The phenotype of adverse drug effects: Do emergency visits due to adverse drug reactions look different in older people? Results from the ADRED study.

AIMS: Older patients in particular suffer from adverse drug reactions (ADR) when presenting in the emergency department. We aimed to characterise the phenotype of those ADRs, to be able to recognise an ADR in older patients. METHODS: Cases of ADRs in emergency departments collected within the multicentre prospective observational study (ADRED) were analysed (n = 2215). We analysed ADR-associated diagnoses, symptoms and their risk profiles. We present frequencies and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals for adults (18-64 years) compared to older adults (≥65 years; young-old 65-79, old-old ≥80 years) and regression coefficients (B) for each year of age. RESULTS: Most prominent differences were seen for drug-associated confusion, dehydration, and bradycardia (OR 6.70 [1.59-28.27], B .054; OR 6.02 [2.41-15.03], B .081, and 4.82 [2.21-10.54], B .040), more likely seen in older adults. Bleedings were reported in all age groups, but gastrointestinal bleedings occurred with more than doubled chance in older adults (OR 2.46 [1.77-3.41], B .030), likewise did other bleedings such as haemorrhage from respiratory passages (OR 2.89 [1.37-6.11], B.036). Falls were more likely in older adults (OR 2.84 [1.77-4.53], B .030), while dizziness was frequent in both age groups. CONCLUSION: Our data point to differences in symptoms of ADRs between adults and older individuals, with dangerous drug-associated phenomena in the older adult such as bleedings or falls. Physicians should consider drug-associated origins of symptoms in older adults with an increased risk for serious health problems.

Personalising drug safety-results from the multi-centre prospective observational study on Adverse Drug Reactions in Emergency Departments (ADRED).

PURPOSE: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) account for 5 to 7% of emergency department (ED) consultations. We aimed to assess medication risk profiles for ADRs leading to ED visits. METHODS: We analysed medication intake and patient demographics in a prospective multi-centre observational study collecting ADR cases in four large EDs in Germany. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated to relate drug classes taken to those suspicious for an ADR after a causality assessment. RESULTS: A total of 2215 cases of ED visits due to ADRs were collected. The median age of the cohort was 73 years; in median, six co-morbidities and an intake of seven drugs were documented. Antineoplastic/immunomodulating agents had the highest OR for being suspected for an ADR (OR 20.45, 95% CI 14.54-28.77), followed by antithrombotics (OR 2.94, 95% CI 2.49-3.47), antibiotics (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.78-3.95), systemic glucocorticoids (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.54-3.82) and drugs affecting the central nervous system (CNS), such as antipsychotics (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.46-3.81), antidepressants (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.57-2.83), antiparkinsonian medication (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.15-3.84), opioids (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.26-2.54) and non-opioid analgesics (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing ADRs leading to ED visits are commonly old, multi-morbid and multi-medicated. CNS drugs may be more relevant than prior expected. With calculating ORs, we could replicate involvement of antineoplastic agents, antithrombotics, antibiotics, systemic glucocorticoids and non-opioid analgesics as frequently suspected for ADRs in EDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS-ID: DRKS00008979.

Surveillance after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with curative intent - a multicenter survey in Germany and review of the literature.

Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers with high risk of relapse even after curative-intended resection. There are no evidence-based recommendations for surveillance in actual guidelines. Given this situation and as a basis for prospective studies, we wanted to determine the current practice of surveillance after pancreatic cancer resection in German institutions. Methods A web-based questionnaire was sent in 2015 to 300 German institutions (hospitals, outpatient clinics, and private practices) experienced in the care of patients with PDAC. The questionnaire comprised 23 items including the respective institution, the level of care, the annual case load of pancreatic cancer surgery, the surveillance algorithms used, and the most frequently used means for surveillance as well as their evaluation by the users with respect to the effectiveness of these means. Additionally, we perform a review of the literature. Results The final analysis comprised 161 questionnaires (response rate 53.7 %). Mainly high-volume centers (82.5 % with > 300 hospital beds) participated. In 46.6 % of centers, more than 80 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Between 60 - 80 % of these patients completed the recommended 6 months of adjuvant treatment, and 47 % of the patients received the whole treatment (surgery, adjuvant therapy) and surveillance in the same center. Upon completion of adjuvant treatment, 96 % of centers survey their patients, and 82 % of these centers already employ diagnostic means during the course of adjuvant chemotherapy. The most commonly used diagnostic means were taking patient history, conducting physical examination, performing laboratory tests including CA19 - 9, and imaging. Of those employed, CA19 - 9 and imaging followed by patient history were considered the most efficient to detect disease relapse by the centers. Half of the institutions perform surveillance for 5 years after surgery. Conclusion This is the first systematic analysis of self-reported surveillance strategies used in Germany after resection of PDAC with curative intent. Surveillance after resection of PDAC with curative intent is common in Germany. Alterations of CA19 - 9 levels as well as imaging and taking patient history are considered the most efficient means to detect relapse of disease by the physicians participating in our survey.