Level of evidence used in recommendations by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines beyond Food and Drug Administration approvals.

BACKGROUND: A previous analysis of 113 National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) recommendations reported that NCCN frequently recommends beyond Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications (44 off-label recommendations) and claimed that the evidence for these recommendations was weak. METHODS: In order to determine the strength of the evidence, we carried out an in-depth re-analysis of the 44 off-label recommendations listed in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). RESULTS: Of the 44 off-label recommendations, 14 were later approved by the FDA and/or are supported by randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. In addition, 13 recommendations were either very minor extrapolations from the FDA label (n = 8) or were actually on-label (n = 5). Of the 17 remaining extrapolations, 8 were for mechanism-based agents applied in rare cancers or subsets with few available treatment options (median response rate = 43%), 7 were based on non-RCT data showing significant efficacy (>50% response rates), and 2 were later removed from the NCCN Guidelines because newer therapies with better activity and/or safety became available. CONCLUSION: Off-label drug use is a frequent component of care for patients with cancer in the United States. Our findings indicate that when the NCCN recommends beyond the FDA-approved indications, the strength of the evidence supporting such recommendations is robust, with a significant subset of these drugs later becoming FDA approved or supported by RCT. Recommendations without RCT data are often for mechanism-based drugs with high response rates in rare cancers or subsets without effective therapies.

Thromboembolic Events Associated with Thalidomide and Multimodality Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of RTOG 0330.

Introduction. RTOG 0330 was developed to address the toxicity of RTOG 9514 and to add thalidomide (THAL) to MAID chemoradiation for intermediate/high grade soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) and to preoperative radiation (XRT) for low-grade STS. Methods. Primary/locally recurrent extremity/trunk STS: ≥8 cm, intermediate/high grade (cohort A): >5 cm, low grade (cohort B). Cohort A: 3 cycles of neoadjuvant MAID, 2 cycles of interdigitated THAL (200 mg/day)/concurrent 22 Gy XRT, resection, 12 months of adjuvant THAL. Cohort B: neoadjuvant THAL/concurrent 50 Gy XRT, resection, 6 months of adjuvant THAL. Planned accrual 44 patients. Results. 22 primary STS patients (cohort A/B 15/7). Cohort A/B: median age of 49/47 years; median tumor size 12.8/10 cm. 100% preoperative THAL/XRT and surgical resection. Three cycles of MAID were delivered in 93% cohort A. Positive margins: 27% cohort A/29% cohort B. Adjuvant THAL: 60% cohort A/57% cohort B. Grade 3/4 venous thromboembolic (VTE) events: 40% cohort A (1 catheter thrombus and 5 DVT or PE) versus 0% cohort B. RTOG 0330 closed early due to cohort A VTE risk and cohort B poor accrual. Conclusion. Neoadjuvant MAID with THAL/XRT was associated with increased VTE events not seen with THAL/XRT alone or in RTOG 9514 with neoadjuvant MAID/XRT.

New drugs for chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer.

To improve the survival of patients with small cell lung cancer, there is a need for new and effective agents to treat this disease. These agents include paclitaxel, docetaxel, topotecan, irinotecan, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and amrubicin. In previously untreated small cell lung cancer patients the response rate for these effective drugs ranges from 27% to 79%. Median survival ranges from 6.6 to 12 months. The major toxicity for these agents is leukopenia. Studies are ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of combination chemotherapy using new agents either together or with other known effective drugs for the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 4):27-29.

Gemcitabine/Alimta in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

The search for new combination chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer is motivated not only by the desire to increase the objective tumor response and survival rates, but also by the desire to reduce toxicity, decrease symptoms, and improve the psychological well-being of treated patients. At present, the overall phase II response rates with existing combination chemotherapeutic regimens are approximately 15% to 30%, and the median survival rates are about 8 to 9 months. The median 1-year survival rates are about 30% to 40%, while the 2-year survival rates are only about 10% to 15%. Thus, while we have made substantial progress in the treatment of this disease, the long-term outcome is still relatively bleak. This article reviews the results of a phase I trial with a new combination chemotherapeutic regimen (gemcitabine [Gemzar] and the novel antifolate, Alimta), and outlines the rationale for, and design of, an ongoing phase II trial.

Pilot study with weekly chemotherapy for patients with extensive small cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (PA586).

PURPOSE: Six of the most active chemotherapy agents in small cell lung cancer were administered sequentially in a weekly fashion in an attempt to optimize the dose and the number of agents received over a 12-week period. The purpose of this study was to estimate the efficacy and to characterize the toxicity of this approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer received weekly treatments with cisplatin and etoposide (weeks 1, 5, and 11), cyclophosphamide (weeks 2, 7, and 10), vincristine (weeks 2, 4, 7, 8, 10, and 12), methotrexate (weeks 3, 6, and 9), and doxorubicin (weeks 4, 8, and 12). Patients achieving a partial response received a second 12-week course. Patients achieving a complete response received prophylactic cranial radiation. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of the 36 patients completed the initial 12-week program over a median of 16 weeks. Hematologic toxicity was most prominent, with two deaths from sepsis and 31 patients having grade 3 or 4 neutropenia The overall response rate was 85%, with 33% of patients achieving a complete response. The median survival was 10.5 months, and the median time to progression was 8.2 months. DISCUSSION: This 12-week program, consisting of administration of six active agents for small cell lung cancer, caused significant myelosuppression that resulted in significant treatment delays and dose reductions. Although a high response rate was achieved, the median overall survival of 10.5 months was not significantly longer than expected from other standard two- to three-drug regimens.

Gemcitabine plus radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced non small-cell lung cancer.

For stage III non small-cell lung cancer, there is a need for better systemic, as well as locoregional, control of the tumor. In an attempt to enhance this locoregional control, systemic chemotherapy has been given currently with radiation therapy. Gemcitabine, a novel deoxycytidine analogue, has been shown to be a potent radiosensitizer. This review focuses on the studies using gemcitabine concurrently with radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced non small-cell lung cancer.

Gemcitabine: single-agent and combination therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

With the advent of several newer agents with single-agent response rates greater than 20% and approximately 30%-40% in combination therapy, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may now be considered a malignancy that is moderately sensitive to chemotherapy. Examples of these agents include the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel; vinorelbine, a new vinca alkaloid, and the camptothecins, of which CPT-11 is the most actively studied agent. Another new and exciting agent is gemcitabine, a nucleoside analogue structurally related to cytosine arabinoside. Gemcitabine's mechanism of action is activated by deoxycytidine kinase to dFdCMP, dFdCDP and dFdCTP. The latter two compounds, when incorporated into DNA, result in chain termination. Phase I studies using a short infusion schedule given weekly for three weeks followed by one week off established 1,000-1,250 mg/m2/week as the maximum tolerated dose. Single-agent gemcitabine has been extensively studied in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC with response rates of approximately 20%. Response rates for the combination of gemcitabine plus cisplatin are approximately 28%-54% in phase II trials. Recently, this combination has been studied in randomized phase II and III trials revealing improvements in response rates, time to progression and, in the phase III trial, survival. Current and future studies are evaluating gemcitabine in non-cisplatin combinations (i.e., taxanes).

Concurrent paclitaxel-containing regimens and thoracic radiation therapy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer.

Therapy for limited-disease (LD) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) includes combined modality therapy using radiation (XRT) and systemic chemotherapy. Because such therapy is effective in treating the disease, LD SCLC is now considered potentially curable. Based on data from the Intergroup study, the current standard chemotherapy regimen is etoposide plus either cisplatin or carboplatin administered concomitantly with XRT given once or twice daily. Paclitaxel has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of extensive-disease (ED) SCLC and in vitro data suggest that the agent has significant radiosensitizing potential. The Sarah Cannon Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, recently reported the results of two sequential phase II studies evaluating two paclitaxel doses in combination with cisplatin and etoposide for SCLC; patients with LD SCLC also received XRT. Patients with LD SCLC demonstrated a higher overall response rate to the higher-dose regimen; median survival was 17 months with the lower-dose regimen and more than 16 months with the higher-dose regimen. Three additional studies are under way to further evaluate the role of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin, etoposide, and XRT therapy for the treatment of LD SCLC. Although the number of evaluable patients is limited and all studies are ongoing, preliminary results thus far appear encouraging.

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and somatostatin therapy in the evaluation and treatment of malignant thymoma.

PURPOSE: This report illustrates the potential diagnostic and therapeutic utility of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and therapy with somatostatin. METHODS: In-111 pentetreotide (In-111 octreotide), a somatostatin analog, was used to define the receptor status and the extent of disease in a case of malignant thymoma. RESULTS: Subsequent treatment with nonradioactive somatostatin inhibited tumor growth. CONCLUSION: In-111 octreotide may be useful to define tumor receptor status and may provide prognostic information useful in determining subsequent therapy.

Docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a multicenter phase II trial.

We examined the safety and efficacy of the docetaxel/cisplatin combination in patients with advanced, previously untreated NSCLC and evaluated changes in quality of life over time. Docetaxel was administered before cisplatin (both 75 mg/m2, 1-hour infusions) every 3 weeks to 47 patients with stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC. Patients also received premedication of oral dexamethasone. The median age (range) of patients was 62 (45-78) years and 26 patients (55.3%) had adenocarcinoma. Of the 40 patients evaluable for response, one achieved a complete response and 14 had partial responses; the response rate was 37.5% (95% confidence intervals; 22.5, 52.5). In the intent-to-treat population the overall response rate was 31.9%. Time to response ranged from 3 to 20 weeks, and the median duration of response was 34.6 weeks. Median survival and median time to progression were 11.3 months and 18.9 weeks, respectively. One-year survival was 40%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in 74.4% and 12.8% of patients, respectively. Severe asthenia was seen in 14.9% of patients. Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included nausea (eight patients), vomiting (five), neurosensory effects (six), neuromotor effects (five), diarrhea (four), and infection (three). There was an improvement in emotional well-being; however, the overall quality of life score did not change with treatment. Docetaxel administered in combination with cisplatin is an active regimen in patients with NSCLC. This regimen of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) repeated at 3-week intervals is being evaluated in an ongoing Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) randomized study in patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

Combined-modality treatment for stage IIIa (N2) non-small cell lung cancer: a National Cancer Institute Intergroup study.

Induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy followed by surgery, evaluated in a number of phase II studies, is an effective treatment for patients with stage III A non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The ongoing phase III National Cancer Institute Intergroup study is evaluating concurrent chemotherapy (cisplatin + etoposide)/radiotherapy followed by either surgery or additional radiotherapy followed by 2 additional cycles of chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA disease. This study will help define the role of surgery and radiotherapy as part of the multimodality therapy of locoregional advanced NSCLC.

A phase II study of all-trans-retinoic acid plus cisplatin and etoposide in patients with extensive stage small cell lung carcinoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

BACKGROUND: The dysregulation of both myc gene expression and retinoid signaling pathways commonly occurs in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Because preclinical data showed that all-trans-retinoic acid (RA) inhibited SCLC growth, altered myc expression, and blocked transition to a treatment-resistant phenotype, a Phase II trial was designed to determine the effects of the combination of RA, cisplatin, and etoposide in patients with SCLC. METHODS: Patients with untreated, extensive stage SCLC were treated with up to 8 cycles of cisplatin, 60 mg/m2, intravenously (i.v.) on Day 1 and etoposide, 120 mg/m2, i.v. on Days 1-3 in addition to up to 1 year of oral RA, 150 mg/m2/day. RESULTS: Of 22 assessable patients 1 had a complete response and 9 had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 45% (95% confidence interval, 24-68%). The median survival was 10.9 months and the 1-year survival was 41%. The median duration of chemotherapy was 6 cycles and the median duration of RA treatment was 2.8 months. Thirteen patients discontinued RA prematurely due to toxicity and only 4 responders were receiving RA at the time of recurrence. Toxicity-limiting RA treatment mainly was comprised of mucocutaneous changes and headaches. CONCLUSIONS: RA at a dose of 150 mg/m2/day was tolerated poorly in combination with cisplatin plus etoposide, leading to early discontinuation of RA in the majority of patients. The hematologic toxicity, response rate, and survival were similar to those associated with cisplatin and etoposide in prior trials. Further studies with more active and less toxic agents will be required to determine the role of retinoids in the treatment of SCLC.

The role of carboplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death due to cancer in the United States, and approximately 178,100 new cases were estimated to occur last year. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 17% to 25% of all lung cancers. Due to its aggressive nature and rapid proliferation rate, small-cell lung cancer is usually widespread at diagnosis. Therefore, chemotherapy is the cornerstone of therapy for this disease. Cisplatin (Platinol) is an active chemotherapeutic agent used to treat small-cell lung cancer, but its toxicity, including nausea and vomiting, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and ototoxicity, has led to the investigation of combination regimens with different toxicity profiles. Carboplatin (Paraplatin), a derivative of cisplatin, has far less nonhematologic toxicity, although myelosuppression may be slightly greater than that observed with cisplatin. The reduced toxicity and equivalent efficacy of carboplatin have resulted in the increased use of carboplatin-based regimens to treat small-cell lung cancer. Phase I and II trials of carboplatin as single-agent treatment for small-cell lung cancer resulted in overall response rates of approximately 60% for previously untreated patients and 17% for those who had received prior therapy. New combination chemotherapy regimens that include carboplatin may improve survival in patients with small-cell lung cancer and potentially cure those patients with limited disease. Further investigation of carboplatin and other new agents is warranted.

Recent advances with chemotherapy for NSCLC: the ECOG experience. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Management of disseminated non-small-cell lung cancer has changed over the past 10 years. Newer agents, such as vinorelbine (Navelbine) and paclitaxel (Taxol), have been shown to modestly improve survival in patients with advanced disease when administered in conjunction with cisplatin (Platinol). Compared with older regimens consisting of cisplatin and a Vinca alkaloid or a podophyllotoxin, the newer regimens yield a 10- to 15-week improvement in median survival and an additional 10% to 15% in 1-year survival. Based on these results derived from randomized trials, it appears that metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients with good performance status should be treated with regimens containing either vinorelbine or paclitaxel in conjunction with cisplatin.

5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. A comparison of their pharmacology and clinical efficacy.

In the mid-1980s it was discovered that serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) was at least partially responsible for producing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. It was therefore realised that serotonin receptor blockade with serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists could inhibit chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. 5-HT3 antagonists have different chemical structures and receptor binding affinity. Granisetron, dolasetron and its major metabolite are pure 5-HT3 antagonists, while ondansetron and tropisetron are weak antagonists at the 5-HT4 receptor. Ondansetron has also been demonstrated to bind at other serotonin receptors and to the opioid mu receptor. The half-lives of granisetron, tropisetron and the active metabolite of dolasetron are 2 to 3 times longer than that of ondansetron. These observations initially suggested that more frequent ondansetron administration would be required; however, it has now been shown that receptor blockade does not correlate with elimination half-life and all 5-HT3 antagonists can be effectively administered once daily. Clinical trials have been conducted that directly compare the 5-HT3 antagonists. To compare these studies, it is necessary to assess trial design, including known risk factors for the development of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and response criteria. Stratification for risk factors, use of strict efficacy criteria and randomisation to a blinded trial using an appropriate comparative regimen are essential for a well designed antiemetic trial. Comparative clinical trials using various doses, routes and regimens of administration have been conducted with 5-HT3 antagonists. Despite some trial design shortcomings, most of the studies show equal efficacy between the agents, especially in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and mild, infrequently occurring adverse effects. The addition of steroids also appears to improve outcome. However, since many doses and regimens of ondansetron were used, further study is needed to determine the optimal regimen. The efficacy of 5-HT3 antagonists in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting from chemotherapy is less well studied. Further, there is no good scientific rationale for the use of 5-HT3 antagonists in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting since serotonin has not been shown to be released during the delayed phase. In fact, most studies show no benefit or modest benefit of 5-HT3 antagonists over placebo. Because the 5-HT3 antagonists perform similarly in the clinical setting, pharmacological differences do not seem to translate into therapeutic differences. There is also no appreciable difference in the incidence or severity of adverse effects among the 5-HT3 antagonists. Determination of clinical use may then be driven by cost.

A phase II study of Didemnin B (NSC 325319) in advanced malignant melanoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (PB687).

PURPOSE: Didemnin B is a novel marine natural product cyclic depsipeptide containing unusual amino acid moieties. This agent demonstrates promising preclinical antitumor activity, including activity against B16 melanoma and against melanoma isolates in the human tumor stem cell assay. METHODS: We conducted a phase II study of Didemnin B, given in Cremophor, at a starting dose of 4.2 mg/m2/IV q 28 days. Patients with measurable metastatic or advanced malignant melanoma were eligible. All patients were previously untreated with chemotherapy and had performance status 0 or 1. Doses were escalated to 4.9 and 5.6 mg/m2 in cycles 2 and 3, respectively. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were entered and treated with a median of one cycle per patient. Eight of these patients went off study for toxicity including 7 with anaphylactoid reactions in the first or second cycle. One patient went off study after 3 cycles with severe myopathy, a newly described toxicity. Two were not evaluable for response and five were considered stable, including one patient with a transient PR of soft tissue disease in the first cycle. Another patient had stable disease for twelve cycles before progressing and one went off study electively after 3 cycles, for a total of 7 patients with stable disease. One patient with a measurable partial remission (PR) and went off study after three cycles due to severe myopathy, a then newly-described toxicity. No hematologic toxicity was seen. Nausea and vomiting were controlled with anti-emetics. CONCLUSIONS: This study was indeterminate with respect to the activity of Didemnin B in melanoma. Signs of activity were seen, particularly in soft tissue masses, though a large number of patients could not be evaluated fully for activity due to the occurrence of anaphylactoid reactions. This study does not preclude a clinically important level of activity for Didemnin B.

Second primary cancers related to smoking and treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Working Cadre.

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of second primary cancers has been reported in patients who survive small-cell carcinoma of the lung. The treatment's contribution to the development of second cancers is difficult to assess, in part because the number of long-term survivors seen at any one institution is small. We designed a multi-institution study to investigate the risk among survivors of developing second primary cancers other than small-cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Demographic, smoking, and treatment information were obtained from the medical records of 611 patients who had been cancer free for more than 2 years after therapy for histologically proven small-cell lung cancer, and person-years of follow-up were cumulated. Population-based rates of cancer incidence and mortality were used to estimate the expected number of cancers or deaths. The actuarial risk of second cancers was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Relative to the general population, the risk of all second cancers among these patients (mostly non-small-cell cancers of the lung) was increased 3.5-fold. Second lung cancer risk was increased 13-fold among those who received chest irradiation in comparison to a sevenfold increase among nonirradiated patients. It was higher in those who continued smoking, with evidence of an interaction between chest irradiation and continued smoking (relative risk = 21). Patients treated with various forms of combination chemotherapy had comparable increases in risk (9.4- to 13-fold, overall), except for a 19-fold risk increase among those treated with alkylating agents who continued smoking. IMPLICATIONS: Because of their substantially increased risk, survivors should stop smoking and may consider entering trials of secondary chemoprevention.