Dry heat, moist heat and body fat: are heating modalities really effective in people who are overweight?

Surface heating modalities are commonly used in physical therapy and physical medicine for increasing circulation, especially in deep tissues, to promote healing. However, recent evidence seems to indicate that in people who are overweight, heat transfer is impaired by the subcutaneous fat layer. The present investigation was conducted on 10 subjects aged 22-54 years, whose body mass index averaged 25.8+/-4.6. Subcutaneous fat above the quadriceps muscle varied from 0.51 to 0.86 cm of thickness. Three heating modalities were examined: the application of dry heat with a commercial chemical heat pack, hydrocollator heat packs (providing a type of moist heat), and a whirlpool, where conductive heat loss through water contact would be very high. The temperature of the skin and the temperature in the muscle (25 mm below the skin surface) were assessed by thermocouples. The results of the experiments showed that for heating modalities that are maintained in skin contact for long periods of time, such as dry heat packs (in place for 6 hours), subcutaneous fat did not impair the change in deep muscle temperature. In contrast, when rapid heat modalities were used, such as the hydrocollator and the whirlpool (15 minutes of sustained skin contact), the transfer of heat from the skin to deep muscle was significantly impaired in people with thicker subcutaneous fat layers. We observed that the greater the impairment in heat transfer to muscle from skin covered by body fat, the warmer the skin temperature increase during the modality.

Does skin moisture influence the blood flow response to local heat? A re-evaluation of the Pennes model.

Pennes first described a model of heat transfer through the limb based only on calories delivered from a heat source, calories produced by metabolism and skin blood flow. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a moist versus a dry heat source on the skin in eliciting a blood flow response to add data to this model. Ten subjects were examined, both male and female, with a mean age of 32.5 +/- 11.6 years, mean height of 172.8 +/- 12.3 cm, and mean weight of 77.6 +/- 19.5 kg. Skin temperature was measured by a thermocouple placed on the skin and skin blood flow measured by a laser Doppler flow meter. The results of the experiments using a dry heat pack (commercially available chemical 42 degrees C cell dry heat source), moist hydrocollator pack (72.8 degrees C) separated from the skin by eight layers of towels, and whirlpool at 40 degrees C, showed that moist heat caused a significantly higher skin blood flow (about 500% greater) than dry heat (p < 0.01). Most of the greater increase in skin blood flow with moist heat was due to the greater rate of rise of skin temperature with moist versus dry heat while some of the increase in blood flow was due to the moisture itself. This could either be related to the greater heat flux across the skin with moist air or due to changing the ionic environment around skin thermo receptors by keeping the skin moist during heating. Skin thermo receptors are believed to be temperature sensitive calcium gated channels in endothelial cells which couple calcium influx to a release of nitric oxide. If true, reducing moisture in the skin might have the effect of altering ionic flux through these receptors. A correct model of skin heat flux should therefore take heat moisture content into consideration.