High levels of anti-factor VIII immunoglobulin G4 and immunoglobulin G total are associated with immune tolerance induction failure in people with congenital hemophilia A and high-responding inhibitors.

Background: Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the treatment of choice to eradicate neutralizing anti-factor (F)VIII alloantibodies (inhibitors) in people with inherited hemophilia A. However, it is not successful in 10% to 40% of the cases. The biological mechanisms and biomarkers associated with ITI outcome are largely unknown. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the association of plasma cytokines (interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor, interleukin [IL]-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-17A), chemokines (IL-8/CXCL8, RANTES/CCL5, MIG/CXCL9, MCP-1/CCL2, and IP-10/CXCL10), and anti-FVIII immunoglobulin (Ig) G total, IgG1, and IgG4 with ITI outcome. Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis of the Brazilian Immune Tolerance Study, we assessed plasma levels of anti-FVIII IgGs using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with plasma-derived FVIII and recombinant FVIII as target antigens, immobilized in microplates. Results: We assayed 98 plasma samples of moderately severe and severe (FVIII activity, <2%) people with hemophilia A after completion of a first ITI course. Levels of anti-recombinant FVIII IgG total and IgG4 were higher in people with hemophilia A who failed ITI (IgG total optical density [OD], 0.37; IQR, 0.15-0.73; IgG4 OD, 2.19; IQR, 0.80-2.52) than in those who had partial (IgG total OD, 0.03; IQR, 0.00-0.14; IgG4 OD, 0.39; IQR, 0.09-1.11; P < .0001 for both) or complete success (IgG total OD, 0.04; IQR, 0.00-0.07; IgG4 OD, 0.07; IQR, 0.06-0.40; P < .0001 for both). Plasma cytokines, chemokines, and anti-FVIII IgG1 were not associated with ITI outcome. Conclusion: Our results show that high levels of plasma anti-FVIII IgG4 and IgG total are associated with ITI failure.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety in the use of cytarabine for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in a reference hospital in northeastern Brazil.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT) is widely used in the treatment of patients with hematological neoplasms. Since these cells circulate in small quantities in the periphery, the use of regimens that promote their mobilization is essential. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of using intermediate doses of cytarabine (1.6 g/m²) + filgrastim (10 mcg/kg/day) in the mobilization of stem cells in 157 patients treated by the Unified Health System at the Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Service of the Hospital Real Português de Beneficência, in Recife, Pernambuco. The sample included patients with multiple myeloma (MM) (58.6 %), lymphomas (29.9 %), and other neoplasms (11.5 %). The target of 2.0 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg was achieved by 148 (94.3 %) patients, in most cases (84.1 %) in a single apheresis and the median number of cells collected was 9.5 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg. No episode of febrile neutropenia was observed, however, 79 patients (50.3 %) required platelet transfusion (no cases attributed to bleeding). The median engraftment time was 11 days. Given these results, we suggest that the use of intermediate doses of cytarabine, combined with filgrastim, is safe and effective in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs).

Time between inhibitor detection and start of immune tolerance induction: Association with outcome in the BrazIT study.

BACKGROUND: Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the treatment of choice for eradication of anti-factor VIII (FVIII) neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors) in people with inherited hemophilia A and high-responding inhibitor (PwHA-HRi). The association between ITI outcome and time elapsed between inhibitor detection and start of ITI (∆tinhi-ITI ) is debatable. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate this association among a large cohort of severe PwHA-HRi. METHODS: Severe (factor VIII activity level <1%) PwHA-HRi on ITI (n = 142) were enrolled in 15 hemophilia treatment centers. PwHA-HRi were treated according to the Brazilian ITI Protocol. ITI outcomes were defined as success (i.e., recovered responsiveness to exogenous FVIII) and failure (i.e., no responsiveness to exogenous FVIII and requirement of bypassing agents to control bleeding). RESULTS: Median ages at inhibitor detection and at ITI start were 3.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.6-8.1) and 6.9 years [IQR, 2.6-20.1), respectively. PwHA-HRi were stratified according to ∆tinhi-ITI quartiles: first (0.0-0.6 year), second (>0.6-1.7 year), third (>1.7-9.2 years), and fourth quartile (>9.2-24.5 years). The overall success rate was 65.5% (93/142), with no difference among first, second, third, and fourth quartiles (62.9%, 69.4%, 58.3%, and 71.4%, respectively) even after adjusting the analyses for potential confounders. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, delayed ITI start is not associated with failure of ITI in PwHA-HRi. Therefore, ITI should be offered for these patients, regardless of the time elapsed between the detection of inhibitor and the ITI start.

Angiomirs expression profiling in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma.

Despite advances in treatment, 30% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cases are refractory or relapse after chemoimmunotherapy. Currently, the relationship between angiogenesis and angiomiRs in DLBCL is unknown. We classified 84 DLBCL cases according to stromal signatures and evaluated the expression of pro- and antiangiomiRs in paraffin embedded tissues of DLBCL and correlated them with microvascular density (MVD). 40% of cases were classified as stromal-1, 50% as stromal-2 and 10% were not classified. We observed increased expression of proangiomiRs Let-7f, miR-17, miR-18a, miR-19b, miR-126, miR-130a, miR-210, miR-296 and miR-378 in 14%, 57%, 30%, 45%, 12%, 12%, 56%, 58% and 48% of the cases, respectively. Among antiangiomiRs we found decreased expression of miR-16, miR-20b, miR-92a, miR-221 and miR-328 in, respectively, 27%, 71%, 2%, 44% and 11%. We found association between increased expression of proangiomiRs miR-126 and miR-130a and antiangiomiR miR-328 and the subtype non-GCB. We found higher levels of the antiangiomiRs miR-16, miR-221 and miR-328 in patients with low MVD and stromal-1 signature. IPI and CD34 confirmed independent impact on survival of the study group. None of the above angiomiRs showed significance as biomarker in an independent serum samples cohort of patients and controls. In conclusion, we confirmed association between antiangiomiRs miR-16, miR-221 and miR-328 and stromal-1 signature. Four angiomiRs emerged as potential therapeutic targets: proangiomiRs miR-17, miR-210 and miR-296 and antiangiomiR miR-20b. Although the four microRNAs seem to be important in DLBCL pathogenesis, they were not predictive of DLBCL onset or relapse in the serum independent cohort.

Comparative expression of a set of genes to an internal housekeeping control in CDNA amplified and not amplified by PolyAPCR in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma samples obtained from fine-needle aspiration cytology.

AIM: We aimed to evaluate the amount and quality of the RNA obtained from lymph nodes of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) patients using fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and to develop strategies to overcome eventual technical drawbacks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with NHL and 10 tonsils from children submitted to tonsillectomy underwent FNAC. The aspirates were performed using both cytoaspirator (sample A) and syringe and needle (sample B). The RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent and transcribed with the Superscript kit (Invitrogen). The quality of RNA was verified through the amplification of a beta-actin 155-bp fragment. RESULTS: Fifty-two NHL and 20 tonsil samples were analyzed. The total amount of RNA in the tonsil samples varied from <1.0 to 6.2 microg with cytoaspirator (A) and from <1.0 to 4.7 microg with syringe and needle (B). The total amount of RNA obtained from NHL varied from <1.0 to 6.5 microg with cytoaspirator (A) and <1.0 to 5.5 microg with syringe and needle. In an attempt to increase the amounts of RNA in each sample, we standardized the polyAPCR technique, which increased by 10 times the amount of cDNA in most of the test and control samples. The efficiency of the reaction was verified through the amplification of beta-actin, in which 100% of the test and control samples were amplified. When polyAPCR cDNA and nonamplified cDNA samples were paired to be evaluated by real-time PCR, using glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as the constitutive gene and nuclear factor-kappa B and NFkappaBIA as target genes, there was equivalence in the amplifications of 100% of the 15 evaluated samples. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that FNAC, obtained either by cytoaspirator or syringe and needle, is a good source of small amounts of RNA. The polyAPCR technique significantly increased the amount of genomic material, which might be a cDNA source for future gene expression studies.

Is the follicular lymphoma international prognostic index better than the international prognostic index to identify high-risk follicular lymphoma patients?

The aims of this study are to validate follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) prognostic score and to compare it with the international prognostic index (IPI) in a cohort of 57 Brazilian patients. According to IPI, 24 patients (42%) were in the low-risk, 28 (49%) in the intermediate-risk, and 4 (7%) in the high-risk group. The distribution according to FLIPI was: 20 (35%) in the low-risk, 8 (14%) in the intermediate-risk, and 29 (51%) in the high-risk group. According to IPI score, median OS was not reached for the low-risk, it was 45 months for the intermediate-risk and 25 months for the high-risk group (p < 0.001). When FLIPI score was applied, median OS was not reached for the low and intermediate-risk, and was 42 months for the high-risk group (p = 0.0064). These findings suggest that: (1) FLIPI score could be validated in a Brazilian population; (2) FLIPI is more accurate than IPI to identify FL patients having worse prognosis (51%); (3) IPI seems to be a better tool for clinical decisions because it selected a smaller high-risk group (7%) having worse prognosis. In our opinion, IPI high-risk patients are the real candidates for more aggressive therapies, avoiding unnecessary over-treatment.