously corroborated against in vitro experimental models, were compared. The results indicated that in treatment of B1 fractures, a single locking plate can be without complications provided partial weight bearing is followed. In case of B2 fractures, long stem revision and bypassing the fracture gap by two femoral diameters are recommended. Considering the risk of single plate failure, long stem revision could be considered in all comminuted B1 and B2 fractures.

The effect of fracture stability on the performance of locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) fixation failures are still occurring. The effect of fracture stability and loading on PFF fixation has not been investigated and this is crucial for optimum management of PFF. Models of stable and unstable PPFs were developed and used to quantify the effect of fracture stability and loading in a single locking plate fixation. Stress on the plate was higher in the unstable compared to the stable fixation. In the case of unstable fractures, it is possible for a single locking plate fixation to provide the required mechanical environment for callus formation without significant risk of plate fracture, provided partial weight bearing is followed. In cases where partial weight bearing is unlikely, additional biological fixation could be considered.