Subject(s)
Cholestasis/etiology , Histiocytosis, Langerhans-Cell/complications , Adult , Humans , MaleSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Histiocytosis, Langerhans-Cell/complications , Histiocytosis, Langerhans-Cell/etiology , Cholestasis/complications , Microscopy, Electron/trends , Microscopy, Electron , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Vinblastine/therapeutic use , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Immunohistochemistry/trends , ImmunohistochemistryABSTRACT
AIMS: The Gleason index (GI) is related to several pathological endpoints in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens, including the risk of extraprostatic disease (ED). The amount of tumour (TM) in core biopsy (CB) specimens also correlates with staging. The aim was to determine whether the sum of the relative statistical weights of GI and TM in CBs strengthens the prediction of ED in RPs. METHODS AND RESULTS: A series of 290 RPs and their previous respective CBs were reviewed. TM and the GI were blindly evaluated in CBs and statistically correlated with ED in RPs. A total of 60 (20.6%) RPs showed ED. The logistic regression model indicated that all cases with > 22 mm of cancer in CB showed ED in RP. All cases with a GI > 7 and > 12 mm of cancer in CB displayed ED. Finally, Pearson's chi2 revealed that 80% of cases with a GI > 7 and > or = 5 mm of cancer in CB showed ED in RP. CONCLUSIONS: The combined evaluation of GI and TM in CB is a useful method to strengthen the prediction of ED, is based on two simple morphological criteria and may be used as an additional tool to choose the best treatment modality.
Subject(s)
Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prostate/surgery , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgerySubject(s)
Colon, Sigmoid/pathology , Rectum/pathology , Colonoscopy , Humans , Male , Metaplasia , Middle AgedABSTRACT
The case of a 76-year-old patient with the Cronkhite-Canada syndrome admitted for diarrhea is presented. Although the clinical, endoscopical and histological data suggested the diagnosis, confirmation was achieved following necropsy, as well the evolution and the different treatment schedules carried out.
