Injury characteristics of the Pulse Nightclub shooting: Lessons for mass casualty incident preparation.

BACKGROUND: On the morning of June 12, 2016, an armed assailant entered the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and initiated an assault that killed 49 people and injured 53. The regional Level I trauma center and two community hospitals responded to this mass casualty incident. A detailed analysis was performed to guide hospitals who strive to prepare for future similar events. METHODS: A retrospective review of all victim charts and/or autopsy reports was performed to identify victim presentation patterns, injuries sustained, and surgical resources required. Patients were stratified into three groups: survivors who received care at the regional Level I trauma center, survivors who received care at one of two local community hospitals, and decedents. RESULTS: Of the 102 victims, 40 died at the scene and 9 died upon arrival to the Level I trauma center. The remaining 53 victims received definitive medical care and survived. Twenty-nine victims were admitted to the trauma center and five victims to a community hospital. The remaining 19 victims were treated and discharged that day. Decedents sustained significantly more bullet impacts than survivors (4 ± 3 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.008) and body regions injured (3 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.0002). Gunshots to the head, chest, and abdominal body regions were significantly more common among decedents than survivors (p < 0.0001). Eighty-two percent of admitted patients required surgery in the first 24 hours. Essential resources in the first 24 hours included trauma surgeons, emergency room physicians, orthopedic/hand surgeons, anesthesiologists, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, intensivists, and hospitalists. CONCLUSION: Mass shooting events are associated with high mortality. Survivors commonly sustain multiple, life-threatening ballistic injuries requiring emergent surgery and extensive hospital resources. Given the increasing frequency of mass shootings, all hospitals must have a coordinated plan to respond to a mass casualty event. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological Study, level V.

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is a good option in patients with abnormal esophageal motility.

BACKGROUND: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and abnormal esophageal motility are the most controversial subgroup of surgically treated patients because of potentially increased risk of postoperative dysphagia. Our study aim was to determine if Nissen fundoplication is associated with increased postoperative dysphagia in patients with ineffective esophageal motility. METHODS: Medical records of all adult (>18 years old) patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for GERD over 8 years were reviewed retrospectively. Of the 151 patients, 28 (group A) met manometric criteria for abnormal esophageal motility (<30 mmHg mean contractile pressure or <80% peristalsis), whereas 63 (group B) had normal esophageal function. Sixty patients had no manometric data and were therefore excluded from analysis. Follow-up time ranged from 1 month to 5 years. Outcomes (postoperative dysphagia, recurrence of GERD symptoms, free of medications) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Group A had higher age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.016 and 0.020), but this did not correlate with outcome. Two patients (7.1%) in group A and three patients (5.3%) in group B had postoperative dysphagia. When adjusted for follow-up time, there was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.94). Group B had more cases of recurrent heartburn (10.7% versus 3.6%, p = 0.039), and more patients in this group were back on medications (21.4% versus 7.1%, p < 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study found equally low rates of dysphagia following Nissen fundoplication regardless of baseline esophageal motility. Preoperative esophageal dysmotility therefore does not seem to be a contraindication for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

A description of the preterm fetal sheep systemic and central responses to maternal general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The second trimester is recommended as the optimal time to conduct a surgical procedure on pregnant patients, even though the fetal responses to anesthesia at this age are not known. Here we assessed the responses of preterm fetal sheep to a standard anesthetic regimen of midazolam, thiopental, and isoflurane. METHODS: Variables were monitored in previously instrumented preterm pregnant sheep before, during, and after 4 h of general anesthesia. Isoflurane produced moderate fetal hypotension and bradycardia, whereas extubation was accompanied by increases in fetal heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure. RESULTS: We observed an initial increase in fetal Sao2 followed by a gradual decline to baseline. Within the fetal brain, oxygenated hemoglobin changed by <10% (nonsignificant) and deoxygenated hemoglobin and total hemoglobin varied by <5%. Overall, although O2 levels within the preterm fetal brain were not independently enhanced by isoflurane (as occurs in the older fetus and in the adult), they did remain constant even as fetal mean arterial pressure decreased by more than 20%. By extension, we failed to identify changes in cerebral oxygenation that could be construed as injurious. CONCLUSION: Any adverse preterm fetal response to maternal surgery should not be attributed solely to the actions of general anesthesia upon the fetus.