Comparison of in vivo vs. frozen vs. Thiel cadaver specimens in visualisation of anatomical structures of the ankle on proton density Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) through a visual grading analysis (VGA) study.

PURPOSE: The use of cadavers for medical education purposes and for radiology research methodologies which involve subjective image quality evaluation of anatomical criteria is well documented. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of cadaver tissue preservation in producing MR images that are representative of living tissue by comparing the visualisation of anatomical structures of the ankle obtained from live and cadaver (fresh frozen and Thiel embalmed) specimens through a visual grading analysis (VGA) study. METHODS: A VGA study was conducted on an image data set consisting of 4 coronal proton density weighted (PDw) sequences obtained from ankles of a live patient and those of a cadaveric specimen, of which the right ankle was frozen and the left Thiel embalmed. RESULTS: Comparison of the image quality scores obtained from: the live patient vs. the Thiel specimen indicate a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) between the scores in favour of the Thiel specimen; between the live patient vs. the frozen specimen indicate a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) in favour of the frozen specimen and between the frozen vs. the Thiel specimen indicate a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) in favour of the Thiel specimen. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of the use of cadavers (frozen or Thiel embalmed) has been shown to also apply for use with proton density (PD) MR imaging. The preservation of cadavers especially using Thiel is a suitable alternative for MRI optimisation and protocol development purposes.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Conventional MRI Pulse Sequences in the Detection of Lesions Causing Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of a range of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pulse sequences in the identification of internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO) caused by medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) lesions in multiple sclerosis patients using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) methodology. METHODS: A total of 15 clinically confirmed INO and 15 control subjects underwent conventional MRI at 1.5 T consisting of T2-weighted, proton density (PD)-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, following full institutional approval. A free-response, multiple-reader multiple-case design ROC study was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each sequence. All imaging sequences were evaluated by 10 board-certified neuroradiologists. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were analysed statistically for all three pulse sequences using repeated-measures analyses of variance and post-test analysis using Bonferroni's multiple comparison test of differences. RESULTS: No significant AUC differences were found between the three sequences (p = 0.0697), with T2 recording the highest AUC (0.8346). Sensitivity differences between PD (0.7927) and FLAIR (0.6329) were significant (p < 0.05). Non-significant differences were also evident between T2 and FLAIR (p = 0.0511). The specificity analysis revealed an overall difference (p = 0.0005), with specific inter-sequence differences shown between T2 and PD (p < 0.05) and PD and FLAIR (p < 0.001) with the PD values being lower than those provided with the other two sequences. CONCLUSION: T2-weighted axial imaging through the MLF region resulted in the greatest overall diagnostic efficacy when viewing a combination of mean AUC, sensitivity, and specificity, in terms of the identification of INO-causing lesions.

Assessing the effect of a true-positive recall case in screening mammography: does perceptual priming alter radiologists' performance?

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of the insertion of less-difficult malignant cases on subsequent breast cancer detection by breast imaging radiologists. METHODS: The research comprises two studies. Study 1: 8 radiologists read 2 sets of images each consisting of 40 mammographic cases. Set A contained four abnormal cases, and Set B contained six abnormal cases, including two priming cases (less difficult malignancies) placed at intervals of three and five subsequent cases before a subtle cancer. Study 2: 16 radiologists read a third condition of the same cases, known as Set C, containing six abnormal cases and two priming cases immediately preceding the subtle cancer cases. The readers were asked to localize malignancies and give confidence ratings on decisions. RESULTS: Although not significant, a decrease in performance was observed in Set B compared with in Set A. There was a significant increase in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (z = -2.532; p = 0.0114) and location sensitivity (z = -2.128; p = 0.0333) between the first and second halves of Set A and a marginal improvement in jackknife free-response ROC figure of merit (z = -1.89; p = 0.0587) between the first and second halves of Set B. In Study 2, Set C yielded no significant differences between the two halves of the study. CONCLUSION: Overall findings show no evidence that priming with lower difficulty malignant cases affects the detection of higher difficulty cancers; however, performance may decrease with priming. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This research suggests that inserting additional malignant cases in screening mammography sets as an audit tool may potentially lead to a decrease in performance of experienced breast radiologists.

A questionnaire survey reviewing radiologists' and clinical specialist radiographers' knowledge of CT exposure parameters.

OBJECTIVE: To review knowledge of computed tomography (CT) parameters and their influence on patient dose and image quality amongst a cohort of clinical specialist radiographers (CSRs) and examining radiologists. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was devised and distributed to a cohort of 65 examining radiologists attending the American Board of Radiology exam in Kentucky in November 2011. The questionnaire was later distributed by post to a matching cohort of Irish CT CSRs. Each questionnaire contained 40 questions concerning CT parameters and their influence on both patient dose and image quality. RESULTS: A response rate of 22 % (radiologists) and 32 % (CSRs) was achieved. No difference in mean scores was detected between either group (27.8 ± 4 vs 28.1 ± 4, P = 0.87) although large ranges were noted (18-36). Considerable variations in understanding of CT parameters was identified, especially regarding operation of automatic exposure control and the influence of kilovoltage and tube current on patient dose and image quality. Radiologists were unaware of recommended diagnostic reference levels. Both cohorts were concerned regarding CT doses in their departments. CONCLUSIONS: CT parameters were well understood by both groups. However, a number of deficiencies were noted which may have a considerable impact on patient doses and limit the potential for optimisation in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • CT users must adapt parameters to optimise patient dose and image quality. • The influence of some parameters is not well understood. • A need for ongoing education in dose optimisation is identified.

Grey-scale inversion improves detection of lung nodules.

OBJECTIVE: The current study aims to establish whether detection of solitary pulmonary nodules can be improved by inverting the grey scale of posteroanterior (PA) chests. METHODS: 30 PA chest images were presented on 2 occasions to 16 senior radiologists on either primary or secondary class displays in the standard or inverted mode. 15 images within each group contained a single nodule positioned in a range of anatomical sites. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology was used to explore differences between the presentation modes. RESULTS: Improved ROC scores were evident with inverted (Az 0.77) compared with standard (Az 0.73) (p=0.02) images; however, this difference was seen only with the primary displays. The benefits seen are most likely owing to increased nodule luminance with the inverted images, particularly when using primary displays. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the inverted image can offer advantages in lung nodule detection over the standard presentation mode when images are viewed on high-specification viewing systems. The study has demonstrated that there is an improvement in the detectability of lung nodules on an inverted image with a primary display monitor that is not evident with secondary displays. This is likely to be the result of increased nodule luminance on primary displays when images are presented in the inverted mode.

On the choice of acceptance radius in free-response observer performance studies.

OBJECTIVES: Choosing an acceptance radius or proximity criterion is necessary to analyse free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) observer performance data. This is currently subjective, with little guidance in the literature about what is an appropriate acceptance radius. We evaluated varying acceptance radii in a nodule detection task in chest radiography and suggest guidelines for determining an acceptance radius. METHODS: 80 chest radiographs were chosen, half of which contained nodules. We determined each nodule's centre. 21 radiologists read the images. We created acceptance radii bins of <5 pixels, <10 pixels, <20 pixels and onwards up to <200 and 200+ pixels. We counted lesion localisations in each bin and visually compared marks with the borders of nodules. RESULTS: Most reader marks were tightly clustered around nodule centres, with tighter clustering for smaller than for larger nodules. At least 70% of readers' marks were placed within <10 pixels for small nodules, <20 pixels for medium nodules and <30 pixels for large nodules. Of 72 inspected marks that were less than 50 pixels from the centre of a nodule, only 1 fell outside the border of a nodule. CONCLUSION: The acceptance radius should be based on the larger nodule sizes. For our data, an acceptance radius of 50 pixels would have captured all but 2 reader marks within the borders of a nodule, while excluding only 1 true-positive mark. The choice of an acceptance radius for FROC analysis of observer performance studies should be based on the size of larger abnormalities.

Grey-scale inversion improves detection of lung nodules.

Objective The current study aims to establish whether detection of solitary pulmonary nodules can be improved by inverting the grey scale of posteroanterior (PA) chests. Methods 30 PA chest images were presented on 2 occasions to 16 senior radiologists on either primary or secondary class displays in the standard or inverted mode. 15 images within each group contained a single nodule positioned in a range of anatomical sites. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology was used to explore differences between the presentation modes. Results Improved ROC scores were evident with inverted (Az 0.77) compared with standard (Az 0.73) (p=0.02) images; however, this difference was seen only with the primary displays. The benefits seen are most likely owing to increased nodule luminance with the inverted images, particularly when using primary displays. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the inverted image can offer advantages in lung nodule detection over the standard presentation mode when images are viewed on high-specification viewing systems. The study has demonstrated that there is an improvement in the detectability of lung nodules on an inverted image with a primary display monitor that is not evident with secondary displays. This is likely to be the result of increased nodule luminance on primary displays when images are presented in the inverted mode.

Quantifying the clinical relevance of a laboratory observer performance paradigm.

OBJECTIVE: Laboratory observer performance measurements, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and free-response ROC (FROC) differ from actual clinical interpretations in several respects, which could compromise their clinical relevance. The objective of this study was to develop a method for quantifying the clinical relevance of a laboratory paradigm and apply it to compare the ROC and FROC paradigms in a nodule detection task. METHODS: The original prospective interpretations of 80 digital chest radiographs were classified by the truth panel as correct (C=1) or incorrect (C=0), depending on correlation with additional imaging, and the average of C was interpreted as the clinical figure of merit. FROC data were acquired for 21 radiologists and ROC data were inferred using the highest ratings. The areas under the ROC and alternative FROC curves were used as laboratory figures of merit. Bootstrap analysis was conducted to estimate conventional agreement measures between laboratory and clinical figures of merit. Also computed was a pseudovalue-based image-level correctness measure of the laboratory interpretations, whose association with C as measured by the area (rAUC) under an appropriately defined relevance ROC curve, is as a measure of the clinical relevance of a laboratory paradigm. RESULTS: Low correlations (e.g. κ=0.244) and near chance level rAUC values (e.g. 0.598), attributable to differences between the clinical and laboratory paradigms, were observed. The absolute width of the confidence interval was 0.38 for the interparadigm differences of the conventional measures and 0.14 for the difference of the rAUCs. CONCLUSION: The rAUC measure was consistent with the traditional measures but was more sensitive to the differences in clinical relevance. A new relevance ROC method for quantifying the clinical relevance of a laboratory paradigm is proposed.

Assessing portal design skills in the radiation oncology interactive case management examination.

The American Board of Radiology is developing a computerized interactive case management examination to be used to evaluate the clinical skills of radiation oncologists. In the past, these skills have been evaluated by a pencil and paper written examination and an oral examination. With the increasing capabilities of computers, these skills can be easily, and perhaps even better, evaluated digitally. The aim is to develop an examination, which will be based on actual clinical cases, and be interactive so that it better mimics the clinical practice of a radiation oncologist than a written examination. It will also be less labor-intensive and less expensive than an oral examination. One of the most important skills of a radiation oncologist is the ability to design treatment portals that will encompass the entire cancer and yet minimize the irradiation of critical tissues and normal organs. Important parameters for radiation oncologists include the direction of the treatment beam, the size and shape of the portals, and the location of the margins of the field relative to patient anatomy and tumor location. In order to evaluate a physician's ability to design treatment portals, the computer-based examination has the capability to interactively construct field lines. The computer interface allows the candidate to draw field lines on a digitized x-ray image in a manner similar to practice. After the candidate illustrates the field lines, the evaluation of the response must be performed quickly to avoid interrupting the flow of the examination. The answer key is stored as a lossless compressed image. The key contains three regions consisting of (1) the must include region, which contains the tumor; (2) the must-exclude region, which contains tissues that if damaged would affect patient vitality and quality of life; and (3) the envelope of acceptable curves. Each region is assigned a unique byte code. The candidate's response is assigned a fourth byte code. Using basic logic operations, the response is swiftly evaluated. The scoring algorithm scores a candidate's action as correct if his/her drawn area encompasses all of the "must-include region" and is within the "envelope of acceptable curves." It scores a candidate's action as incorrect if his/her drawn area overlaps any part of the "exclude region" and/or exceeds at any point the "envelope of acceptable curves."

Calibration of medium-resolution monochrome cathode ray tube displays for the purpose of board examinations.

This report discusses calibration and set-up procedures for medium-resolution monochrome cathode ray tubes (CRTs) taken in preparation of the oral portion of the board examination of the American Board of Radiology (ABR). The board examinations took place in more than 100 rooms of a hotel. There was one display-station (a computer and the associated CRT display) in each of the hotel rooms used for the examinations. The examinations covered the radiologic specialties cardiopulmonary, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, vascular, pediatric, and genitourinary. The software used for set-up and calibration was the VeriLUM 4.0 package from Image Smiths in Germantown, MD. The set-up included setting minimum luminance and maximum luminance, as well as positioning of the CRT in each examination room with respect to reflections of roomlights. The calibration for the grey scale rendition was done meeting the Digital Imaging and communication in Medicine (DICOM) 14 Standard Display Function. We describe these procedures, and present the calibration data in. tables and graphs, listing initial values of minimum luminance, maximum luminance, and grey scale rendition (DICOM 14 standard display function). Changes of these parameters over the duration of the examination were observed and recorded on 11 monitors in a particular room. These changes strongly suggest that all calibrated CRTs be monitored over the duration of the examination. In addition, other CRT performance data affecting image quality such as spatial resolution should be included in set-up and image quality-control procedures.

Influence of image processing on chest radiograph interpretation and decision changes.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors investigate the effect of image processing on diagnostic performance in the reading of computed chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six radiologists read 168 chest images with and without the use of image processing. Diagnostic performance was measured by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis, and changes made in diagnostic decisions with the use of image processing were evaluated. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between reader performance with image processing and reader performance without image processing (P < .05). Readers' decisions were just as likely to change from false-negative to true-positive as from true-positive to false-negative with the use of image processing. More decisions changed from true-negative to false-positive than from false-positive to true-negative with processing, CONCLUSION: The effect of image processing does not greatly influence diagnostic performance in chest radiography.

External fixation maintained until fracture consolidation in the skeletally immature.

In a prospective study, we investigated the effects of external fixation on fracture union in skeletally immature patients. Twenty-five fractures of the femur and tibia in 21 patients were fixed externally with the intention of leaving the fixator in place until the fractures consolidated or nonunion was established. The main indications were head injury and multiple trauma. One hundred percent of the fractures consolidated with the fixator in place; 45 of 50 joints had 100% motion, three had 95% motion, and two had 60% motion owing to scarring from traumatic wounds. Eight-four percent of the fractures lost no position in the fixator, and 16% lost < or = 5 degrees.

Factors that determine reexploration treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Eighteen patients (20 hands) underwent reexploration of the carpal tunnel after a primary carpal tunnel release. The patients complained of unrelieved symptoms after their initial surgical procedures. We recommend reexploration for patients with unrelieved carpal tunnel syndrome if they have a positive Phalen's test, have symptoms that cause nocturnal wakening or are exacerbated by activities, or have a short or transverse initial incision. If the incision is adequate and these symptoms are not present, we believe that reexploration will not result in a satisfactory outcome.