ABSTRACT
Introduction: Acupuncture is commonly used to treat chronic pain. Patients often access public social media platforms for healthcare information when querying acupuncture. Our study aims to appraise the utility, accuracy, and quality of information available on YouTube, a popular social media platform, on acupuncture for chronic pain treatment. Methods: Using search terms such as "acupuncture for chronic pain" and "acupuncture pain relief", the top 54 videos by view count were selected. Included videos were >1 minute duration, contained audio in English, had >7000 views, and was related to acupuncture. One primary outcome of interest was categorizing each video's usefulness as useful, misleading, or neither. Another primary outcome of interest was the quality and reliability of each video using validated instruments, including the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool and the Global Quality Scale (GQS). The means were calculated for the video production characteristics, production sources, and mDISCERN and GQS scores. Continuous and categorical outcomes were compared using Student's t-test and chi-square test, respectively. Results: Of the 54 videos, 57.4% were categorized as useful, 14.8% were misleading, and 27.8% were neither. Useful videos had a mean GQS and mDISCERN score of 3.77±0.67 and 3.48±0.63, respectively, while misleading videos had mean GQS and mDISCERN score of 2.50±0.53 and 2.38±0.52, respectively. 41.8% of the useful videos were produced by a healthcare institution while none of the misleading videos were produced by a healthcare institution. However, 87.5% of the misleading videos were produced by health media compared to only 25.8% of useful videos from health media. Discussion: As patients increasingly depend on platforms like YouTube for trustworthy information on complementary health practices such as acupuncture, our study emphasizes the critical need for more higher-quality videos from unbiased healthcare institutions and physicians to ensure patients are receiving reliable information regarding this topic.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The Watchman device is approved in the US, but little is known about Watchman's ischemic stroke reduction compared to the newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This study explored the differences in ischemic stroke reduction between the Watchman device, warfarin, and DOAC medication. Methods: Three patient cohorts, each containing 10,969 patients, were created using TriNetX. The primary and secondary endpoints were the ischemic stroke risk and all-cause mortality risk at 1 and 5 years. Results: At 1 year, the Watchman device's relative risk of ischemic stroke was 0.86 against warfarin but 1.27 against DOACs (P < 0.0001). The relative risk of ischemic stroke between the Watchman and DOACs was higher at 1 and 5 years (1.27 and 1.30, P < 0.0001). The relative risk of all-cause mortality at 1 and 5 years was 0.49 and 0.72 for the Watchman device compared to warfarin (P < 0.0001) and 0.66 and 0.92 between the Watchman and DOACs (P < 0.0001 and 0.01). Conclusion: While DOACs were associated with lower ischemic stroke rates, treatment with the Watchman device was associated with lower all-cause mortality. Patients placed on the Watchman device due to DOAC contraindications may benefit from its lower all-cause mortality risk.
ABSTRACT
Background: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring helps determine whether patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) should initiate medical management by predicting future cardiac event risk. CAC scoring is underutilized because many insurance companies consider it experimental. This study aimed to determine whether CAC screening of patients at risk for CAD is associated with decreased risk of myocardial infarction and improved survival. Methods: The TriNetX research network was used for this study. Two cohorts of 86,574 patients aged 40 to 70 years were created. All patients were diagnosed with dyslipidemia and without CAD, and the cohorts were matched for demographics, comorbidities, and statin use. One cohort had been screened with CAC scoring while the other had not. The primary outcomes of this study were myocardial infarction and overall survival at 5 years. Results: Screened patients had 44% fewer myocardial infarction events at 5 years with a 76% lower risk of death. Conclusion: CAC scoring is associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction and death in asymptomatic dyslipidemia patients and should be considered as a screening tool in these patients. The presumed mechanism for improved outcomes is that early identification of CAD results in earlier or more intensive treatment, reducing future cardiac event risk.
