Phase II Study of Lorlatinib in Patients With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Lung Cancer and CNS-Specific Relapse.

PURPOSE: The CNS is a recurrent site of progression in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged (ALK+) lung cancer. Lorlatinib is a third-generation ALK inhibitor developed to penetrate the CNS and overcome ALK resistance mutations. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the intracranial activity of lorlatinib in patients with CNS-only progression on second-generation ALK inhibitors. METHODS: Patients with ALK+ lung cancer who had intracranial progression on ≥ 1 ALK inhibitor without measurable extracranial disease received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. The primary end point was intracranial disease control rate at 12 weeks per modified RECIST v1.1. Secondary end points included intracranial progression-free survival, intracranial objective response rate, and safety/tolerability. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled between November 2016 and January 2019. Fifteen (65%) patients had irradiated CNS metastases, with a median of 20.2 months between radiation and lorlatinib. Control of intracranial disease was observed in 21 (95%) evaluable patients at 12 weeks. The intracranial objective response rate was 59% with six complete and seven partial responses. The median intracranial progression-free survival was 24.6 months (95% CI, 20.2 to not reached). With a median follow-up of 16.8 months, nine patients developed disease progression, including four patients with CNS progression. The most common treatment-related adverse events were hypercholesterolemia (96%), hypertriglyceridemia (87%), edema (65%), cognitive effects (52%), and mood effects (43%). Three patients discontinued treatment because of toxicity, including two patients with fatal respiratory events. CONCLUSION: Lorlatinib induced durable intracranial disease control in patients with CNS-only relapse on second-generation ALK inhibitors, suggesting that tumors with CNS-limited progression on brain-penetrant ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors remain ALK-dependent.

Biomarker testing and tissue journey among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer receiving first-line therapy in The US Oncology Network.

OBJECTIVES: The MYLUNG (Molecularly Informed Lung Cancer Treatment in a Community Cancer Network) consortium pragmatic study assessed real-world biomarker testing rates and turnaround times within a large community-based oncology network. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational chart review study investigated patients with mNSCLC initiating first-line (1L) systemic therapy between 01-April-2018 and 31-March-2020. Biomarker testing rates and timing relative to 1L therapy for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, and PD-L1 were assessed, including use of next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Among 3474 adults: 74% had adenocarcinoma and 76% had a documented ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Ninety percent had testing for at least one biomarker, and 46% received all 5 biomarker tests. Changes in testing rates from 2018 to 2020 were 71% to 71% for EGFR, 71% to 70% for ALK, 69% to 67% for ROS1, 51% to 59% for BRAF, 82% to 84% for PD-L1, and 42% to 49% for all 5 biomarkers. NGS testing increased from 33% to 45% (p < 0.0001). Median time from mNSCLC diagnosis to 1L therapy was 35 days. Median turnaround times from biomarker testing orders to results ranged from 10 to 15 days for the individual biomarkers and 18 days for NGS. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, while most patients received at least one biomarker test prior to 1L, <50% received all 5 tests. NGS testing also occurred in < 50% of patients but appeared to increase over time. The next phase of MYLUNG will evaluate contemporary ordering practices and turnaround times prospectively.

Narrative review of the epidemiology, economic burden, and societal impact of metastatic bone disease.

As the prevalence of cancer continues to rise in the United States due to a combination of both early detection and increased life expectancy, the number of clinically symptomatic skeletal metastases will continue to grow. Healthcare expenditures on cancer treatment have steadily increased each decade to our estimated level of approximately $200 billion in 2020. Metastatic bone disease is a significant driver of this cost, accounting for nearly one-fifth of the total cost of oncologic treatment. Understanding the impact of metastatic bone disease can help to identify the gaps between diagnosis and initiation of treatment in an effort to decrease the socioeconomic and psychosocial implications of the disease. In this paper, we review the epidemiology and economic burden of metastatic bone disease in addition to other sequelae that affect patients, including financial hardship, caregiver burden, diminished quality of life and psychological impact. Upon literature review of multiple studies investigating these factors, we found that advanced metastatic bone disease had overall poor outcomes with regards to the socioeconomic and psychosocial effects on not only patients and their families, but also society at large. These consequences may be improved by early referral to orthopedic specialists and establishment of a multi-disciplinary team.