Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Molecules ; 29(8)2024 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675715

ABSTRACT

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the fourth most prevalent cancer amongst males worldwide. While patients with non-muscle-invasive disease have a favorable prognosis, 25% of UC patients present with locally advanced disease which is associated with a 10-15% 5-year survival rate and poor overall prognosis. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is associated with about 50% 5 year survival when treated by radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy; stage IV disease is associated with 10-15% 5 year survival. Current therapeutic modalities for MIBC include neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and/or chemoradiation, although patients with relapsed or refractory disease have a poor prognosis. However, the rapid success of immuno-oncology in various hematologic and solid malignancies offers new targets with tremendous therapeutic potential in UC. Historically, there were no predictive biomarkers to guide the clinical management and treatment of UC, and biomarker development was an unmet need. However, recent and ongoing clinical trials have identified several promising tumor biomarkers that have the potential to serve as predictive or prognostic tools in UC. This review provides a comprehensive summary of emerging biomarkers and molecular tumor targets including programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), DNA damage response and repair (DDR) mutations, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) expression and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), as well as their clinical utility in UC. We also evaluate recent advancements in precision oncology in UC, while illustrating limiting factors and challenges related to the clinical application of these biomarkers in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Neoplasm , Biomarkers, Tumor , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Urologic Neoplasms , Humans , Antigens, Neoplasm/metabolism , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Prognosis , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/metabolism , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urologic Neoplasms/therapy
2.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(2): 217-223, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087703

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite the introduction of various novel therapies for management of metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in recent decades, available treatment options are finite and remain limited. Multiple historical studies have demonstrated activity and a favorable toxicity profile of oral metronomic cyclophosphamide (mCyc) in prostate cancer (PCa). Unlike the cytotoxic immunosuppressive effects of high-dose intravenously-administered cyclophosphamide, continuous low doses of oral mCyc have a unique immune-stimulatory mechanism of action. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, multi-institution study of men with 43 patients with mCRPC treated mCyc. Patient demographic information as well as clinical, pathologic, and genomic characteristics of their PCa were extracted. The primary endpoint was the rate of PSA decline by ≥ 50% (ie, PSA50). Additional efficacy and toxicity data as well as cost analysis compared to other commonly used agents in mCRPC was obtained. RESULTS: PSA50 was noted in 20.9% of patients, while an additional 25.6% patients achieved < PSA50 and 6.9% reported improvement in prostate cancer-related symptoms without any PSA reduction. Meanwhile, 9.3% of patients required mCyc dose reduction, 11.6% needed dose interruption due to toxicity, and no treatment discontinuations due to toxicity were observed. mCyc was also cost effective compared to other agents commonly used in mCRPC. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small sample size and retrospective nature of this dataset, mCyc demonstrated promising rapid activity and a tolerable toxicity profile in a heavily pretreated mCRPC population with aggressive clinical, pathologic, and genomic disease features.


Subject(s)
Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Cyclophosphamide
3.
Ann Transl Med ; 8(17): 1109, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33145328

ABSTRACT

Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer is one of the most common malignancy worldwide. In unresectable or metastatic disease, the prognosis is poor and is generally less than a year. Standard front-line chemotherapy includes two- or three-drug regimens with the addition of trastuzumab in HER2-positive disease. With an increased understanding of the biology of cancer over the past few decades, targeted therapies have made their way into the treatment paradigm of many cancers. They been examined in the first- and second-line settings in the treatment of gastroesophageal cancer though has yielded few viable treatment options. One success is ramucirumab either as monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel is the preferred choice in second-line therapy. While immunotherapy has been considered a breakthrough in oncology over the past decade, the response rates in gastric and gastroesophageal cancers have been relatively low compared to other cancers, resulting in its limited approval and mostly reserved for second-line therapy or beyond. In this article, we will review the standard first- and second-line treatment regimens. Furthermore, this article will review the use of targeted therapies and immunotherapy in treatment of gastric and gastroesophageal cancers. Lastly, we will touch upon future treatment strategies that are currently under investigation.

4.
Cancer Biol Ther ; 20(8): 1047-1056, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30975030

ABSTRACT

As a kinase at the crossroads of numerous metabolic and cell growth signaling pathways, glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK-3ß) is a highly desirable therapeutic target in cancer. Despite its involvement in pathways associated with the pathogenesis of several malignancies, no selective GSK-3ß inhibitor has been approved for the treatment of cancer. The regulatory role of GSK-3ß in apoptosis, cell cycle, DNA repair, tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis reflects the therapeutic relevance of this target and provides the rationale for drug combinations. Emerging data on GSK-3ß as a mediator of anticancer immune response also highlight the potential clinical applications of novel selective GSK-3ß inhibitors that are entering clinical studies. This manuscript reviews the preclinical and early clinical results with GSK-3ß inhibitors and delineates the developmental therapeutics landscape for this potentially important target in cancer therapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta/antagonists & inhibitors , Immunomodulation/drug effects , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/etiology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Biomarkers, Tumor , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta/genetics , Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta/metabolism , Humans , Molecular Targeted Therapy/adverse effects , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/pathology , Organ Specificity , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...