Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurosurg ; 90(2 Suppl): 163-9, 1999 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10199244

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 125 consecutive patients in whom instrumentation was placed to promote lumbar fusion for the treatment of degenerative instability. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon. The authors sought to determine the risk factors for next-segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion with rigid instrumentation. METHODS: Thirty-one of 125 fusion procedures were performed in women who were postmenopausal. A total of 18 of 125 patients developed symptomatic next-segment degeneration at a previously asymptomatic level; 15 were postmenopausal women. Data were obtained in patients with next-segment failure based on radiographic studies, neurological assessment, demographic factors, and sequential follow-up examinations. The mean follow-up period for this group was 44.8 months. All women were postmenopausal, and 53% received biphosphonate drugs and calcium supplementation preoperatively for osteopenia. Twenty percent of all patients with next-segment failure were cigarette smokers. Next-segment diseases included spondylolisthesis (39%), spinal canal stenosis due to disc herniation and/or facet hypertrophy (33%), stress fracture of the adjacent vertebral body (28%), and scoliosis (17%). Patients frequently had more than one degenerative process at the next segment. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of adjacent-segment failure is clearly higher for patients in whom lumbar fusion with rigid instrumentation is performed to treat degenerative instability. This risk appears to be especially high in postmenopausal women.


Subject(s)
Joint Instability/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Orthopedic Fixation Devices , Spinal Diseases/etiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Laminectomy , Male , Middle Aged , Myelography , Postmenopause/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Failure
2.
J Neurosurg ; 88(1): 158-60, 1998 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9420093

ABSTRACT

Anterior odontoid screw fixation is being performed with increasing frequency and may currently be the treatment of choice for Type II and selected Type III odontoid fractures, because it is the only surgical fusion that preserves C1-2 motion. Typically patients are immobilized postoperatively in a simple cervical collar. The authors present a case of postoperative fracture of the anterior body of the axis secondary to screw dislocation 5 weeks after single anterior odontoid screw osteosynthesis. Possible reasons for this rare complication and its implications for the technique are discussed.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws , Odontoid Process/surgery , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Adult , Humans , Male , Reoperation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...