Postmortem redistribution of amphetamines and benzodiazepines in humans: Important variables that might be influencing the central blood / peripheral blood ratio.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of postmortem forensic toxicology is to determine if toxicological substances detected in bodily material of victims have contributed to the death of the victim. Interpretation of postmortem drug concentrations is hindered by the fact that time and site dependent variations in postmortem drug concentrations occur, as a result of postmortem redistribution (PMR). An often-used marker for the occurrence of PMR, is the cardiac blood concentration/peripheral blood concentration ratio (C/P ratio) of a drug. In this study, we investigated the relationship between 13 variables and the C/P ratios of amphetamines and benzodiazepines. METHOD: Toxicological results of all postmortem cases that were positive for amphetamines (amphetamine, MDMA, MDA) and/or benzodiazepines (diazepam, desmethyldiazepam, temazepam, oxazepam, midazolam, α-hydroxymidazolam) investigated by the Netherlands Forensic Institute between January 1 2010 and July 31 2020 were reviewed. A total of 112 amphetamine positive cases (224 paired specimen) and 179 benzodiazepine positive cases (358 paired specimen) were selected. The C/P ratios were determined for all selected cases. Ratios were compared between subgroups by performing either a Mann-Whitney U test or a Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post-hoc Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: After dividing cases in quartiles based on their amphetamine concentration in femoral blood, the amphetamine C/P ratio was significantly lower in cases with a high amphetamine concentration (quartile 4) compared to cases with a low amphetamine concentration (quartiles 1 and 2) with median C/P ratios of 1.6, 2.4 and 2.2, respectively (p-value<0.001 and p-value=0.001, respectively). The MDA C/P ratio was significantly higher in cases where trauma was the cause of death compared to cases where intoxication was the cause of death with median C/P ratios of 3.3 and 1.6, respectively (p-value<0.001). The MDA C/P ratio was also significantly lower in cases where resuscitation was attempted compared to cases where no resuscitation was attempted with median C/P ratios of 1.6 and 2.4, respectively (p-value=0.003). However, a significant dependency between the variables cause of death and attempted resuscitation was observed. No significant differences in benzodiazepine C/P ratios were observed between subgroups of any of the investigated variables. However, the low p-value of BMI suggests a potential difference in midazolam C/P ratio between BMI subgroups (p-value=0.027). CONCLUSION: When interpreting postmortem toxicological results, it might prove useful to take the above-mentioned variables into account.

Comparison of the Impact of Pharmacogenetic Variability on the PK of Slow Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations.

Tacrolimus-modified release formulations allow for once-daily dosing, and adherence is better compared to the twice-daily immediate release formulation. When patients are switched from one formulation to another, variable changes in drug concentrations are observed. Current data suggest that the changes in drug exposure are larger in patients who express the CYP3A5 enzyme (CYP3A5 *1/*3 or *1/*1) compared to nonexpressers (CYP3A5*3/*3). Possibly, these differences are due to the fact that in the upper region of the small intestine CYP3A activity is higher, and that this expression of CYP3A decreases towards the more distal parts of the gut. Modified release formulations may therefore be subject to a less presystemic metabolism. However, the full implications of pharmacogenetic variants affecting the expression and function of drug transporters in the gut wall and of enzymes involved in phase I and phase II metabolism on the different formulations are incompletely understood, and additional studies are required. Conclusions: In all patients in whom the formulation of tacrolimus is changed, drug levels need to be checked to avoid clinically relevant under- or overexposure. In patients with the CYP3A5 expresser genotype, this recommendation is even more important, as changes in drug exposure can be expected.