Probability of Cardioembolic vs. Atherothrombotic Pathogenesis of Cryptogenic Strokes in Older Patients.

Some clinical, laboratory, ECG, and echocardiographic parameters could provide useful indications to assess the probability of cardioembolism or atherothrombosis in cryptogenic strokes. We retrospectively examined 290 patients with ischemic stroke aged ≥60 years, divided into 3 groups: strokes originating from large artery atherothrombosis (n = 92), cardioembolic strokes caused by paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n = 88) and cryptogenic strokes (n = 110). In addition to echocardiographic and routine clinical-laboratory variables, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, red blood cell distribution width, mean platelet volume, P wave and PR interval duration and biphasic inferior P waves, both on admission and after 7 to 10 days, were also considered. By multiple logistic regression, cardioembolic strokes were compared with large artery atherothrombosis strokes, and beta coefficients were rounded to produce a scoring system. Late PR interval ≥188 ms, left atrium ≥4 cm, left ventricular end-diastolic volume <65 ml, and posterior circulation syndrome were associated with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (positive scores). In contrast, male gender, hypercholesterolemia, and initial platelet count ≥290 × 109/L were associated with atherothrombosis of large arteries (negative scores). The algebraic sum of these scores produced values indicative of cardioembolism if >0 (positive predictive value 89.1%), or of atherothrombosis, if ≤0 (positive predictive value 72.5%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85. Among cryptogenic strokes, 41.5% had a score >0 (probable atrial fibrillation) and 58.5% had a score ≤0 (possible atherothrombosis). In conclusion, a scoring system based on electrocardiogram, laboratory, clinical and echocardiographic parameters can provide useful guidance for further investigations and secondary prevention in older patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Clinical Role of Lung Ultrasound for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Coronavirus Disease Pneumonia in Elderly Patients: A Pivotal Study.

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) showed a promising role in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients hospitalized for novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). However, no data are available on its role in elderly patients. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of LUS in elderly patients hospitalized for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia. METHODS: Consecutive elderly patients (age >65 years) hospitalized for COVID-19 were enrolled. Demographics, laboratory, comorbidity, and the clinical features of the patients were collected. All patients underwent LUS on admission to the ward. LUS characteristics have been analyzed. Uni- and multivariate analyses to evaluate predictors for in-hospital death were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven hospitalized elderly patients (19 men) with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection were consecutively enrolled. The median age was 82 years (interquartile range 74.5-93.5). Ultrasound alterations were found in all patients enrolled; inhomogeneous interstitial syndrome with spared areas (91.9%) and pleural alterations (100%) were the most frequent findings. At univariate analysis, LUS score (hazard ratio [HR] 1.168, 95% CI 1.049-1.301) and pleural effusions (HR 3.995, 95% CI 1.056-15.110) were associated with in-hospital death. At multivariate analysis, only LUS score (HR 1.168, 95% CI 1.049-1.301) was independelty associated with in-hospital death. The LUS score's best cutoff for distinguishing patients experiencing in-hospital death was 17 (at multivariate analysis LUS score ≥17, HR 4.827, 95% CI 1.452-16.040). In-hospital death was significantly different according to the LUS score cutoff of 17 (p = 0.0046). CONCLUSION: LUS could play a role in the diagnosis and prognosis in elderly patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection.